Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Share

    Vladimir79
    Grand Marshal
    Grand Marshal

    Posts : 2193
    Points : 3099
    Join date : 2009-07-10

    Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  Vladimir79 on Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:36 pm

    Russian robotic soldier revealed

    Edited 28 October, 2009, 20:41

    A prototype track-mounted combat platform tailored to use Russian weapons has been unveiled at an arms show in Moscow. Producers say it beats the similar American bot widely used in Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns.

    The bot, called MRK-27-BT, was produced by the robotics lab of the Moscow Bauman Technical University. It was shown to the public at the Interpolitex-2009 arms exhibition.

    MRK-27-BT’s standard armament includes two Shmel rocket launchers, two grenade launchers, a Pecheneg machine gun with a 100 round ammunition belt, and six smoke grenades. It is operated with a couple of joysticks and has a maximum range of 500 meters. All the weapons are standard issue used by human soldiers and can be detached in the field.

    http://russiatoday.com/Sci_Tech/2009-10-28/russian-robotic-soldier-revealed.html#

    Vladimir79
    Grand Marshal
    Grand Marshal

    Posts : 2193
    Points : 3099
    Join date : 2009-07-10

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  Vladimir79 on Tue Nov 03, 2009 1:15 pm


    solo.13mmfmj
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 118
    Points : 141
    Join date : 2010-04-16

    Interesting

    Post  solo.13mmfmj on Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:09 pm

    Is this a technology demonstrator only or there are others plans for it?
    I personally believe that robots that fight on the ground(air to air fighter drones to)will not have a future until artificial inteligente is developed sufficiently to allow them to be 90%-100% independent.

    sepheronx
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 7302
    Points : 7612
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 27
    Location : Canada

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  sepheronx on Fri Apr 16, 2010 8:07 pm

    solo.13mmfmj wrote:Is this a technology demonstrator only or there are others plans for it?
    I personally believe that robots that fight on the ground(air to air fighter drones to)will not have a future until artificial inteligente is developed sufficiently to allow them to be 90%-100% independent.

    I used to code C (Basic, before C++) and learned that when dealing with creating artificial intelligence, it is all Ifs and but statements. It is very hard to make something fully autonomous and get it to work the way you want it too. If you do try to create such a system, friendly fire would become far more common.

    solo.13mmfmj
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 118
    Points : 141
    Join date : 2010-04-16

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  solo.13mmfmj on Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:30 pm

    To Sepheronx:I am curios are you a programmer?

    They could be organized in special units compose of robots for Fighting and human technicians for resupply , repair and tactical advise.
    I am somehow aware of the difficulties that that fighter robots are facing.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:22 am

    Most of the artificial intelligence systems I have seen are black box systems.
    You set some rules and then you set up some scenarios and you train the system with those scenarios that include the answers when it has tried.
    After a few thousand goes the program works out which solutions work and which do not for itself, but you can't just print out the new stuff it has learned and you have to hope it has learned the right things.
    Once it has been trained then you release it out into the real world and test its reactions.
    It is no longer learning, it is just applying what it learned from the examples it was trained on.

    One example I have read about was a NATO attempt to develop a computer program that could detect tanks automatically. Basically the program was given thousands of different pictures with tanks in them and some pictures that did not have tanks and the program was trained to learn the difference.

    The plan was you install the program on a computer in a tank and connect it to the commanders panoramic sight and it constantly scans the view to find tanks of all shapes and sizes and camouflage schemes.

    It got about a 95% success rate in lab tests but when tested in the field it didn't find a single tank.

    Because the program was a set of rules and training that it used to create more rules (that cannot be extracted to find out what went wrong) it is called a black box system.

    Eventually it was worked out what the problem was... the photos in the training that had tanks in them were all taken on sunny days and the photos with no tanks were darker cloudy days, as was the test. They had spent an enormous amount of money to make a program that detects whether it is a sunny day or not... Laughing

    No I am not making this up.

    sepheronx
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 7302
    Points : 7612
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 27
    Location : Canada

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  sepheronx on Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:05 pm

    solo.13mmfmj wrote:To Sepheronx:I am curios are you a programmer?

    They could be organized in special units compose of robots for Fighting and human technicians for resupply , repair and tactical advise.
    I am somehow aware of the difficulties that that fighter robots are facing.

    I used to code for various things.

    Robots are indeed good for reconnaissance, and resupply, but other then that, they are an iffy tool that may never have the ability to have an appropriate, self aware, combat abilities. As hardware moves only so far, but it takes the software engineers to properly code the system in order to work.

    solo.13mmfmj
    Junior Sergeant
    Junior Sergeant

    Posts : 118
    Points : 141
    Join date : 2010-04-16

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  solo.13mmfmj on Sun Apr 18, 2010 4:38 am

    "Eventually it was worked out what the problem was... the photos in the training that had tanks in them were all taken on sunny days and the photos with no tanks were darker cloudy days, as was the test. They had spent an enormous amount of money to make a program that detects whether it is a sunny day or not"

    That because A.I. technology is in its infancy.Is like laughing at the Right's brothers airplane and saying that planes will never go faster then the speed of sound.

    sepheronx
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 7302
    Points : 7612
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 27
    Location : Canada

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  sepheronx on Sun Apr 18, 2010 10:04 am

    solo.13mmfmj wrote:"Eventually it was worked out what the problem was... the photos in the training that had tanks in them were all taken on sunny days and the photos with no tanks were darker cloudy days, as was the test. They had spent an enormous amount of money to make a program that detects whether it is a sunny day or not"

    That because A.I. technology is in its infancy.Is like laughing at the Right's brothers airplane and saying that planes will never go faster then the speed of sound.

