Russia Defence Forum

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


+70
billybatts91
Big_Gazza
nomadski
thegopnik
The-thing-next-door
Rodion_Romanovic
walle83
Belisarius
TMA1
Arkanghelsk
Podlodka77
AZ-5
lyle6
RTN
zepia
ALAMO
GreyHog
Finty
lancelot
Backman
miketheterrible
mnztr
Arrow
kvs
jhelb
LMFS
Hole
Isos
d_taddei2
PapaDragon
Odin of Ossetia
airstrike
OminousSpudd
Walther von Oldenburg
Solncepek
JohninMK
Werewolf
Kyo
AlfaT8
AirCargo
sepheronx
max steel
nemrod
victor1985
magnumcromagnon
andalusia
Airbornewolf
ATošić
higurashihougi
Hannibal Barca
Mike E
TR1
Sujoy
Mindstorm
Russian Patriot
medo
IronsightSniper
SOC
GarryB
KamovHelicopter
Viktor
nightcrawler
ahmedfire
NationalRus
solo.13mmfmj
milky_candy_sugar
Jelena
Vladislav
Turk1
Admin
74 posters

    US Air Force: Discussion and News

    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Sat Apr 02, 2016 12:06 am

    2 dead after pursued Jeep crashes into California air base, hits fighter jet   Suspect

    Two are dead after a Jeep Cherokee pursued by law enforcement crashed through a gate at Lemoore Naval Air Station and slammed into an FA-18E fighter jet Wednesday night.

    According to authorities at the base, the male driver of the SUV and female passenger were killed.

    At a news conference Thursday morning, base authorities said the Jeep crashed through an “entry control point.” The two were not affiliated with the base, authorities said.

    The pursuit began in Kings County when the California Highway Patrol investigated a vehicle stopped alongside the road on Highway 41 and Jackson Avenue. The vehicle sped away and began to weave, CHP Lt. Dave Knoff said.

    “We don’t know why they were running,” Knoff said.

    The pursuit was called off temporarily when the driver began going against traffic on Highway 198, authorities said, but was picked up later on the same highway.

    About 11:30 p.m., the Jeep went through the gate and onto the base. Naval security forces pick up the pursuit while a CHP helicopter tracked the vehicle.

    The driver collided with the horizontal stabilizer of an FA-18E fighter jet, authorities said.The driver was taken to a hospital, where he died. The passenger died at the scene.

    In a news briefing early Thursday, Capt. Monty G. Ashliman Jr., commander of the Lemoore base, said just how the vehicle was able to get onto the airfield is a key part of the follow-up investigation that will be done.

    A spokeswoman for Rep. David Valadao, R-Hanford, said the congressman is still collecting information about the incident. Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, was unavailable for comment. Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Tulare, was awaiting a briefing on the incident.

    Lemoore is the largest naval installation in the country for carrier-based aircraft, and soon will be getting larger. Currently, 15 active F-18 fighter jet squadrons and one auxiliary squadron are stationed there. One more is on its way in August, and another will move to Lemoore in 2018. A year from now the station also will get some of the first crews to fly the F-35, America’s newest fighter jet. In all, more than 3,000 people – naval aviators and their family members – will be added to the base before 2019.

    About 60 percent of the nation’s naval fighter jets will be based at Lemoore Naval Air Station. The Pacific Strike Fighter Wing, as it’s called, is growing due to the Department of Defense’s plans to divert 60 percent of all spending to the Pacific theater.

    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Sat Apr 02, 2016 8:26 am

    Boeing Tanker Issue Could Delay Production Decision

    An issue that prevented Boeing’s KC-46 tanker from transferring fuel to a US Air Force C-17 during a recent test could delay the start of production of the new aircraft, according to the Air Force.

    During a recent test of the tanker’s refueling boom, higher than expected axial loads prevented the transfer of fuel of a C-17 transport plane, service spokesman Daryl Mayer said April 1. The boom, a rigid, telescoping tube that an operator on the tanker extends to and inserts into a receptacle on the receiving aircraft, is used to refuel most Air Force aircraft.

    Boeing has a “good understanding” of the problem and is working to identify a fix, Mayer said. However, the Air Force does not yet know the schedule impact to a planned “Milestone C” decision to formally approve production of the new tanker in May, he said.

    “We don't yet know the schedule impact to the planned May Milestone C decision, but the problem is well understood and we don't expect an extended delay,” Mayer said.

    The KC-46 successfully refueled an Air Force F-16, a much lighter aircraft than the C-17, in a previous test, Mayer noted. The tanker has also successfully transferred fuel to a Navy F/A-18 and Marine Corps Harrier, which use the aircraft’s hose-and-drogue system for refueling, he said.

    Boeing spokesman William Barksdale declined to say how much the fix will cost, saying the company is "aggressively working the problem now."

