Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Share

    PapaDragon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3684
    Points : 3796
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  PapaDragon on Fri Aug 19, 2016 1:41 pm

    sepheronx wrote:After doing a bit of reading and even reading nationalreview (blah...) it turns out that the issue isn't all the missiles, but just 1 missile type - 9M96 missile.  Essentially it is having trouble with long range missiles and all other ones (less than 150km range) are working as intended so they blame the Fakel plant which makes the missile, hence why they never mentioned the radar but the missile itself.  Makes sense.  So the 9M100 and such are working as intended.

    This is what I have been saying all along. Only one latest type of missile has problems.

    hoom wrote:.........
    Possibly 20380 wasn't ever really intended to be able to properly use 9m96 but they gave it a whirl anyway hoping for something like 30km effective?
    ...........

    20380 was not supposed to use this type nor it ever will. Gorshkov frigate will, a completely different class of vessels.

    20380 never had any problems whatsoever with AA systems. Why are people even talking about this? It is Gorshkov frigate that has problems with 9M96 missile, not 20380 corvette which does not use it to begin with.

    Can we finally stop discussing 9M96 missile and 20380 corvette already? They have no connection nor relation with one another.

    I really dislike 20380 corvettes but their AA systems work fine, even I admit that.

    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Fri Aug 19, 2016 3:25 pm

    it has a lock on after launch capability which means it can be fired blind and directed towards the target and get a lock on the target in flight after launch
    True.

    Can we finally stop discussing 9M96 missile and 20380 corvette already? They have no connection nor relation with one another.
    20380 (other than Steregushchy with the Kashtan) has Redut & there are only 3 missiles associated with that launcher: 9m100, 9m96 & 9m96M.
    There isn't any other missile for it to use & yes 20380 did have reported development problems/test fails.

    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Sat Aug 20, 2016 2:56 am

    This seems to be from 2013 but has relevant details
    http://bastion-opk.ru/poliment-redut/ (google translate)
    Air defense missile system 3K96 "POLIMENT-redoubt" ( "redoubt") The development of modern air defense systems for the ships of the Russian Navy "Poliment-Redoute" is the NGO "Almaz-Antey".
    SEC "Altair", being a parent in GSKB Concern PVO "Almaz Antey "on the complexes and sea-based systems, in 2012, continued the work begun in the structure of" MNIIRE "Altair".
    First of all, the ROC and the participation in the supply of production samples on the main themes NTC - ed. 3K96 and SAM "Calm 1".
    In the onshore SAM 50R6 "Vityaz" uses tezhe missiles that SAM "Redoubt" ( "Poliment-Redoute"), this anti-aircraft missiles 9M96 and 9M100.
    In 2011, products 9M96 and 9M100 shot S-400 air defense system "Redoubt".
    In both cases, the target acquisition homing (GOS) was broke, and the target were not affected.
    As noted in 2011, the development of modern air defense systems for the ships of the Russian Navy "Poliment-Redoubt" was behind schedule.
    The lag was due to the shortage of engineers in the design bureau of the group. Instead of a complex maritime best design minds occupied land.
    This situation has led to a delay in the construction of new Russian frigate project 22350.
    The main difficulties arose in the establishment of the radar "Poliment" station with a phased antenna array (PAA) and the Marine version 9M96 missiles, which should become the main weapon SAM "Redoubt".
    Together, these two systems constitute complex defense "Poliment-Redoute."
    All 2012 Concern PVO "Almaz-Antey" arguments homing anti-aircraft missiles 9M96 "to mind" and held their own ground tests.
    In October 2012 the Department of Defense suffered indefinitely test ship antiaircraft missile system (SAM) "Redoubt" which must arm a new generation of ships.
    In 2012, shot three times - twice with a corvette of the Baltic Fleet "savvy" 20380 to the sea, and once with a ground installation.
    All launches were not successful, in August 2012 the launch took place in normal mode, but the homing head is unable to acquire a target, and the missile self-destructed.
    According to the test results, the 1st Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defence presented the conclusion complex underfulfilled needs to eliminate a plurality of drawbacks.
    Naval experts particularly unhappy rocket under the symbol 9M96M and radar "Furke-2." In SAM "Redoubt" do not have a radar target detection.
    This problem is solved "Furke" general ship radar detection at the time of the test is not sufficiently effective.
    Theme 3K96 in 2012, made ​​significant amount of work that allows you to speak with confidence about the end of the test in 2013, ed. 3K96-3 on ships 20380 and putting samples of the products of the Navy, as well as carrying out preliminary bench tests, the supply of sample Vol. 3K96-2 on the lead ship of the project 22350, its assembly and testing.
    At the head of the project 22350 frigate "Admiral Gorshkov" test "Reduta" will begin no earlier than 2014, upon the ship's readiness.
    In this set of 9M96 missiles and 9M100 9M96D ready for testing. On the frigates of Project 22350 will be installed 4 module SAM "Poliment-Redoute" to 8 cells in each (a total of 32 cells for SAM).
    During the briefing, which took place in the framework of the MAKS-2013, the general director of Concern PVO "Almaz-Antey" said that testing of the new SAM system was interrupted in 2012 due to a fire in the TFR "savvy" (20380).
    This year the ship after repairs arrived for the resumption of SAM tests. He also said that at the head of the project 22350 frigate "Admiral Gorshkov" test "Reduta" will begin no earlier than 2014, upon the ship's readiness.
    In this set of 9M96 missiles and 9M100 9M96D ready for testing.
    Источник: http://bastion-opk.ru/poliment-redut/ ОВТ «ОРУЖИЕ ОТЕЧЕСТВА» A.V.Karpenko
    According to that 9m96 & 9m100 tests with S-400 in 2011 failed as well as the later tests with 20380 & 22350.
    That certainly seems to point to missile side issues.

