Home
Latest images
Register
Log in^^^nice video of a nice boat. if ever they miss the pool on the typhoon i think a great alternative would be the spacious escape capsule- pump some distilled water half way up and enjoy the ad hoc pool.
+85
lancelot
TMA1
Rasisuki Nebia
Backman
mnztr
Tingsay
owais.usmani
xeno
nero
LMFS
slasher
verkhoturye51
Tsavo Lion
Isos
Hole
AlfaT8
PapaDragon
JohninMK
miketheterrible
kumbor
ali.a.r
Orocairion
Peŕrier
walle83
ZoA
The-thing-next-door
hoom
BM-21
Benya
Rowdyhorse4
Singular_Transform
Project Canada
franco
GunshipDemocracy
SeigSoloyvov
KiloGolf
Svyatik
Singular_trafo
max steel
George1
ult
cheesfactory
jhelb
Morpheus Eberhardt
rambo54
kvs
flamming_python
Honesroc
Kyo
Werewolf
zg18
Big_Gazza
Vympel
sepheronx
Vann7
Sujoy
Mike E
navyfield
RTN
collegeboy16
bandaidwacker87
magnumcromagnon
Cyberspec
dino00
runaway
Viktor
Ogannisyan8887
GJ Flanker
Mindstorm
KomissarBojanchev
medo
Arrow
TheArmenian
SOC
TR1
Gagydza
IronsightSniper
nightcrawler
Robert.V
GarryB
coolieno99
Austin
Admin
Stealthflanker
Russian Patriot
89 posters
Project 955: Borei class SSBN
collegeboy16- Posts : 1135
Points : 1134
Join date : 2012-10-05
Age : 27
Location : Roanapur
George1- Posts : 18303
Points : 18800
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
Great! 6th nuclear submarine Project 955 "Borey" will be laid on Friday on Sevmash
Honesroc- Posts : 68
Points : 70
Join date : 2014-11-01
- Post n°253
SEVERODVINSK /Arkhangelsk Region/, December 26. /TASS/. The seventh and eigth Borei-class
Honesroc Fri Dec 26, 2014 4:57 pm
SEVERODVINSK /Arkhangelsk Region/, December 26. /TASS/. The seventh and eigth Borei-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines will be laid down by the end of 2015, the head of the Rubin design bureau said on Friday.
Igor Vilnit said the key task of designers and shipbuilders is not the increase of the number of submarines but maintenance of those boats that are currently in service.
Mikhail Budnichenko, the head of the Sevmash shipyard, told TASS that three Project 885M Yasen-class attack submarines and two Borei-class submarines will be laid down next year.
The Borei-class ballistic-missile submarines are to become the backbone of the Russian Navy's strategic nuclear deterrent.
The submarines displace 24,000 tons, reach speeds of 29 knots (some 54 km per hour), can dive to 450 meters and carry crews of 107 people. The vessels will be armed with up to 16 Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missiles, which have a range of over 8,000 kilometers.
Igor Vilnit said the key task of designers and shipbuilders is not the increase of the number of submarines but maintenance of those boats that are currently in service.
Mikhail Budnichenko, the head of the Sevmash shipyard, told TASS that three Project 885M Yasen-class attack submarines and two Borei-class submarines will be laid down next year.
The Borei-class ballistic-missile submarines are to become the backbone of the Russian Navy's strategic nuclear deterrent.
The submarines displace 24,000 tons, reach speeds of 29 knots (some 54 km per hour), can dive to 450 meters and carry crews of 107 people. The vessels will be armed with up to 16 Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missiles, which have a range of over 8,000 kilometers.
GarryB- Posts : 38916
Points : 39412
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
So we have a 6th Borey layed down soon... didn't someone say 8 Boreys by 2020 was dreaming... even with the current financial situation it seems likely to have at least 7 in the water by 2020.
TR1- Posts : 5435
Points : 5433
Join date : 2011-12-06
8 in service by 2020 is still dreams, barring induction/testing times being reduced enormously.
It took the two serial boats 6.5 years from being laid down to launch, and years after to commission.
I think I predicted 4 boats would be in service by 2020, at best 5. I still hold that will be the case.
It took the two serial boats 6.5 years from being laid down to launch, and years after to commission.
I think I predicted 4 boats would be in service by 2020, at best 5. I still hold that will be the case.
GarryB- Posts : 38916
Points : 39412
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
So you think in the next 5 years they will only get one or two more into service?
They are laying down boats 7 an 8 next year... 2015.
