Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Share

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:45 pm


    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:44 pm



    Somalia, i think this is picture of the year.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Werewolf on Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:51 pm

    Some years ago i saw some video on youtube by some alledged Canadian afghanistan "VETERAN" who held an AK in some of his videos to show how to shoot the same way, almost like a RPG.


    Veterans the most overused word on the internet from this kind of armschairgenerals with frontpacks.

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4468
    Points : 4659
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:54 pm

    Militarov wrote:

    Somalia, i think this is picture of the year.

    Still doesn't top this...




    ...See the problem here lol?

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Werewolf on Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:36 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    Militarov wrote:

    Somalia, i think this is picture of the year.

    Still doesn't top this...




    ...See the problem here lol?

    Yes, that one is fake. The RPG warhead has no detonator cap.

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:10 pm



    Some my montage from few years ago


    Last edited by Militarov on Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:54 pm; edited 1 time in total

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9457
    Points : 9949
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  George1 on Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:35 pm

    Werewolf wrote:

    Yes, that one is fake. The RPG warhead has no detonator cap.

    and also would be great stupidity to fire an RPG near yourself Cool


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9457
    Points : 9949
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  George1 on Thu Mar 31, 2016 11:37 pm

    DEFEXPO India – 2016 images

    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1821869.html


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:54 pm


    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:30 pm



    Ukrainians showing new body armor Smile

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:33 pm



    Bulgarian Su-25

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Werewolf on Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:38 pm

    Militarov wrote:

    Ukrainians showing new body armor Smile

    What is so special about it?

    New armor, tested with a pistol of a probably fascist guy looking at the current ukrop jewish controlled clown state and their volunteers.

    Shot with an AK-47 at least or its worth nothing.

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Mon Apr 11, 2016 9:46 pm

    Werewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:

    Ukrainians showing new body armor Smile

    What is so special about it?

    New armor, tested with a pistol of a probably fascist guy looking at the current ukrop jewish controlled clown state and their volunteers.

    Shot with an AK-47 at least or its worth nothing.

    Well its more than unusual way of testing body armor Smile

    Also i am suspicious about the bullets, its probably copper jacket.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Werewolf on Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:09 pm

    Militarov wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:

    Ukrainians showing new body armor Smile

    What is so special about it?

    New armor, tested with a pistol of a probably fascist guy looking at the current ukrop jewish controlled clown state and their volunteers.

    Shot with an AK-47 at least or its worth nothing.

    Well its more than unusual way of testing body armor Smile

    Also i am suspicious about the bullets, its probably copper jacket.

    It is not, that is traditional testing of body armor and armor overall.



    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Mon Apr 11, 2016 10:16 pm

    Werewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:
    Militarov wrote:

    Ukrainians showing new body armor Smile

    What is so special about it?

    New armor, tested with a pistol of a probably fascist guy looking at the current ukrop jewish controlled clown state and their volunteers.

    Shot with an AK-47 at least or its worth nothing.

    Well its more than unusual way of testing body armor Smile

    Also i am suspicious about the bullets, its probably copper jacket.

    It is not, that is traditional testing of body armor and armor overall.



    I would not dare calling it "traiditional", Alex Armor factory where that i visited use jelly blocks for quality testing of materials delivered (micro Dynema instead of kevlar). And i highly doubt any other factory anywhere would use an actual man to test their body armor.

    However you can always find videos of people doing something stupid.


    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Werewolf on Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:11 pm

    That is fake video, but anyways that is indeed traditional testing, because noone believed or trusted WINDOWS to be bulletproof aswell body armor was tested that way. A producer that is not willing to test it with live fire is not trusted back then and that is a good thing. If you are afraid of testing your lifesavers with own tests why should anyone believe in your product?

    Ballistic Jelly is also very bad for testing anything. It does not have consistence of human tissue, the only thing it has is the average resilience of human tissue, not molelucalr structure, not the strips of muscles that would also affect the wounding channels of projectiles aswell no bones are used.

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Mon Apr 11, 2016 11:33 pm

    Werewolf wrote:That is fake video, but anyways that is indeed traditional testing, because noone believed or trusted WINDOWS to be bulletproof aswell body armor was tested that way. A producer that is not willing to test it with live fire is not trusted back then and that is a good thing. If you are afraid of testing your lifesavers with own tests why should anyone believe in your product?

    Ballistic Jelly is also very bad for testing anything. It does not have consistence of human tissue, the only thing it has is the average resilience of human tissue, not molelucalr structure, not the strips of muscles that would also affect the wounding channels of projectiles aswell no bones are used.

    You have occasional guys doing it to prove a point or to show how great and brave they are, or to promote their products. But it has nothing to do with an actual quality control or testing.