    "We expected to find items like this in development test and we are evaluating system changes to improve boom response," Barksdale said April 1. "Over the coming weeks, we will have a better understanding of program impacts, if any. We continue to make steady progress in flight test and aircraft production, and believe we are taking the right steps to fulfill our commitments to the Air Force."

    The Air Force is planning to buy 179 KC-46 tankers to recapitalize its aging tanker fleet. Boeing’s KC-46 is unique in its ability to switch between the boom and hose-and-drogue during the same mission, allowing the Air Force to refuel more aircraft more quickly.
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:15 am

    Two airmen shot dead in 'workplace violence' at Texas air base

    Two airmen were killed in a "a workplace violence incident" on Friday at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas, military officials said, with media outlets reporting that an airman shot his commanding officer and then himself.

    Two weapons identified as Glocks were found at the scene, Brigadier General Robert LaBrutta, Commander, Joint Base San Antonio, told a news conference. LaBrutta said the two men were the only casualties and he declined to provide further details such as a possible motive.

    "This was a workplace violence incident and not the result of a terrorist attack," the U.S. Air Force Joint Base San Antonio said in a statement.

    The Air Force Times, citing internal Pentagon communications, reported the commanding officer of a training squadron at the base was shot by an airman who then apparently killed himself in a classroom building.

    A Pentagon official, speaking on condition on anonymity, told CNN that the airman shot his commander.

    Military officials would not confirm the reports. The Bexar County Sheriff's office described the deaths as a likely murder-suicide.

    LaBrutta said individuals are not allowed to carry weapons on base unless they are in security forces or the Air Force's Office of Special Investigations.

    "This morning we received one of those calls you never want to receive," LaBrutta told reporters.

    "Our hearts and prayers go out to the families that are going to be affected by this tragedy," he said.

    LaBrutta said that after an initial report of a shooter, security officers rushed to the scene within three minutes. Both men were found in an office. The shootings occurred at the Medina annex, where operations such as military dog training take place.
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Thu Apr 14, 2016 10:28 pm

    Radar Planes: Why Does the Air Force Need A Dozen Years to Buy 17 Off-the-Shelf Aircraft?

    The U.S. Air Force operates a small fleet of radar planes that can track the movement of ground forces day or night, rain or shine. No kidding, the planes can peer through the murkiest sandstorm to pinpoint the location of hostile forces, identifying what kind of vehicles they are operating, what direction they are moving in, and at what speed. The information is passed along to coalition air and ground units over secure datalinks so they can target enemies without harming friendly forces — once a common occurrence in the fog of war.

    Officially called the Joint Surveillance and Target Attack Radar System, there is little doubt that “JSTARS” planes have saved many American lives since their battlefield debut during Operation Desert Storm 25 years ago. Imagine what it means for soldiers to have an airborne surveillance asset that can simultaneously track up to 600 moving ground targets over an area of nearly 20,000 square miles. It’s a game-changer in terms of combat survivability and success. Which means it could be a game-loser if troops lost access to the planes.

    Unfortunately, that is precisely the vector that the Air Force has put JSTARS on as a result of continuously ignoring congressional direction and combatant commander requests for a quick replacement of the aging planes. The problem is that three decades ago, in a misplaced drive for economy, the Air Force decided to install its ground-tracking radars on “pre-owned” (second-hand) Boeing 707 jetliners. In other words, the planes that debuted in Desert Storm had already been flying for dozens of years, and today the whole fleet is decrepit.

    The service had the option of refurbishing the corroded airframes, replacing outdated engines and refreshing on-board electronics, but it figured for half as much money it could just install a new radar on business jets that would be much cheaper to operate than the four-engine, first-generation jetliners currently in use. All it was trying to do was reproduce the impressive tracking and imaging capability of JSTARS on a more efficient off-the-shelf airframe, which seemed simple enough. The plan was to develop and field the new airframes in six years.

    Well, for reasons only the Air Force can explain, that plan has now stretched out to a dozen years. Air Force planners say the first new plane will not be operational under what it calls JSTARS Recap until 2024, and the fleet of 17 replacement planes will not be fully available until 2028. That timeline has two disturbing consequences. Because they aren't buying a capability for the warfighter. They are buying a jobs program for .gov bureaucrats.


    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Sun Apr 17, 2016 1:16 am

    US fighter jets could be accompanied by drone wingmen as soon as 2018

    Current-generation US fighter jets could take to the skies alongside unmanned armed drones for within the next two years. The "Loyal Wingman" initiative could see fifth-generation stealth fighters matched with older craft to reduce the risk faced by the human pilot.

    The technology would allow these drones to fly ahead of the fighter in hostile environments to identify and attack targets without leaving human pilots open to potentially dangerous situations. According to the Medium blog War is Boring, the US Air Force (USAF) is moving ahead with new computer algorithms which would allow fighter pilots to take control of the drones from their own cockpit. The drone could fire at targets chosen by the pilot.

    Air Force Researcher Laboratories (AFRL) launched the initiative in mid-2015 with a formal request for information (RFI) to the aerospace sector. "Autonomy technologies can enhance future operations and capabilities in contested and denied environments," the RFI said.

