Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+65
galicije83
limb
TMA1
diabetus
Podlodka77
mnrck
Krepost
Lennox
Atmosphere
Rasisuki Nebia
Broski
eridan
ALAMO
LMFS
RTN
Sujoy
The-thing-next-door
ult
AJ-47
thegopnik
mnztr
jhelb
PhSt
xeno
dino00
archangelski
Hole
Isos
Interlinked
franco
Regular
0nillie0
Benya
BliTTzZ
miketheterrible
airstrike
JohninMK
sepheronx
OminousSpudd
Project Canada
magnumcromagnon
PapaDragon
d_taddei2
GunshipDemocracy
Cyberspec
Akula971
KomissarBojanchev
Vann7
Morpheus Eberhardt
Vympel
Mike E
kvs
Viktor
Dima
flamming_python
Mindstorm
gloriousfatherland
TR1
George1
medo
TheArmenian
AbsoluteZero
nightcrawler
GarryB
Russian Patriot
69 posters

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Regular
    Regular


    Posts : 3868
    Points : 3842
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Ukrolovestan

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  Regular Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:48 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Regular wrote:So wheeled vehicles are getting traction in Russia? Why is that? It's silly to be dependent on infrastructure in a country with such geography like Russia. Or this will go to Rosgvardiya?


    They are building infrastructure

    And any war that would require massive number vehicles to move off-road like in WW2 would be handled by nukes anyway so why bother?


    Infrastructure is really getting better every year. Maintenance should be also cheaper for wheeled vehicles. Well, atleast motorized forces are getting some love, but I do hope tracked vehicles won't go out of fashion too, knowing that Russia had so much experience with these platforms.
    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 8988
    Points : 9050
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  flamming_python Sun Dec 08, 2019 4:23 pm

    Regular wrote:So wheeled vehicles are getting traction in Russia? Why is that? It's silly to be dependent on infrastructure in a country with such geography like Russia. Or this will go to Rosgvardiya?

    Wheeled-vehicles can still move off-road if they're light enough and have 4-wheel drive. Like any Toyota pickup type vehicle, or indeed the Chaborz buggy.

    The wide-use of technicals in wars in the Middle East, North Africa is testament to that. Technicals move around and deploy quickly using the highways but in tactical battle position themselves and advance off-road just fine. The Syrians have in fact reformed part of their army into light-infantry based on technicals, away from the Soviet model of armour-tank forces and mech infantry (although they still do have those). They have the advantage not only of mobility and economy, but also a minimal logistics trail, and the ability to move out and deploy immediately without preparation.

    And it's for these sorts of wars that Russia want an ultra-light battallion or two on the basis of the UAZ Patriot chassis, and for use in special forces raids. For example the Wagnerites are in Libya now, probably using technicals as well.

    You can have Patriot pickups purely for transporting troops in the back, as well as those with HMGs/autocannons, ATGM launchers, and indeed something like this mini-MLRS. Ideal for harassment and raids.

    More useful in the Middle East and Central Asia though than most of Russia. But then those are the areas where Russia is active.
    Regular
    Regular


    Posts : 3868
    Points : 3842
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Ukrolovestan

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  Regular Sun Dec 08, 2019 5:05 pm

    flamming_python wrote:
    Wheeled-vehicles can still move off-road if they're light enough and have 4-wheel drive. Like any Toyota pickup type vehicle, or indeed the Chaborz buggy.

    The wide-use of technicals in wars in the Middle East, North Africa is testament to that. Technicals move around and deploy quickly using the highways but in tactical battle position themselves and advance off-road just fine. The Syrians have in fact reformed part of their army into light-infantry based on technicals, away from the Soviet model of armour-tank forces and mech infantry (although they still do have those). They have the advantage not only of mobility and economy, but also a minimal logistics trail, and the ability to move out and deploy immediately without preparation.

