Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Share
    avatar
    max steel

    Posts : 2945
    Points : 2970
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  max steel on Sat May 14, 2016 2:01 am

    Three tests of a 14Ts033 (14Ц033) system, which is apparently the designation of the entire system (rather than 14А042, which appears to be the missile). There were three test launches - on 12 August 2014, 22 April 2015, and 18 November 2015. Only the third one was successful (although none of them involved an intercept the tests do not involve a kill vehicle - these are tests of the launcher.).

    The April 22, 2015 test was, in fact, reported at the time - as a failed test of a missile for the Antey-2500 air defense system. The missile was said to fail shortly after launch and all the debris landed within the perimeter of the test site.
    avatar
    sepheronx

    Posts : 7118
    Points : 7392
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 28
    Location : Canada

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  sepheronx on Sat May 14, 2016 3:41 am

    Interesting. So there is a possibility that they may convert the S-300V to be able to operate anti sat capabilities as well?
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4475
    Points : 4638
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Sat May 14, 2016 5:59 am

    sepheronx wrote:Interesting.  So there is a possibility that they may convert the S-300V to be able to operate anti sat capabilities as well?

    I speculated in the past that some of the S-500's missile variants may find their way to older systems, after modernization of course. Both S-300V4 and S-400 have max ranges of 400 km, so it's not totally impossible that newer missiles will push the envelope from 400 km to 600 km with compatibility and necessary modification/modernization.
    avatar
    zg18

    Posts : 883
    Points : 955
    Join date : 2013-09-26
    Location : Zagreb , Croatia

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  zg18 on Fri May 27, 2016 5:52 pm

    US confirms new successful test of Nudol ASAT missile

    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-flight-tests-anti-satellite-missile/
    avatar
    max steel

    Posts : 2945
    Points : 2970
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  max steel on Fri May 27, 2016 9:00 pm

    Can new Nudol ASAT destroy GEO based satellites ?
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4475
    Points : 4638
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri May 27, 2016 9:56 pm

    zg18 wrote:US confirms new successful test of Nudol ASAT missile

    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-flight-tests-anti-satellite-missile/

    Pay serious attention how they (neo-cons) keep referring to Nudol/A-235 as simply an ASAT system as opposed to a Anti-ICBM ABM with additional ASAT capability...this is grade A black propaganda, because once the average Joe neo-con realizes that Russia is putting 2 different Anti-ICBM ABM's in to service (S-500, Nudol/A-235) in the same time frame and NATO will have no Anti-ICBM system in service, they'd be far more hesitant to push the ABM Meatshield in Europe.
    avatar
    zg18

    Posts : 883
    Points : 955
    Join date : 2013-09-26
    Location : Zagreb , Croatia

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  zg18 on Fri May 27, 2016 10:01 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    zg18 wrote:US confirms new successful test of Nudol ASAT missile

    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-flight-tests-anti-satellite-missile/

    Pay serious attention how they (neo-cons) keep referring to Nudol/A-235 as simply an ASAT system as opposed to a Anti-ICBM ABM with additional ASAT capability...this is grade A black propaganda, because once the average Joe neo-con realizes that Russia is putting 2 different Anti-ICBM ABM's in to service (S-500, Nudol/A-235) in the same time frame and NATO will have no Anti-ICBM system in service, they'd be far more hesitant to push the ABM Meatshield in Europe.

    Agreed, Russia made good decision to keep advancing in key area it has considerable edge over US.
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 11475
    Points : 11948
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  George1 on Sun May 29, 2016 2:48 pm

    Russia conducted another test of the Nudol ASAT system on Wednesday, May 25, 2016. The test is said to be successful.

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1924797.html


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    Mindstorm

    Posts : 792
    Points : 961
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  Mindstorm on Tue May 31, 2016 1:46 pm


    Article on A-235 with some detail useful for Austin and its interst/doubts Wink




    http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/149632/
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4475
    Points : 4638
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Tue May 31, 2016 7:08 pm

    Mindstorm wrote:
    Article on A-235 with some detail useful for Austin and its  interst/doubts  Wink




    http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/149632/

    Holy crap, there's some serious jewels in that article:

    "Expert Council member board of the Military-Industrial Commission of the Russian Federation, the chief editor of "Arsenal Fatherland" Viktor Murakhovski:  Given that the mutual speed of interception will be, probably, more than 10 kilometers per second (or close to this figure), here to destroy even the explosive is required."

    I might be confused, but its either the speed of the target being intercepted, or the minimum flight-speed of A-235 is 10 km/sec?!?! That speed of 10 km/sec translates to approximately Mach 30, the use of "mutual speed of interception" suggests that the A-235 fly's at Mach 30 speed as well. Either way US/UK based neo-cons truly screwed up now!

