Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Intercepting Iskander

    Share

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Viktor on Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:47 pm

    etaepsilonk wrote:
    And I'm not sure you're right about Patriot here. Last time it was used with pretty high success ratio, with about 7 or so scuds intercepted.

    No SCUDs where intercepted ever. All the Patriot missiles exploded behind SCUD

    Patriot is a worst SAM system ever designed for numerous reasons and the only thing it managed to shot down where their own planes (NATO planes).

    You have numerous links on the net about that. Anyway SM-3 and THAAD can not defend against winged targets so cruise missiles will fly to its targets unopposed.


    etaepsilonk
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 717
    Points : 699
    Join date : 2013-11-19

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  etaepsilonk on Sun Jan 19, 2014 3:29 pm

    Well, then mentioning PATRIOT, my information was pretty vague anyway  Embarassed 
    After a quick search, I came to this:
    http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2003/03/patriot_games.html
    "In "development tests," which are designed to see if the technology works on the most basic level, the new Patriot did very well, hitting 10 out of 11 targets. However, in "operational tests," which are supposed to simulate real combat, the missile did much less well, slamming into the target in fewer than half the engagements, due mainly to computer glitches."


    Also:
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/030321-patriot03.htm


    "The Army did not respond to repeated requests to comment on the PAC-3's record in trials. But an official at Raytheon said Coyle and others didn't understand what the tests were designed to do.
    "What we were testing was the entire system, not just whether we could kill a target at the end," the official added. "The end game may not be to intercept the missile.""

    Well, if I were Polish, I wouldn't feel very safe after reading this  Laughing 

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15450
    Points : 16157
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  GarryB on Mon Jan 20, 2014 9:35 am

    The Scud turned out to be a largely political weapon and Patriot was its political answer.

    Ask any civilian with no military interests and they will tell you Patriot saved the day and shot down all those Scuds...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    sepheronx
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 7302
    Points : 7612
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 27
    Location : Canada

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  sepheronx on Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:17 am

    I'll just add in that there has been numerous tests recently of the newer SM-3, THAAD and Arrow showing it engaging BM's. Now mind you, nothing is said about type of missile besides Israel that mentioned it was a launch from an aircraft (the time that Russia detected the missile with their radar).

    Besides all of this, majority of the talk about ABM systems, majority of the performance characteristics falls under the same as S-300VM and newer. The US and Israel are pushing for KKV's and thus are aiming for high accuracy, which IMO may not be best solution when dealing with a weapon like Iskander who has decoys and maneuvering. Instead, it should be high explosive like S-300V's missiles are like, where even if it does not hit right on, the explosion from the warhead would guarantee it will hit it (well, more or less).

    Is Iskander impossible to take down? Probably not. I bet that if they launch more than one missile from air defense systems, that they will more than likely hit Iskander. Is an Iskander a Scud? Yes and No. Yes in the sense it is a IRBM. No in the sense that it flies a different trajectory and it has subsystems making it significantly more accurate and able to survive if engaged.

    Most tests for ABM systems, like Pantsir's against Cruise missiles, SM-3 and THAAD against BM targets and Arrow are all pre-planned and pre-determined. In other words, they know where it is flying from, they know where it is going to strike, thus they can concentrate on its tracking. If a missile is launched from an area that is a surprise to you? Then things may be different.

    As of recently, systems like Iron Dome have proven itself to be quite accurate and effective of a system. Dumb bombs are not easy to intercept either, especially if they are launched without warning. Russia really needs to work on its sensor development as the west is really improving theirs and eventually, they may very well be able to counter Iskander without much effort.

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Viktor on Wed Jan 22, 2014 12:26 am

    sepheronx wrote:Besides all of this, majority of the talk about ABM systems, majority of the performance characteristics falls under the same as S-300VM and newer.  The US and Israel are pushing for KKV's and thus are aiming for high accuracy, which IMO may not be best solution when dealing with a weapon like Iskander who has decoys and maneuvering.  Instead, it should be high explosive like S-300V's missiles are like, where even if it does not hit right on, the explosion from the warhead would guarantee it will hit it (well, more or less).

    There is one big difference. Arrow/THAAD/SM-3 are all anti-ballistic missile systems ONLY while S-300V is first mobile anti-ALL missile system.