    And it's for these sorts of wars that Russia want an ultra-light battallion or two on the basis of the UAZ Patriot chassis, and for use in special forces raids. For example the Wagnerites are in Libya now, probably using technicals as well.

    You can have Patriot pickups purely for transporting troops in the back, as well as those with HMGs/autocannons, ATGM launchers, and indeed something like this mini-MLRS. Ideal for harassment and raids.

    More useful in the Middle East and Central Asia though than most of Russia. But then those are the areas where Russia is active.

    I agree about Middle East, but in Russia cross-country offroading is near impossible through spring and autumn seasons. There's no wheeled vehicle created that could go where old matalyga can go.
    flamming_python
    flamming_python


    Posts : 8988
    Points : 9050
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  flamming_python Sun Dec 08, 2019 5:07 pm

    Regular wrote:
    flamming_python wrote:
    Wheeled-vehicles can still move off-road if they're light enough and have 4-wheel drive. Like any Toyota pickup type vehicle, or indeed the Chaborz buggy.

    The wide-use of technicals in wars in the Middle East, North Africa is testament to that. Technicals move around and deploy quickly using the highways but in tactical battle position themselves and advance off-road just fine. The Syrians have in fact reformed part of their army into light-infantry based on technicals, away from the Soviet model of armour-tank forces and mech infantry (although they still do have those). They have the advantage not only of mobility and economy, but also a minimal logistics trail, and the ability to move out and deploy immediately without preparation.

    And it's for these sorts of wars that Russia want an ultra-light battallion or two on the basis of the UAZ Patriot chassis, and for use in special forces raids. For example the Wagnerites are in Libya now, probably using technicals as well.

    You can have Patriot pickups purely for transporting troops in the back, as well as those with HMGs/autocannons, ATGM launchers, and indeed something like this mini-MLRS. Ideal for harassment and raids.

    More useful in the Middle East and Central Asia though than most of Russia. But then those are the areas where Russia is active.

    I agree about Middle East, but in Russia cross-country offroading is near impossible through spring and autumn seasons. There's no wheeled vehicle created that could go where old matalyga can go.

    Even in Russia, geography tends to vary. There are deserts in southern Siberia, in and near the north Caucasus too. Of course in Kazakhstan and further south of it all the way to Tajikistan it's mostly steppe, also ideal terrain for such vehicles.
    From what I've seen of the Russian 201st base in Tajikistan, they already have trucks with Zu-23-2s mounted on them, as in the Afghan war era.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Mon Dec 09, 2019 6:29 am

    So wheeled vehicles are getting traction in Russia? Why is that? It's silly to be dependent on infrastructure in a country with such geography like Russia. Or this will go to Rosgvardiya?

    They are showing it on the back of a light utility vehicle, but the animation showed it on a range of vehicles from dune buggy types to armoured vehicles.

    I think the point is its modularity... these things could be added to something like an Armata Tank or a BMPT vehicle to add rocket fire power to deliver some HE quickly and easily when needed with a cheap in service already in production rocket type.

    New laser guided models offering precision without the cost of an ATGM, while direct fire short range potential to deluge an enemy position with rockets from a vehicle platform that can arrive... fire and then leave rapidly.

    It could be part of an armoured force or it could be a special forces group like the British SAS used to use jeeps in the desert... they seem to be fully remote control and can be fired from inside the vehicle with a driver and an operator... so any MRAP or light vehicle could use them.

    Sounds like a clever idea to me.

    Also remember the range of 80mm rockets already in production is actually quite big from HE frag to penetrating HE, to HEAT to FAE rockets as well as various other rounds including flare and chaff rounds as well as illumination rockets that could be used to light up the sky around the target while the area around your forces is dark which is an advantage too. There are even UAV models that could rapidly accelerate out to 6-8km away and then loiter for a period of time looking for targets or threats.

    A four wheel drive light vehicle with a decent winch should be able to operate all sorts of places reasonably well... and where they can't these rocket pods could just as easily be mounted on tracked vehicles or even water based craft and hovercraft...

