Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Share

    nemrod
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 806
    Points : 1309
    Join date : 2012-09-11

    Will US Air Force hire russian pilots ?

    Post  nemrod on Fri Feb 13, 2015 3:05 pm


    http://www.migflug.com/jetflights/united-states-air-force-looking-to-turn-on-to-supersonic-mercenaries.html

    andalusia
    Corporal
    Corporal

    Posts : 84
    Points : 128
    Join date : 2013-10-01

    US Air Force Shrinking?

    Post  andalusia on Sat Feb 28, 2015 11:52 pm

    http://news.yahoo.com/stressed-shrinking-air-force-needs-more-funding-u-202313912--business.html

    Mike E
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2789
    Points : 2853
    Join date : 2014-06-19
    Location : Bay Area, CA

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Mike E on Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:31 am

    andalusia wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/stressed-shrinking-air-force-needs-more-funding-u-202313912--business.html
    It's been shrinking for a while now. 

    With the transition to "5th-gen fighters" it will shrink to a smaller force of "more capable aircraft".

    nemrod
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 806
    Points : 1309
    Join date : 2012-09-11

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  nemrod on Sun Mar 01, 2015 12:15 pm

    andalusia wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/stressed-shrinking-air-force-needs-more-funding-u-202313912--business.html

    It is the consequence of economic depression. US air force, and US Navy will shrink more in the comming years, as it was the case during the collapse of the Soviet Union.

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4468
    Points : 4659
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:52 pm

    Mike E wrote:
    andalusia wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/stressed-shrinking-air-force-needs-more-funding-u-202313912--business.html
    It's been shrinking for a while now. 

    With the transition to "5th-gen fighters" it will shrink to a smaller force of "more capable aircraft".

    You haven't seen shrinking yet, the U.S. aerospace industry is heavily reliant on Russian titanium, Boeing which is the 2nd largest defense contractor in the world for example is dependent on Russia for 40% of its titanium, so a titanium embargo would wreck untold havoc on the U.S. aerospace industry. It wouldn't stop the U.S. aerospace industry from obtaining titanium, but it would drive up prices for aircraft to astronomical levels.

    victor1985
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 852
    Points : 901
    Join date : 2015-01-02

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  victor1985 on Sun Mar 01, 2015 3:20 pm

    Who cares about them?as long as s400 radar range is 1000km and theyr f22 aesa is just 150. By the way when tracking enemy radar waves emited the doppler efect can be use?

    nemrod
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 806
    Points : 1309
    Join date : 2012-09-11

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  nemrod on Sun Mar 01, 2015 4:30 pm

    victor1985 wrote:....f-22 aesa is just 150....
    Stay away from this tale. In a war, the F-22 could not survive against Mig-35, or SU-35. If Iran now could access to 100 or 150 SU-35, never US or anyone could attack this country. If Venezuela could build up 90 Mig-35, or SU-35 US won't be able to attack them. If Syria could access at least 100 Mig-35 neither F-22, or F-35, F-15, F-18 could threat this country. The F-22 is a mere tale done in order we were feared.

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Guided Missiles

    Post  max steel on Thu Mar 05, 2015 10:53 pm

    What are your views on following usa new missiles and how russia will counter them   :-

    a) MALD b) JSOW c) HARM Shocked

    sepheronx
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 7302
    Points : 7612
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 27
    Location : Canada

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  sepheronx on Thu Mar 05, 2015 11:00 pm

    max steel wrote: What are your views on following usa new missiles and how russia will counter them   :-

    a) MALD b) JSOW c) HARM Shocked

    They are guided munitions, no different than amy other. Air defense systems like Tor, Buk and such would counter that if detected. No different.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15458
    Points : 16165
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB on Fri Mar 06, 2015 2:43 am

    TOR, BUK, Pantsir-S1, and even Verba and Igla-S can engage those weapons, and the next generation missiles will be even more efficient at taking out such weapons in much larger volumes, like S-350 and S-400.

    The latter two systems will also take out the launch platforms before they can launch.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel on Fri Mar 06, 2015 1:57 pm

    sepheronx wrote:
    max steel wrote: What are your views on following usa new missiles and how russia will counter them   :-

    a) MALD b) JSOW c) HARM Shocked

    They are guided munitions, no different than amy other. Air defense systems like Tor, Buk and such would counter that if detected. No different.



    Are they hard to detect ?


    Focusing on usa battleships . They use SM-6 sam which are guided by awacs . SM-6 can destroy any incoming missile at any height . Is there any way to defeat it ?

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15458
    Points : 16165
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB on Sat Mar 07, 2015 12:33 am

    Focusing on usa battleships . They use SM-6 sam which are guided by awacs . SM-6 can destroy any incoming missile at any height . Is there any way to defeat it ?

