Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Godric
    Godric

    Posts : 561
    Points : 581
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Space X Falcon 9 goes boom

    Post  Godric on Sun Jun 28, 2015 7:52 pm

    I feel dirty using this site as a source here goes

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-33305083

    Unmanned SpaceX rocket explodes after Florida launch

    An unmanned American Falcon-9 rocket has broken apart in flames minutes after lifting off from Cape Canaveral in Florida.

    Debris from the SpaceX vehicle tumbled out of the sky into the Atlantic Ocean.

    The rocket, which had 18 straight successes prior to Sunday's flight, was in the process of sending a cargo ship to the International Space Station.

    As well as carrying supplies for the astronauts, the Falcon had also been transporting a new docking port.

    "The vehicle has broken up," said Nasa commentator George Diller, as TV images showed the white rocket falling to pieces.


    "We appear to have had a launch vehicle failure," he added.

    "At this point it is not clear to the launch team exactly what happened."

    The failure occurred 139 seconds into the flight.

    A SpaceX commentator reportedly suggested the vehicle had been able to to reach supersonic speed, but something had happened before the cargo ship was able to detach from the first stage of the rocket and reach orbit.

    thankfully it was unmanned and no one injured .... just goes to show how far behind the US has fallen in the space industry
    avatar
    whir

    Posts : 827
    Points : 866
    Join date : 2015-04-27

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  whir on Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:45 pm

    Godric wrote:just goes to show how far behind the US has fallen in the space industry
    It just shows that "private" enterprises face the same challenges as government agencies.
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 4536
    Points : 4651
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  kvs on Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:09 pm

    whir wrote:
    Godric wrote:just goes to show how far behind the US has fallen in the space industry
    It just shows that "private" enterprises face the same challenges as government agencies.

    I hope all the fanboi masturbation about the private companies teaching Russia a lesson in how to do it right
    splatters back in their faces.

    Some showman like Musk cannot equate to hundreds of engineers and decades of experience. He should stick
    to making overpriced electric cars.
    max steel
    max steel

    Posts : 2939
    Points : 2964
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  max steel on Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:22 pm

    Reusable rockets are just like reusable condoms – they blow-up at the worst possible moment. Cool


    Don't make new threads , we're discussing it here : http://www.russiadefence.net/t3877p30-nasa-launch-vehicles-and-spacecraft-discussion-news
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8158
    Points : 8244
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  PapaDragon on Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:06 pm

    Strange, nobody in the west is celebrating. I remember when Progress went haywire everyone was jumping with joy... dunno

    What changed?
    Mike E
    Mike E

    Posts : 2646
    Points : 2684
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Mike E on Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:35 pm

    Too late to change it... I say this thread stays cause that title is hilarious "goes boom". 

    AFAIK it was a problem with detaching the first stage, and when the second stage ignited it "went boom".
    flamming_python
    flamming_python

    Posts : 3505
    Points : 3589
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  flamming_python on Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:03 am

    Nothing to laugh about really, don't be like the idiots who laughed when the Russian Proton rocket failed; not the sort of bottom-feeders that are worth emulating.
    Thankfully no-one was hurt.

    I do admit to just a little satisfaction though, over the smugness of the people who were so confidently proclaiming the death of Russia's Space industry over its recent failures.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 8158
    Points : 8244
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  PapaDragon on Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:01 am


    Well, will you look at that, not so smug anymore, are we?

    If only arrogance could be used as propellant, NASA would have warp-drive by now... lol1
    Mike E
    Mike E

    Posts : 2646
    Points : 2684
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Mike E on Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:42 am

    flamming_python wrote:Nothing to laugh about really, don't be like the idiots who laughed when the Russian Proton rocket failed; not the sort of bottom-feeders that are worth emulating.
    Thankfully no-one was hurt.

    I do admit to just a little satisfaction though, over the smugness of the people who were so confidently proclaiming the death of Russia's Space industry over its recent failures.
    This x1000 

    Those that were trashed Roscosmos (and Russia has a whole) for the Proton failures are not making a word about this. 

    It is odd that this problem came up in the first place... It *actually* was some kind of failure in the upper-stage LOX tank, which is very uncommon. Makes me wonder if they will issue an updated design, or if this was simply a lone case.
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 4536
    Points : 4651
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  kvs on Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:54 am

    There has not been a single post in this thread laughing over this failure.

    The point, if it is not clear enough, is that chest thumping chauvinism from America about its genetic superiority
    is grotesque, obscene and should get zero tolerance from sane people. American magical thinking is indeed
    something to be laughed at and ridiculed.
    Godric
    Godric

    Posts : 561
    Points : 581
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Godric on Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:53 pm

    Mike E wrote:Too late to change it... I say this thread stays cause that title is hilarious "goes boom". 

    AFAIK it was a problem with detaching the first stage, and when the second stage ignited it "went boom".

