Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Share

    AirCargo
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 104
    Points : 108
    Join date : 2014-05-19
    Location : Seattle, WA. United States

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  AirCargo on Fri May 29, 2015 9:01 am

    NASA Orders First Ever Commercial Human Spaceflight Mission from Boeing

    http://www.universetoday.com/120523/nasa-orders-first-ever-commercial-human-spaceflight-mission-from-boeing/

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15482
    Points : 16189
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  GarryB on Fri May 29, 2015 1:39 pm

    Sorry... but that is pathetic... when you talk about the first "ever" commercial human spaceflight mission, you should actually be talking about the first time a human pays to go into space... and that has already happened... and it wasn't the Americans who did it...


    Butchering the English language should be frowned upon, but it seems to just be encouraged in the west...

    They couldn't just say the first commercial human space flight mission by an American company...

    Aholes are so full of themselves... I really have little time for NASA.  tongue


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    collegeboy16
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1207
    Points : 1234
    Join date : 2012-10-05
    Age : 20
    Location : Roanapur

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  collegeboy16 on Fri May 29, 2015 2:33 pm

    GarryB wrote:Sorry... but that is pathetic... when you talk about the first "ever" commercial human spaceflight mission, you should actually be talking about the first time a human pays to go into space... and that has already happened... and it wasn't the Americans who did it...


    Butchering the English language should be frowned upon, but it seems to just be encouraged in the west...

    They couldn't just say the first commercial human space flight mission by an American company...

    Aholes are so full of themselves... I really have little time for NASA.  tongue
    hey, these are the people who won the space race, show some respect! /sarc

    AirCargo
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 104
    Points : 108
    Join date : 2014-05-19
    Location : Seattle, WA. United States

    NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  AirCargo on Tue Jun 02, 2015 6:42 am

    Update: Vulcan Aerospace / Stratolaunch

    Largest aircraft to fly 2016 . . . . 80% of the aircraft is fabricated now . . . . about 40 percent assembled . . . . we should have final assembly done the end of this year.

    http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/update-vulcan-aerospace-stratolaunch/

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9451
    Points : 9943
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:54 am

    Launch of US Dragon Cargo Vessel to ISS Slated for Sunday - NASA


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9451
    Points : 9943
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Sun Jun 28, 2015 5:47 pm

    During today's launch attempt of a Falcon 9 rocket the rocket was seen to disintegrate during first stage flight, it is not known what caused this yet.



    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    Godric
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 392
    Points : 406
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    Space X Falcon 9 goes boom

    Post  Godric on Sun Jun 28, 2015 7:52 pm

    I feel dirty using this site as a source here goes

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-33305083

    Unmanned SpaceX rocket explodes after Florida launch

    An unmanned American Falcon-9 rocket has broken apart in flames minutes after lifting off from Cape Canaveral in Florida.

    Debris from the SpaceX vehicle tumbled out of the sky into the Atlantic Ocean.

    The rocket, which had 18 straight successes prior to Sunday's flight, was in the process of sending a cargo ship to the International Space Station.

    As well as carrying supplies for the astronauts, the Falcon had also been transporting a new docking port.

    "The vehicle has broken up," said Nasa commentator George Diller, as TV images showed the white rocket falling to pieces.


    "We appear to have had a launch vehicle failure," he added.

    "At this point it is not clear to the launch team exactly what happened."

    The failure occurred 139 seconds into the flight.

    A SpaceX commentator reportedly suggested the vehicle had been able to to reach supersonic speed, but something had happened before the cargo ship was able to detach from the first stage of the rocket and reach orbit.

    thankfully it was unmanned and no one injured .... just goes to show how far behind the US has fallen in the space industry

    whir
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 812
    Points : 851
    Join date : 2015-04-27

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  whir on Sun Jun 28, 2015 8:45 pm

    Godric wrote:just goes to show how far behind the US has fallen in the space industry
    It just shows that "private" enterprises face the same challenges as government agencies.

    kvs
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2533
    Points : 2666
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  kvs on Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:09 pm

    whir wrote:
    Godric wrote:just goes to show how far behind the US has fallen in the space industry
    It just shows that "private" enterprises face the same challenges as government agencies.

    I hope all the fanboi masturbation about the private companies teaching Russia a lesson in how to do it right
    splatters back in their faces.

    Some showman like Musk cannot equate to hundreds of engineers and decades of experience. He should stick
    to making overpriced electric cars.

