Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5283
    Points : 5436
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Oct 30, 2019 10:49 pm

    RTN wrote:
    GarryB wrote:
    SOSNA and Kornet and Vikhr are the same, but they are looking back at a laser and determining where they are in the beam in a similar way... they manouver themselves in to the centre of the beam..

    Is Russia going to introduce a GPS/GLONASS guided artillery shell, like the M982 Excalibur ? Satellite guided shells have benefits.
    GLONASS shells have existed since 2011, and they've been discussed in dozens of threads, and their 25 to 40 times cheaper than the US GPS equivalent shells.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22353
    Points : 22897
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  GarryB on Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:19 am

    They have developed a new nose mounted fuse system with control surfaces for 152mm and larger calibre artillery rounds that includes a GLONASS navigation system receiver and can be used to direct shells on to targets. CEP is reportedly 10m, which is pretty damn good.

    Note a CEP of 10m means a volley of shots fired by Coalition battery, means each gun could fire 6 or more shells at the target and all those shells will hit at once... with 6 vehicles that would mean the impact of more than 36 shells in a 10m circle... I would say most things in that circle are dead... but of course being guided they might just allocate one vehicle per target with perhaps 2-3 shells per target to be sure of the result.

    Of course they also have a range of guided gun launched missile shells from 120mm Gran, to 122mm Kitilov, and of course the 152mm Krasnopol, and also rounds for the larger calibres like 160mm, 180mm, 203mm and 240mm they still use.

    They also have guided Naval rounds in large calibres but technology in 57mm guided shells could probably be applied to larger calibre guns to allow larger HE payloads in those rounds.

    And while the US is busting their budget with guided shells like the very expensive Excalibur... which costs 10 times more than Metis BTW, they are also not even bothering with the new gun system on their new ships because their guided shells cost $800K each... so they aren't buying any ammo for their guns.

    Like I said... the Russians are well known for taking good ideas and solving problems without gold plating the solutions and making them affordable...
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22353
    Points : 22897
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  GarryB on Thu Oct 31, 2019 3:27 am

    They are developing a range of autonomous terminal guidance seekers for missiles like Hermes and this new air to ground missile on the Mi-28NM... one assumes something like that could be fitted to larger calibre artillery too.
    RTN
    RTN

    Posts : 213
    Points : 192
    Join date : 2014-03-24
    Location : Fairfield, CT

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  RTN on Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:24 pm

    GarryB wrote:Note a CEP of 10m means a volley of shots fired by Coalition battery, means each gun could fire 6 or more shells at the target and all those shells will hit at once...

    CEP of 10m is not that great unless of course you are using 160mm, 180mm, 203mm and 240mm calibre shells. On the other hand Excalibur has a CEP < 4 meters. So a single 155mm shot ensures that the target is take out.

    BTW - Why is the Russian Army still using 160mm, 203mm and 240mm shells ? World has moved onto 155mm shells a long time ago. Makes perfect sense. You can use these shells with the M-777 light howitzers and PzH 2000 self propelled howitzers.

    GarryB wrote:And while the US is busting their budget with guided shells like the very expensive Excalibur... which costs 10 times more than Metis BTW,

    Granted that Excalibur is expensive. But why would you suggest that Russian GLONASS guided artillery shells will be much cheaper ?
    RTN
    RTN

    Posts : 213
    Points : 192
    Join date : 2014-03-24
    Location : Fairfield, CT

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  RTN on Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:38 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    GLONASS shells have existed since 2011, and they've been discussed in dozens of threads, and their 25 to 40 times cheaper than the US GPS equivalent shells.

    I could not find any thread dedicated to GLONASS guided artillery shell in this forum.

    Cheaper than US versions by 25 to 40 multiple ? That's not possible. Essentially the same tech. How come they are so cheap ?
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22353
    Points : 22897
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  GarryB on Fri Nov 01, 2019 2:33 am

    CEP of 10m is not that great unless of course you are using 160mm, 180mm, 203mm and 240mm calibre shells. On the other hand Excalibur has a CEP < 4 meters. So a single 155mm shot ensures that the target is take out.

    It is going to be the standard fuse for their 152mm shells, so all standard and long range shells will get this level of performance.

    There are targets a single 155mm shell is not good enough to take out on its own.