    Furthermore, Mindstorm do you have any new information concerning the truck based ROFAR OTH radars being developed by KRET? I suspect A-235/Nudol's radar sets maybe based off ROFAR technology, as it's the only type of radar technology capable of allowing A-235/Nudol complex to perform at it's maximum capability.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 17793
    Points : 18359
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jun 01, 2016 11:13 am

    Given that the mutual speed of interception will be, probably, more than 10 kilometers per second (or close to this figure), here to destroy even the explosive is required."

    I think he means closing speed... ie impact speed = speed of S-500 + incoming threat speed.

    As the target speed is at most 7km per second this means the speed of the S-500 interceptor is at least 3km/s and likely rather more because the impact speed will be more than 10km per second.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Austin

    Posts : 6703
    Points : 7094
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  Austin on Wed Jun 01, 2016 2:10 pm

    Mindstorm wrote:
    Article on A-235 with some detail useful for Austin and its  interst/doubts  Wink




    http://svpressa.ru/war21/article/149632/

    Very Interesting , Thanks Mindstorm.

    So A-235 is like mobile GBD system which is great thing in itself , Can intercept ICBM target in midcourse and altitude at 650 -700 km in Height , typical height of Sun-Synchronus orbit and above LEO orbit

    Lets see what comes out , Right now I find S-500 very impressive for what it can do
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4475
    Points : 4638
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:50 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Given that the mutual speed of interception will be, probably, more than 10 kilometers per second (or close to this figure), here to destroy even the explosive is required."

    I think he means closing speed... ie impact speed = speed of S-500 + incoming threat speed.

    As the target speed is at most 7km per second this means the speed of the S-500 interceptor is at least 3km/s and likely rather more because the impact speed will be more than 10km per second.

    Well if that's the case then the word 'mutual' wouldn't be used then and he would of used the word 'combined' instead, and why would A-235 have the same characteristics as S-500 when it's designed to have a higher capability? For that  matter the 3 km/s figure that you just threw out there is only slightly faster than 48N6E2, 48N6DM/48N6E3 missiles for the S-400, which fly at 2 km/sec...we are talking about A-235/Nudol here right? BTW having a interceptor with at least 10km/sec speed would make sense in the long run to counter-balance any enemies future developments in boost-glide hypersonic vehicles...as the increased maneuverability would require faster speeds on behalf of the interceptor to maintain any successful engagement capability.
    avatar
    kvs

    Posts : 3674
    Points : 3781
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  kvs on Thu Jun 02, 2016 12:13 am

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    GarryB wrote:
    Given that the mutual speed of interception will be, probably, more than 10 kilometers per second (or close to this figure), here to destroy even the explosive is required."

    I think he means closing speed... ie impact speed = speed of S-500 + incoming threat speed.

    As the target speed is at most 7km per second this means the speed of the S-500 interceptor is at least 3km/s and likely rather more because the impact speed will be more than 10km per second.

    Well if that's the case then the word 'mutual' wouldn't be used then and he would of used the word 'combined' instead, and why would A-235 have the same characteristics as S-500 when it's designed to have a higher capability? For that  matter the 3 km/s figure that you just threw out there is only slightly faster than 48N6E2, 48N6DM/48N6E3 missiles for the S-400, which fly at 2 km/sec...we are talking about A-235/Nudol here right? BTW having a interceptor with at least 10km/sec speed would make sense in the long run to counter-balance any enemies future developments in boost-glide hypersonic vehicles...as the increased maneuverability would require faster speeds on behalf of the interceptor to maintain any successful engagement capability.

    I second your logic. A 10 km/s speed would be the correct design target and not 3 km/s. Since the A-235 is a silo system it could be as big as needed to achieve such warhead speeds. Since it does not need to deliver a fragile payload to orbit it can accelerate like hell and be much smaller than a regular rocket or ICBM. The faster the burn, the smaller the amount of rocket fuel needed to reach the same velocity.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 17793
    Points : 18359
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  GarryB on Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:06 pm

    Well if that's the case then the word 'mutual' wouldn't be used then and he would of used the word 'combined' instead, and why would A-235 have the same characteristics as S-500 when it's designed to have a higher capability?

    I agree that mutual is a poor choice of words in this case, but are you suggesting mutual means counting the speed of the interceptor but not the target?

    We already know the target speed is up to 7km/s, so the speeds of both combined that equal at least 10km/s means the interceptor must be travelling at at least 3km/s... that would make the combined speed 10km/s.

    For that  matter the 3 km/s figure that you just threw out there is only slightly faster than 48N6E2, 48N6DM/48N6E3 missiles for the S-400, which fly at 2 km/sec...we are talking about A-235/Nudol here right?