    Well, atleast motorized forces are getting some love, but I do hope tracked vehicles won't go out of fashion too, knowing that Russia had so much experience with these platforms.

    Low operating costs will appeal and lower maintenance costs and higher running speeds will also be appealing, but they could just as easily fit these rocket pods to MTLB vehicles and even their new vehicles... it would be a useful addition to the BMPT for example.

    Also reason why TOS-1 was on tracked chassis was because rockets were short range so they used tank as platform for armor

    Indeed, Tos was tank based because it was supposed to operate on the front line with thanks... often clearing ways through minefields and clearing out trenches pretty quickly...

    Speed can often be more important than protection... sometimes it is better not to get hit in the first place... so being light and fast means you get in and attack and then get out of there before they can respond with more than small arms fire and live to fight another day.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Mon Dec 09, 2019 11:25 am

    BTW they are also starting to build a lot more roads and rail lines to really open the country up... traditionally Air Force air defence systems like S-300 and Pantsir have traditionally used wheeled vehicles for good mobility around airfields... if you imagine a main airfield that has a 5km long runway... a single SA-9 battery sitting at one end couldn't cover the entire length of the runway...
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1085
    Points : 1186
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  jhelb Tue Dec 24, 2019 3:16 pm

    GarryB wrote:Rockets and missiles are for different things, but these days the purpose has become blurred with guided rockets...

    So what's the future of guided rockets then or for that matter the future of rockets in general ?

    Will we see the evolution of :

    1. state-of-the-art guidance systems for rockets ?

    2. changes in aerodynamic shape ?

    3. any other advancement ?
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11275
    Points : 11245
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  Isos Tue Dec 24, 2019 3:28 pm

    jhelb wrote:
    GarryB wrote:Rockets and missiles are for different things, but these days the purpose has become blurred with guided rockets...

    So what's the future of guided rockets then or for that matter the future of rockets in general ?

    Will we see the evolution of :

    1. state-of-the-art guidance systems for rockets ?

    2. changes in aerodynamic shape ?

    3. any other advancement ?

    1. No because that would be costly. More like a good enough guidance system to have a 1m accuracy agaibst a vehicle.

    2. Little change to allow manoeuvrability. The rocket is still a rocket and would be launch 2 or 3 km away in the direction of the threat.

    3. Unlikely.
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1085
    Points : 1186
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  jhelb Tue Dec 24, 2019 3:31 pm

    Isos wrote:3. Unlikely.

    What about new type of warheads for rockets ?
    Isos
    Isos


    Posts : 11275
    Points : 11245
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  Isos Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:02 pm

    jhelb wrote:
    Isos wrote:3. Unlikely.

    What about new type of warheads for rockets ?

    They already have HE, HEAT and thermobaric what else would they use ?

    Anyway guidance for rockets would benefits this one the most : s-25. 480kg with 190kg equivalent of TNT. 3km range. That would replace the use of dumb bombs for precision strikes.

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 220px-11
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Wed Dec 25, 2019 12:11 pm

    So what's the future of guided rockets then or for that matter the future of rockets in general ?

    Will we see the evolution of :

    1. state-of-the-art guidance systems for rockets ?

    2. changes in aerodynamic shape ?

    3. any other advancement ?

    First of all I am no expert, this is merely opinion.

    Rockets traditionally were an effective way of covering a fairly wide area in deadly fragments and blast, or chem or bio agents rapidly and that really hasn't changed much.

    If you have located an enemy group to an area it is still an effective way of dealing with them... ie you know they are in the forest but you don't have precise coordinates for them.

    This is more relevant to shorter range artillery rockets used in large numbers like Katyusha rather than V-2 or Scud or newer models.

    In terms of a terror weapon a low flying subsonic cruise missile with excellent accuracy is vastly more effective in war than a dumb unguided ballistic rocket, because in military terms you can hit specific targets with the CM, while the rocket is more of a psychological tool against an enemy.

