Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+85
lancelot
TMA1
Rasisuki Nebia
Backman
mnztr
Tingsay
owais.usmani
xeno
nero
LMFS
slasher
verkhoturye51
Tsavo Lion
Isos
Hole
AlfaT8
PapaDragon
JohninMK
miketheterrible
kumbor
ali.a.r
Orocairion
Peŕrier
walle83
ZoA
The-thing-next-door
hoom
BM-21
Benya
Rowdyhorse4
Singular_Transform
Project Canada
franco
GunshipDemocracy
SeigSoloyvov
KiloGolf
Svyatik
Singular_trafo
max steel
George1
ult
cheesfactory
jhelb
Morpheus Eberhardt
rambo54
kvs
flamming_python
Honesroc
Kyo
Werewolf
zg18
Big_Gazza
Vympel
sepheronx
Vann7
Sujoy
Mike E
navyfield
RTN
collegeboy16
bandaidwacker87
magnumcromagnon
Cyberspec
dino00
runaway
Viktor
Ogannisyan8887
GJ Flanker
Mindstorm
KomissarBojanchev
medo
Arrow
TheArmenian
SOC
TR1
Gagydza
IronsightSniper
nightcrawler
Robert.V
GarryB
coolieno99
Austin
Admin
Stealthflanker
Russian Patriot
89 posters

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  GarryB Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:29 am

    US has the most potent nuclear submarine building capability in the world by a long shot right now. Russia is in line with the other builders, US is the one outlier.
    They don't make diseal boats, but they make larger nuclear submarines faster!

    Perhaps because they have always been fully funded and never had a 15 year break when even minor repairs were not funded let alone no major vessels were laid down...

    The real question is WTF would be the point of making 20 nuke subs a year.... even the US with its global empire to maintain and countries to attack within an hour or what ever their goal is at the moment doesn't need as many subs as it has or is making... what cute cuddly prize would Russia get if it wasted the money and tried to out produce the US in subs?

    Of course despite your low opinion of conventional subs I would argue that they are actually rather more useful and cost effective and EXPORTABLE.

    The new Lada-M class have the sonar and equipment previously only seen on nuclear attack subs. With new batteries and AIP they will have all the best attributes of a nuke but without the top speed... when they get its problems sorted out and into production I suspect they will sell very well.
    RTN
    RTN


    Posts : 739
    Points : 716
    Join date : 2014-03-24
    Location : Fairfield, CT

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  RTN Sat Jul 05, 2014 9:12 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Of course despite your low opinion of conventional subs I would argue that they are actually rather more useful and cost effective and EXPORTABLE.

    Garry , Borei will also be using OK 650 reactor right ...?

    What's the weight of the OK 650 reactor ?
    Stealthflanker
    Stealthflanker


    Posts : 1405
    Points : 1481
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 36
    Location : Indonesia

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Stealthflanker Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:48 am

    RTN wrote:

    Garry , Borei will also be using OK 650 reactor right ...?

    What's the weight of the OK 650 reactor ?

    This information is kinda rare.. I'm also looking for it.

    Nonetheless, you can try estimating them based from following table :

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Npp_by_stealthflanker-d7jy3ms

    Borei is using OK-650 with OK-9 GTZA (Turbine) With around 50000 Shaft horse power or 37284 Kw. The latest OK-650 as far as i know is a monoblock construction where steam generator is "unified" With the reactor, making it more compact. Thus we can assume specific weight of 21 Kg/Kw

    Thus the reactor along with its steam generator would weigh 37284*21=782964 Kg or some 782 ton discounting the shield tank and foundation.

    If we included those parts, assuming specific weight of 7 Kg/Kw the weight of the foundation and shield tank would be 7*37284=260988 or 261 ton.

    Bring total weight of 1043 Ton.
    RTN
    RTN


    Posts : 739
    Points : 716
    Join date : 2014-03-24
    Location : Fairfield, CT

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  RTN Mon Jul 07, 2014 8:22 pm

    Stealthflanker wrote:
    This information is kinda rare.. I'm also looking for it.