    Yeah... I just made that speed up obviously... I mean if the incoming target can be travelling at up to 7km/s then obviously to have a closing speed of more than 10km/s then the interceptor must be travelling at like a million miles an hour...  Rolling Eyes

    BTW having a interceptor with at least 10km/sec speed would make sense in the long run to counter-balance any enemies future developments in boost-glide hypersonic vehicles...as the increased maneuverability would require faster speeds on behalf of the interceptor to maintain any successful engagement capability.

    Lets change a word... instead of talking about a mutual interception speed of 10km/s or more, how about we consider it impact speed. BTW I would define the interception speed as the combined speed of the interceptor and the target... impact speed just makes that clearer.

    But can I ask... why does S-500 need a speed of 10km/s? Is it going to launch from Alaska and have to chase these targets down all over Russia?

    Looking at this image again:



    Note it says S-500 in the bottom centre, but if you actually look at all the vehicles pictured... from top left to right top to bottom we have S-350 Vityaz, Improved TOR on a wheeled launcher, S-400, the missile launcher in question, and bottom right we have BUK3.

    Maybe the S-500 is the system that is not pictured and this is a picture of all the systems that will support the S-500 in service...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    sepheronx

    Posts : 7118
    Points : 7392
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 28
    Location : Canada

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  sepheronx on Wed Jun 22, 2016 6:58 am

    An article from Politrussia on missile defense: https://translate.yandex.by/web?url=http://politrussia.com/vooruzhennye-sily/kak-rossiya-laquo-nezametno-raquo-426/

    to compliment Viktors post:
    VCS successfully tested a short-range anti-missile defense system
    avatar
    Viktor

    Posts : 5647
    Points : 6284
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 37
    Location : Croatia

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  Viktor on Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:30 am

    sepheronx wrote:An article from Politrussia on missile defense: https://translate.yandex.by/web?url=http://politrussia.com/vooruzhennye-sily/kak-rossiya-laquo-nezametno-raquo-426/

    Nice thumbsup
    avatar
    George1

    Posts : 11475
    Points : 11948
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  George1 on Sat Jun 25, 2016 4:54 am

    Some recent construction activity at the Chekhov radar site near Moscow it might be related to (among other things) to the Nudol ASAT program.

    http://russianforces.org/blog/2016/06/construction_at_the_chekhov_radar_site.shtml


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov

    avatar
    Viktor

    Posts : 5647
    Points : 6284
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 37
    Location : Croatia

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  Viktor on Thu Jun 30, 2016 6:52 pm

    Nice reading thumbsup

    Russia Successfully Tests Short-Range Anti-Missile System
    avatar
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 2246
    Points : 2236
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  miketheterrible on Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:30 pm

    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-conducts-fifth-test-new-anti-satellite-missile/

    December 16th, Russia tested successfully Nudol abm system.
    avatar
    AlfaT8

    Posts : 1570
    Points : 1567
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  AlfaT8 on Thu Dec 22, 2016 4:21 am

    miketheterrible wrote:http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-conducts-fifth-test-new-anti-satellite-missile/

    December 16th, Russia tested successfully Nudol abm system.

    Freebeacon??.... Izvestia is more reliable.
    avatar
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 2246
    Points : 2236
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  miketheterrible on Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:24 am

    Others have reported it. Dunno what you hate about Free Beacon. So far has been pretty good at reporting. They also name the official too. Pentagon spokeswoman Lt. Col. Michelle Baldanza. So it isn't like we have "unnamed sources".
    avatar
    Viktor

    Posts : 5647
    Points : 6284
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 37
    Location : Croatia

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  Viktor on Thu Dec 22, 2016 5:25 pm

    The same missile will be part of the A-235 and S-500 meaning Russian national missile defense will have its fixed and mobile variant.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 4475
    Points : 4638
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Dec 22, 2016 7:27 pm

    Viktor wrote:The same missile will be part of the A-225 and S-500 meaning Russian national missile defense will have its fixed and mobile variant.

    A-225/Nudol isn't fixed, it's mobile.

    Austin

    Posts : 6703
    Points : 7094
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Location : India

    Russia Conducts Fifth Test of New Anti-Satellite Missile

    Post  Austin on Fri Dec 23, 2016 9:37 am

    Russia Conducts Fifth Test of New Anti-Satellite Missile

    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-conducts-fifth-test-new-anti-satellite-missile/


    I always wondered if the launcher image is of S-500 or Nudal ?

    http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/1773939_original.jpg

    Sponsored content

    Re: A–235 Nudol ASAT/ABM system

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:31 pm