    For artillery rockets adding cheap and simple but effective terminal guidance makes them more flexible and versatile but there will still be a use for unguided rockets that can cover an area in fragments... either to kill and maim or to stop them firing at you while others are doing something else and don't want to be interrupted.

    A helicopter landing force might start receiving fire from a flank direction... having a dozen helicopters turn and open fire with a barrage of rockets can protect the troops long enough for them to land and establish a position and start to work towards dealing with enemy on the ground... ideally you want troops to land safely and then be able to form up and move to an objective that needs to be taken, but plans don't always work out.

    In terms of guidance AI and video processing technology means even a simple cell phone level of technology and processing power can be used to capture video footage of the target area in front of the missile and process the natural light and thermal image of the scene and determine thermal shapes and compare them with a database of 3D thermal target shapes and work out for itself what is a target and act accordingly. Modern IR and video optics offer very high resolution and high quality images for identification...

    But the basics are also cheap and get the job done... a simple TV sensor can detect a laser spot on a target... an aircraft like a Hind or Havoc or Hokum can mark a target with a laser beam and then launch a rocket to hit that target easily enough... the added value of guidance in this case is that with unguided rockets a helicopter can generally destroy a truck or vehicle with 1-3 rockets... if you miss the truck it will likely land nearby and the explosions and fragments can often take the truck out anyway. To get the accuracy to hit that truck though you need to be relatively close because accuracy becomes an issue (when you can't see the target and are just firing at area targets of course accuracy is not important any more). The huge advantage that guidance introduces is that instead of 1-3 rockets against a truck you need one rocket only, but more importantly instead of firing at at 1.5-2km range, you can launch it into the air at 30-45 degrees from 5-6km away and then as it approaches the target lase it for the hit... it still gets the job done but the helo is much safer outside HMG range of the target... and a compact laser guidance kit makes it cheaper than using an ATGM which would be the only alternative and totally overkill for something with little or no armour...

    I suspect speeds will increase with new propulsion technology so rocket designs might change slightly in shape in terms of being more pointy at the front with a long full length gradual width increase continuing right to the rear of the rocket rather than a pointed nose and a cylinder shape we know and love...

    If they can get speeds high enough like high energy solid rocket fuels perhaps as well as scramjets then simple metal core penetrator payloads become alternatives against heavily armoured targets.

    There is potential for EMP warheads, and jammer warheads too, but I suspect the former being limited by size wont have an effective radius much greater than a conventional HE warhead and of course for structures EMP warheads make no difference... they only effect electronics.

    Anyway guidance for rockets would benefits this one the most : s-25. 480kg with 190kg equivalent of TNT. 3km range. That would replace the use of dumb bombs for precision strikes.

    The S-25LD show they are way ahead of you... and with laser guidance their range is about 10km...

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 S-25L-pod-krylom-Su-17M4.
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1085
    Points : 1186
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  jhelb Fri Dec 27, 2019 5:07 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Rockets traditionally were an effective way of covering a fairly wide area in deadly fragments and blast, or chem or bio agents rapidly and that really hasn't changed much.

    If you have located an enemy group to an area it is still an effective way of dealing with them... ie you know they are in the forest but you don't have precise coordinates for them.

    Or develop a range of MBRL rockets with varying diameters , all of which can be launched from a common launch vehicle, like China's SR-5 system developed by NORINCO:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=62&v=1kY2f8NS1gI&feature=emb_logo


    If such a MBRL launcher can be developed by the Russia, then this will be able to launch rockets of varying diameters, like 214mm, 300mm & even 800mm BSMs like the ATACMS. Such a versatile MBRL launcher will then be in great demand for delivering non-contact beyond-the-horizon rocket artillery fire-assaults. Right now, having different types of vehicles & logistics-support systems for 122mm, 214mm & 300mm MBRLs hugely complicates their operational usage in the battlefield.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Fri Dec 27, 2019 8:13 pm

    It is something they already have... but to be honest I am not sure how useful it would actually be.