    Apparently the CEO of Almaz-Antey has been fired/forced to resign in the last few days.

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9457
    Points : 9949
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  George1 on Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:25 pm

    Corvette "Sovershennyy" on the demagnetization





    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2146361.html


    This ship was laid down 10 years ago... unshaven


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    AlfaT8
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1149
    Points : 1162
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  AlfaT8 on Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:08 am

    George1 wrote:Corvette "Sovershennyy" on the demagnetization





    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2146361.html


    This ship was laid down 10 years ago... unshaven

    Amur shipyard??

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9457
    Points : 9949
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  George1 on Mon Sep 26, 2016 1:29 am

    AlfaT8 wrote:

    Amur shipyard??

    Yes. First ship of that class for Pacific fleet


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Mon Sep 26, 2016 2:23 am

    Looks pretty far short of the completion state that other ships have been at for demagnetisation Neutral
    Pretty unusual to do it tied up to a dock with all sorts of random chunks of steel still onboard/right next to it...

    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Thu Oct 13, 2016 9:52 am

    One of the 20380s Soobrazitelnyy tested 9M96 vs surface target


    Most AA missiles seem to have secondary anti-surface ability but pretty rare to see it used.
    Fair bit of it going round lately, particularly US made a big hoo-hah about testing SM-6es, even our local mini-navy shot a couple of old Sea Sparrows at a target ship at RIMPAC.

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9457
    Points : 9949
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  George1 on Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:02 am

    Corvette " Sovershenny" on demagnetization



    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2227965.html


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    GunshipDemocracy
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1516
    Points : 1558
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Fri Nov 18, 2016 10:43 pm

    TV Zvezda: The barrier: the Corvette "Resistant" and "Savvy" staged a duel in the Baltic sea


    Isos
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 307
    Points : 311
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  Isos on Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:33 pm

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:TV Zvezda: The barrier: the Corvette "Resistant" and "Savvy" staged a duel in the Baltic sea


    Did they shot down the Kh-35 or a drone ??