    There is no one thing you can do to defeat a modern system, but generally a combination of: Jam them, shoot down the AWACS aircraft and launch multiple very fast missiles against the vessel carrying the SAMs and of course a good modern SSN should work wonders where even an old french design has been shown to be useful... ie

    http://sputniknews.com/news/20150306/1019130173.html


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel on Sat Mar 07, 2015 5:51 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Focusing on usa battleships . They use SM-6 sam which are guided by awacs . SM-6 can destroy any incoming missile at any height . Is there any way to defeat it ?

    There is no one thing you can do to defeat a modern system, but generally a combination of: Jam them, shoot down the AWACS aircraft and launch multiple very fast missiles against the vessel carrying the SAMs and of course a good modern SSN should work wonders where even an old french design has been shown to be useful... ie

    http://sputniknews.com/news/20150306/1019130173.html


    yeah i shared the same link in other post . Very Happy Believing you are safe is more important than actually being safe... in America pwnd ..explains the ABM systems in Europe too BTW.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15458
    Points : 16165
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  GarryB on Wed Mar 11, 2015 2:48 am

    Believing you are safe is more important than actually being safe... in America pwnd ..explains the ABM systems in Europe too BTW.

    The appearance of seeming to do something makes you seem strong to the voters... and in the US appearance is everything.

    It doesn't matter if ignorance makes them much less safe because by thinking they are much safer than they are they will take risks and be more aggressive than they would be if they knew how vulnerable they actually were...

    Regarding the Chinese missile vs US missile... there is no point comparing US and Chinese anti ship missiles... their comparable performance is irrelevant as they are not used against each other.

    the US has to use air defence missiles to stop the Chinese anti ship ballistic missile and would most likely be using Standard-3 for that role. The Chinese on the other hand will be using their naval SAMs to stop the US anti ship missile.

    The main point is that the US missiles are not fired from mainland USA so to use their missiles they have to get close to China... the Chinese missiles seems to be long range enough to be launched from shore without risking any aircraft or ships or subs.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9423
    Points : 9915
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 on Thu Mar 19, 2015 8:40 am

    Air Force developing new F-16 radars

    The Air Force has budgeted $25 million to begin development of new radars for its F-16 fleet, a need especially felt by the service's homeland defense mission.

    Lt. Gen. Stanley Clarke, director of the Air National Guard, said the upgrade is needed for surveillance and the ability to detect targets.

    "It's a deficit and we need to address this," Clarke told the House Appropriations defense subcommittee Tuesday.

    The service earlier this month filed a "sources sought" notice to contractors for information on the development of an active electronically scanned array radar for the F-16.

    Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh told lawmakers on Tuesday that the service has budgeted money to begin development, and would like to spend about $75 million "if we can find the funding'' to build the radars for the entire F-16 fleet.

    "We need to develop an AESA radar plan for our F-16s who are conducting the homeland defense mission in particular," Welsh told the House Armed Services Committee. "Our entire fleet – active, Guard and Reserve – none of them have been upgraded with that radar."

    The service estimates it would spend $3.2 million per aircraft to install an integrated AESA radar.

    "We think that's the way to go," Welsh said. "We're looking now at how we can do that as we move forward."

    The Air Force originally sought the upgrade in the fiscal 2013 budget request, but it was cut as part of cost reductions imposed in the Budget Control Act.

    First Air Force, the numbered Air Force responsible for the homeland protection mission, earlier this month filed an "Urgent Operational Need" request for radar upgrades to its F-16 fleet.

    These requests are used to identify needs "during a current conflict or crisis situation that if not satisfied in an expedited manner, will result in unacceptable loss of life or critical mission failure," the Air Force said in a statement.

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9423
    Points : 9915
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 on Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:20 am

    US Developing Space Radar in Marshall Islands - Lockheed Martin

    Lockheed Martin stated that the US Air Force would create an advanced radar system in the Marshall Islands.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The US Air Force is establishing an advanced radar system in the Marshall Islands to detect thousands of satellites and space debris, the builder of the Space Fence radar system Lockheed Martin said in a statement.

    “The number of small satellites and satellite operators around the world is skyrocketing, rapidly crowding an environment already congested by the more than 17,000 pieces of space debris that we are able to track today,” Lockheed Martin Advanced Systems Vice President Steve Bruce said on Monday.

    “By comparison, when it comes online in 2018, Space Fence will enable the Air Force to locate and track hundreds of thousands of objects orbiting Earth with more precision than ever before to help reduce the potential for collisions with our critical space-based infrastructure,” Bruce added.

    The new system uses S-band ground-based radar and will replace a 1960s-era system used by the US Air Force to monitor satellites and space debris.

    Construction began in February on the nearly $1.5 billion radar system located on the Kwajalein Atoll, where the United States has a military installation including a Ballistic Missile Defense test site.

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/military/20150324/1019913557.html#ixzz3VIEY1XMH

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel on Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:24 pm

    US Unmanned Aircraft Must Be Fully Capable for Long-Term Missions - McCain






    The US Navy’s first unmanned carrier-launched aircraft should have intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), as well as precision strike capabilities for long-term missions, US Senator John McCain said in a letter to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter on Wednesday.

