Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Share
    avatar
    Stealthflanker
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 800
    Points : 884
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 29
    Location : Indonesia

    Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Stealthflanker on Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:29 am

    Greetings.

    As the title said.. i wonder if Russian have any interest toward hypervelocity kinetic kill missile like US MGM-166 LOSAT, MRM-KE and recently under development HATM/CKEM.

    one advantage over conventional gun launched ATGM is reduced reaction time to enemy as those missile travels in exact same speed as conventional APFSDS. Thus reducing guidance time requirement where ATGM platform have to keep the missile at sight.
    avatar
    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5367
    Points : 5610
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Werewolf on Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:51 am

    Stealthflanker wrote:Greetings.

    As the title said.. i wonder if Russian have any interest toward hypervelocity kinetic kill missile like US MGM-166 LOSAT, MRM-KE and recently under development HATM/CKEM.

    one advantage over conventional gun launched ATGM is reduced reaction time to enemy as those missile travels in exact same speed as conventional APFSDS. Thus reducing guidance time requirement where ATGM platform have to keep the missile at sight.
    MRM-KE = cancelled.
    LOSAT and the CKEM are cancelled too.

    Vann7
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3346
    Points : 3466
    Join date : 2012-05-16

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Vann7 on Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:13 am

    Stealthflanker wrote:Greetings.

    As the title said.. i wonder if Russian have any interest toward hypervelocity kinetic kill missile like US MGM-166 LOSAT, MRM-KE and recently under development HATM/CKEM.

    one advantage over conventional gun launched ATGM is reduced reaction time to enemy as those missile travels in exact same speed as conventional APFSDS. Thus reducing guidance time requirement where ATGM platform have to keep the missile at sight.
    Look for Russian hermes missiles.. not far from hypersonic speeds.. Mach 4.0 (hypersonic 5.0)
    They will be used on Ka-52 hellicopter ,probably tanks ,and boats.. range from 20km to 100km.. it will be the competition
    of Hellfire but much better. not sure if they already in service..

    http://www.russiadefence.net/t339-the-missile-complex-hermes-will-replace-ataka


    avatar
    Zivo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1498
    Points : 1532
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Zivo on Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:56 am

    Hermes may not be hypersonic, but it'll be one hell of an ATGM. The missile itself is more that twice as fast as Hellfire, and the warhead is 3x larger.


    Here's KBP's page.

    http://www.kbptula.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=146&Itemid=414&lang=en

    On the top-right of the page under "System composition" there's a link that says "Containerized "Hermes" Guided missile."

    Hermes-A's max flight velocity is listed at 1000m/sec. Which is just a hair under Mach 3.
    avatar
    collegeboy16
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1195
    Points : 1218
    Join date : 2012-10-05
    Age : 20
    Location : Roanapur

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  collegeboy16 on Wed Oct 16, 2013 8:55 am

    Hermes looks like Pantsir missile, prolly same booster too. As for future rounds, I would like to see laser beam riding APFSDS, with mini
    control surfaces to reduce drag and powerful booster around the penetrator. Scramjet seems ok, though it seems like a very expensive
    option with exotic materials etc., whats important is that the KE round doesnt cost as much as m829a4/5, so your guys can use a decent amount per target to ensure a kill since decent future armour would do away with ammo/fuel in the crew compartment. For HEAT rounds, they should just continue what they do with Hermes, hypervelocity sounds impressive but HEAT doesnt depend on velocity so they prolly
    shouldnt overdo the velocity department. What they should further develop would be anti-APS systems, the KE would rely on brute speed and mass while the HEAT rounds would rely on tricks to go past the defences, also top attack for both rounds would be nice.
    avatar
    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15997
    Points : 16652
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  GarryB on Wed Oct 16, 2013 12:40 pm

    The Hermes uses the smaller rocket booster of the SA-19, which at 170mm calibre accelerates the missile to about 1km/s.

    The later SA-22 with its 210mm calibre heavier booster rocket accelerates to 1.3km/s, but that really isn't enough for a kinetic weapon... of course that is not to say they couldn't make one if they wanted to.

    Slimming down the HERMES and filling its core with a 2m long DU penetrator that weighs half the weight of the HE payload (15kgs vs 30kgs of the original HE payload) would greatly reduce size as DU is much denser than HE and therefore more compact.