    That means that if you defend some area against potential threats in form of ballistic and winged threats you can not place just THAAD or just Arrow or just SM-3. You need a Patriot too. On

    the other hand S-300V handles all threats at the same time. Than we have issue of mobility and many others  Very Happy 

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15450
    Points : 16157
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:33 am

    Instead, it should be high explosive like S-300V's missiles are like, where even if it does not hit right on, the explosion from the warhead would guarantee it will hit it (well, more or less).

    The S-300V moves at between mach 5 and mach 7 depending on which missile we are talking about, and the incoming threat will be moving very fast too.

    It is all fine and dandy having all the best sensors, but if the target starts a turn at the last fraction of a second it just has to move a metre or less for a hit to kill interceptor to miss.

    The outgoing interceptor with an adaptive warhead has multiple fuses throughout the HE payload and an onboard computer can choose which fuse or fuses to set off to direct the blast into the path of the incoming target.

    HE detonates at about 5-6km/s depending upon the type, so considering the closing speeds it is not the HE that will be important... a tiny row of charges that blows the main payload of 130kgs of small metal cubes into the path of the incoming target would actually be more effective than 130kgs of HE as high altitude interceptions mean very thin air which makes blast explosive warheads useless. For high altitude use the explosive is most useful accelerating fragments which in the thinner air travel much faster and further and are much more effective than at lower altitudes.

    Having a light payload means the missile can be smaller and lighter... which generally means cheaper, but at the end of the day a light payload is less useful against quite a few different target types... especially aircraft, so heavy payloads remain in Russian SAMs designed for multi purposes like S-400 and S-300V. S-500 might have a hit to kill payload to reduce weight and size... smaller lighter missiles require less energy to travel the same distance... the 9M96 missiles are a case in point where lighter payloads results in smaller lighter missiles that still have decent ranges/performance.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3223
    Points : 3347
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Vann7 on Sat Jan 25, 2014 4:07 pm



    The only curiosity i have is on SM-3 operation.. and its limits..
    If its need to be placed at about the same flight path of a ballistic missile to intercept it(just like have been said thaad works)
    in a way that the Iskander fly right above it , then SM-3 will be next to useless for defending a mobile Army from modern ballistic attacks.
    Iskander and others BM Russia have are very mobile and could easily be used in a way to bypass any Thaad static defense
    flying away of it .

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Viktor on Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:09 pm

    Vann7 wrote:

    The only curiosity i have is on SM-3 operation.. and its limits..
    If its need to be placed at about the same flight path of a ballistic missile to intercept it(just like have been said thaad works)
    in a way that the Iskander fly  right above it , then SM-3 will be next to useless for defending a mobile Army from modern ballistic attacks.
    Iskander and others BM Russia have are very mobile and could easily be used in a way to bypass any Thaad static defense
    flying away of it .

    SM-3 is not design to protect mobile Army, S-300V is.

    SM-3 will be placed on prepared ground launch systems and this is a system that can not engage aerodynamic targets.

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3223
    Points : 3347
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Vann7 on Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:53 am

    Viktor wrote:
    Vann7 wrote:

    The only curiosity i have is on SM-3 operation.. and its limits..
    If its need to be placed at about the same flight path of a ballistic missile to intercept it(just like have been said thaad works)
    in a way that the Iskander fly  right above it , then SM-3 will be next to useless for defending a mobile Army from modern ballistic attacks.
    Iskander and others BM Russia have are very mobile and could easily be used in a way to bypass any Thaad static defense
    flying away of it .

    SM-3 is not design to protect mobile Army, S-300V is.

    SM-3 will be placed on prepared ground launch systems and this is a system that can not engage aerodynamic targets.

    But can SM-3 intercept Ballistic missiles,even if the launcher is not positioned in the same trajectory of the missile ?
    it was claimed Thaad have that limitation.

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Viktor on Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:02 pm

    Extremely interesting video about Russian Iskander ECM capabilities.

    Take note that this is a video produced by The Institute for National Security Studies (Israelies) and that they look at things throw they eyes with high propaganda spam etc

    but still facts are fact and here you have some very interesting points.

    about the institute LINK

    about the man speaking LINK



    enjoy

    Few points I want to make regarding this video.