    In the field they currently have 122mm Grad rockets, 220mm Uragan rockets, and 300mm Smerch rockets and while their older launchers remain in service they seem to have introduced a few vehicles that can carry any of those rocket types in pallets.

    The point is that unguided rocket launchers use enormous volumes of rockets to do their job... now if you want to give them the option of different calibre rockets to use that triples the size of your logistic train to support your rocket artillery battery and supply enough rockets for the mission whatever it might be.

    I rather suspect instead the idea is that you have a unified modular launcher and then based on the mission and condition and location you select the rocket size that best suits and that is the rocket that is supplied... because each rocket calibre has a range of rocket types too so you need to offer a selection of rocket types as well as the volume needed for the mission... there is little chance of being able to offer that sort of variety in three different calibres and still remain a mobile force.

    The Russian military has introduced a new 5.45 x 39mm round with a very long heavy projectile that can be fired underwater. It doesn't mean every unit will now be issued with it to complicate logistics... naval units might be issued with one magazine with this ammo to allow firing into and in water at targets, but most ammo will be standard ammo.

    It will be the same with rockets... if most of the enemy are expected to be in armoured vehicles then anti armour submunitions will dominate the supplied rocket inventory and they will be used accordingly but plain rockets as well as other variations will also be carried for flexibility... they will have formulas and rules to determine what rockets they get issued with.

    We are talking about battlefield assets... a ground force having rockets to hit targets more than 200km away is just silly... that is more of a theatre strike capability and against a single point target something like Iskander and likely its newer longer ranged cousins would be much more suitable for that sort of job... an armoured division wont be attacking targets more than 200km away... how would it even detect such a target or know when to launch... that is silly.

    This is all off topic so I will move this to a more suitable section... (if you have any preference as to where it would better fit you can make a suggestion if you like).
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1085
    Points : 1186
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty temporary multiple rocket launcher thread

    Post  jhelb Fri Dec 27, 2019 8:46 pm

    GarryB wrote:I rather suspect instead the idea is that you have a unified modular launcher and then based on the mission and condition and location you select the rocket size that best suits and that is the rocket that is supplied

    Does such a unified modular launcher already exists in Russia ? Or is something similar being designed ?


    GarryB wrote:The Russian military has introduced a new 5.45 x 39mm round with a very long heavy projectile that can be fired underwater. It doesn't mean every unit will now be issued with it to complicate logistics... naval units might be issued with one magazine with this ammo to allow firing into and in water at targets, but most ammo will be standard ammo.

    What's the name of this projectile ? So you are saying this is a new rocket meant for the Russian Navy ?


    GarryB wrote:This is all off topic so I will move this to a more suitable section... (if you have any preference as to where it would better fit you can make a suggestion if you like).

    I suspect this is probably the right place where you can move it

    https://www.russiadefence.net/t4810-russian-mrls-grad-uragan-smerch-tornado-g-s
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:01 pm


    Does such a unified modular launcher already exists in Russia ? Or is something similar being designed ?

    It does in the sense that they seem to have two different truck platforms... one large with two pallets and one small with one pallet, where you can change calibre from 122mm, 220mm, and 300mm rockets by replacing the pallets.

    The different calibre pallets hold different numbers of rockets ready to fire but effectively the same vehicle battery could be loaded with any of the three calibres of rockets and of course for each calibre there are dozens of warhead types to choose from.

    What's the name of this projectile ? So you are saying this is a new rocket meant for the Russian Navy ?

    Sorry, no... I was talking about an underwater rifle round that is used by rifles to fire while underwater.

    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1085
    Points : 1186
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  jhelb Fri Dec 27, 2019 9:56 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    The point is that unguided rocket launchers use enormous volumes of rockets to do their job... now if you want to give them the option of different calibre rockets to use that triples the size of your logistic train to support your rocket artillery battery and supply enough rockets for the mission whatever it might be.