    "Technologies are also required to seamlessly integrate the pilot and his/her aircraft with the autonomous unmanned aircraft to allow them to operate as a team for combat effectiveness."

    The formal programme is set to be launched in 2018 and demonstrations will run until 2022 when the paired jets will carry out a strike mission in a hostile and well-defended environment as proof of the technology's capability. The theory behind giving the unmanned aircraft a large degree of autonomy is to avoid signal jamming and other complications from occurring.

    Last month Deputy Defence Secretary Robert Work said the use of autonomous technology and platforms is an inevitability.

    "It is going to happen," Work told a forum hosted by the Washington Post in the US capital. "I would expect to see unmanned wingmen in the air first, I would expect to see unmanned systems undersea all over the place, I would expect to see unmanned systems on the surface of the sea."

    He added that the creation of unmanned vehicles would take longer to create given the challenges faced by the military, such as navigating off-road on rough terrain. The US is keen to develop driverless vehicles to protect its soldiers from roadside bombs which have killed hundreds of military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan.
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Tue Apr 19, 2016 8:33 am

    Small Diameter Bomb II Completes Live Fire Test Destroying T-72 Tank


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 SDB-II


    Air Force F-15 Eagle recently destroyed a moving -model T-72 tank during a live-fire test of the Small Diameter Bomb II at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., service leaders said.

    “Just this month we had a successful live fire mission. It was an F-15E that targeted a moving T-72 tank surrogate. We’re still analyzing the data to get the details of it but the visual indicated it was a direct hit,” Lt. Gen. Ellen Pawlikowski, military deputy for Air Force acquisition, told Military.com in an interview.

    The test earlier this month was the final live fire mission required for the developmental weapons program to move toward what’s called a “Milestone C” full rate production decision, she added.

    Pentagon acquisition chief Frank Kendall is expected to approve full-rate production of the weapon by May of this year — a move which would clear the path for large-scale manufacturing and delivery of the Small Diameter Bomb II, or SDB II, later this year.

    Ultimately, the Air Force plans to acquire 12,000 SDB II weapons — which will enter service by 2017, service officials said.

    “This was the graduation exercise. This is what the warfighter is going to drop on the bad guys. It is the end to end test. The warhead performed as expected and we ended up putting steel on target which is what the goal is,” Jeff White, senior manager, business development, Raytheon, told Military.com.

    White explained that the model tank was moving at tactically relevant battle speeds when it was destroyed by the SDB II during the live-fire test.

    “Just because you hit a target that does not mean you achieved the right kill metrics. That is what the Air Force is doing right now, analyzing the target to make sure the target destruction was at the right level for the test,” White added.

    Depending upon the test outcome, there can be catastrophic kill tests or mobility kills designed only to stop a target from moving, he explained.

    “Each test has its own metrics,” White said.

    The SDB II is a new air-dropped bomb that can pinpoint targets from long distances, destroy stationary or moving targets and change course in flight using a two-way data link, Raytheon and Air Force officials said.

    The Small Diameter Bomb II represents a technological departure from previously fielded precision-guided air-dropped weapons because of its ability to track and hit moving targets from long distances.

    Most of the testing of the SBD II thus far has been on an Air Force F-15 Eagle fighter jet, however the weapon has also been fitted and tested on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. Engineers are also working on plans to integrate the bomb onto the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and F-16 as well, Raytheon officials said.

    GPS and laser-guided weapons such as Joint Direct Attack Munitions have been around for decades, however, they have primarily been designed for use against fixed or stationary targets.

    A key part of the SDB II is a technology called a “tri-mode” seeker — a guidance system which can direct the weapon using millimeter wave radar, uncooled imaging infrared guidance and semi-active laser technology.

    “The really transformational thing about this product is the fact that our seeker, our tri-mode seeker, allows us to prosecute both those moving and stationary targets from standoff distances to exceed 40 nautical miles both on land and at sea,” Mike Jarrett, vice president, air warfare systems, Raytheon, said last summer at the Farnborough Air Show, London.

    A tri-mode seeker provides a range of guidance and targeting options typically not used together in one system. Millimeter wave radar gives the weapon an ability to navigate through adverse weather, conditions in which other guidance systems might encounter problems reaching or pinpointing targets.

    Imaging infrared guidance allows the weapon to track and hone in on heat signatures such as the temperature of an enemy vehicle. With semi-active laser technology, the weapon can be guided to an exact point using a laser designator or laser illuminator coming from the air or the ground.

    Also, the SBD II brings a new ability to track targets in flight through use of a two-way Link 16 and UHF data link, Raytheon officials said.

    “The millimeter wave radar turns on first. Then the data link gives it a cue and tells the seeker where to open up and look. Then it turns on its IR (infrared) which uses heat seeking technology,” White said.