    Nonetheless, you can try estimating them based from following table :

    Thanks Stealthflanker . I kinda did the math on this based on the numbers that you provided . It seems Russian reactors for submarines are quite heavy compared to US ones . Not sure of the reason though .

    First, the power generation you mentioned in the kilowatt range for actual unmanned spacecraft is probably from a thermoelectric generator as opposed to a fission reactor.  

    A thermoelectric generator converts the heat generated from natural radioactive decay into electric power.  Due to design considerations it is not practical for thermoelectric generators to be large enough to produce more than about a kilowatt of electricity.  Based on pure physics, however, here is the thermoelectric generator calculation.

    Plutonium is often used in space applications because of its long half-life.  So, if a space craft is on a decades-long mission, A Pu power source should be able to function continuously.  The downside of plutonium is that it is extremely heavy.  Considering plutonium-238 for the moment, its specific power is 0.56 Watts/gm due to natural radioactive decay.  So, to generate 1 kW, we need 1000*0.56 gm = 560 gm or 0.56 kg.  This is thermal energy due to radioactive decay.  The thermoelectric generator which converts the thermal energy to electric energy has an efficiency of only a few percent.  For our example, let's assume a 5% conversion efficiency.  Then, the 0.56 kg will generate 0.05*1000 Watts = 50 Watts electric power, or, we can get 89 Watts per kilogram.  For 1 Kw, our mass is 11 Kg.  For  1 MW, our mass is 11,000 kg.

    Now, onto a more practical means for generation 1 MW of power using a Plutonium fission reaction.  

    To calculate the mass required to obtain a certain power level, we have to know the neutron flux and the fission cross-section.  Let’s assume the flux is 1E14 neutron/cm2/sec, the cross section for fast fission of Pu-239 is about 2 barns (2E-24 cm2), the energy release per fission is 204 MeV, and the Pu-239 number density is 4.939E22 atoms/cm3.  Then the power is

    P = flux * number density * cross section * Mev per fission * 1.602E-13 Watt/MeV
    P = 1E14 * 4.939E22 * 2E-24  * 204  * 1.602E-13  = 323 W/cm3

    So, for 1 MW, we need  1E6/323 = 3100 cm3.  Given a density of 19.6 gm/cm3, this is 19.6*3100 = 60,760 gm or 60.76 kg.  

    The next question to ask is: how long do you want to sustain this reaction?  In other words, what is the total energy output?

    For example, a Watt is one Joule per second.  So, to sustain a 1 MW reaction for 1 year, the total energy is 1E6 J/s * 3.15E7 s/year = 3.15E13 J

    For Pu-239, we have 204 Mev per fission and we have 6.023E23./239 = 2.52E21 atoms/gm.  So, the energy release per gram is 2.52E21 * 204 Mev/fission * 1.602E-13 J/Mev = 8.24E10 J/gm.

    Therefore, to sustain 1 MW for 1 year, we will use 3.15E13 J / 8.24E10 J/gm = 382 gm of Pu-239 or 0.382 kg.  This is only a small fraction of the total 60.76 kg needed for the fission reaction.

    Finally, this is thermal energy.  Our current light water reactors have about a 35% efficiency for conversion to electric power.  So, you can take these numbers and essentially multiply by 3 to get a rough answer for the total Pu-239 needed: 3 x 60.76 = 182 kg.  Rounding up, you would need roughly 200 kg for a long term sustained 1 MW fission reaction with a 35% conversion efficieny.

    These calculations assume quite a bit and I wouldn’t use these numbers to design a real reactor, but they should give you a ballpark idea of the masses involved.
    Stealthflanker
    Stealthflanker


    Posts : 1405
    Points : 1481
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 36
    Location : Indonesia

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Stealthflanker Mon Jul 07, 2014 11:42 pm

    RTN wrote:

    Thanks Stealthflanker . I kinda did the math on this based on the numbers that you provided . It seems Russian reactors for submarines are quite heavy compared to US ones . Not sure of the reason though .