    The UCLASS is the US Navy’s project to develop an unmanned aircraft able to launch from aircraft carriers to provide strike capability, ISR and air support in complex war environments.

    “I am concerned that the current requirements proposed for the Unmanned Carrier-Launched Airborne Surveillance-Strike (UCLASS) program place a disproportionate emphasis on unrefueled endurance to enable sustained ISR support to the carrier strike group,” McCain stated.

    The emphasis would result in an aircraft design with serious deficiencies in both long-term survivability and its internal weapons payload capacity, he added.

    The project has experienced a number of delays amid a debate about what features should have priority given cost and available technology.

    “This program will have far-reaching implications for the future of naval power-projection,” McCain said in his letter to the Secretary of Defense. “Given both its warfighting importance and the reality of a constrained fiscal environment, it is essential that we prioritize the right set of requirements today to prepare our Navy and the joint force for the future.”

    McCain explained he advocates an advanced UCLASS capable of ISR, long air unrefueled endurance, strike capability of up to a 4,000 pound payload, advanced radar and the ability to stay in the air for multiple days when refueled.

    “This would expand the strike range and lethality of the carrier strike group, thereby ensuring its role as the preeminent tool of naval power projection,” McCain said.

    US defense contractors Boeing, General Atomics, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are designing and testing various versions of a future UCLASS, each with different features and strengths. The US Navy will ultimately decide which UCLASS to develop in accordance with ISR, endurance and strike capabilities and priorities given the budget environment.






    http://sputniknews.com/military/20150325/1020012155.html#ixzz3VWNkyMCN

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel on Thu Mar 26, 2015 8:51 pm

    F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Program Costs Drop by $7.5 Billion - Pentagon

    The overall F-35 program costs decreased from $398.6 billion to $391.1 billion, according to a US Department of Defense acquisition report.





    http://sputniknews.com/us/20150319/1019739229.html#ixzz3VWUyoOfC

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9423
    Points : 9915
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 on Sat Mar 28, 2015 1:53 pm

    US Air Force Awards $485Mln Contract for Precision Weapons Guidance Pods

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/military/20150328/1020127862.html#ixzz3VgUHiDLM

    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 9423
    Points : 9915
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 on Sat May 02, 2015 12:26 pm

    US Air Force transport fleet consists of 52 C-5M and 223 C-17A.

    AirCargo
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 104
    Points : 108
    Join date : 2014-05-19
    Location : Seattle, WA. United States

    USAF confirms British hypersonic SABRE engine is feasible

    Post  AirCargo on Sat May 16, 2015 4:43 am

    US Air Force confirms hypersonic SABRE engine is feasible

    http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/04/us-air-force-confirms-hypersonic-sabre.html

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel on Wed May 20, 2015 12:38 pm

    US to Produce Bomb Retargeting in Mid-Flight


    Raytheon said in a statement that the US Air Force and defense contractor Raytheon have passed a final review of the Small Diameter Bomb II, an advanced bomb that can change direction and target in midflight.

    WASHINGTON (Sputnik) — The US Air Force and defense contractor Raytheon have passed a final review of the Small Diameter Bomb II (SDB II), an advanced bomb that can change direction and target in midflight through the use of a secure datalink, Raytheon said in a statement on Monday.

    "The Milestone C decision enables us to begin putting this game-changing capability into the warfighters' hands," US Air Force SDB II program manager Col. Kevin Hickman in the statement.

    Hickman explained that the ability to strike moving targets with extreme precision in adverse weather “reduces an aircrew's time in harm's way and limits collateral damage in the battlespace."


    The SDB II can strike moving targets from a distance of 45 miles through radar, infrared and laser sensors, as well as change direction and targets after being fired from aircraft.
    The US Department of Defense has invested more than $700 million in the SDB II program.


    The final review will enable initial production of the missile.

    Raytheon is one of the top US defense contractors with $23 billion in sales in 2014.



    http://sputniknews.com/military/20150518/1022293398.html#ixzz3afqTpOxA

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel on Thu May 21, 2015 10:06 pm

    Mach 5 passenger plane ? Thats nice . I guess US must be looking to use SABRE engine for their space industry

    AirCargo
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 104
    Points : 108
    Join date : 2014-05-19
    Location : Seattle, WA. United States

    US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  AirCargo on Wed May 27, 2015 4:47 am

    US Air Force looks to future gunship modernization

    http://www.janes.com/article/51603/sofic-2015-us-air-force-looks-to-future-gunship-modernisation

    AirCargo
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 104
    Points : 108
    Join date : 2014-05-19
    Location : Seattle, WA. United States

    US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  AirCargo on Wed May 27, 2015 4:54 am

    DARPA tests laser weapon for fighters, drones

    http://www.computerworld.com/article/2925588/emerging-technology/darpa-tests-laser-weapon-for-fighters-drones.html

    Sponsored content

    Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 4:53 am


      Current date/time is Sun Dec 04, 2016 4:53 am