    I laugh at the concept of A.I. and people who believe in it. A.I. is only coding. There is no learning intelligence. There is no intelligence at all. All there really is down to it, is 'Ifs' 'ands' or 'but' statements in a line of coding. The optics (camera) views what is going around it through its lense, and it determines through a line of coding to understand what it sees.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Sun Apr 18, 2010 12:55 pm

    With a few simple rules to follow something that has no intelligence at all can seem semi intelligent because of the way it reacts to certain situations.

    If then procedural code is not used in object oriented programming.

    You create objects of a specific class that has certain attributes and features.

    That because A.I. technology is in its infancy.Is like laughing at the Right's brothers airplane and saying that planes will never go faster then the speed of sound.

    AI has certainly moved on since the 1980s when the example I gave took place.
    You'd actually be surprised how much AI there is around you right now.

    From the auto focus in your digital camera to the auto tuning on your TV.

    From the face recognition with the camera in your cellphone to the computer spyware on your computer detecting the site you go to and your internet habits and sending that data to some site on the internet.

    All those cameras in Britain would still be useful in solving crime but with face recognition software they can be used to find and track the movements of specific people of interest.

    Back to the robot, its purpose is not really to replace all soldiers, its job is to be an expendible point man you can send into places to see what is there.
    Otherwise the range of 500m would be a bit useless, but you can roll him around a corner and have him take two shots at an enemy tank without fear of him being killed by return fire.
    His camera and mechanisms are relatively small so to defeat him you will either need to shower him in small arms fire in the hope of taking out the gun or the camera or hit him with explosives, which would give away your position.
    With his MG he could provide support while your unit is moving, or you could send him around an enemy position to provide flanking fire.
    You could even roll him back to high ground to offer a view of the enemy position that could be relayed by the operator to the unit commmander and not even fire a shot... he could just observe and fire if fired upon.
    You could send him up to a suspicious vehicle or house that looks undefended.

    brudawson
    Private
    Private

    Posts : 8
    Points : 8
    Join date : 2010-06-05

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  brudawson on Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:20 pm

    A prototype track-mounted combat platform tailored to use Russian weapons has been revealed in Moscow. Producers say it beats the similar American bot widely used in Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns.
    The bot, called MRK-27-BT, was produced by the robotics lab of the Moscow Bauman Technical University. MRK-27-BT’s standard armament includes two Shmel rocket launchers, two grenade launchers, a Pecheneg machine gun with a 100 round ammunition belt, and six smoke grenades. It is operated with a couple of joysticks and has a maximum range of 500 meters. All the weapons are standard issue used by human soldiers and can be detached in the field.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:31 am

    In the thread about the AK-200s there was a website with photos and it had a tracked vehicle with what appeared to be a remote turret with a PKT (ie a PKM with no stock and a heavy barrel and conical muzzle flash hider) with a large optic device mounted next to it.

    ...oops, sorry, I tell a lie.

    Here is the link:

    http://www.lifenews.ru/news/25555

    ...and if you scroll to the bottom of the page and click through to image number 22 in the black box you can see it and it doesn't have tracks so it must be a different vehicle.

    nightcrawler
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 559
    Points : 687
    Join date : 2010-08-20
    Age : 27
    Location : Pakistan

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  nightcrawler on Sat Oct 30, 2010 10:20 pm

    Instead developing 100% artificial intelligence one has to integrate machine within a human; like that of Iron man Wink
    Mechanical Humaniods concept is way better than pure Robots

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:00 am

    The problem with cyborgs (part man part machine) is that a computer can process somethings faster and has much faster reactions.

    I think the best solution would be simply remote control.

    It means a human is in control but not in danger.

    You get all the advantages of expendable machine with potentially enormous payload of weapons and ammo plus you get human decision making as well.

    Last thing you want is AI robots going on a rampage in your own military base because of a short circuit.

    Most robot supporters claim that robots can be made safe by using Asimovs rules, but that assumes the robot even comprehends what that means or can understand the consequences of its actions.

    ie if it has no sensor that can detect the presence of petrol or explosive gas fumes and it sees a threat and fires a weapon it could kill the person or people it is trying to protect. Also just because it is a robot doesn't mean it can see through walls etc so when shooting an enemy it might get a shoot through of a wall and injure or kill friendlies.

    Personally I think the idea of an armed robot you can send forward to look is the best compromise for the moment and we should wait to see how they develop before deciding on what next.