    1. Excellent review of Iskander massive ECM potential in comparison with similar western one and much more advanced

    2. Notice fear that cause low flying winged missiles (with the introduction of 3M-14 missile to Iskander system)

    3. I did not know that 3M-14 missile incorporated in Iskander-K is longer (with longer range) than already 2500km 3M-14 missile of Club-S system

    4. Range of the 3M-14 can easily be much longer than 2500 according to this guy.

    5. Range of Iskander - up to 900km but huge potential (room) for more payload of any kind

    6. Russia has 7 S-300V brigades (I though 3-4 up to 5 at max)

    7. Modernized seeker of Yakhont missile makes it capable to strike ground targets (speed Mach 4.5)

    8. Interesting systems of ICBM silo defense, Russia developed

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3223
    Points : 3347
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Vann7 on Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:03 pm

    Viktor wrote:Extremely interesting video about Russian Iskander ECM capabilities.

    Take note that this is a video produced by The Institute for National Security Studies (Israelies) and that they look at things throw they eyes with high propaganda spam etc

    but still facts are fact and here you have some very interesting points.

    about the institute LINK

    about the man speaking LINK



    enjoy

    Few points I want to make regarding this video.

    1. Excellent review of Iskander massive ECM potential in comparison with similar western one and much more advanced

    2. Notice fear that cause low flying winged missiles (with the introduction of 3M-14 missile to Iskander system)

    3. I did not know that 3M-14 missile incorporated in Iskander-K is longer (with longer range) than already 2500km 3M-14 missile of Club-S system

    4. Range of the 3M-14 can easily be much longer than 2500 according to this guy.

    5. Range of Iskander - up to 900km but huge potential (room) for more payload of any kind

    6. Russia has 7 S-300V brigades (I though 3-4 up to 5 at max)

    7. Modernized seeker of Yakhont missile makes it capable to strike ground targets (speed Mach 4.5)

    8. Interesting systems of ICBM silo defense, Russia developed


    Isn't that treason? and punishable with Jail ?
    That A Russian citizen supply detailed information to Israel about how their Iskanders or cruise missles operate?

    a little of topic... that might or not apply to Iskander..here is an interesting video that shows
    how can Ballistic missiles can evade system of defenses..with cheap technology..

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNSR7dXHdCY


    Last edited by Vann7 on Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:36 pm; edited 1 time in total

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Viktor on Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:11 pm

    Vann7 wrote:[Isn't that treason? and punishable with Jail ?
    That A Russian citizen supply information to Israel about how their Iskanders or cruise missles operate?

    He made may mistakes and knows very little about the problems but nevertheless for our lvl of discussion he has some interesting points.

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3223
    Points : 3347
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Vann7 on Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:57 pm

    Viktor wrote:
    Vann7 wrote:[Isn't that treason? and punishable with Jail ?
    That A Russian citizen supply information to Israel about how their Iskanders or cruise missles operate?

    He made may mistakes and knows very little about the problems but nevertheless for our lvl of discussion he has some interesting points.


    BTW... i think the presenter missed the point of Russian Radars pointing at Iran.. and middle easti don't think Russia is concerned about IRAN missile development . But its enemies actions.The reason of many radars pointing to IRAN is to help them with logistics ,whenever IRAN is attacked ,because of the tensions with Israel.Probably Russian logistic helped Iran to capture the stealth drone they got of U.S. Russian Radars can provide an early warning system to them. And help iran in their defense ,spot even stealth planes . Those same Radars detected for example an Israeli ballistic test near Syria with exact coordinates and timing and flight path and duration the missile traveled and exact time of launch. Something that caught of guard and surprised Israel and NATO.

    www.sott.net/article/265794-Russian-radars-detect-launch-of-two-ballistic-missiles-from-Mediterranean-Sea-Israel-first-denies-knowledge-then-claims-responsibility-for-test-launch-from-fighter-jet

    For me is clear that Russian Radars on land could supply Iran but also Syria with a better view of its airspace specially against ballistic targets in case they attacked .

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  max steel on Thu May 14, 2015 12:04 pm

    Viktor wrote:Extremely interesting video about Russian Iskander ECM capabilities.

    Take note that this is a video produced by The Institute for National Security Studies (Israelies) and that they look at things throw they eyes with high propaganda spam etc

    but still facts are fact and here you have some very interesting points.

    about the institute LINK

    about the man speaking LINK








    Nice video there . He is a Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies in London .


    1) Can you tell me more viktor whether the info he released to Israelis were conidential or non-confidential ? and surprisingly israelis didn't work in designing counter measures against such russian missiles . don't know how AEGIS sm-6 OR Thaad can intercept IKSANDER . Looks improbable .