    You do not test car crash worthiness with humans inside the car. Also in half of those videos they use pistol 9mm PARA full copper jacket, which shouldnt penetrate even frying pan, its just silly commercial stunt. Also in most of the cases they use class III+ west which should protect aganist .223 and even .308 Winchester.

    Actually jelly these guys used were made on Patology department on Military Medical Institute, they have torso shape and have an actual bone structure including major internal organs so they can inspect soft tissue trauma. It completely replicates human torso trauma except hematoma naturally.

    http://www.aleksarmor.com/naslovna.html This is the company btw, i have their undercoat lvl IIIA jacket

    NationalRus
    Senior Lieutenant
    Senior Lieutenant

    Posts : 637
    Points : 650
    Join date : 2010-04-11

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  NationalRus on Tue Apr 12, 2016 12:55 am



    epic video

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9457
    Points : 9949
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  George1 on Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:49 am

    Su-25K of Bulgarian Air Force (tail number "246") is flying in tandem with attack aircraft Fairchild-Republic A-10C Thunderbolt II from the 74th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron 23th Air Force wing in the deployment on the latest Bulgarian airport Plovdiv, February 2016.



    http://bmpd.livejournal.com/1859967.html


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    Elbows
    Private
    Private

    Posts : 12
    Points : 12
    Join date : 2016-03-13

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Elbows on Wed Apr 20, 2016 2:58 am

    Talk about two old reliable workhorses. Both of which don't seem to have a solid replacement in the pipeline.

    OminousSpudd
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 817
    Points : 836
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 21
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  OminousSpudd on Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:04 am

    Elbows wrote:Talk about two old reliable workhorses.  Both of which don't seem to have a solid replacement in the pipeline.

    Best "replacement" for the Su-25 is the Su-25SM3 in my humble opinion. Very Happy

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:32 am

    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Elbows wrote:Talk about two old reliable workhorses.  Both of which don't seem to have a solid replacement in the pipeline.

    Best "replacement" for the Su-25 is the Su-25SM3 in my humble opinion. Very Happy

    That is just a stopgap. Also it seems real CAS aircraft are to disappear and their missions to be splitted among frontline bombers, multirole fighters and UCAVs in future.

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4468
    Points : 4659
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:04 pm

    Militarov wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Elbows wrote:Talk about two old reliable workhorses.  Both of which don't seem to have a solid replacement in the pipeline.

    Best "replacement" for the Su-25 is the Su-25SM3 in my humble opinion. Very Happy

    That is just a stopgap. Also it seems real CAS aircraft are to disappear and their missions to be splitted among frontline bombers, multirole fighters and UCAVs in future.

    I don't know what your talking about, it maybe true for the West, but Russia is financing the Pak-Sha program as a direct replacement for Su-25.

    Militarov
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4883
    Points : 4930
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Militarov on Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:15 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    Militarov wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Elbows wrote:Talk about two old reliable workhorses.  Both of which don't seem to have a solid replacement in the pipeline.

    Best "replacement" for the Su-25 is the Su-25SM3 in my humble opinion. Very Happy

    That is just a stopgap. Also it seems real CAS aircraft are to disappear and their missions to be splitted among frontline bombers, multirole fighters and UCAVs in future.

    I don't know what your talking about, it maybe true for the West, but Russia is financing the Pak-Sha program as a direct replacement for Su-25.

    That project is far from being financed, its just proposed. And there has been no new real CAS aircraft developed for decades now.

    Last real CAS aircrafts were Jugoslavian J-22 Orao and Italian-Brasilian AMX. For CAS aircraft they today mostly use just modified advanced trainers and turboprops and i dont think many pure CAS aircraft will appear.

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4468
    Points : 4659
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Apr 20, 2016 6:25 pm

    Militarov wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    Militarov wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Elbows wrote:Talk about two old reliable workhorses.  Both of which don't seem to have a solid replacement in the pipeline.

    Best "replacement" for the Su-25 is the Su-25SM3 in my humble opinion. Very Happy

    That is just a stopgap. Also it seems real CAS aircraft are to disappear and their missions to be splitted among frontline bombers, multirole fighters and UCAVs in future.

    I don't know what your talking about, it maybe true for the West, but Russia is financing the Pak-Sha program as a direct replacement for Su-25.

    That project is far from being financed, its just proposed. And there has been no new real CAS aircraft developed for decades now.

    Last real CAS aircrafts were Jugoslavian J-22 Orao and Italian-Brasilian AMX. For CAS aircraft they today mostly use just modified advanced trainers and turboprops and i dont think many pure CAS aircraft will appear.

    Preliminary design stages doesn't mean it's not being financed (aerospace engineers don't work for free), which will take some due to the fact that it'll be heavily IR-opaque/stealth design.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Non-Russian Μilitary multimedia and Discussion thread:

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 3:09 am


      Current date/time is Sun Dec 11, 2016 3:09 am