    The SBD II is engineered to weigh only 208 pounds, a lighter weight than most other air dropped bombs, so that eight of them can fit on the inside of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, White explained.

    If weapons are kept in an internal weapons bay and not rested on an external weapons pod, then an aircraft can succeed in retaining its stealth properties because the shapes or contours of the weapons will not be visible to enemy radar.

    About 105 pound of the SDB II is an explosive warhead which encompasses a “blast-frag” capability and a “plasma-jet” technology designed to pierce enemy armor, White explained.

    The SDB II also has the ability to classify targets, meaning it could for example be programmed to hit only tanks in a convoy as opposed to other moving vehicles. The weapon can classify tanks, boats or wheeled targets, White added.

    The Pentagon and Raytheon have already invested more than $700 million into SBD II development, Raytheon officials said.
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18303
    Points : 18800
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 Fri Apr 22, 2016 9:33 am

    US Air Force Actively Seeking to Replace Huey Helicopter

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/military/20160422/1038418488/usaf-seeks-huey-replacement.html#ixzz46XRX7lTp
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14642
    Points : 14777
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  JohninMK Sun Apr 24, 2016 12:20 am

    A pretty unique photo opportunity

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 B-52-over-Paris
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Guest Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:25 pm

    "Gen. David Goldfein, a battle-tested command pilot who flew combat missions in the Gulf War, the Afghanistan War, and in NATO's 1999 air war to force the president of the former Yugoslavia to end his campaign of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, has been nominated to be the service's next chief of staff, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

    If approved, Goldfein will succeed Gen. Mark Welsh, who is retiring July 1. He has been the Air Force's vice chief of staff since August 2015.

    "I'm extremely humbled by the nomination to serve as the Air Force's 21st chief of staff," Goldfein said in an Air Force release. "If confirmed, I pledge to serve our airmen and their families unwaveringly and honor our remarkable heritage and legacy of integrity, service and excellence."

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 150806-F-EK235-341

    Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James and Welsh also lauded Goldfein's selection in the release.

    "Gen. Goldfein possesses the experience and vision needed to address dynamic global challenges and increasing military demand," James said. "He knows how to build and sustain key partnerships, has important warfighting experience, and will exercise the critical judgment required to balance our manpower and resources as we shape tomorrow's Air Force. There is not a better person to lead our airmen into the next century of airpower dominance."


    So, guy that was shot down over Yugoslavia is to become commander of US Airforce.

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Nakuaa10

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Nakuaa10


    Source: http://www.airforcetimes.com/story/military/2016/04/26/goldfein-nominated-next-chief-staff/83542108/
    George1
    George1


    Posts : 18303
    Points : 18800
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  George1 Fri May 13, 2016 9:42 am

    New C-130J Military Cargo Planes Delivered to US Air Force, Coast Guard

    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/military/20160513/1039536190/us-air-force-c130j.html#ixzz48WGlh2Ln
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14642
    Points : 14777
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  JohninMK Thu May 19, 2016 9:56 pm

    Burnt out B-52H in Guam today. No-one injured. Stunning photo. The second link is the last big crash there, a B-2, starts about 1.50, the crew ejected.

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Guam_crash



    http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/3556/b-52-stratofortress-crashes-and-burns-at-andersen-air-force-base-in-guam


    Last edited by JohninMK on Thu May 19, 2016 10:11 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : Second item added. Source corrected)
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Guest Thu May 19, 2016 10:47 pm

    I smell another B-52 being pulled from graveyard where it spent 35 years and overhauled for service.
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14642
    Points : 14777
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  JohninMK Tue May 24, 2016 12:58 am

    The Pentagon is finally doings its sums on just what, the USAF in this case, they are able to afford in the years going forward. It isn't what the USAF is trying to develop and purchase either.

    If Moscow had a plan to break the financial back of Washington, like what was done to them, by forcing the US into introducing more and more expensive weapons as a counter to Russia's announcements and actions, it seems to be working.

    Now, a report from the Pentagon itself, highlighted by Defensenews.com, describes exactly this situation. What is most interesting is that in the report the USAF's fighter budget doesn't tank in some far-off future date. Not even close, by just 2021 there will not be enough funding to support the USAF's current fighter plan. Yes, you read that right, in just five years, the USAF's tactical fighter master plan is bankrupt.

    The report states:

    "The Air Force has insufficient resources to maintain the FY2016 NDAA mandated number of fighter aircraft (1900) beyond the 2017-2021 FYDP. At the current resource levels, projected aircraft service life divestiture outpaces procurement. This will substantially drop the total number of combat coded fighters and fighter squadrons through the 2022-2026 FYDP. The inventory drop will continue until it reaches its lowest level in 2031."