    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Sun Nov 20, 2016 1:51 pm

    It's supposedly the Kh-35 fired from one shot down with 9M96 from the other.

    Rmf
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 382
    Points : 377
    Join date : 2013-05-30

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  Rmf on Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:48 pm

    still using uran?? its a shame russia doesnt have stealthy subsonic antiship missile in this day....

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15490
    Points : 16197
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  GarryB on Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:58 pm

    It does... the anti ship versions of Klub.

    Stealth would be pointless for Uran and the upgraded Uran as they are active radar homing...

    A better alternative for stealth is speed because most modern ships would have a good chance of detecting an incoming missile stealthy or not due to IR sensors and EO systems.

    The solution of speed means no time to react effectively.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Rmf
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 382
    Points : 377
    Join date : 2013-05-30

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  Rmf on Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:37 am

    again this, you always same, going offtopic picking some sideline point- and driving with that, instead of adressing real question.- e.g. stealth subsonic antiship missile.

    could kh-ushke from pak-fa programe be used....?

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15490
    Points : 16197
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  GarryB on Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:16 am

    Me going off topic.. you are the one complaining about lack of stealth anti ship missiles for Russian corvettes.

    Uran is the bargain basement missile... for upgrades and for ships that don't need anything better.

    There is nothing wrong with the missile... it actually has better performance than the exocet or harpoon which would be the closest western equivalents.

    When operating in a small enclosed area with the enemy in a known position and expecting to be fired upon then a single uran missile is not going to be a devastating weapon... nor is harpoon or exocet or anything else really.

    Ships don't operate with their radars blasing away all the time scanning for threats... that gives away their position and gives up the element of surprise... when they don't have their radars on the Uran will get much closer before it is detected and when more than one is fired its chance of success will be much greater.

    could kh-ushke from pak-fa programe be used....?

    If you mean the latest version of the AS-11 it could only be used if the target is using its radar and the obvious problem there is that it would likely take out the targets radar but not sink the ship...

    For most targets a Uran is fine... for better protected targets several Uran would probably still do the job. For most modern targets bigger than a corvette you would need Yakhont or the supersonic Klub or Zircon/Brahmos II.

    Stealthy subsonic will be detected no matter how radar invisible it is... even old missiles are stealthy in that they don't emit radar signals so a target not scanning... which will be all the ones that don't want to be detected at long range and saturation attacked... wont see it till it is visual on EO or Thermal optics... for subsonic targets that gives little time... for supersonic targets next to no time at all.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    chicken
    Corporal
    Corporal

    Posts : 83
    Points : 88
    Join date : 2014-09-04

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  chicken on Mon Nov 21, 2016 6:41 am

    GarryB wrote:It does... the anti ship versions of Klub.

    Did Russia buy that version? I was under the impression that they did not.

    TheArmenian
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1523
    Points : 1686
    Join date : 2011-09-14

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  TheArmenian on Mon Nov 21, 2016 7:57 am

    Rmf wrote:still using uran?? its a shame russia doesnt have stealthy subsonic antiship missile in this day....

    I can write like an 8 year old too...

    still using harpoon and exocet?? its a shame usa and france don't have stealthy subsonic antiship missile in this day....

    Rmf
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 382
    Points : 377
    Join date : 2013-05-30

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  Rmf on Mon Nov 21, 2016 6:33 pm

    thats true but some nato countries do have very stealth subsonic cruise antiship missiles, which usa or any other nato country could get very fast, and besides russia should lead not play catchup most of time.
    i was thinking going with that kh-ushke missile with passive homing and IIR combined warhead.... that would enable totaly passive closure to target using its emisions and with IIR target the ship ,with stealth it would be very hard to intercept missile, plus it has simmilar weight and range characteristics to Uran.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15490
    Points : 16197
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  GarryB on Tue Nov 22, 2016 9:33 am

    My understanding is that that is still an ARM but with backup guidance options...

