Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Share

    Stealthflanker
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 808
    Points : 894
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 28
    Location : Indonesia

    [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Stealthflanker on Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:14 am

    Hmm anyone complain about T-15's unusually long add-on armor "beak" ? It creates hull overhang which detrimental for obstacles climbing.

    Mike E
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2853
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Mike E on Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:24 am

    Stealthflanker wrote:Hmm anyone complain about T-15's unusually long add-on armor "beak" ? It creates hull overhang which detrimental for obstacles climbing.
    At the very least it seems to be sufficiently uplifted... We'll have to see trials to judge whether if it is a problem or not.

    cracker
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 232
    Points : 273
    Join date : 2014-09-04

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  cracker on Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:47 am

    poor asphalt Sad ...


    and, this view gives a new dimension to the turret, nice

    alexZam
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 351
    Points : 409
    Join date : 2015-04-23
    Location : SoCal

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  alexZam on Thu Apr 30, 2015 6:03 am

    Thanks to otvaga guys again!































    Cyberspec
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1946
    Points : 2117
    Join date : 2011-08-08
    Location : Terra Australis

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Cyberspec on Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:54 am

    alexZam wrote:Just gonna live this here.... Wink



    (с)Денис Давыдоv

    Now we're getting somewhere....thanks for sharing

    macedonian
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1086
    Points : 1121
    Join date : 2013-04-29
    Location : Skopje, Macedonia - Скопје, Македонија

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  macedonian on Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:47 am

    Two more pics from TASS HERE >>

    TACC wrote:New Armata tanks roll through Red Square in May 9 parade rehearsal

    Vympel
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 112
    Points : 118
    Join date : 2013-01-30

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Vympel on Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:59 am

    xeno wrote:
    TR1 wrote:http://topwar.ru/index.php?do=lastcomments&userid=60226

    Intersting info from Alex, overall a relatively reliable "insider":

    -152mm WILL be on the tank, but not right away. And it will be electrochemical, and has already been financed by the MOD.
    -Tanks are not final products, half of the ones already made will be sent to Kubinka to be flogged the other back to UVZ. This includes the T-15.
    -Protection.....make of this what you will, but I just translating what he said:
    -traditional  ERA has become outdated in terms of potential
    -instead they will use 'electro, plasma polymers, graphene" <--------anyone with a background should comment here.
    -APS will be very advanced, multi-shot, with automatic reloading.
    -Electrical transmission
    -Claims crew in the next 5-6 years will be cut down to 2- FOR SURE.
    -45mm has been chosen as firm replacement for 30mm- already has started testing with new rounds- YAY
    -Armata program so far has full funding, no sequester.

    Anyways yeah.
    The guy has generally been proven more right than GurKhan has in their big Armata debate....how much of the above will come to fruition I cannot say.

    Like a dream if were true...

    BTW, can you clarify "-Electrical transmission" does he mean Armata has it now or in the future?

    Like a dream? That depends. A lot of it sounds great. 2 man crew? No. Driving, fighting, and commanding the tank is too much work for two men.

    Stealthflanker
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 808
    Points : 894
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 28
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Stealthflanker on Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:01 am

    Vympel wrote:

    Like a dream? That depends. A lot of it sounds great. 2 man crew? No. Driving, fighting, and commanding the tank is too much work for two men.

    Computer or sort of smart scheme will take care of the fighting part. More serious consideration however is in the maintenance department, a whole new scheme must be devised to ensure that 2 man tank can still be maintained adequately without exhausting the crew.

    2 man tank scheme was already devised as early as 1980's. The main weaknesses observed was maintenance and the fact that computer at that time was not ready to fully replace the gunner.



    Dima
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1035
    Points : 1050
    Join date : 2012-03-22

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Dima on Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:20 am

    alexZam wrote:Just gonna live this here.... Wink



    (с)Денис Давыдоv
    Good one.
    The turret slowly revealing its shape. But I hope this tease continue till 9th may.

    Check the two long boxes on the edges....its a single piece unit. One is APU for sure, what could be the other one of same length be, another APU due to increased power consumption?

    KoTeMoRe
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3547
    Points : 3582
    Join date : 2015-04-21
    Location : Krankhaus Central.

