Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Share
    avatar
    KiloGolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1624
    Points : 1652
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Macedonia, Hellas

    Re: Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Post  KiloGolf on Sun Nov 27, 2016 9:23 am

    sheytanelkebir wrote:yea. its purely about the money (or lack of) now. Iraq is pretty much "non aligned" as of today... so they host both NATO and US forces and commands... alongside Russian Advisors, Intel Sharing office and Iranian IRGC advisors... meanwhile there's a whole team of Chinese officers operating out of Kut Air Base... and a few miles down the road Koreans are building a new Airbase at Suwayra. The US has accepted  the "multi-polar" relations in Iraq, and its also a way of keeping communications channels open (the Russian/Iranian/Syrian/Iraqi intel office is only a couple of kilometers from the US Embassy!).

    But the issue with the Russian weapons orders that have been "put on hold" is purely based on Iraq's lack of credit worthiness from a Russian perspective. Whilst the Chinese and Americans are willing to throw a few billion here and there to further their interests. Thing is Russians do control a few oil fields in Iraq (not as many as the chinese of course)... so I would have thought they could come to an agreeable deal on credit for weapons... but sadly they haven't yet as far as we know Sad

    Lets see what happens in 2017... things can turn quickly.


    PS Zarib, Iraq didn't cancel any of those above mentioned items from the US (apaches, additional 175 abrams, 220 bradleys, 24 AT6C etc...). Iraq NEVER ordered them in the first place and only asked for an offer, for comparison with other offers... and for example the apache lost in competition against the Mi28Ne, the M1A1SA lost against the T90S, the M2A2 Bradley lost against the BMP-3 and as far as I know the AT-6C lost against the CH-4 UCAV.

    Go ahead and search... you won't find a single FMS contract for any of the above items only a DSCA offer.

    Nice one thanks. From the look of it USA and PRC are willing to loan more of their cash than Russian. Which is my point, they play the risky game but will end up with more returns if it all works out for them.

    sheytanelkebir
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 491
    Points : 508
    Join date : 2013-09-17

    Re: Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Post  sheytanelkebir on Sun Nov 27, 2016 9:42 am

    miketheterrible wrote:A while ago, US froze Iraqi money in US banks of something around $75B or less that was to be used to purchase Russian gear.  After negotiations, US unfroze the accounts but Iraq decided not to buy Russian gear and purchased American.  Specifically continued on the F-16 deal when they were threatening to cancel it (Iraq) in the first place.  Iraq may not have the money.  But to make matters worst, the US is constantly pressuring Iraq to not turn to Russia for its equipment.

    yea... the money in the Federal Reserve bank of New York (fluctuates between $70-$100Bn) is there as a guarantee for many loans and lines of credit and investment programmes by foreign firms... its basically cash that is deposited by Iraq as some sort of guarantee against default. So that money acts as an insurance guarantee for loads of things from a 100,000 housing unit city being built by a Korean contractor (Basmayah), to Chinese and French railways and Boeing aircraft etc... Its not cash that Iraqis can simply "withdraw" and pay for stuff with.
    avatar
    OminousSpudd
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 865
    Points : 884
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 21
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Post  OminousSpudd on Sun Nov 27, 2016 10:12 am

    KiloGolf wrote:
    sheytanelkebir wrote:yea. its purely about the money (or lack of) now. Iraq is pretty much "non aligned" as of today... so they host both NATO and US forces and commands... alongside Russian Advisors, Intel Sharing office and Iranian IRGC advisors... meanwhile there's a whole team of Chinese officers operating out of Kut Air Base... and a few miles down the road Koreans are building a new Airbase at Suwayra. The US has accepted  the "multi-polar" relations in Iraq, and its also a way of keeping communications channels open (the Russian/Iranian/Syrian/Iraqi intel office is only a couple of kilometers from the US Embassy!).

    But the issue with the Russian weapons orders that have been "put on hold" is purely based on Iraq's lack of credit worthiness from a Russian perspective. Whilst the Chinese and Americans are willing to throw a few billion here and there to further their interests. Thing is Russians do control a few oil fields in Iraq (not as many as the chinese of course)... so I would have thought they could come to an agreeable deal on credit for weapons... but sadly they haven't yet as far as we know Sad

    Lets see what happens in 2017... things can turn quickly.


    PS Zarib, Iraq didn't cancel any of those above mentioned items from the US (apaches, additional 175 abrams, 220 bradleys, 24 AT6C etc...). Iraq NEVER ordered them in the first place and only asked for an offer, for comparison with other offers... and for example the apache lost in competition against the Mi28Ne, the M1A1SA lost against the T90S, the M2A2 Bradley lost against the BMP-3 and as far as I know the AT-6C lost against the CH-4 UCAV.

    Go ahead and search... you won't find a single FMS contract for any of the above items only a DSCA offer.

    Nice one thanks. From the look of it USA and PRC are willing to loan more of their cash than Russian. Which is my point, they play the risky game but will end up with more returns if it all works out for them.
    I highly doubt the US will end up with anymore "returns" than they already have from Iraq... Extortion generally leaves a sour taste in a customer's mouth. China at a guess, is happy to practically give away gear, which is pretty standard practice especially if we look at their Africa Investment projects, but that's because they have the raw economic output to do so (and returns as mentioned should in theory balance out), the US may not be happy with this, but there's no way to freeze Iraq's ability to purchase if they're essentially being gifted hardware. Like Mike mentioned, the US actively attempted to derail Iraq-Russia deals multiple times, and not through good business practice.
    The US is no charity, and the advancement of ISIS was beneficial in a geopolitical sense for many (well documented) reasons, they were perfectly happy to bottleneck Iraq's ability to counter this "new" resurgent insurgency.

    So far the US has achieved one thing in Iraq, and I'm pretty sure they want to stick to that achievement: instability. The returns for this "investment" are that no independent Iraqi state goes selling oil in a different currency.

    avatar
    airstrike
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 131
    Points : 131
    Join date : 2016-07-13

    Re: Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Post  airstrike on Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:01 pm

    Iraq considering $2.5 billion arms deal with China

    http://defense-watch.com/2016/11/28/iraq-considering-2-5-billion-arms-contract-china/
    avatar
    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 10120
    Points : 10614
    Join date : 2011-12-23
    Location : Greece

    Re: Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 on Wed Mar 29, 2017 6:19 pm

    The Pentagon ordered a US defense company to produce 150 High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled (HMMW) vehicles for Iraqi forces.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — A US contractor received a more than $28 million Army foreign military sales contract to provide 150 High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled (HMMW) vehicles for the government of Iraq, the Department of Defense said in a press release.

    https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201703291052064268-us-army-iraq-humvee/


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    Sponsored content

    Re: Iraqi Armed Forces: Discussion and News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:51 pm