    But in the video that I posted above of the Chinese SR-5 MLRS, different calibre rockets are being used because they are all guided rockets.

    GarryB wrote:It does in the sense that they seem to have two different truck platforms... one large with two pallets and one small with one pallet

    Which two ? BM 9A52-2 is one of those, correct ?
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Sat Dec 28, 2019 1:21 am

    But in the video that I posted above of the Chinese SR-5 MLRS, different calibre rockets are being used because they are all guided rockets.

    The two rockets they are talking about are basically Chinese copies of the Uragan 220mm rocket and the Grad 122mm rocket... I don't really understand why you would want those two rockets together on the same vehicle.

    It really does not make sense.

    If targets appear at less than 40km both rocket types could be used but targets between 45km and 70km could only be engaged with the bigger rockets.

    You might say that if the target appears at less than 40km then you can either fire heavy rockets or light rockets at it, but effectively the main difference in the different calibre rockets is the number of ready to fire rockets...

    In this view the rocket launcher can carry two pallets of rockets... in this case 20 x 122mm rockets on one side and 6 x 220mm rockets on the other side.

    So effectively when loaded with 2 pallets of 122mm rockets this is a Grad system, and when fitted with two pallets of 220mm rockets it is an Uragan but with 4 fewer rockets because the Uragan carries 16 x 220 rockets and not 12.

    It is the Smerch that carries 6 rockets per pallet but they are 300mm rockets with a range of 120km.

    If you look on the first page of this thread at the fourth post that was posted by me you will see two Russian vehicles with pallets for rockets... the first is a light vehicle with one pallet obviously optimised for mobility and light weight and low cost. The second has two pallets, which would make it the equivalent of this Chinese vehicle. It could probably carry different pallets but I would not know why it would do that.

    I suspect the Chinese vehicle is fitted with different rocket pallets to show its capacity to use different calibres rather than any real operational capability.

    If you have a read through this thread we discuss some guided rocket options, but I am not sure we are totally conclusive regarding what systems Russia will put in to service...
    jhelb
    jhelb


    Posts : 1085
    Points : 1186
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  jhelb Sat Dec 28, 2019 7:27 am

    GarryB, trans-loading would go down drastically with a commom use MBRL. Also, a common-use MBRL launcher for different types of rockets also comes with standardised test-equipment, thereby doing away with the need for rocket-specific equipment.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:32 am

    GarryB, trans-loading would go down drastically with a commom use MBRL. Also, a common-use MBRL launcher for different types of rockets also comes with standardised test-equipment, thereby doing away with the need for rocket-specific equipment.

    I like the theory, but in practise I think it is not as useful as perhaps some people might expect it to be.

    Hand loading is slow, but it means you can have a load out of different rocket warhead types if required, and in most war situations it is best practise to fire and then move. Once you get to a new location you can load and it wont really matter if it takes 5 minutes or 20 minutes because targets are not going suddenly appear or disappear... odds are most of the time they will be showering explosives on an attacking enemy over a fairly wide front, or waiting for the enemy to be defeated and be used to cover his withdrawal paths with HE, or an enemy armoured force might be discovered and need to be engaged to soften it up or weaken it a bit by smashing optics and aerials and making troops mount up armoured vehicles so they can be engaged full by long range anti armour units.

    The point is that the idea that they would sit empty and when a target is selected they choose the pallet with the ammo they want to use and load it and fire it are not realistic.

    Equally not realistic is the idea of firing a volley of rockets and then removing the empty pallet, and then loading a full pallet to continue firing is also unrealistic even in a place like Syria.

    During the cold war there was a czech or polish version of a grad that had an extra long chassis and a full reload of rockets sitting on the back so you fired your volley and could then load another 40 rockets into the tubes and fire a second volley within 5 minutes of launching the first volley and every western expert thought that was brilliant and why don't those stupid Soviets copy that and do the same with their grad vehicles. They didn't of course.