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  KoTeMoRe on Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:00 am

    There is a suspicious cutaway of the tarp. ON the turret...like a bulkhead.

    Dima
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1035
    Points : 1050
    Join date : 2012-03-22

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Dima on Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:04 am

    Vann7 wrote:Well. for me it looks like Armata pretty much was designed by Amateurs ,with zero experience
    in aesthetics.. when it comes to visual look of the armored vehicles.. with the exception of
    boomeran and koalition..  T-15 and T-14.. if it was a contest of exterior design.. will get
    a score of 4 of 10.  that is not horrible but very amateurish.  Specially the T-15.. that you don't know whether the vehicle is finished or if it is missing parts. No
    I quite like the Armata MBT as far as looks go...but I like the looks of T-90M better, the welded turret...clean lines..  
    Designed by amateurs?  Dont think so, when talking about amaterurs designing tank....first thing that comes to mind is Leopard series. basically the engine installation. Germans are known for their automotive industry, but tanks need different solutions not a V-12 stuffed in the engine bay like your beemer or merc and on top of it two massive air filters. Its the worst of designs for a tank! That whole thing called as the power pack is the single factor that contributed to the design need of a 7th wheel and hence a longer hull and weight associated with that extra volume.

    there is also serious design issues in armata ..that pose a major danger to soldiers lives outside.. for example the barbeque grill protecting the air vents on the sides of T-14.. are too far from the tank, If the tank moves , while soldiers are very near the tank.. they will get impaled or dismembered an arm by the grill. if that is the final version of Armata t-14 then definitively is a really bad design..  and t-15 looks like they just slapped covers on the sides to make it look like weird plane.  i really don't understand what the were thinking with such
    protection placed that way.. covers only half .
    First thing to note is that when tank and soldiers are moving together the speed of tank is too low and the soldiers mainly take the rear end cover or side cover. So the chance of the grills dragging a soldier is negligible. Other case is of the tank in real motion in which soldiers wont be near to it and the chances of a soldier getting injured or killed by a tank hit is even greater.

    Anyway disappointed with the designers of Armata ,looks like their first tank .. or maybe the final version of the tank will be much different its design.. it doesn't look like anything we saw on the first page..models in plastic, that looked very modern and futuristic.

    T-14 looks totally different to the plastic models they had in display for generals.
    Something that really looked like a future tank..



    any case im sure the tank protection will be best in the world.. and this is what really matters
    in the end..
    Installation of additional ERA/NERA will change the looks and the front might look closer to that model. Consider the plain T-72 to that of UVZ upgrade and you will see the difference on the glacis.



    Dima
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1035
    Points : 1050
    Join date : 2012-03-22

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Dima on Thu Apr 30, 2015 11:17 am

    Werewolf wrote:
    thumbsup

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15440
    Points : 16147
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  GarryB on Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:45 pm

    Like a dream? That depends. A lot of it sounds great. 2 man crew? No. Driving, fighting, and commanding the tank is too much work for two men.

    Normally I would agree... but with an autotracker and an autoloader and therefore just needing to place the aim point on the target and fire the gun the gunners job is largely automated and could be performed by the fire control system while the driver drives and the commander continues to search for targets....



    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5390
    Points : 5639
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:54 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Like a dream? That depends. A lot of it sounds great. 2 man crew? No. Driving, fighting, and commanding the tank is too much work for two men.

    Normally I would agree... but with an autotracker and an autoloader and therefore just needing to place the aim point on the target and fire the gun the gunners job is largely automated and could be performed by the fire control system while the driver drives and the commander continues to search for targets....


    We have seen T-90MS driving with Okhotnik an image processing system that can autotrack and autolockon, if the Armata further got its upgrades with a better working Okhotnik a broad angle TIS so the system can automatically search and track for targets like an IRST or like Shkval did that would already do most of the job. To ease up the workload and to give even basic equipment to even enable a 2 man crew, it would need at least a radar or better Radar and the Anti Sniper Device of russians to detect Optical devices from vehicles, spotters, ATGM teams and co that would give the least amount of necessary equipment to simplify the workload on Commander/Gunner and give him enough space to plan, communicate with other forces (aviation,artillery or infantry) and that certainly would reflect much better on morality. Sitting in a 2 man tank and being the commander must be shitload of workload, taking responsibility alone for all actions, while driver is relying only on you without a 2nd or 3rd crew member to boost his morality.