The "laid down dates" are november 1996, march 2004, march 2006 for the first three that are now in service. The next three are july 2012, july 2014 and dec 2014, and the following two are both supposed to be laid down in 2015.
From launch to commission the dates for the three in service vessels are 5 years, 3 years, and 2 years respectively.
Laid down to launch times are 12 years, 6 years, and 6 years.
Now that Bulava seems to be working what cause for delay are you expecting?
They are laying down boats 7 an 8 next year... 2015.
The "laid down dates" are november 1996, march 2004, march 2006 for the first three that are now in service. The next three are july 2012, july 2014 and dec 2014, and the following two are both supposed to be laid down in 2015.
From launch to commission the dates for the three in service vessels are 5 years, 3 years, and 2 years respectively.
Laid down to launch times are 12 years, 6 years, and 6 years.
Now that Bulava seems to be working what cause for delay are you expecting?
TR1- Posts : 5435
Points : 5433
Join date : 2011-12-06
Yes, only one or at best two more, if we are talking by 2020.
My logic is simple construction trends and the time the boats were laid down. The two first serial boats took 6.5 years to float out, and 3-2 years to commission after. Now let us say for the sake of argument that this goes down. I think this is itself questionable since the ships are no longer using ex-971 hull sections, and starting with Knyaz Oleg will have different sail construction and different equipment suit. But let's go ahead and say the total time from laying down to service acceptance becomes 6 years. This automatically disqualifies the 7th and 8th boats, who are planned to be laid down in late 2015. Even if we use our hypothetical schedule, they will only be ready by late 2021, or 2022 effectively.
As for the rest:
Dolgoruki, Nevsky and Monomakh are in service.
Knyaz Vladimir effectively started construction in 2010 IRC, so I am confident it will enter service well before 2020.
The 5th and 6th hulls however were laid down only in mid 2014 and right at the end of the year. They would have to finish construction and acceptance trials within 5 years to to be ready for service by 2020. Let's be realistic here, little points to this suddenly happening. Time to commission won't be held up by Bulava, but I have not seen anything to suggest construction times have drastically decreased (ignoring Dolgoruki as the obvious outlier). More in line with the trend is them commissioning in 2021 or 2022.
My logic is simple construction trends and the time the boats were laid down. The two first serial boats took 6.5 years to float out, and 3-2 years to commission after. Now let us say for the sake of argument that this goes down. I think this is itself questionable since the ships are no longer using ex-971 hull sections, and starting with Knyaz Oleg will have different sail construction and different equipment suit. But let's go ahead and say the total time from laying down to service acceptance becomes 6 years. This automatically disqualifies the 7th and 8th boats, who are planned to be laid down in late 2015. Even if we use our hypothetical schedule, they will only be ready by late 2021, or 2022 effectively.
As for the rest:
Dolgoruki, Nevsky and Monomakh are in service.
Knyaz Vladimir effectively started construction in 2010 IRC, so I am confident it will enter service well before 2020.
The 5th and 6th hulls however were laid down only in mid 2014 and right at the end of the year. They would have to finish construction and acceptance trials within 5 years to to be ready for service by 2020. Let's be realistic here, little points to this suddenly happening. Time to commission won't be held up by Bulava, but I have not seen anything to suggest construction times have drastically decreased (ignoring Dolgoruki as the obvious outlier). More in line with the trend is them commissioning in 2021 or 2022.
Mike E- Posts : 2619
Points : 2651
Join date : 2014-06-19
Location : Bay Area, CA
Honestly, I'm starting to think that Russia really needs a ton of boomers in service anyway.... The USN is servery downsizing their fleet, and who knows exactly how much this will affect their boomers. Right now they are on schedule to build "only" 12 of them, but we've all seen how the USN loves to drop their word in favor of MIC corruption... Anyway, with Russia deploying such a large number of land-based mobile ICBM's, the need for lots of boomers ins decreasing.
GarryB- Posts : 38916
Points : 39412
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
With Bulava testing successful and any modifications needed being made to the basic design I think there will be fewer delays to the newer subs and therefore getting them into the water should speed up... and I think the current confrontational relationship with the west will speed up production priorities rather than slow them down.
You are of course entitled to your opinion on this.
You are of course entitled to your opinion on this.
collegeboy16- Posts : 1135
Points : 1134
Join date : 2012-10-05
Age : 27
Location : Roanapur
12 boreis sound too much- 8 is plenty adequate. If murica wants to up the ante with its nukes in europe the russkies always have the ace in the hole- breaking out of INF treaty. imagine suddenly having 3x the warheads pointing at conus- would sober up the most bloodthirsty warmongers there.