    During WWIII a Grad vehicle makes an enormous cloud of smoke and flame that could be detected by a deaf and blind person from 10km away... the last thing you want to do after launching 40 rockets per vehicle is to then stay still and reload the rockets and then fire again.... five minutes after your first volley you probably wont know if you hit the target or not so do you fire the second volley at the same place or somewhere different?

    If the first volley missed then your second volley will likely miss too but the enemies counter battery fire wont miss you.

    As such reload times are not really that important simply because compared to the amount of time it will take to move the entire battery after firing it can be done rather easily when you get to your new launch position while the HQ and comms vehicles are finding new targets for you to engage and trying to find out how effective the last attack actually was and if another attack is needed.

    With regard to transloading it is not different really... you have trucks that launch rockets and you have trucks that carry rockets for loading onto rocket launchers.. whether they are rockets individually sitting on a truck or packed into a pallet that is loaded as one piece makes little real difference... you could have ten trucks with ten different types of rocket, that is individual rockets or rockets in pallets.

    If you mix them up like that Chinese vehicle remember these are ballistic rockets so setting a launch angle for the 122mm rockets means you need to stop firing and change the launch angle if you want to fire 220mm or 300mm rockets at the same target and the totally different trajectory means they wont land at the same time either.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  magnumcromagnon Sun Mar 08, 2020 2:12 pm

    Technically a mine layer, but it operates like MLRS, set to be debuted at the 2020 Victory Day parade. It looks like Grad/Tornado-G, but it's probably more offshoot of Tornado-G than Grad. Tornado-G is having 100km range rockets being introduced, but a dedicated mine laying vehicle being created suggested a much reduced range in favor of a much greater supply of submunitions, so instead of having 100km range, it could have 10km range but with double the supply of bomblets.

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 ESiLvajUUAA37Tk?format=jpg&name=medium
    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 ESiLtzjU8AA4RBY?format=jpg&name=large
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  GarryB Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:03 am

    Well hopefully they have unified the design perhaps, although that might not be ideal.

    A truck vehicle that can take artillery rockets and mine laying rockets probably does not make a lot of sense as the electronics and communications requirements would be different... both would need to be responsive but with 100km range rockets I suspect elevation control would need to be fairly precise.

    I suppose both systems would need precise orientations and elevations for launching their payloads, and of course both would need good communications for different reasons... add a TOS replacement system on there too and you have a unified rocket launcher/mine layer vehicle...
    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2730
    Points : 2768
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  mnztr Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:48 pm

    You do need longer range today. With drones, it is not likely the launcher can position itself to attack. Also with drones the launcher crew can send a drone for targeting. I wonder if a small wing can be added that pops out at the apogee to extend rangeI bet this will add at least 10 KM to the range. Perhaps only use those for long range missions. With drones and longer range, precision becomes much more valuable. If you look at how US MLRS has evolved, with just 3 vehicles you can now provide precision strike in a radius of almost 1000 KM which is a staggering capability. By extension the Tornados newest missiles allow the same to over 2000KM which is quite mind blowing. The shorter range missiles are probably a bit more practical however as the 1000K missiles cannot be very cheap and thus cannot really replace artillary. *edit* I did read the longest range Grad is about 120 km today with precision. This is very useful. Extra range would be "nice to have" but maybe not worth the $$


    Last edited by mnztr on Sun Mar 15, 2020 4:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  magnumcromagnon Sun Mar 15, 2020 3:59 pm

    mnztr wrote:You do need longer range today. With drones, it is not likely the launcher can position itself to attack. Also with drones the launcher crew can send a drone for targeting. I wonder if a small wing can be added that pops out at the apogee to extend rangeI bet this will add at least 10 KM to the range. Perhaps only use those for long range missions. With drones and longer range, precision becomes much more valuable. If you look at how US MLRS has evolved, with just 3 vehicles you can now provide precision strike in a radius of almost 1000 KM which is a staggering capability.