    Mike I did a search of the forums for Space X and never seen any threads ... sorry for starting another
    avatar
    Prince Darling

    Posts : 77
    Points : 82
    Join date : 2015-05-31

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Prince Darling on Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:26 pm

    i will say only this

    "couldn't have happened to a bigger asshole"

    Godric
    Godric

    Posts : 561
    Points : 581
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Godric on Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:31 pm

    the thing that gets to me in this whole saga is message boards like the old MP.net and the mess is the arrogance from the Nato types and Americans that brag about their so called "superior" technology over Russian and Chinese Tech and look down their noses at Russia and China yet Russia is ahead of the USA in space technology, Tanks, anti tank, air defense, electronic warfare, APC's/IFVs, Submarines, and I would say the Su-35/30 are superior aircraft to their nato 4th generation aircraft and in the Su-50 the Russians have a match for the USA F-22 ... and the Americans complained about Russian Comms going black just before Crimea and how they could no longer listen into the Russian armed forces
    Godric
    Godric

    Posts : 561
    Points : 581
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Godric on Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:34 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:Strange, nobody in the west is celebrating. I remember when Progress went haywire everyone was jumping with joy... dunno

    What changed?

    because they are hypocrites my friend they just love to see Russia fail
    max steel
    max steel

    Posts : 2939
    Points : 2964
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  max steel on Mon Jun 29, 2015 10:49 pm

    Russian Ship to Supply International Space Station After Space X Explosion x)


    The Russian Ressuply ship will deliver more than three tons of food and fuel to the crew of ISS on Friday, a US National Aeronautics and Space Administration official blogger Mark Garcia acknowledged on Monday.

    The International Space Station crew will be spared any risk of hardship because a regular Russian Progress supply mission will be launched to them on Friday, according to Garcia's blog.

    “ Russian resupply ship is getting ready for its launch Friday at 12:55 am EDT (5:55 p.m. GMT)” Garcia wrote on his NASA blog. “The ISS Progress 60 will deliver more than three tons of food, fuel and supplies to the crew and dock to the Pirs docking compartment after a two-day ride.”



    http://sputniknews.com/science/20150629/1024003769.html#ixzz3eUCfDYlS
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21441
    Points : 21991
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jul 01, 2015 4:50 am

    I was going to merge this thread with the other thread on NASA spacecraft, but on reading the posts it seems to be more about the different attitudes of US strong between the current US failure and their reactions and attitudes to previous Russian failures, so I will leave things as they are.

    Please, however, keep it sensible.... Russian achievements don't need defending, but are in no way improved by berating the achievements or failures of others.

    Space is hard.
    Book.
    Book.

    Posts : 696
    Points : 755
    Join date : 2015-05-08
    Location : Oregon, USA

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Book. on Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:19 am

    Prince Darling wrote:i will say only this

    "couldn't have happened to a bigger asshole"


    I agree. Mcain talk lot

    today feel salt !
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13418
    Points : 13905
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:01 pm

    NASA Wants to Send Microbes to Mars Prep Red Planet for Human Habitation

    As NASA considers the possibility of a manned mission to Mars, it may first send another lifeform: microscopic bacteria which could biologically engineer the planet’s ecosystem, making it more habitable.

    Terraforming has long been a staple of science fiction. Literally meaning "Earth-shaping," the theoretical process involves artificially altering a planet’s atmosphere and climate to be more accommodating for human life.

    The question has always been: How? Do you bombard the stratosphere with particles which would help trap or release greenhouse gases? A similar proposal was made to solve global warming on Earth. Or do you somehow dump an ocean’s worth of water onto the surface and hope it sticks?

    For NASA, the answer could be cyanobacteria.

    The agency has begun funding research to send "ecosystem-building, pioneer organisms" to Mars. If all goes according to plan, the microorganisms could be used to make living a bit easier on any future astronauts landing on the Red Planet.

    Stored inside small canisters, the bacteria could be planted in the Martian soil by a robot like the Curiosity rover. Interactions between the bacteria and the arid clay would then produce oxygen. Slowly, but surely, a habitable atmosphere would begin to develop.

    "This is a possible way to support a human mission to Mars, producing oxygen without having to send heavy gas canisters," project head Eugene Boland said in a statement. "Let’s send microbes and let them do the heavy lifting for us."

    To terraform the entire planet in this way would take centuries, at best. But to speed up the process, the project would also incorporate large biodomes on the surface. With the bacteria producing oxygen in the land beneath, the biodome would trap in the gases, establishing an isolated, contained ecosystem in a fraction of the time.

    The NASA team hopes to also use the concept to provide water. If pockets of water ice can be found beneath the surface, organisms could be utilized to unlock the water’s potential.

    "I’m a biologist and an engineer. So I want to put those two things together to make a useful tool," Boland said.