    Add a scramjet sustainer but reduce the weight of the projected missile and using the heavier booster you should be able to get burnout speeds of 1.4-1.5 km/s with the scramjet accelerating the penetrator to say 1.8-2km/s over the next few seconds so that at 15km it is travelling at 2km/s with a 15kg DU penetrator 2m long... that would be a good penetrator with simple and proven beam riding guidance... already used on Russian helos in a weapon that will use a launch tube that looks like standard weapons...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    collegeboy16
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1195
    Points : 1218
    Join date : 2012-10-05
    Age : 20
    Location : Roanapur

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  collegeboy16 on Wed Oct 16, 2013 1:50 pm

    Sounds awesome... though a 2m long, 15kg DU penetrator would most likely snap at impact...
    avatar
    Stealthflanker
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 800
    Points : 884
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 29
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Stealthflanker on Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:13 pm

    Werewolf wrote:
    MRM-KE = cancelled.
    LOSAT and the CKEM are cancelled too.
    Yeah, as well as the FCS program planned to use them. Nonetheless the basic technology are sound and well demonstrated.. just somewhat lack of interest.

    which i found weird.
    avatar
    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15997
    Points : 16652
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  GarryB on Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:58 am

    Sounds awesome... though a 2m long, 15kg DU penetrator would most likely snap at impact...
    Why would it snap on impact?

    If anything is going to snap on impact it would be a 7kg DU penetrator they currently use in MBT ammo because it is lighter and thinner.

    Like most APFSDS penetrators it hits end on, which concentrates the entire mass of the projectile onto the point of the projectile... the longer it is the higher the mass being concentrated on the point at impact = better penetration. The heavier the projectile the more mass concentrated on the point = better penetration.

    Yawing the penetrator before impact introduces a bending force that could make it break but a 15kg DU penetrator 2m long is rather less vulnerable to yaw than a lighter shorter penetrator...

    which i found weird.
    The size and weight of the rockets required means it is still rather more efficient to use a big gun.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5367
    Points : 5610
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Werewolf on Thu Oct 17, 2013 7:31 pm

    It is so unnecessary even to consider Hermes-A to alter it into an APFSDS ATGM, it has a god damn 30kg Explosive WARHEAD, it can destroy almost everything and it won't make a big difference if it hits a civil car or a tank, it can destroy buildings,bridges and even bunkers will see devestating force.

    That is what it looks like by 16kg Explosion of conventional ANFO and military uses explosives with higher brisance than a fertilizer can achieve and the Hermes-A uses almost the double of the explosive...
    avatar
    Zivo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1498
    Points : 1532
    Join date : 2012-04-13
    Location : U.S.A.

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Zivo on Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:01 pm

    Werewolf wrote:It is so unnecessary even to consider Hermes-A to alter it into an APFSDS ATGM, it has a god damn 30kg Explosive WARHEAD, it can destroy almost everything and it won't make a big difference if it hits a civil car or a tank, it can destroy buildings,bridges and even bunkers will see devestating force.

    That is what it looks like by 16kg Explosion of conventional ANFO and military uses explosives with higher brisance than a fertilizer can achieve and the Hermes-A uses almost the double of the explosive...
    The fact that they managed to get 20km of range while using a 30kg warhead is an achievement. The launcher is even light enough to be deployed on most vehicles. The only ATGM with comparable range I can think of is Spike NLOS, and that missile doesn't even come close to Hermes-A's payload or velocity.

    How powerful is 30kg of explosives? Well, the Hellfire ATGM achieves its ability to "defeat all known armor" with 9kg of explosives.


    Last edited by Zivo on Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:14 am; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    TheArmenian
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1648
    Points : 1809
    Join date : 2011-09-14

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  TheArmenian on Fri Oct 18, 2013 2:31 am

    Zivo wrote:
    Werewolf wrote:It is so unnecessary even to consider Hermes-A to alter it into an APFSDS ATGM, it has a god damn 30kg Explosive WARHEAD, it can destroy almost everything and it won't make a big difference if it hits a civil car or a tank, it can destroy buildings,bridges and even bunkers will see devestating force.