KomissarBojanchev- Posts : 1429
Points : 1584
Join date : 2012-08-05
Age : 26
Location : Varna, Bulgaria
Quite right, what russia needs is much more SSNs. Boomers after all wont be destroying CBGs, which is the absolute main weapon of NATO not nukes.
GarryB- Posts : 38916
Points : 39412
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
Actually the need for more SSBNs is diminishing as most Russian Naval surface vessels will be getting the capability to carry long range precision guided cruise missiles with nuclear level accuracy and performance.
Would be much cheaper to fill the UKSK tubes with nuclear armed Zirconiums and Kalibrs... especially if the latter are developed to the level where they can fly 5,500km or more like their air launched counterparts (Kh-101/102).
Would be much cheaper to fill the UKSK tubes with nuclear armed Zirconiums and Kalibrs... especially if the latter are developed to the level where they can fly 5,500km or more like their air launched counterparts (Kh-101/102).
flamming_python- Posts : 8988
Points : 9050
Join date : 2012-01-30
GarryB wrote:Actually the need for more SSBNs is diminishing as most Russian Naval surface vessels will be getting the capability to carry long range precision guided cruise missiles with nuclear level accuracy and performance.
Would be much cheaper to fill the UKSK tubes with nuclear armed Zirconiums and Kalibrs... especially if the latter are developed to the level where they can fly 5,500km or more like their air launched counterparts (Kh-101/102).
Nothing can beat a good 'ol ballistic missile though. Unmatchable range, high hypersonic speed and multiple warheads/decoys. With the new advances in warhead busses; perhaps the Bulava will have be given some improvements too - to allow one Bulava missile to send warheads and decoys to a whole bunch of different targets along its ballistic trajectory.
Cruise missiles, for all their advantages, are much shorter ranged (especially supersonic variants), a lot slower and vulnerable, and can have only the fraction of the payload. They should be kept for tactical targets; for strategic targets ballistic missiles more than fit the bill.
kvs- Posts : 15110
Points : 15247
Join date : 2014-09-11
Location : Turdope's Kanada
Russia can afford to operate many more than 8 ballistic missile submarines. At the very least it should have 16 boats. The number 8 is just too
small. The US can always come up with a way to take these boats out and the only real way to frustrate such schemes is with numbers. This applies
to the BMD, which relies on disarmament to have viability.
I think around 24 operational Borei submarines would be a worthy target. One of the key pluses for these boats is that they make the
chimps running Washington worry about their "invulnerable" BMD shield.
small. The US can always come up with a way to take these boats out and the only real way to frustrate such schemes is with numbers. This applies
to the BMD, which relies on disarmament to have viability.
I think around 24 operational Borei submarines would be a worthy target. One of the key pluses for these boats is that they make the
chimps running Washington worry about their "invulnerable" BMD shield.
KomissarBojanchev- Posts : 1429
Points : 1584
Join date : 2012-08-05
Age : 26
Location : Varna, Bulgaria
Unfortunately hypersonic SSM barrage dream that might not happen as long as the yasens take exponentially longer to get into service than the boreis, and no cheaper SSGN modern alternate model to them have been developed.GarryB wrote:Actually the need for more SSBNs is diminishing as most Russian Naval surface vessels will be getting the capability to carry long range precision guided cruise missiles with nuclear level accuracy and performance.
Would be much cheaper to fill the UKSK tubes with nuclear armed Zirconiums and Kalibrs... especially if the latter are developed to the level where they can fly 5,500km or more like their air launched counterparts (Kh-101/102).
GarryB- Posts : 38916
Points : 39412
Join date : 2010-03-30
Location : New Zealand
What has Yasen got to do with it?
Even future Russian SSKs will have UKSK, and by 2025 the Zirconium should be in service... as should Brahmos II.
Even future Russian SSKs will have UKSK, and by 2025 the Zirconium should be in service... as should Brahmos II.
George1- Posts : 18303
Points : 18800
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
4th Ballistic missile submarine project Borei class - "Prince Vladimir" - planned to be transferred to the Navy in 2017
TR1- Posts : 5435
Points : 5433
Join date : 2011-12-06
kvs wrote:Russia can afford to operate many more than 8 ballistic missile submarines. At the very least it should have 16 boats. The number 8 is just too
small. The US can always come up with a way to take these boats out and the only real way to frustrate such schemes is with numbers. This applies
to the BMD, which relies on disarmament to have viability.