    How so ? I think US reactors aren't much lighter than Russian one considering they have somewhat excessive safety imposed on them.

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Reactor-image3

    This is only for the reactor compartment.. Which would mean it contain the reactor, steam generator and the foundation along with other structural member.




    First, the power generation you mentioned in the kilowatt range for actual unmanned spacecraft is probably from a thermoelectric generator as opposed to a fission reactor.  


    A thermoelectric generator converts the heat generated from natural radioactive decay into electric power.  Due to design considerations it is not practical for thermoelectric generators to be large enough to produce more than about a kilowatt of electricity.  Based on pure physics, however, here is the thermoelectric generator calculation.

    Plutonium is often used in space applications because of its long half-life.  So, if a space craft is on a decades-long mission, A Pu power source should be able to function continuously.  The downside of plutonium is that it is extremely heavy.  Considering plutonium-238 for the moment, its specific power is 0.56 Watts/gm due to natural radioactive decay.  So, to generate 1 kW, we need 1000*0.56 gm = 560 gm or 0.56 kg.  This is thermal energy due to radioactive decay.  The thermoelectric generator which converts the thermal energy to electric energy has an efficiency of only a few percent.  For our example, let's assume a 5% conversion efficiency.  Then, the 0.56 kg will generate 0.05*1000 Watts = 50 Watts electric power, or, we can get 89 Watts per kilogram.  For 1 Kw, our mass is 11 Kg.  For  1 MW, our mass is 11,000 kg.

    Now, onto a more practical means for generation 1 MW of power using a Plutonium fission reaction.  

    To calculate the mass required to obtain a certain power level, we have to know the neutron flux and the fission cross-section.  Let’s assume the flux is 1E14 neutron/cm2/sec, the cross section for fast fission of Pu-239 is about 2 barns (2E-24 cm2), the energy release per fission is 204 MeV, and the Pu-239 number density is 4.939E22 atoms/cm3.  Then the power is

    P = flux * number density * cross section * Mev per fission * 1.602E-13 Watt/MeV
    P = 1E14 * 4.939E22 * 2E-24  * 204  * 1.602E-13  = 323 W/cm3

    So, for 1 MW, we need  1E6/323 = 3100 cm3.  Given a density of 19.6 gm/cm3, this is 19.6*3100 = 60,760 gm or 60.76 kg.  

    The next question to ask is: how long do you want to sustain this reaction?  In other words, what is the total energy output?

    For example, a Watt is one Joule per second.  So, to sustain a 1 MW reaction for 1 year, the total energy is 1E6 J/s * 3.15E7 s/year = 3.15E13 J

    For Pu-239, we have 204 Mev per fission and we have 6.023E23./239 = 2.52E21 atoms/gm.  So, the energy release per gram is 2.52E21 * 204 Mev/fission * 1.602E-13 J/Mev = 8.24E10 J/gm.

    Therefore, to sustain 1 MW for 1 year, we will use 3.15E13 J / 8.24E10 J/gm = 382 gm of Pu-239 or 0.382 kg.  This is only a small fraction of the total 60.76 kg needed for the fission reaction.

    Finally, this is thermal energy.  Our current light water reactors have about a 35% efficiency for conversion to electric power.  So, you can take these numbers and essentially multiply by 3 to get a rough answer for the total Pu-239 needed: 3 x 60.76 = 182 kg.  Rounding up, you would need roughly 200 kg for a long term sustained 1 MW fission reaction with a 35% conversion efficieny.

    These calculations assume quite a bit and I wouldn’t use these numbers to design a real reactor, but they should give you a ballpark idea of the masses involved.

    I've seen this math before.. Nonetheless haven't tried it.

    Typical naval reactor however uses highly enriched uranium with level of 20-93% Mainly to prolong core life and to provide excess reactivity to allow rapid restart.