    Repairs on vehicle with only two is probably also a burden in the field when you have to fix snapped gears or lift heavy equipment or even basic reloading of the tank, one stay in the tank turret for reloading the other is running like a madman carrying around heavy huge rounds.

    PapaDragon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3663
    Points : 3775
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  PapaDragon on Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:23 pm

    Dima wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:
    thumbsup

    From this angle turret definitely looks like that scale model on the table... Cool

    Strizh
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 135
    Points : 136
    Join date : 2014-05-06

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Strizh on Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:24 pm



    Neutral Does it looks like that there is a hatch on top of the turret and the turret is not unmanned?

    Morpheus Eberhardt
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1967
    Points : 2092
    Join date : 2013-05-20

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt on Thu Apr 30, 2015 2:28 pm

    Strizh wrote:

    Neutral  Does it looks like that there is a hatch on top of the turret and the turret is not unmanned?

    Even for an unmanned turret you most probably have to have service hatches and ammunition replenishment hatches.

    Also the hatch is right behind the gun, not a suitable location for human presence, ingress, or egress.

    Big_Gazza
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 506
    Points : 530
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Big_Gazza on Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:19 pm

    Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:
    Strizh wrote:

    Neutral  Does it looks like that there is a hatch on top of the turret and the turret is not unmanned?

    Even for an unmanned turret you most probably have to have service hatches and ammunition replenishment hatches.

    Also the hatch is right behind the gun, not a suitable location for human presence, ingress, or egress.

    What makes you think its a hatch? Because it looks like one? Well, I think that is exactly the purpose of dis-info campaigns - to mislead the adversaries analysts....

    Big_Gazza
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 506
    Points : 530
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Big_Gazza on Thu Apr 30, 2015 3:22 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    Dima wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:
    thumbsup

    From this angle turret definitely looks like that scale model on the table... Cool  

    Bingo. That turret has a MUCH lower aspect than the other vehicles on the practice yards. Clear evidence that the shape beneath the tarpaulin is not an accurate indicator of the actual turret shape.

    medo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3051
    Points : 3149
    Join date : 2010-10-24
    Location : Slovenia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  medo on Thu Apr 30, 2015 5:26 pm

    Strizh wrote:

    Neutral  Does it looks like that there is a hatch on top of the turret and the turret is not unmanned?

    Most probably a door for ammo reloading and repairs.

    alexZam
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 351
    Points : 409
    Join date : 2015-04-23
    Location : SoCal

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  alexZam on Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:33 pm

    KoTeMoRe wrote:There is a suspicious cutaway of the tarp. ON the turret...like a bulkhead.

    That one is easy: it's just an access door to the turret's internal mechanism. For service and maintenance purposes. IMHO. afro

    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5840
    Points : 5892
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  TR1 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 8:33 pm

    The word on Russian forums has been that the MOD would not compromise on a requirement that the turret needed to be able to be accessed by the crew for field repairs and such.

    Past that, wait and see, no-one knows for sure.

    Stealthflanker
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 808
    Points : 894
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 28
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Stealthflanker on Thu Apr 30, 2015 9:11 pm

    The image of Armata being transported by that KAMAZ 65525 was really helpful. put it in to corel draw and make some "measurement" based on it. So..

    The total length of Armata is around 9.5-10 meter, Hull length is 8 m, width is 3 m without ballistic skirt and 3.45m with ballistic skirt, total height is 2.9-3 m, roadwheel diameter is indeed the same 670mm as T-80. Turret length is 4 meter with 2.72 m wide though may not be accurate since it's still under tarps.

    Looks reasonable enough for me. but i would love to see better estimate.

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3221
    Points : 3345
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Vann7 on Thu Apr 30, 2015 9:49 pm





    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5390
    Points : 5639
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Apr 30, 2015 10:41 pm



    What are those two closed circle like fittings on the back side?

    Sponsored content

    Re: [Official] Armata Discussion thread #3

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 7:47 am


      Current date/time is Sat Dec 03, 2016 7:47 am