    At this time, the project remains in the early test phase, with scientists experimenting with various microbes inside a small container known as the "Mars room," which mimics the planet’s conditions. Depending on how successful the team’s work proves, microscopic travelers could be the first Earthlings to see a Martian sunrise.

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/science/20150702/1024106769.html#ixzz3ejM3YWgA
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 21441
    Points : 21991
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  GarryB on Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:56 pm

    Except those bacteria that process the CO2 in the Martian atmosphere and convert it to O2 will dramatically reduce the air temperature and kill themselves when they in effect reverse the effects of the greenhouse effect...

    I suspect it would be more productive to closely examine the atmosphere of Venus and look at how the sulphuric acid could be neutralised and water vapour in the atmosphere be turned back into liquid to lower the air pressure and reduce the temperatures to a more acceptable range...
    Walther von Oldenburg
    Walther von Oldenburg

    Posts : 1100
    Points : 1165
    Join date : 2015-01-23
    Age : 28
    Location : Oldenburg

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Walther von Oldenburg on Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:54 pm

    With current technology any form of terraforming is unfeasible. On Mars you have to create a proper magnetosphere first - basically brining an object of the size of Ceres to martian orbit... good luck.
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13418
    Points : 13905
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Mon Jul 06, 2015 12:13 am

    NASA’s New Horizons Spacecraft to Pluto Experiences Anomaly
    flamming_python
    flamming_python

    Posts : 3505
    Points : 3589
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  flamming_python on Mon Jul 06, 2015 1:37 am

    George1 wrote:NASA’s New Horizons Spacecraft to Pluto Experiences Anomaly

    Spooky
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13418
    Points : 13905
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Tue Jul 14, 2015 5:22 am

    NASA's New Horizons Closes in on Pluto

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 1024436761
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13418
    Points : 13905
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Tue Jul 14, 2015 4:06 pm

    Never Get Lost on Mars Again With NASA's New Red Planet Map
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 13418
    Points : 13905
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Fri Jul 31, 2015 2:58 am

    NASA Scared of Traffic Jams Around Mars

    With a growing number of spacecraft orbiting the Red Planet, NASA is beginning to worry about celestial collisions. To avoid satellite fender benders, the agency is looking to boost its Deep Space Network traffic monitoring system.

    If 2013’s "Gravity" taught us anything, it’s that there’s little room for error in space. One defunct satellite bumps into your space shuttle, and suddenly you’ve got a chain reaction which pretty much brings down every space station every launched into orbit.

    We almost lost Sandra Bullock.

    While it may be over 100 million miles away from Earth – and presumably immune to the traffic problems that plague Interstate 405 in Los Angeles – the space around Mars is also becoming surprisingly crowded. India launched its Mangalyaan probe last year, immediately followed by NASA’s Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) spacecraft. They’re now rocketing around Mars, often narrowly avoiding the Mars Odyssey, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), and Mars Express probes also in orbit.

    Not to mention Phobos and Deimos, the planet’s two moons. While their orbits are typically further out than that of the spacecraft, there are points of overlap.

    "Previously, collision avoidance was coordinated between the Odyssey and MRO navigation teams," Robert Shotwell, Mars Program chief engineer with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said in a statement.

    But the new spacecraft are complicating things.

    "There was less of a possibility of an issue. MAVEN’s highly elliptical orbit, crossing the altitudes of other orbits, changes the probability that someone will need to do a collision-avoidance maneuver," Shotwell said. "There’s still a low probability of needing a maneuver, but it’s something we need to manage."

    To accomplish that, the agency relies on Deep Space Network. With communications facilities in the US, Spain, and Australia, the system utilizes a global antenna network designed to assist interplanetary spaceflight.

    Using ultra-sensitive receivers, DSN can keep track of any vessel travelling over 10,000 miles from Earth. If any of those spacecraft appear to be getting too close to one another, an alert is sent to the remote pilot, who can then alter the flightpath.

    The system is already proving its worth. In January, an automated signal warned of a potential collision between MRO and MAVEN, which would pass within two miles of each other. Thankfully, avoidance maneuvers turned out to be unnecessary.

    Monitoring, of course, can only do so much. The Mars Global Surveyor, an old mapping satellite which went dark in 2006, is also being tracked by Deep Space Network. If it were to enter the flight path of one of the active probes, those could be steered away. But because NASA has lost communication with Surveyor, it could do little if that satellite was on a collision course with either of the two moons or a rogue asteroid.

    Over 19,000 large pieces of space junk are being tracked in orbit around Earth. If a similar buildup were to occur around Mars, it could add strain on the tracking system, and make future missions to the Red Planet exponentially more complicated.

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/science/20150731/1025234219.html#ixzz3hQT1Nm9s

    Sponsored content

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News - Page 4 Empty Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Aug 18, 2019 10:07 am