    Their fissile energy should be higher than provided at the math above.
    http://www.alternatewars.com/BBOW/Nuclear/US_Naval_Reactors.htm

    The link deals with uranium enrichment to fissile energy.
    navyfield
    navyfield


    Posts : 118
    Points : 69
    Join date : 2013-05-27

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  navyfield Wed Jul 09, 2014 4:12 pm

    for nuclear submarines weight is less of an issue its volume that is premium.
    but i would agree with garry in ocean 1 on 1 diesel sub cant go against nuclear but in sea and coastal areas ...
    the diesel sub is getting some very advanced technologies its cheaper and you can build and operate many more of them.
    Sujoy
    Sujoy


    Posts : 2300
    Points : 2460
    Join date : 2012-04-02
    Location : India || भारत

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Sujoy Thu Jul 10, 2014 1:19 pm

    RTN wrote:Russian reactors for submarines are quite heavy compared to US ones

    The math that you have provided does not prove that Russian nuclear reactors are heavier.

    If we include  the weight of  the shield tank and foundation the weight of the reactor is bound to increase .

    The exact clean weight of the OK 650 is therefore not known .
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  TR1 Fri Jul 11, 2014 1:40 pm

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/916623.html

    Great photo of Monomach trials.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18268
    Points : 18765
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  George1 Fri Jul 25, 2014 3:24 pm

    Borei-Class Submarines Enter Service Ahead of Russian Navy Day

    MOSCOW, July 25 (RIA Novosti) – Two Russian submarines are entering service just in time for the Russian Navy Day, which falls on July 27 this year: a Yasen-class nuclear attack submarine Severodvinsk and a Borei-class ballistic missile submarine Alexander Nevsky.

    Construction of the Severodvinsk began in 1993, but its completion was significantly delayed because of limited funding as a result of economic problems Russia faced in the 1990s. The submarine was finally launched in 2010.

    The submarine, whose rivals are the US Navy’s Seawolf-class and Virginia-class submarines, is equipped with the Russian equivalent of the US Tomahawk missile, which can carry a nuclear warhead and has a firing range of up to 3,000 kilometers (1,800 miles).

    The Yasen-class submarine also has additional missiles that can be used for high-precision strikes against ground targets.

    The Borei-class Alexander Nevsky submarine began trials in October 2010. It was involved in test-firing Bulava intercontinental ballistic missiles, which all Borei-class submarines are equipped with. Aleksander Nevsky is the first series-built submarine of the Borei class.

    Two additional Borei-class submarines and two Yasen-class submarines are currently under construction. In total, Russia plans to build 8 Borei-class submarines and 8 Yasen-class submarines by 2020.

    Russia has been stepping up the development of its navy since Crimea became part of the Russian Federation in March. In addition to the Russian naval base in the Crimean city of Sevastopol, Russia is developing a port in the country’s southern city of Novorossiysk, so that part of Russian’s Black Sea Fleet vessels and troops could be deployed there.

    By 2017, six Adm. Grigorovich-class frigates and six improved Kilo-class diesel-electric submarines will join the Black Sea Fleet.

    Russia is also awaiting the delivery of two French-made Mistral-class assault carriers. The first one, Vladivostok, is expected in St. Petersburg in October, where it will be equipped with Russian weapons. The second carrier, Sevastopol, should be delivered in 2015.
    avatar
    Vann7


    Posts : 5385
    Points : 5485
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Vann7 Sun Jul 27, 2014 12:43 pm

    How can Russia commission Borei submarines without weapons?  Does the problems with Bulava missiles
    have been fixed. ?  they were supposed to try again 6 more launches ,to finally be sure if it can do the job
    after too many failures.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon


    Posts : 8138
    Points : 8273
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  magnumcromagnon Sun Jul 27, 2014 2:55 pm

    Vladimir Monomakh, Borei Class:

    sepheronx
    sepheronx


    Posts : 8495
    Points : 8757
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 34
    Location : Canada

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  sepheronx Sun Jul 27, 2014 2:59 pm

    Vann7 wrote:How can Russia commission Borei submarines without weapons?  Does the problems with Bulava missiles
    have been fixed. ?  they were supposed to try again 6 more launches ,to finally be sure if it can do the job
    after too many failures.