    Vladimir79
    Grand Marshal
    Grand Marshal

    Posts : 2193
    Points : 3099
    Join date : 2009-07-10

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  Vladimir79 on Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:51 am

    You can't really afford to employ human operators for each system and have it widely used. An autonomous search algorithm would be more realistic and one human controller could be responsible for several systems. Only the human could open fire.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Sun Oct 31, 2010 5:56 am

    If the robots are performing the roles a soldier would perform then the person who was going to be the soldier doing the job could become the operator controlling the robot to do the job.

    nightcrawler
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 559
    Points : 687
    Join date : 2010-08-20
    Age : 27
    Location : Pakistan

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  nightcrawler on Sun Oct 31, 2010 11:08 am

    GarryB wrote:If the robots are performing the roles a soldier would perform then the person who was going to be the soldier doing the job could become the operator controlling the robot to do the job.

    So you have been influenced ny the film Surrogates.....Soldiers will just be playing video game like soldiers in battlefield; isn't this you are referring to controlling...My God then soldiers will be a team of professional gamers!!

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:56 am

    Technically it is already happening with aircraft.

    Kids who played flight sims in the 1980s and 1990s can now operate recon and even light attack platforms in many militaries in the world right now.

    Being used to just seeing what can be seen through a "camera view" on a TV screen would be an advantage over a real pilot that expects a rather better view of his surroundings.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  GarryB on Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:55 am

    I would expect that in many roles remotely controlled robots are already being used by Russian paramilitary personnel in the role of unexploded ordinance (UXO) disposal and mine removal.
    Simply the danger to personnel in working with UXO means the further you can get your people yet still deal with the problem the better.

    Obviously most of the time the Russian military will not have the luxury of dealing with mines one at a time so other measures are used like TOS and of course mine rollers on engineer vehicles to deal with land mines.

    I have the impression that the robotic soldier they are talking about above would be something that moves around with a normal unit and might be controlled by a specially fitted out vehicle perhaps based on a BTR or BMP that allows the robot to take the most dangerous position... that of point where it will go forward and look around and shoot at any threats it can deal with, but most of the time it will simply be finding targets and the layout so attack plans can be formulated with real information. It could be fitted with a sound system that detects gunshots and therefore plot the location of anyone that shoots at it, which will further aid in the planning of an attack.

    KomissarBojanchev
    Lieutenant Colonel
    Lieutenant Colonel

    Posts : 991
    Points : 1144
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 19
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  KomissarBojanchev on Sat Dec 08, 2012 2:27 pm

    Are there any plans in the future for the russian army to use new armor suits with small motors to speeden up running or exoskeletons to lift heavy equipment?

    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4468
    Points : 4659
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:40 pm

    New ballistic mask at 1:32? It looks like the face mask for Shredder, from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles lol:


    Regular
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1955
    Points : 1962
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Western Hemisphere.. mostly

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  Regular on Fri Jan 31, 2014 9:50 pm

    MICH helmet at 1:16??? And that facemask would come in handy to special forces especially in assaulting situations.

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5391
    Points : 5640
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  Werewolf on Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:23 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:New ballistic mask at 1:32? It looks like the face mask for Shredder, from Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles lol:


    In the last few seconds they are talking about that they are working on new transparent armor (bullet proof glass) for eyes on this helmets.

    I don't know exactly how good aluminium glass also called ALON, which is just a very compressed aluminium sheet untill it becomes transparent.

    But i think it could come handy for Special Operation Units, i don't think they will need such a thick ALON sheet to stop 12.7mm, the energy would most probably break their necks even if it wouldn't penetrate.

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6eb_1374180030&comments=1

    higurashihougi
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2130
    Points : 2245
    Join date : 2014-08-13
    Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.

    Russian exoskeleton for infantry

    Post  higurashihougi on Sat May 02, 2015 9:23 am

    http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150429/1021513320.html

    Russian armed forces are going to be equipped with mind-controlled exoskeletons which would massively increase the strength, endurance and effectiveness of a serviceman multiple times, enabling each soldier to carry up to 300 kilograms of personal gear.

    The Russian Army is set to receive mind-controlled exoskeletons.

    The wearable robots will be controlled by brain waves and will increase the strength and endurance of the serviceman wearing it by several times.

    The device will also enable an officer to carry up to 300 kilograms with him.

    “I think that in about five years we will introduce a neuroelectronic interface which will control the exoskeletons and artificial limbs through the electrical potential of a human brain,” said Head of Medical Equipment Development and Manufacturing department of Russia’s United Instrument Manufacturing Corporation, Aleksander Kulish.

    The exoskeleton, he added, will allow the soldier to carry up to 200-300 kilograms of personal gear. The soldiers will be able to jump higher and farther as well as move and throw heavy objects.

    collegeboy16
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1207
    Points : 1234
    Join date : 2012-10-05
    Age : 20
    Location : Roanapur

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  collegeboy16 on Sat May 02, 2015 9:48 am

    mind control is pushing it- just simple haptic feedback is enough.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Russia's Future Technology Weapons

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 5:07 pm


      Current date/time is Thu Dec 08, 2016 5:07 pm