Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Share
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 2733
    Points : 2727
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  Isos on Tue Nov 13, 2018 9:31 am

    kumbor wrote:
    PapaDragon wrote:
    GarryB wrote:.....
    But they have to make sure the design is right because once they start making them they don't want to have to stop and redesign them...

    Since when?

    Changing their mind and redesigning ships several times during construction and then abandoning the whole project and starting over from scratch with more money wasted it's literally their preferred MO.

    They aren't ordering or building anything​ because they can't.

    Last combat ship that isn't missile boat was laid down several years ago, since then nothing.

    It is simply not true!

    Yes it is.
    eehnie
    eehnie

    Posts : 2466
    Points : 2483
    Join date : 2015-05-13

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  eehnie on Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:57 pm

    Interesting pictures:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/Mirage2000B/status/1061150562601787393







    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov

    Posts : 1171
    Points : 1169
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  SeigSoloyvov on Tue Nov 13, 2018 7:50 pm

    Nice Fanart?.
    PapaDragon
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 7579
    Points : 7673
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  PapaDragon on Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:03 pm

    SeigSoloyvov wrote:Nice Fanart?.

    Hey, they got the rust right lol1
    George1
    George1

    Posts : 12692
    Points : 13175
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  George1 on Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:54 pm

    Just a scale model
    avatar
    kumbor

    Posts : 232
    Points : 230
    Join date : 2017-06-09

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  kumbor on Wed Nov 14, 2018 8:17 pm


    As of 1st november 2018, following surface ships are in construction (laid down or launched) for VMF RF. Only ships of 2000 t D or bigger.

    Arctic patrol ship pr.23550 - 1
    frigate pr.22350 - 3
    corvette pr.20386 - 1
    corvette pr.20380/5 - 5
    patrol ship pr.22160 - 3

    Nibiru
    Nibiru

    Posts : 144
    Points : 146
    Join date : 2018-05-22

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  Nibiru on Wed Nov 14, 2018 9:00 pm

    Cant wait to see the real ship in 2100...
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 19557
    Points : 20109
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  GarryB on Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:08 am

    So many clowns telling the same old jokes.

    Shame Russia has to suffer the leadership of Putin instead of someone smart like you guys... Rolling Eyes

    Just a scale model

    He knows... he is just being a dick...
    Militarov
    Militarov

    Posts : 5990
    Points : 6017
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  Militarov on Fri Nov 16, 2018 10:23 pm

    PapaDragon wrote:
    SeigSoloyvov wrote:Nice Fanart?.

    Hey, they got the rust right lol1

    lol!
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 19557
    Points : 20109
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  GarryB on Sat Nov 17, 2018 1:19 am

    Yeah, American ships don't rust... they just run into cargo ships...
    avatar
    hoom

    Posts : 1524
    Points : 1514
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  hoom on Sat Nov 17, 2018 3:26 am

    The rust thing was fair enough 10+yrs back but now its bullshit & especially for a new class.

    Actually you see even older Russian ships looking clean & well cared for last few yrs, its the US & NATO ships that are increasingly showing up rusty.
    Russian ships been catching up on deferred maintenance/completing refits/getting new ships & becoming more active, US etc being over-used, increasing reports of deferred maintenance, poorly trained crews causing incidents, ships tied up at dock inactive for years...
    SeigSoloyvov
    SeigSoloyvov

    Posts : 1171
    Points : 1169
    Join date : 2016-04-08

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  SeigSoloyvov on Sun Nov 18, 2018 9:09 am

    GarryB wrote:Yeah, American ships don't rust... they just run into cargo ships...

    Hey at least we don't nearly sink our own carriers~
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 19557
    Points : 20109
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  GarryB on Sun Nov 18, 2018 10:49 am

    The rust thing was fair enough 10+yrs back but now its bullshit & especially for a new class.

    It is on a MODEL...

    And even brand new models rust, so you think the laws of physics have changed?

    Put lots of different metal types in salt water... look it up... it is called electrolysis

    Hey at least we don't nearly sink our own carriers~

    Haha... give them time...

    Even your brand new ships seem to suffer from corrosion...

    [url=https://www.matcor.com/navy-finds-aggressive-corrosion-on-new-ship/ ]https://www.matcor.com/navy-finds-aggressive-corrosion-on-new-ship/ [/url]



    avatar
    hoom

    Posts : 1524
    Points : 1514
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  hoom on Sun Nov 18, 2018 2:39 pm

    It is on a MODEL...
    A model depicting it as a post-soviet '90s rustbucket basically its a subtle bit of propaganda.


    Even your brand new ships seem to suffer from corrosion...
    From recollection that LCS one was because the shipyard didn't put anodes on it before launch/handing over to the navy, considered it navy responsibility, navy didn't realise they're missing -> the aluminium hull sat there in the sea for many months playing sacrificial anode.

    Contract or not its hard to understand nobody at the shipyard saying 'nope, we can't launch this with no anodes' Neutral
    Big_Gazza
    Big_Gazza

    Posts : 1447
    Points : 1449
    Join date : 2014-08-25
    Location : Melbourne, Australia

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  Big_Gazza on Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:39 am

    hoom wrote:Contract or not its hard to understand nobody at the shipyard saying 'nope, we can't launch this with no anodes' Neutral

    Especially as anodes can only be installed below the waterline onto hull studs provided for that purpose.  If the studs are in place, why no anodes?  If no studs, did they think the Navy would dry-dock and weld some on themselves?...

    It boggles the mind.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 19557
    Points : 20109
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  GarryB on Tue Nov 20, 2018 6:14 am

    From recollection that LCS one was because the shipyard didn't put anodes on it before launch/handing over to the navy, considered it navy responsibility, navy didn't realise they're missing -> the aluminium hull sat there in the sea for many months playing sacrificial anode.

    The aluminium hull with steel lined propulsion system was always going to create problems at sea where the two different metals met... it is not rocket science...
    avatar
    hoom

    Posts : 1524
    Points : 1514
    Join date : 2016-05-06

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  hoom on Tue Nov 20, 2018 7:17 am

    Not if its properly anoded.
    avatar
    kumbor

    Posts : 232
    Points : 230
    Join date : 2017-06-09

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  kumbor on Tue Nov 20, 2018 11:16 am

    hoom wrote:Not if its properly anoded.

    Anode protection is something ordinary for at least a century!

    Sponsored content

    Re: Promising destroyer / NIR Leader:

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:00 pm