    The whole 36 page report is here

    https://drive.google.com/viewerng/viewer?url=http://ec.militarytimes.com/static/pdfs/2016-Annual-Aviation-Report.pdf
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Sun May 29, 2016 10:20 pm

    New Air Force Tanker Delayed Because It Can’t Refuel Planes

    Boeing has eaten $1.3 billion trying to fix their KC-46 Pegasus aerial refueling plane. Now new aircraft, USAF decision to buy more, pushed back months.
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Guest Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:35 pm

    "Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) successfully completed the initial flight test of its T-50A configured aircraft. The T-50A is the company’s aircraft offering in the U.S. Air Force’s Advanced Pilot Training competition.

    “The aircraft in its new configuration with the 5th Gen cockpit and other upgrades performed flawlessly,” said Mark Ward, Lockheed Martin T-50A lead test pilot, after his flight in Sacheon, South Korea. “I have no doubt this aircraft will close the gap which currently exists between the trainer fleet and 5th Generation fighters.” The T-50A is low risk and ready now. It builds on the proven heritage of the T-50 with more than 100 T-50s flying today—100,000 flight hours and counting—and more than 1,000 pilots trained.

    The T-50A is the only offering that meets all APT requirements and can deliver those capabilities on schedule at the lowest risk to the customer. Lockheed Martin teams studied clean-sheet alternatives and determined they pose prohibitive risk to APT cost and schedule requirements. The T-50A delivers the performance and capabilities needed to prepare pilots to fly, fight and win with 5th Generation fighter aircraft.

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 1464874034426-696x367

    Lockheed Martin is currently standing up its T-50A Final Assembly and Checkout site in Greenville, South Carolina. The T-50A was developed jointly by Lockheed Martin and Korea Aerospace Industries. The accompanying T-50A Ground-Based Training System features innovative technologies that deliver an immersive, synchronized ground-based training platform."


    Source: http://defence-blog.com/news/lockheed-martin-flies-first-t-50a-upgraded-aircraft-for-t-x-competition.html
    max steel
    max steel


    Posts : 2930
    Points : 2955
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  max steel Fri Jun 03, 2016 6:10 pm

    Thunderbirds F-16 crashes following Air Force Academy graduation; pilot reported safe

    United States Navy Blue Angels F/A-18 jet crashes; pilot reportedly dead
    nemrod
    nemrod


    Posts : 839
    Points : 1333
    Join date : 2012-09-11
    Age : 59

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Will the U.S. Air Force be Totally Obsolete by 2030

    Post  nemrod Sun Jun 05, 2016 4:28 pm


    For the first, US high responsible acknowledges the limitations of the F-22. More than never, the SU-30, beside the Mig-35 seem to be among the best aircrafts in the world and are fully capable to defeat US. Russia is taking an edge over US. As it was during soviet's era. It tooks around 20 years for Russia to catch up the gap with US.

    http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/will-the-us-air-force-be-totally-obsolete-by-2030-16466


    Will the U.S. Air Force be Totally Obsolete by 2030 ?

    Dave Majumdar
    June 4, 2016

    The United States Air Force will have to build a new Penetrating Counterair (PCA) capability to gain and maintain air superiority in the post-2030 global threat environment. Moreover, it is increasingly clear that a combination of Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptors and F-35 Joint Strike Fighters will not be sufficient in the decades to come.

    “You can assume if the F-22 and F-35 were good enough for everything, we'd stop there and or buy more,” said one senior Air Force official familiar with the service’s next generation air superiority efforts. “This is the need.”

    Further, the official added that it is a mystery to most of the Air Force senior leadership as to why Air Force chief of staff Gen. Mark Welsh suggested in May that the he would be open to restarting production of the F-22. Not only would the Raptor be extremely difficult and prohibitively expensive to revive—given its obsolete avionics and problems with recovering its manufacturing tooling—the F-22 is simply not going to be effective or survivable in the post-2030 threat environment. “Nobody has any idea why he said that,” one senior official told me. “A senior moment, perhaps.”

    In any case, it is exceedingly unlikely that the Raptor will be revived. That’s despite the best efforts of the House Armed Service Committee Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee chairman Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA), who inserted language into the 2017 defense authorization bill that mandates that the Air Force study the issue. Instead, the Air Force will need to take a broader, more comprehensive approach to air superiority that includes a host of platforms, electronic warfare systems, datalinks and new weapons. But while the Air Force will need new hardware, the service must break free of platform-centric thinking.

    “The Air Force’s projected force structure in 2030 is not capable of fighting and winning against this array of potential adversary capabilities,” reads the Air Force’s 2030 Air Superiority Flight Plan. “Developing and delivering air superiority for the highly contested environment in 2030 requires a multi-domain focus on capabilities and capacity. Importantly, the rapidly changing operational environment means the Air Force can no longer afford to develop weapon systems on the linear acquisition and development timelines using traditional approaches.”

    The Air Force expects that emerging integrated and networked air-to-air, surface-to-air, space and cyberspace threats—as well a dwindling and increasingly obsolescent tactical fighter fleet—will threaten the service’s ability to gain air superiority inside the highly contested airspace in 2030 and beyond. These threats include advanced new enemy fighter aircraft like the Russian Sukhoi PAK-FA and the Chinese Chengdu J-20, new sensors and new weapon systems. “While near-peers have most of these capabilities today, advanced air and surface threats are spreading to other countries around the world,” the document reads.