    That is what it looks like by 16kg Explosion of conventional ANFO and military uses explosives with higher brisance than a fertilizer can achieve and the Hermes-A uses almost the double of the explosive...
    The fact that they managed to get 20km of range while using a 30kg warhead is an achievement. The launcher is even light enough to be deployed on most vehicles. The only ATGM with comparable range I can think of is Spike LNOS, and that missile doesn't even come close to Hermes-A's payload or velocity.

    How powerful is 30kg of explosives? Well, the Hellfire ATGM achieves its ability to "defeat all known armor" with 9kg of explosives.
    A projectile that has 30 kg of explosive will disable any tank even if it is not an anti-tank projectile.
    It is similar to a 152 mm artillery shell smashing on a tank. Even if it hits the most heavily armored part of the tank and does not penetrate, the damage will be significant to eliminate the tank from the battlefield until it is repaired.
    avatar
    collegeboy16
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1195
    Points : 1218
    Join date : 2012-10-05
    Age : 20
    Location : Roanapur

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  collegeboy16 on Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:20 am

    Haha, Hermes-A would demolish an M1A2 from the front and light up the ammo at the back. It would be even more awesome when even light vehicles can carry Hermes-A. Hell, just give it a more powerful motor, top attack capability and APHE warhead and it will destroy any vehicle with soft roof armor, not just small holes you get with HEAT and APFSDS.
    OTOH the APFSDS makers have a lot of work ahead of them, 130mm is not that far from 125mm, and whatever shape or form M1a3 will take its sure that it will require 1m+ penetration capabilities.


    Last edited by collegeboy16 on Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:34 am; edited 1 time in total
    avatar
    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5367
    Points : 5610
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Werewolf on Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:31 am

    The row force of the impact with 1.3km/s is enough to make significant damage and the explosion of 30kg high brisant explosive will not only kill the crew it will have enough power to displace the turret from the hull, the canon will be ripped apart, tracks with wheels will see an uncommon increase in their travel path in horizontal achse, the crew will just die like a goldfish in a barrel with water and an firecracker.
    30kg can destroy big massive buildings and bridges, for example bridges get blown off with only 10kg explosives, one Hermes-A that hits the middle of the bridge or the bridge piers and it is gone, a normal ATGM can't do so.
    avatar
    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15997
    Points : 16652
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  GarryB on Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:28 am

    The 30kg HEAT warhead is multipurpose and will have armour penetration aspects and HE Frag aspects too to ensure whatever it hits it will do the max damage.

    The Vikhr has a switch that can be set at launch to determine whether it penetrates lots of armour or sends out lots of fragments and I suspect the Hermes will do the same.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    Werewolf
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5367
    Points : 5610
    Join date : 2012-10-24

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Werewolf on Sat Oct 19, 2013 12:57 am

    GarryB wrote:The 30kg HEAT warhead is multipurpose and will have armour penetration aspects and HE Frag aspects too to ensure whatever it hits it will do the max damage.

    The Vikhr has a switch that can be set at launch to determine whether it penetrates lots of armour or sends out lots of fragments and I suspect the Hermes will do the same.
    Yes it must have the same configuration as the Vikhr since KPB tula states on their website that Hermes-A will have 1200mm RHAe penetration capability.
    And the AT or Air engagement mode you mean doesn't changes which warhead it will set off but what fuze it use, against Armor contact fuze and against air targets or infantry targets on the ground it sets the proximity fuze at 60 to 200cm radius to the target sets in the proximity fuze giving it an airburst like capability against infantry targets, both explosive charges will blow off regardless of armor or aircraft target.
    avatar
    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15997
    Points : 16652
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  GarryB on Sat Oct 19, 2013 10:43 am

    Yes, what you are saying is essentially correct, there is only one HE charge, but there are multiple fuse positions and detonation options.

    A HEAT warhead needs a fuse at its extreme rear to be set off at the precisely correct time so the plasma beam is formed and stable by the time it reaches the armour. A fuse somewhere else within the explosive and the plasma beam will not even form and the HEAT liner simply become fragments.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Sponsored content

    Re: Kinetic Energy Missiles (KEM)

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri May 26, 2017 7:26 am