    I too would like to know the answer to this.  Borei has been plauged with problems and I found it silly they switched developers from ones who were traditional in SSBM's to ICBM's and vice versa. I like Borei, but what is the cost benefit and development if they went with producing upgraded Delta's instead and using Lyner missiles? Since the missile has higher success rate and all.
    TR1
    TR1


    Posts : 5435
    Points : 5433
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  TR1 Sun Jul 27, 2014 4:09 pm

    http://kuleshovoleg.livejournal.com/310054.html

    Interesting. Boats starting with Knyaz Oleg, will have classical sail, not the sharply raked variant.
    Mike E
    Mike E


    Posts : 2619
    Points : 2651
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Mike E Sun Jul 27, 2014 6:24 pm

    Vann7 wrote:How can Russia commission Borei submarines without weapons?  Does the problems with Bulava missiles
    have been fixed. ?  they were supposed to try again 6 more launches ,to finally be sure if it can do the job
    after too many failures.
    I thought that the problems with the Bulava were fixed, maybe not...
    Stealthflanker
    Stealthflanker


    Posts : 1405
    Points : 1481
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 36
    Location : Indonesia

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Stealthflanker Sun Jul 27, 2014 6:58 pm

    TR1 wrote:http://kuleshovoleg.livejournal.com/310054.html

    Interesting. Boats starting with Knyaz Oleg, will have classical sail, not the sharply raked variant.

    Back to classical trademark of Rubin OKB  paratrooper 
    Viktor
    Viktor


    Posts : 5796
    Points : 6429
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 43
    Location : Croatia

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Viktor Sun Jul 27, 2014 7:43 pm

    5th Borei project 955A Princ Oleg

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 EdgG8dU

    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  GarryB Mon Jul 28, 2014 11:08 am

    How can Russia commission Borei submarines without weapons? Does the problems with Bulava missiles have been fixed. ?

    Lots of weapons throughout history have been put in service before all the bugs have been worked out... right now the choice between the Borei and the Delta IV subs is like the choice between a B-52 late model bomber and an upgraded B-2 but with a few faults that need work before it is ready for full combat status.

    At the end of the day the Borei is the much more capable sub and the Bulava is the more capable missile. Giving contracts to companies with different experience is often a good way of jarring other companies out of their comfortable chairs.

    An example is MiG, who got a different company to develop the optics for its MiG-35. the company is an optics company, but they worked with space based systems so they new the job but were new to the field of aircraft optics so they didn't know what could or could not be done... so they were likely more adventurous and less afraid to try strange solutions.

    With Buluva it was a very ambitious programme and the result will be very capable when it is ready.

    There is no other alternative so it makes sense to get the vessels into service even if all the missiles are not completely ready. When they are ready it will be fairly straight forward to get a large number of missiles directly into service.

    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18268
    Points : 18765
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  George1 Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:37 pm

    Russia’s new Alexander Nevsky submarine to arrive in Kamchatka by year-end

    MOSCOW, August 21. /ITAR-TASS/. Russia’s new nuclear submarine Alexander Nevsky will arrive at its base in Kamchatka before the end of the year to begin combat training, Eastern Military District Commander, Colonel-General Sergei Surovikin said on Thursday.

    Surovikin is inspecting the construction of infrastructure facilities for the fourth-generation submarines in Vilyuchinsk, Kamchatka.

    “The commander inspected the construction of the pier, including mooring areas and support facilities, to ensure that work was proceeding according to the schedule approved by the ministry of defense,” Eastern Military District spokesperson Alexander Gordeyev told ITAR-TASS.