    Further, new threats could negate traditional U.S. advantages. “Increased threat capabilities to negate our advantages in the space domain, increased quantity and sophistication of cyberspace threats, and air threats including hypersonic weapons, low observable cruise missiles, and sophisticated conventional ballistic missile systems,” the document reads. “How, when and where these capabilities emerge is less clear, but it is certain air superiority forces will face many of these threats by 2030.”

    To counter the rising threat, the Air Force will have to address everything from hardening bases against attacks, to aerial refueling tankers to developing a “cloud-based sensor networks”—what former Air Force intelligence chief Lt. Gen. Dave Deptula, current dean of the Mitchell Institute, refers to as the “combat cloud.” But the service, as mentioned earlier, will also need new platforms. “To achieve air superiority against this strategy in support of joint force mission objectives, the Air Force needs to develop a family of capabilities that operate in and across the air, space and cyberspace domains—there is no single capability that provides a ‘silver bullet’ solution. This family must include both stand-off and stand-in forces, integrated and networked to achieve mission effects,” the document reads.

    Both the Pentagon’s Stand Off Arsenal Plane and the developmental Northrop Grumman B-21 Long Range Strike Bomber will play a role in gaining and maintaining air supremacy. The Air Force will also have to develop new electronic warfare capabilities—which the service used to publicly disavow—to counter next generation threats rather than purely relying on stealth. It will also need a host of new weapons. “Specific weapons development efforts will be paired with platform development efforts,” reads the document. “Both long-range and high capacity weapons will enhance the overall effectiveness of the AS 2030 family of capabilities.”

    Perhaps the centerpiece of the Air Force’s air superiority flight plan is the need to develop a new Penetrating Counterair capability. This would be a new aircraft—but the Air Force is loathe to use terms like “sixth-generation” or “next-generation” platform. “The Air Force must reject thinking focused on ‘next generation’ platforms,” the document states. “Such focus often creates a desire to push technology limits within the confines of a formal program.”

    Nonetheless, the document provides some general cues about what the PCA might look like. “Capability development efforts for PCA will focus on maximizing tradeoffs between range, payload, survivability, lethality, affordability, and supportability. While PCA capability will certainly have a role in targeting and engaging, it also has a significant role as a node in the network, providing data from its penetrating sensors to enable employment using either stand-off or stand-in weapons. As part of this effort, the Air Force should proceed with a formal AoA in 2017 for a PCA capability. Consistent with an agile acquisition mindset designed to deliver the right capability on the required timeline, this AoA will include options to leverage rapid development and prototyping in order to keep ahead of the threat,” the document states. “In addition to F2TA capabilities above, the penetrating capabilities of PCA will allow the stand-in application of kinetic and non-kinetic effects from the air domain.”

    The Air Force will start an analysis of alternative next year in 2017 to determine what the PCA—previously known as Next Generation Air Dominance or F-X—will ultimately look like. What from Air Force officials tell me, it is exceedingly unlikely that the PCA will be any derivation of the F-22—despite the wishes of the some in Congress.

    Dave Majumdar is the defense editor for The National Interest. You can follow him on Twitter: @davemajumdar.

    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Guest Sun Jun 05, 2016 4:36 pm

    Term "Obsolete avionics" is very different on the West and Russia. Also they are refering to post 2030. challenges from other 5th generation platforms that are yet to be fielded. And all this crying is served every few years b USAF to "cover" crazy expences of modernisation and procurement of new fighters.

    Almost identical articles were appearing in early 90s to justify F22A development when they were saying how F14/F15 are getting obsolete, and yet they even today in newer "blocks" are top noch fighters. Its politics trust me.

    Senate needs to think how US is in grave threat from some Chinese junk, so they sign further funding for projects like F35, "B21", further improvements on F22A etc, etc.
    JohninMK
    JohninMK


    Posts : 14642
    Points : 14777
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  JohninMK Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:12 pm

    A team of Iowa University experts has developed a stretchable “skin” that exceeds the radar-wave deflection qualities of all existing materials, including those used on military aircraft, N+1 online paper wrote.

    Dubbed as “meta-skin” the new material consists of several layers of silicon elastomers each consisting of 225 identical resonators filled with galinstan, a metal alloy of gallium, indium and tin. During a series of tests the resonators — small rings 2.5 millimeters across and half a millimeter thick – suppressed up to 75 percent of radar waves in the frequency range of 8 to 10 gigahertz.

    According to Iowa University’s website, the developers of the meta-skin technology expect it to replace all existing stealth technology and hope that it may someday help create a cloak of invisibility.