    BTW - Why is the Russian Army still using 160mm, 203mm and 240mm shells ?

    Why is the US Army using M113s?

    They returned 203mm and 240mm calibre weapons for specific roles, and AFAIK the 160mm mortars have never left their mountain unit arsenals.

    World has moved onto 155mm shells a long time ago. Makes perfect sense.

    Why would Russia adopt a foreign calibre? Their 152mm calibre guns are fine.

    You can use these shells with the M-777 light howitzers and PzH 2000 self propelled howitzers.

    Russia doesn't have or make either of those.

    Granted that Excalibur is expensive. But why would you suggest that Russian GLONASS guided artillery shells will be much cheaper ?

    Because they revealed the price a few years ago and they are much much cheaper... the fuse system is about $1,000 which is 50-80 times cheaper than Excalibur... but Excalibur is a complete round, while the Russian system is a fuse and guidance system that can be attached to the nose of any 152mm calibre round.

    Cheaper than US versions by 25 to 40 multiple ? That's not possible. Essentially the same tech. How come they are so cheap ?

    They developed a way of controlling the shell without having to stop it from spinning, and it is not a complete round... it is a fuse and control surface kit that attaches to the nose fuse position of standard rounds.

    You can attach it to already produced 152mm rounds or any type.

    This is off topic BTW so will likely move some or all of it somewhere else.
    jhelb
    jhelb

    Posts : 658
    Points : 757
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  jhelb on Fri Nov 01, 2019 8:18 pm

    ---


    Last edited by jhelb on Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:09 pm; edited 3 times in total (Reason for editing : Comment posted on the wrong thread, hence deleted)
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 3898
    Points : 3878
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  miketheterrible on Fri Nov 01, 2019 8:27 pm

    RTN wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    GLONASS shells have existed since 2011, and they've been discussed in dozens of threads, and their 25 to 40 times cheaper than the US GPS equivalent shells.

    I could not find any thread dedicated to GLONASS guided artillery shell in this forum.

    Cheaper than US versions by 25 to 40 multiple ? That's not possible. Essentially the same tech. How come they are so cheap ?

    Are you seriously asking this question?

    Think hard for a moment.

    No, the bombs aren't the same. Because one is made in Russia and one is made in USA. Tack on a multiplier for US made one vs Russian. Plus Glonass and GPS tracking devices are rather cheap these days.
    jhelb
    jhelb

    Posts : 658
    Points : 757
    Join date : 2015-04-04
    Location : Previously: Belarus Currently: A Small Island No One Cares About

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  jhelb on Fri Nov 01, 2019 10:12 pm

    GarryB wrote:They are developing a range of autonomous terminal guidance seekers for missiles like Hermes and this new air to ground missile on the Mi-28NM... one assumes something like that could be fitted to larger calibre artillery too.

    And will these missiles be GLONASS guided ?
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22353
    Points : 22897
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  GarryB on Sat Nov 02, 2019 2:07 am

    There were plans to include Glonass in some of the seekers... the advantage of which is that a forward deployed unit could passively locate targets and pass their coordinates to HQ via the Ratnik super soldier system... with this information passed from HQ to a platform on the battlefield near those coordinates they could launch in this case a Hermes missile which will head to the target location... as it approaches it can turn on its TV or IIR seeker to find the target and then hit it directly. Or with a cheap optical guidance system it can look for a laser spot on the target from a nearby unit or UAV. Or it could scan with its MMW radar seeker and find the target and hit it that way.

    If the platform is a Coalition battery then firing off a salvo of cheap GLONASS guided shells... HQ could simply generate a grid around the target coordinates... which might be a platoon of enemy soldiers dug in to position or in buildings... the HQ creates a grid around that position with a 4m or 5m grid base and then order that Coalition battery to fire two rounds at each node of the grid all to impact at the same time, with airburst shells bursting at 2m altitudes for troops in the open or in open topped trenches, or delay fuses for buildings and trenches with roof cover...

    Excalibur would be far too expensive for such area targets because you will know the location and the extent of the trenches but you wont know where the people are, so you just need an even coverage on target to arrive together so there is no time to take cover.

    Once they take cover you will need thousands of rounds and days to get them all.

    Sponsored content

    Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News - Page 6 Empty Re: Mi-24/Mi-35M Hinds: News

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun Nov 17, 2019 12:08 pm