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  max steel on Sun Jun 28, 2015 9:22 pm

    Reusable rockets are just like reusable condoms – they blow-up at the worst possible moment. Cool


    Don't make new threads , we're discussing it here : http://www.russiadefence.net/t3877p30-nasa-launch-vehicles-and-spacecraft-discussion-news

    PapaDragon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3682
    Points : 3794
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  PapaDragon on Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:06 pm

    Strange, nobody in the west is celebrating. I remember when Progress went haywire everyone was jumping with joy... dunno

    What changed?

    Mike E
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2853
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Mike E on Sun Jun 28, 2015 10:35 pm

    Too late to change it... I say this thread stays cause that title is hilarious "goes boom". 

    AFAIK it was a problem with detaching the first stage, and when the second stage ignited it "went boom".

    flamming_python
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3188
    Points : 3316
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  flamming_python on Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:03 am

    Nothing to laugh about really, don't be like the idiots who laughed when the Russian Proton rocket failed; not the sort of bottom-feeders that are worth emulating.
    Thankfully no-one was hurt.

    I do admit to just a little satisfaction though, over the smugness of the people who were so confidently proclaiming the death of Russia's Space industry over its recent failures.

    PapaDragon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3682
    Points : 3794
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  PapaDragon on Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:01 am


    Well, will you look at that, not so smug anymore, are we?

    If only arrogance could be used as propellant, NASA would have warp-drive by now... lol1

    Mike E
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2853
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Mike E on Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:42 am

    flamming_python wrote:Nothing to laugh about really, don't be like the idiots who laughed when the Russian Proton rocket failed; not the sort of bottom-feeders that are worth emulating.
    Thankfully no-one was hurt.

    I do admit to just a little satisfaction though, over the smugness of the people who were so confidently proclaiming the death of Russia's Space industry over its recent failures.
    This x1000 

    Those that were trashed Roscosmos (and Russia has a whole) for the Proton failures are not making a word about this. 

    It is odd that this problem came up in the first place... It *actually* was some kind of failure in the upper-stage LOX tank, which is very uncommon. Makes me wonder if they will issue an updated design, or if this was simply a lone case.

    kvs
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2533
    Points : 2666
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  kvs on Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:54 am

    There has not been a single post in this thread laughing over this failure.

    The point, if it is not clear enough, is that chest thumping chauvinism from America about its genetic superiority
    is grotesque, obscene and should get zero tolerance from sane people. American magical thinking is indeed
    something to be laughed at and ridiculed.

    Godric
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 392
    Points : 406
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Godric on Mon Jun 29, 2015 4:53 pm

    Mike E wrote:Too late to change it... I say this thread stays cause that title is hilarious "goes boom". 

    AFAIK it was a problem with detaching the first stage, and when the second stage ignited it "went boom".

    Mike I did a search of the forums for Space X and never seen any threads ... sorry for starting another

    Prince Darling
    Corporal
    Corporal

    Posts : 79
    Points : 84
    Join date : 2015-05-31

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Prince Darling on Mon Jun 29, 2015 5:26 pm

    i will say only this

    "couldn't have happened to a bigger asshole"


    Godric
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 392
    Points : 406
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Godric on Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:31 pm

    the thing that gets to me in this whole saga is message boards like the old MP.net and the mess is the arrogance from the Nato types and Americans that brag about their so called "superior" technology over Russian and Chinese Tech and look down their noses at Russia and China yet Russia is ahead of the USA in space technology, Tanks, anti tank, air defense, electronic warfare, APC's/IFVs, Submarines, and I would say the Su-35/30 are superior aircraft to their nato 4th generation aircraft and in the Su-50 the Russians have a match for the USA F-22 ... and the Americans complained about Russian Comms going black just before Crimea and how they could no longer listen into the Russian armed forces

    Godric
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 392
    Points : 406
    Join date : 2015-04-30
    Location : Alba (Scotland)

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Godric on Mon Jun 29, 2015 8:34 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:Strange, nobody in the west is celebrating. I remember when Progress went haywire everyone was jumping with joy... dunno

    What changed?

    because they are hypocrites my friend they just love to see Russia fail

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  max steel on Mon Jun 29, 2015 10:49 pm

    Russian Ship to Supply International Space Station After Space X Explosion x)


    The Russian Ressuply ship will deliver more than three tons of food and fuel to the crew of ISS on Friday, a US National Aeronautics and Space Administration official blogger Mark Garcia acknowledged on Monday.