    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/us/20160605/1040812364/us-invisibility-skin.html#ixzz4AiaNVuWA
    AlfaT8
    AlfaT8


    Posts : 2463
    Points : 2454
    Join date : 2013-02-02

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  AlfaT8 Sun Jun 05, 2016 6:10 pm

    JohninMK wrote:A team of Iowa University experts has developed a stretchable “skin” that exceeds the radar-wave deflection qualities of all existing materials, including those used on military aircraft, N+1 online paper wrote.

    Dubbed as “meta-skin” the new material consists of several layers of silicon elastomers each consisting of 225 identical resonators filled with galinstan, a metal alloy of gallium, indium and tin. During a series of tests the resonators — small rings 2.5 millimeters across and half a millimeter thick – suppressed up to 75 percent of radar waves in the frequency range of 8 to 10 gigahertz.

    According to Iowa University’s website, the developers of the meta-skin technology expect it to replace all existing stealth technology and hope that it may someday help create a cloak of invisibility.


    Read more: http://sputniknews.com/us/20160605/1040812364/us-invisibility-skin.html#ixzz4AiaNVuWA

    I can already see the smiles on those KRET engineers. Wink
    nemrod
    nemrod


    Posts : 839
    Points : 1333
    Join date : 2012-09-11
    Age : 59

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  nemrod Sun Jun 05, 2016 10:48 pm

    Militarov wrote:Term "Obsolete avionics" is very different on the West and Russia. Also they are refering to post 2030. challenges from other 5th generation platforms that are yet to be fielded. And all this crying is served every few years b USAF to "cover" crazy expences of modernisation and procurement of new fighters.
    This is not new concerning US. But this article should be read between lines, as it translates the frustration of US high command against the choices imposed by Complex militaro-industrial. This high responsible could not say all the truth, he could speak only in equivocal  way because of the sensitive nature of this subject. By saying F-22's obsolete avionics, he acknowledges the F-22 could not match with the modern Sukhoi and Mig nowadays, he could not tell more, if he does, it means US are weak, and US will face heavies consequences.

    Militarov wrote:
    Almost identical articles were appearing in early 90s to justify F22A development when they were saying how F14/F15 are getting obsolete, and yet they even today in newer "blocks" are top noch fighters. Its politics trust me.
    As I said US's propaganda is not new, I remember reading the soviet military power in the 80's and I use to read stupidities like these examples :

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 06a5ea476763244

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 82675d487856135

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 095b50487856136


    Militarov wrote:
    Senate needs to think how US is in grave threat from some Chinese junk, so they sign further funding for projects like F35, "B21", further improvements on F22A etc, etc.
    The geopolical context nowadays is completly different than it occured during the 80's. Indeed, China, and Russia caught up, and even overpass US in air superiority. Nowadays in 2010's we have the parity between China, Russia against US. But after the 2020 the China and Russia will get the superiority. This is in fine the message of US military to US Militaro-Industrial complex and politicians.
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  OminousSpudd Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:09 am

    Militarov wrote:Term "Obsolete avionics" is very different on the West and Russia. Also they are refering to post 2030. challenges from other 5th generation platforms that are yet to be fielded. And all this crying is served every few years b USAF to "cover" crazy expences of modernisation and procurement of new fighters.

    Almost identical articles were appearing in early 90s to justify F22A development when they were saying how F14/F15 are getting obsolete, and yet they even today in newer "blocks" are top noch fighters. Its politics trust me.
    Yep, definitely the case here, especially given it is the National Interest. See how the article justifies the B-21, and in the same breathe dismisses the F-22. The F-22 (maybe? Sounds like it's a nightmare reliability wise) and F-15 are still the platforms with the most potential for the USAF for ASF configuration. If they'd actually invested in the F-15SE for domestic use...

    Militarov wrote:Senate needs to think how US is in grave threat from some Chinese junk, so they sign further funding for projects like F35, "B21", further improvements on F22A etc, etc.
    Wow, this talk reminds me of the way my father spoke about SSR tech 15 years ago. Something tells me that you people who consistently throw Chinese hardware under the bus are in for a hell of a wake up one day.
    nemrod
    nemrod


    Posts : 839
    Points : 1333
    Join date : 2012-09-11
    Age : 59

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  nemrod Mon Jun 06, 2016 12:31 am

    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Yep, definitely the case here, especially given it is the National Interest. See how the article justifies the B-21, and in the same breathe dismisses the F-22. The F-22 (maybe? Sounds like it's a nightmare reliability wise)  and F-15 are still the platforms with the most potential for the USAF for ASF configuration. If they'd actually invested in the F-15SE for domestic use...

    They could justify what they want, I did not credit the National Interrest, or any others western medias, all I said, including Janes, BBC, CBS, CNN, NHK, AlJazeerah, TF1 etc...are all mere shit, not more, not less.
    The thing that is interresting is they admit that US are lagging behind their adversaries, and it is new. The context is completly different of the 80's against the Soviet Union. The effort made by Russia to modernize its arsenal bear its fruit now. Above syrian skies, for example when SU-30, were deployed US refused fly F-22. It was a fact, and evidence. Even those deployed met great problem of non-availabilities because of nightmare of maintenance. There was  facts. Americans are finding themselves naked, a defenceless, and they are in a deep disarray and frustration.