    It depends on the situation. If your fighting an advanced enemy traveling through the country side with notable armored column formations, you'd want to strike at the from the farthest distance. But if your fighting in Syria, then your literally fighting city block to city block, so mining rocket with reduced range but with a much greater submunition capacity is more ideal, specifically anti-personnel mines. You could trap militants in some parts of the city, and greatly prevent their movement, leaving them to be sitting ducks to surrounded in a cauldron. If they move positions their manpower gets blown to bits by the mines, if they try to blow up the munitions they'll give their positions away, and if they sit still they'll eventually suffocate.
    avatar
    mnztr


    Posts : 2730
    Points : 2768
    Join date : 2018-01-21

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  mnztr Sun Mar 15, 2020 4:12 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    mnztr wrote:You do need longer range today. With drones, it is not likely the launcher can position itself to attack. Also with drones the launcher crew can send a drone for targeting. I wonder if a small wing can be added that pops out at the apogee to extend rangeI bet this will add at least 10 KM to the range. Perhaps only use those for long range missions. With drones and longer range, precision becomes much more valuable. If you look at how US MLRS has evolved, with just 3 vehicles you can now provide precision strike in a radius of almost 1000 KM which is a staggering capability.

    It depends on the situation. If your fighting an advanced enemy traveling through the country side with notable armored column formations, you'd want to strike at the from the farthest distance. But if your fighting in Syria, then your literally fighting city block to city block, so mining rocket with reduced range but with a much greater submunition capacity is more ideal, specifically anti-personnel mines. You could trap militants in some parts of the city, and greatly prevent their movement, leaving them to be sitting ducks to surrounded in a cauldron. If they move positions their manpower gets blown to bits by the mines, if they try to blow up the munitions they'll give their positions away, and if they sit still they'll eventually suffocate.

    You can accomplish almost the same things with snipers and mortar support. Or drones and mortars. With 120 mm mortars (just 4 or 5 tubes) you can rain hellfire with great precision using drones and observers.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  magnumcromagnon Sun Mar 15, 2020 6:56 pm

    mnztr wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    mnztr wrote:You do need longer range today. With drones, it is not likely the launcher can position itself to attack. Also with drones the launcher crew can send a drone for targeting. I wonder if a small wing can be added that pops out at the apogee to extend rangeI bet this will add at least 10 KM to the range. Perhaps only use those for long range missions. With drones and longer range, precision becomes much more valuable. If you look at how US MLRS has evolved, with just 3 vehicles you can now provide precision strike in a radius of almost 1000 KM which is a staggering capability.

    It depends on the situation. If your fighting an advanced enemy traveling through the country side with notable armored column formations, you'd want to strike at the from the farthest distance. But if your fighting in Syria, then your literally fighting city block to city block, so mining rocket with reduced range but with a much greater submunition capacity is more ideal, specifically anti-personnel mines. You could trap militants in some parts of the city, and greatly prevent their movement, leaving them to be sitting ducks to surrounded in a cauldron. If they move positions their manpower gets blown to bits by the mines, if they try to blow up the munitions they'll give their positions away, and if they sit still they'll eventually suffocate.

    You can accomplish almost the same things with snipers and mortar support. Or drones and mortars. With 120 mm mortars (just 4 or 5 tubes) you can rain hellfire with great precision using drones and observers.

    Not really. Snipers? Insurgents could just hide behind sand bags. Manually launched mortars wouldn't be as accurate, wouldn't have has much ammo readily available, wouldn't have anywhere near as many submunitions, would require more manpower who would be exposed, would take much longer to fire off just as many projectiles (within the same time span of launching one rocket), and the purpose is to impede movement by laying anti-personnel mines, and not to detonate on impact. Why would you need additional impact drones, when the rockets would have more fire power within them, and Russian MLRS has rockets with observeration drones built in to them.

    Sponsored content


    Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S - Page 10 Empty Re: Russian MRLS: Grad, Uragan, Smerch, Tornado-G/S

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:56 pm