    The general demanded strict compliance with the construction schedule and technical specifications approved by the Defense Ministry and the Navy, which require improved seismic resistance and the use of high anti-corrosion technologies.

    The Alexander Nevsky is the second Borei-class submarine and the first serial Project 955 ship of the Borei Class. It was laid down on March 19, 2004. This is a fourth generation strategic underwater missile cruiser.

    The leading submarine of the series, Yuri Dolgoruky, went into service in January 2013. It was the 129th nuclear-powered submarine built by the Sevmash shipyard and the first one in the past 12 years. Prior to that, in December 2001, the shipyard handed over the multirole submarine Gepard (carrying no ballistic missiles) to the Navy.

    The Alexander Nevsky is the first serial strategic rocket carrier of the Borei class. It is 170 metres long, 13.5 metres wide, maximum operating depth is 450 metres, underwater speed is 29 knots, and a crew of 17 sailors.

    Borei class submarines are designed to serve as the basis of Russia's strategic nuclear capabilities for the decades to come. They are designed by the St. Petersburg-based Naval Design Bureau Rubin. Each submarine can be armed with 12 ICBMs with MIRVs. They will also have an escape capsule for all crewmembers.

    The Borei claims to be a state-of-the-art submarine, featuring characteristics superior to any submarine currently in service, such as the ability to cruise silently and be less detectable to sonar. Advances include a compact and integrated hydrodynamically efficient hull for reduced broadband noise and the first ever use of pump-jet propulsion on a Russian nuclear submarine.

    The submarines will be armed with Bulava missiles. The Bulava carries the NATO reporting name SS-NX-30 and has been assigned the GRAU index 3M30. In international treaties, the common designation RSM-56 is used.

    The Russian Defense Ministry plans to build at least eight new Borei-class submarines that should become the main naval component of Russia’s strategic nuclear forces.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18268
    Points : 18765
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  George1 Fri Aug 22, 2014 5:47 pm

    Russian Navy to get Vladimir Monomakh sub by end of 2014

    ST.PETERSBURG, August 22. /ITAR-TASS/. The third Borey-class nuclear-powered ballistic-missile submarine will be handed over to the Russian Navy by the end of 2014, the president of the United Shipbuilding Corporation said Friday. "The submarine will enter service by the end of this year as planned," Alexei Rakhmanov said.

    The construction of the Vladimir Monomakh submarine began at the Sevmash shipyard in 2006. The first two Borey-class submarines, the Alexander Nevsky and Yuri Dolgoruky, were commissioned in 2013.

    The Borey-class ballistic-missile submarines are to become the backbone of the Navy's strategic nuclear deterrent.
    Russia’s new nuclear submarine to use only domestically made components

    The submarines displace 24,000 tons, reach speeds of 29 knots (some 54 km per hour), can dive to 450 meters and carry crews of 107 people. The vessels will be armed with up to 16 Bulava submarine-launched ballistic missiles, which have range of over 8,000 kilometers.

    A total of eight Borey-class boats are to be built for the Russian Navy by 2020.
    Mike E
    Mike E


    Posts : 2619
    Points : 2651
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Mike E Fri Aug 22, 2014 7:02 pm

    It seems like they might really reach their 2020 deadmark... I doubted it at first, but they seem to be speeding things up.
    avatar
    Vann7


    Posts : 5385
    Points : 5485
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Vann7 Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:21 pm

    RT says that an upgraded version of the Borei Class (project 955) will carry 20 SLBM missiles and not 16 like the previous ones..

    http://rt.com/news/yury-dolgoruky-submarine-ceremony-678/

    In May 2012 the Navy has also contracted development of [b]an upgraded version of the Borei class submarine, which will carry 20 ICBMs,[/b] compared to the regular version’s 16. It will also have improved characteristics, such as reduced noise, better measurability and more advanced weapon controls. The keel of the lead advanced vessel, Knyaz Vladimir, was laid down in July 2012, with four more submarines expected to be built. wrote:

    And following more information.. Wikipedia  says the 4th Borei submarine .  
    (K-??? Knyaz Vladimir) (project 955) lay down in 30 july 2012.. will be the one with 20 x Bulavas missiles.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borei-class_submarine

    So only the first 3 Borei I subs will be 16 bulavas and the upgraded version (Borei II) subs from 4th to the 8th submarine will carry 20 and with new advanced controls and more modern technology they testing that the first ones..
    Mike E
    Mike E


    Posts : 2619
    Points : 2651
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Mike E Tue Aug 26, 2014 12:16 am

    I thought that was already known... All Boreis after the first three will carry 20 Bulavas. - Which is great, should make the West change their diaper.
    GarryB
    GarryB


    Posts : 38765
    Points : 39261
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  GarryB Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:01 am

    Actually I think that would be stupid... the current START treaty limits both sides to between 1,200 and 1,500 warheads each... which means 400-500 per service... 400-500 ICBM, 400-500 Cruise missile, and 400-500 SLBM.

    Now if each of your SSBNs is going to have 20 missiles and each missile has... say 5 warheads... that means each vessel will have 100 warheads per boat. If the limit is 400-500 SLBMs that means 8 boats with 800 warheads... so according to that you can have 4 Boreis with 20 launch tubes and that is all in your entire SSBN fleet... which is pretty dumb.

    With 16 missiles per vessel and 5 warheads per missile you can have 5, and with 12 missiles you can have 6 subs.

    Obviously with 8 subs planned they will likely load them with 3-4 warheads and use the extra warhead space for decoys and jammers and other bits and bobs.

    What I am saying is that it makes rather more sense to have more subs with fewer tubes than a few subs with lots of tubes.
    avatar
    Vympel


    Posts : 122
    Points : 126
    Join date : 2013-01-30

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Vympel Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:01 pm

    GarryB wrote:Actually I think that would be stupid... the current START treaty limits both sides to between 1,200 and 1,500 warheads each... which means 400-500 per service... 400-500 ICBM, 400-500 Cruise missile, and 400-500 SLBM.

    Now if each of your SSBNs is going to have 20 missiles and each missile has... say 5 warheads... that means each vessel will have 100 warheads per boat. If the limit is 400-500 SLBMs that means 8 boats with 800 warheads... so according to that you can have 4 Boreis with 20 launch tubes and that is all in your entire SSBN fleet... which is pretty dumb.

    With 16 missiles per vessel and 5 warheads per missile you can have 5, and with 12 missiles you can have 6 subs.

    Obviously with 8 subs planned they will likely load them with 3-4 warheads and use the extra warhead space for decoys and jammers and other bits and bobs.

    What I am saying is that it makes rather more sense to have more subs with fewer tubes than a few subs with lots of tubes.

    Only if, as you indicate, you intend to load each SLBM with a large number of warheads. Besides, maintaing a large boomer fleet is I bet more expensive than maintaining a smaller amount of subs with more tubes.
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza


    Posts : 4595
    Points : 4587
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Big_Gazza Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:30 pm

    There is an alternative view - that while current treaties limit the number of warheads, such a restriction cannot be guaranteed as the US could elect to withdraw from START should relations degrade catastrophically. It makes sense to build SSBNs that can meet peace time treaty limits while only using (for example) 70% of total installed missile throw weight, and which have the option to sacrifice penetration aids to significantly upgrade the warhead load if required.

    Cost is probably the major determining factor - ie which is less expensive? Adding 4x tubes to 5x Borei Mk II (ie 20 tubes total) or an extra Borei Mk I+ with the system upgrades but retaining the original complement of 16 tubes? I'd guess the extra boomer is a significantly higher cost? Plus the extra SSBN needs to be operated (extra crew trained) and maintained.

    Sponsored content


    Project 955: Borei class SSBN - Page 8 Empty Re: Project 955: Borei class SSBN

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:49 pm