    2) I'm sure usa isn't lagging behingd with Russia on missiles tech . Can you tell me what russian equivalent of brahmos , yakhont , onyx , mokshit etc USA use with their military ?? They use upgraded Harpoon as anti-ship missile etc ?

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Viktor on Thu May 14, 2015 11:25 pm

    max steel wrote:Nice video there . He  is a Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies in London .


    1) Can you tell me more viktor whether the info he released to Israelis were conidential or non-confidential ? and surprisingly israelis didn't work in designing counter measures against such russian missiles . don't know how AEGIS sm-6 OR Thaad can intercept IKSANDER . Looks improbable .


    Nothing confidential there. Just a traitor trying to suck in. Knows a bit more than general internet population and thats about it.



    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  max steel on Thu May 14, 2015 11:48 pm

    Can Iskander maneuver mid-course ? Can sm-6 or thaad intercept it in Europe ?

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3223
    Points : 3347
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Vann7 on Fri May 15, 2015 11:36 am

    max steel wrote:Can Iskander maneuver mid-course ? Can sm-6 or thaad intercept it in Europe ?

    No one knows.. But at least it can be said that Russia designed Iskanders to counter
    NATO ABM system is Europe.. So it have to be a well though missile. Also is worth to remember
    there are Iskander cruise missiles too.. so they both can be used at same time.. to maximize the success . Thaad or SM-3 cannot target things flying low.. only ballistic missile flying high..
    SM-6 ,appears to be a light version of S-300 with extended range. SM-6 ,on paper Doesn't appear that it can target Iskander ,because Iskanders are hypersonic and fly at mach 6.17 or 2100 m/s, while the Sm-6 is a supersonic missiles mach 3.5.. So if the missile comes from behind will fail to chase it ,fly at half the speed.. I think only Patriots or perhaps the israeli ones in the video ,will have a better chance to try ,if launched in numbers. Sm-6 appears to be more ideal against combat planes. Because is a Big Missile.. and have a big booster.. its maneuverability against fast moving targets will be not the best. All missiles usually are vulnerable on its mid course.. but i dont know if Iskander also was made with mid course maneuverability too.. Knowing how Russia understand the mid course interceptors that NATO ABM system is.. it will not be surprising if can evade at any time missiles.

    flamming_python
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3182
    Points : 3310
    Join date : 2012-01-30

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  flamming_python on Fri May 15, 2015 11:58 am

    Viktor wrote:
    max steel wrote:Nice video there . He  is a Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies in London .


    1) Can you tell me more viktor whether the info he released to Israelis were conidential or non-confidential ? and surprisingly israelis didn't work in designing counter measures against such russian missiles . don't know how AEGIS sm-6 OR Thaad can intercept IKSANDER . Looks improbable .


    Nothing confidential there. Just a traitor trying to suck in. Knows a bit more than general internet population and thats about it.



    Nice, long, important-sounding title for a traitor Laughing

    max steel
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2980
    Points : 3014
    Join date : 2015-02-12
    Location : South Pole

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  max steel on Fri May 15, 2015 12:26 pm

    You mean Israel's Barak or Arrow system and Patriot PAC-# ( whatever number their modern patriot is , 6 maybe ) have good chance against Iksander . How ,

    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5390
    Points : 5639
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Werewolf on Fri May 15, 2015 3:54 pm

    max steel wrote:
    Viktor wrote:Extremely interesting video about Russian Iskander ECM capabilities.

    Take note that this is a video produced by The Institute for National Security Studies (Israelies) and that they look at things throw they eyes with high propaganda spam etc

    but still facts are fact and here you have some very interesting points.

    about the institute LINK

    about the man speaking LINK








    Nice video there . He  is a Research Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies in London .


    1) Can you tell me more viktor whether the info he released to Israelis were conidential or non-confidential ? and surprisingly israelis didn't work in designing counter measures against such russian missiles . don't know how AEGIS sm-6 OR Thaad can intercept IKSANDER . Looks improbable .



    2) I'm sure usa isn't lagging behingd with Russia on missiles tech . Can you tell me what russian equivalent of brahmos , yakhont , onyx , mokshit etc USA use with their military ?? They use upgraded Harpoon as anti-ship missile etc ?

    Funny propaganda about the russian deployment of Radars and TBM's they are not against Iran but against Israel which is the most unstable country that has nuclear capability and has several times threatend to use nuclear weapons against all european countries when Israel should be turned down by UN and NATO.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Intercepting Iskander

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 2:40 pm


      Current date/time is Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:40 pm