    The International Space Station crew will be spared any risk of hardship because a regular Russian Progress supply mission will be launched to them on Friday, according to Garcia's blog.

    “ Russian resupply ship is getting ready for its launch Friday at 12:55 am EDT (5:55 p.m. GMT)” Garcia wrote on his NASA blog. “The ISS Progress 60 will deliver more than three tons of food, fuel and supplies to the crew and dock to the Pirs docking compartment after a two-day ride.”



    http://sputniknews.com/science/20150629/1024003769.html#ixzz3eUCfDYlS

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15482
    Points : 16189
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jul 01, 2015 4:50 am

    I was going to merge this thread with the other thread on NASA spacecraft, but on reading the posts it seems to be more about the different attitudes of US strong between the current US failure and their reactions and attitudes to previous Russian failures, so I will leave things as they are.

    Please, however, keep it sensible.... Russian achievements don't need defending, but are in no way improved by berating the achievements or failures of others.

    Space is hard.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Book.
    Senior Lieutenant
    Senior Lieutenant

    Posts : 667
    Points : 730
    Join date : 2015-05-08
    Location : Oregon, USA

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Book. on Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:19 am

    Prince Darling wrote:i will say only this

    "couldn't have happened to a bigger asshole"


    I agree. Mcain talk lot

    today feel salt !

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9451
    Points : 9943
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  George1 on Thu Jul 02, 2015 1:01 pm

    NASA Wants to Send Microbes to Mars Prep Red Planet for Human Habitation

    As NASA considers the possibility of a manned mission to Mars, it may first send another lifeform: microscopic bacteria which could biologically engineer the planet’s ecosystem, making it more habitable.

    Terraforming has long been a staple of science fiction. Literally meaning "Earth-shaping," the theoretical process involves artificially altering a planet’s atmosphere and climate to be more accommodating for human life.

    The question has always been: How? Do you bombard the stratosphere with particles which would help trap or release greenhouse gases? A similar proposal was made to solve global warming on Earth. Or do you somehow dump an ocean’s worth of water onto the surface and hope it sticks?

    For NASA, the answer could be cyanobacteria.

    The agency has begun funding research to send "ecosystem-building, pioneer organisms" to Mars. If all goes according to plan, the microorganisms could be used to make living a bit easier on any future astronauts landing on the Red Planet.

    Stored inside small canisters, the bacteria could be planted in the Martian soil by a robot like the Curiosity rover. Interactions between the bacteria and the arid clay would then produce oxygen. Slowly, but surely, a habitable atmosphere would begin to develop.

    "This is a possible way to support a human mission to Mars, producing oxygen without having to send heavy gas canisters," project head Eugene Boland said in a statement. "Let’s send microbes and let them do the heavy lifting for us."

    To terraform the entire planet in this way would take centuries, at best. But to speed up the process, the project would also incorporate large biodomes on the surface. With the bacteria producing oxygen in the land beneath, the biodome would trap in the gases, establishing an isolated, contained ecosystem in a fraction of the time.

    The NASA team hopes to also use the concept to provide water. If pockets of water ice can be found beneath the surface, organisms could be utilized to unlock the water’s potential.

    "I’m a biologist and an engineer. So I want to put those two things together to make a useful tool," Boland said.

    At this time, the project remains in the early test phase, with scientists experimenting with various microbes inside a small container known as the "Mars room," which mimics the planet’s conditions. Depending on how successful the team’s work proves, microscopic travelers could be the first Earthlings to see a Martian sunrise.

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/science/20150702/1024106769.html#ixzz3ejM3YWgA


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov


    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15482
    Points : 16189
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  GarryB on Fri Jul 03, 2015 12:56 pm

    Except those bacteria that process the CO2 in the Martian atmosphere and convert it to O2 will dramatically reduce the air temperature and kill themselves when they in effect reverse the effects of the greenhouse effect...

    I suspect it would be more productive to closely examine the atmosphere of Venus and look at how the sulphuric acid could be neutralised and water vapour in the atmosphere be turned back into liquid to lower the air pressure and reduce the temperatures to a more acceptable range...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Sponsored content

    Re: NASA Launch Vehicles and Spacecraft: Discussion & News

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 8:21 pm


      Current date/time is Fri Dec 09, 2016 8:21 pm