I think around 24 operational Borei submarines would be a worthy target. One of the key pluses for these boats is that they make the
chimps running Washington worry about their "invulnerable" BMD shield.
You gonna pay for that?
George1- Posts : 18303
Points : 18800
Join date : 2011-12-22
Location : Greece
Two Borei class nuclear submarines to replace old Kalmar class subs in Russia's Far East
Borei class submarines of Project 955 will no longer be built, Project 955A will continue Project 955
LANGKAWI (Malaysia), March 17. /TASS/. Two fourth generation Project 955 Borei class strategic nuclear submarines will replace in Russia’s Pacific Fleet the old strategic nuclear submarines of Project 667BDR (Kalmar class), director general of the submarine design bureau Rubin Igor Vilnit said on Tuesday.
The submarines’ decommissioning will be phased, the head of the Rubin Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering said at the Langkawi International Maritime and Aerospace Exhibition (LIMA-2015) in Malaysia.
"Both series - 667BDRM (Dolphin) and 667BDR in the East have had a long life already. Submarines of the BDR project are actually at the final stage, so it is planned to deliver two Borei class subs there this year," said Vilnit.
However, he said, the Borei class submarines of Project 955 will no longer be built. "Project 955 is over. Three boats have been built and delivered to the Navy. Now Project 955A will continue Project 955," Vilnit said.
All contracts on the construction of the Borei-A class submarines of Project 955A have been concluded and the work is going on schedule, he said. A total of five such submarines are planned to be built.
Russia’s Navy currently has three Borei class submarines - the Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh boats that have been commissioned in recent years. They are armed with the Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles.
According to the Russian military, Borei-class are state-of-the-art submarines, featuring characteristics superior to any submarine currently in service worldwide. The Borei-class subs are replacing outgoing nuclear subs of the previous generation and are set to become the backbone of Russia’s sea-based nuclear defences.
A Borei-class sub is 170 metres long and 13.5 metres wide, and can dive up to 450 metres. They have a compact, hydro-dynamically efficient hull for reduced broadband noise and are the first to use pump-jet propulsion among Russian submarines. Their submerged cruise speed is at least 30 knots (56 kilometres per hour). Safety measures for the subs include a rescue chamber that can host all 107 crew members.
Borei class submarines of Project 955 will no longer be built, Project 955A will continue Project 955
LANGKAWI (Malaysia), March 17. /TASS/. Two fourth generation Project 955 Borei class strategic nuclear submarines will replace in Russia’s Pacific Fleet the old strategic nuclear submarines of Project 667BDR (Kalmar class), director general of the submarine design bureau Rubin Igor Vilnit said on Tuesday.
The submarines’ decommissioning will be phased, the head of the Rubin Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering said at the Langkawi International Maritime and Aerospace Exhibition (LIMA-2015) in Malaysia.
"Both series - 667BDRM (Dolphin) and 667BDR in the East have had a long life already. Submarines of the BDR project are actually at the final stage, so it is planned to deliver two Borei class subs there this year," said Vilnit.
However, he said, the Borei class submarines of Project 955 will no longer be built. "Project 955 is over. Three boats have been built and delivered to the Navy. Now Project 955A will continue Project 955," Vilnit said.
All contracts on the construction of the Borei-A class submarines of Project 955A have been concluded and the work is going on schedule, he said. A total of five such submarines are planned to be built.
Russia’s Navy currently has three Borei class submarines - the Yuri Dolgoruky, Alexander Nevsky and Vladimir Monomakh boats that have been commissioned in recent years. They are armed with the Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles.
According to the Russian military, Borei-class are state-of-the-art submarines, featuring characteristics superior to any submarine currently in service worldwide. The Borei-class subs are replacing outgoing nuclear subs of the previous generation and are set to become the backbone of Russia’s sea-based nuclear defences.
A Borei-class sub is 170 metres long and 13.5 metres wide, and can dive up to 450 metres. They have a compact, hydro-dynamically efficient hull for reduced broadband noise and are the first to use pump-jet propulsion among Russian submarines. Their submerged cruise speed is at least 30 knots (56 kilometres per hour). Safety measures for the subs include a rescue chamber that can host all 107 crew members.
rambo54- Posts : 163
Points : 165
Join date : 2014-04-01
not only the K-329 Severodvinsk but also the Borey class show different length on satellite pictures than specified. Try to measure these boats in Severodvinsk or Severomorsk or Zapadnaya Litsa in google earth. These boats are about 158m and not 170m!
Any Ideas?
Any Ideas?