    Moreover, they could deploy what they want, Iam sure it will be faillure, as there were for F-104, F-106, F-105, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, and now the F-35.
    During these last 70 years the only US success that I could barely list is F-86 sabre.


    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Wow, this talk reminds me of the way my father spoke about SSR tech 15 years ago. Something tells me that you people who consistently throw Chinese hardware under the bus are in for a hell of a wake up one day.
    This is the west, if they don't consider the others are intrinsically inferiors, they said that they necessary copied, and stole the secrets of americans, forgetting facts that they are the first robbers, as they loot much soviets secrets during the collapse of Soviet Union. If today Russia deploys a more modern AESA's radar they will consider that the slavish had necessarily steal american secrets to do that. No use to take credit what the west say.
    OminousSpudd
    OminousSpudd


    Posts : 942
    Points : 947
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Location : New Zealand

    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  OminousSpudd Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:05 am

    nemrod wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Yep, definitely the case here, especially given it is the National Interest. See how the article justifies the B-21, and in the same breathe dismisses the F-22. The F-22 (maybe? Sounds like it's a nightmare reliability wise)  and F-15 are still the platforms with the most potential for the USAF for ASF configuration. If they'd actually invested in the F-15SE for domestic use...

    They could justify what they want, I did not credit the National Interrest, or any others western medias, all I said, including Janes, BBC, CBS, CNN, NHK, AlJazeerah, TF1 etc...are all mere shit, not more, not less.
    The thing that is interresting is they admit that US are lagging behind their adversaries, and it is new. The context is completly different of the 80's against the Soviet Union. The effort made by Russia to modernize its arsenal bear its fruit now. Above syrian skies, for example when SU-30, were deployed US refused fly F-22. It was a fact, and evidence. Even those deployed met great problem of non-availabilities because of nightmare of maintenance. There was  facts. Americans are finding themselves naked, a defenceless, and they are in a deep disarray and frustration.

    Moreover, they could deploy what they want, Iam sure it will be faillure, as there were for F-104, F-106, F-105, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, and now the F-35.
    During these last 70 years the only US success that I could barely list is F-86 sabre.
    F-14, F-15, F-16 were all excellent aircraft back in the day, and to a lesser extent still are. The F-16 has reached its maximum potential however, and I think the later Blocks were sabotaged by a part of the same cancer the F-35 is afflicted by; being asked to perform outside of its intended role. F-15 is the USAF's best hope from an A2A standpoint now. I think that Russia has closed and perhaps surpassed any tech gap that existed, it is now just a case of fielding the numbers.


    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Wow, this talk reminds me of the way my father spoke about SSR tech 15 years ago. Something tells me that you people who consistently throw Chinese hardware under the bus are in for a hell of a wake up one day.
    nemrod wrote:This is the west, if they don't consider the others are intrinsically inferiors, they said that they necessary copied, and stole the secrets of americans, forgetting facts that they are the first robbers, as they loot much soviets secrets during the collapse of Soviet Union. If today Russia deploys a more modern AESA's radar they will consider that the slavish had necessarily steal american secrets to do that. No use to take credit what the west say.
    I guess I am just little perplexed at the fact a Serb would take the same tiresome line of drivel as most Western "academia".
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Guest Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:54 am

    OminousSpudd wrote:
    Militarov wrote:Term "Obsolete avionics" is very different on the West and Russia. Also they are refering to post 2030. challenges from other 5th generation platforms that are yet to be fielded. And all this crying is served every few years b USAF to "cover" crazy expences of modernisation and procurement of new fighters.

    Almost identical articles were appearing in early 90s to justify F22A development when they were saying how F14/F15 are getting obsolete, and yet they even today in newer "blocks" are top noch fighters. Its politics trust me.
    Yep, definitely the case here, especially given it is the National Interest. See how the article justifies the B-21, and in the same breathe dismisses the F-22. The F-22 (maybe? Sounds like it's a nightmare reliability wise)  and F-15 are still the platforms with the most potential for the USAF for ASF configuration. If they'd actually invested in the F-15SE for domestic use...

    Militarov wrote:Senate needs to think how US is in grave threat from some Chinese junk, so they sign further funding for projects like F35, "B21", further improvements on F22A etc, etc.
    Wow, this talk reminds me of the way my father spoke about SSR tech 15 years ago. Something tells me that you people who consistently throw Chinese hardware under the bus are in for a hell of a wake up one day.

    Well expectations are atm that F15Es will serve at least another 25 years with 2 block updates in future so yeah, they are to be around for quite long time.

    I will take Chinese for serious in fighter technology when they figure out how to make own half decent engine.

    Sponsored content


    US Air Force: Discussion and News - Page 8 Empty Re: US Air Force: Discussion and News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Apr 19, 2024 10:41 am