    A large radar generates a lot of heat that is rather hard to hide.

    For instance an AWACS aircraft could be targeted based on its radar emissions, but if shut down when the incoming missile is detected then the missile would still detect the heat signature of the target and home in on the turned off radar system.

    The same would apply to ground based radar... I would suspect with a naval vessel the IR signature of the vessel against the water at a different temperature would allow engagement but again I suspect the engagement of the radar would result in trivial/ie not terminal damage as the radar arrays would be hit but the hull would not likely be penetrated.

    Of course taking out the main radar array would leave the vessel vulnerable to attack from more conventional missiles.

    Did Russia buy that version? I was under the impression that they did not.

    Have heard all sorts of rumours... mostly from western sources about them not working. If they want them their new vessels all have UKSK launchers which are compatible with Onyx, Zircon, Calibr... which is the long range land attack version of Klub, and also the rocket powered torpedo delivering Klub model.. I don't see why they would not buy the anti ship subsonic and anti ship supersonic models of Klub too... there is talk of a supersonic anti ship missile in Russian service with a range of 1,500km... sounds like supersonic Klub to me. the whole purpose of a subsonic cruising stage and a supersonic terminal stage is maximum range and max effect in the terminal phase... it ticks all the boxes.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    r3mu511
    Private
    Private

    Posts : 5
    Points : 7
    Join date : 2016-12-05

    9M96 uplinking question

    Post  r3mu511 on Mon Dec 05, 2016 6:00 am

    I was wondering if anyone knew what equipment was providing the midcourse guidance update uplinks to the 9M96 missile from the corvette?

    on the Gorshkov-class frigate the Poliment 5P-20K radar provides this midcourse uplinking, while on the land-based S-350 Vityaz the 50N6 radar does this uplinking, similarly for S-300/-400 systems the Tombstone/Gravestone will perform the uplinks...

    but what equipment is performing the midcourse uplinks for the 9M96 on the Steregushchy corvette?

    or are they not using midcourse update uplinks and instead launching the 9M96 with just it's initial, pre-launch ARH seeker INS activation point and once launched no further seeker activation point updates are done?

    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Mon Dec 05, 2016 11:48 am

    or are they not using midcourse update uplinks and instead launching the 9M96 with just it's initial, pre-launch ARH seeker INS activation point and once launched no further seeker activation point updates are done?
    That's apparently the big issue.
    Supposedly the Puma radar may be able to do it but definitely not optimal.

    r3mu511
    Private
    Private

    Posts : 5
    Points : 7
    Join date : 2016-12-05

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  r3mu511 on Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:28 pm

    ^thanks, would you happen to have a url/link to a reference on the use of the 5P-10E radar to perform the midcourse uplinking to the 9M96?

    per the manufacturer's website (concern-agat.ru / en / production / artillery-systems-fire-control-systems / 5p-10e-radar-control-system), this FCR has a tracking range of around 60 km which would mean it would only be useful with the 40 km range variant of the 9M96, so does this then mean the Steregushchy does not use the 120 km missile variant?

    hoom
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 255
    Points : 257
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  hoom on Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:51 pm

    Sorry, I don't think I'd be able to find it again (wish I'd kept the URL) but mentioned the article in previous post http://www.russiadefence.net/t47p300-project-2038-0-steregushchy-corvette#172731, as I said there it could be a case of Lost in Translation or outright wrong since it referenced the IR & unspotted 9M100 -> handful of salt.
    But as far as I understand it's either that or just initial inertial with no updates scratch

    r3mu511
    Private
    Private

    Posts : 5
    Points : 7
    Join date : 2016-12-05

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  r3mu511 on Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:05 pm

    ^ok, thanks

    Sponsored content

    Re: Project 2038.0: Steregushchy Corvette

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 3:35 pm


      Current date/time is Sat Dec 10, 2016 3:35 pm