Stealthflanker- Posts : 1410
Points : 1486
Join date : 2009-08-04
Age : 36
Location : Indonesia
rambo54 wrote:not only the K-329 Severodvinsk but also the Borey class show different length on satellite pictures than specified. Try to measure these boats in Severodvinsk or Severomorsk or Zapadnaya Litsa in google earth. These boats are about 158m and not 170m!
Any Ideas?
I wonder why.. However I suspected that the satellite wasn't really on top of the sub.. Thus accidentally made "angled" image that distort measurement.
rambo54- Posts : 163
Points : 165
Join date : 2014-04-01
Stealthflanker wrote:rambo54 wrote:not only the K-329 Severodvinsk but also the Borey class show different length on satellite pictures than specified. Try to measure these boats in Severodvinsk or Severomorsk or Zapadnaya Litsa in google earth. These boats are about 158m and not 170m!
Any Ideas?
I wonder why.. However I suspected that the satellite wasn't really on top of the sub.. Thus accidentally made "angled" image that distort measurement.
I don't think so. For example use the History layer in Severodvinsk and measure other ships next to the Boreys. You will see that they match more or less exactly their specifications. You only see significant mismatches for Borey and K-329 Severodvinsk!
see what I mean:
Last edited by rambo54 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 2:53 pm; edited 2 times in total
Morpheus Eberhardt- Posts : 1925
Points : 2032
Join date : 2013-05-20
rambo54 wrote:Stealthflanker wrote:rambo54 wrote:not only the K-329 Severodvinsk but also the Borey class show different length on satellite pictures than specified. Try to measure these boats in Severodvinsk or Severomorsk or Zapadnaya Litsa in google earth. These boats are about 158m and not 170m!
Any Ideas?
I wonder why.. However I suspected that the satellite wasn't really on top of the sub.. Thus accidentally made "angled" image that distort measurement.
I don't think so. For example use the History layer in Severodvinsk and measure other ships next to the Boreys. You will see that they match more or less exactly their specifications. You only see significant mismatches for Borey and K-329 Severodvinsk!
see what I mean:
It is normal for the real specifications of weapon systems, including their dimensions, to be different from their published values. That is a rule, actually.
Take what is on the internet for example; very very few of the "non-obvious" specification details are correct, and I am being very very generous with my description of the situation.
For more than a decade the published submerged displacement of the proekt 941 was being listed as 24000 tonnes to 27000 tonnes, including in all of the Jane's publications, while from the beginning a simple calculation would show that it was close to 50000 tonnes.
I can recall that from the very beginning my calculations for Borej showed figures very similar to yours, and I didn't use satellite images; what I think I did was to add the length of a missile compartment to the length of a proekt 971.
Stealthflanker- Posts : 1410
Points : 1486
Join date : 2009-08-04
Age : 36
Location : Indonesia
rambo54 wrote:
I don't think so. For example use the History layer in Severodvinsk and measure other ships next to the Boreys. You will see that they match more or less exactly their specifications. You only see significant mismatches for Borey and K-329 Severodvinsk!
Yes.. i have checked it now... So basically Wikipedia and basically whoever quotes that 170 m figure is inaccurate.
and this is better.
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/index-370.html
This one is for Graney
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/index-372.html
You can see in the Graney specs there are hmm three length figures from 119 to 139m
Anyway can i ask where did you find the Graney ? coordinates and time stamp ?
rambo54- Posts : 163
Points : 165
Join date : 2014-04-01
Stealthflanker wrote:rambo54 wrote:
I don't think so. For example use the History layer in Severodvinsk and measure other ships next to the Boreys. You will see that they match more or less exactly their specifications. You only see significant mismatches for Borey and K-329 Severodvinsk!
Yes.. i have checked it now... So basically Wikipedia and basically whoever quotes that 170 m figure is inaccurate.
and this is better.
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/index-370.html
This one is for Graney
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/index-372.html
You can see in the Graney specs there are hmm three length figures from 119 to 139m
Anyway can i ask where did you find the Graney ? coordinates and time stamp ?
Severodvinsk:
64.578015° 39.814701° - 23 June 2010
64.575185° 39.800798° - 30 July 2010
64.575245° 39.800658° - 13 Aug 2011 + 21 Aug 2011
64.575394° 39.800599° - 28 Aug 2012
64.578223° 39.804305° - 9 May 2013
64.575394° 39.800599° - 18 June 2013
64.575984° 39.805111° - 10 Sept 2014
Severomorsk
69.095267° 33.414915° - 20 July 2014
Have Fun