Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4913
    Points : 4943
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Age : 77
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:24 am

    magnumcromagnon wrote:
    Why not just convert a Zircon to launch munitions and fly back.  

    Aside material problems, not sure if software can deal with such speeds yet in autonomous flight yet. Mind that every drone now is subsonic, for a reason. But once supersonic/hypersonic unmanned 6gen fighters will be reality perhaps topic will return.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22332
    Points : 22876
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GarryB on Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:50 pm

    Just change the accepted definition of "land"...

    Extend the wheels in a 60 degree spiralling dive at mach 12... it is landing... the 10 MT warhead will detonate 300m above the ground so it is not like it will crash.... Twisted Evil
    RTN
    RTN

    Posts : 213
    Points : 192
    Join date : 2014-03-24
    Location : Fairfield, CT

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  RTN on Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:11 pm

    Mindstorm wrote:
    USA analysts , like ours, are perfectly aware of those geo-strategic dynamics and that the actual exit from INF greatly penalize them while opening other enormous opportunities for us ,also and above all in the conventional struggle  and not only for the effect that on this balance will produce the grounding of the sub-strategic "Циркон" and "Кинжал" but above all because any future IRBM equiped with an Авангард vehicle will attain global reach while not being limited by START,  but them lack any credible alternatives.  

    Your point about lack of R & D is not true. The Glide Breaker program is being designed specifically to defeat hypersonic vehicles.

    https://www.fbo.gov/index.php?_cview=0&id=ba100893931fb47264d09521173f7435&mode=form&s=opportunity&tab=core

    Do IRBMs carry hypersonic glide vehicles ? If not they can be targetted using PAC 3.

    In any case what percentage of cruise missiles that Russia has (or even US has) are actually supersonic? Speed itself is not enough. Notice that there are no takers for Brahmos despite the fact that it is a supersonic missile.
    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 3896
    Points : 3876
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  miketheterrible on Tue Mar 26, 2019 12:37 pm

    They fly low so you don't need speed tbh.

    And to add to that, Russian ICBM and SRBM are quasi ballistic, not fully ballistic meaning they don't fly a straight path.

    As for their anti Hypersonic system, well, judging by history they need to really work on getting their previous systems like THAAD and PAC-3 to actually work.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4913
    Points : 4943
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Age : 77
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Tue Mar 26, 2019 1:49 pm

    RTN wrote:

    Your point about lack of R & D is not true. The Glide Breaker program is being designed specifically to defeat hypersonic vehicles.

    https://www.fbo.gov/index.php?_cview=0&id=ba100893931fb47264d09521173f7435&mode=form&s=opportunity&tab=core

    it would be strange if there was no projects in the USA to defend against hypersonic gliders. Soviets had similar project in 1980' BTW . I posted this in Avangard thread
    The question is when they will be ready since ABM is not really working since late 90s'/2000s . Does it? then why Korean missile flying over Japan couldn't be intercepted by any of US missile.
    You understand propaganda effect it it was?


    Do IRBMs carry hypersonic glide vehicles ? If not they can be targetted using PAC 3.

    Iskander-M already does, this is one of sources you can use:
    When descending to the target, the rocket maneuvers with an overload of 20-30 units (G) primarily due to aerodynamic control surfaces. The rocket has a hypersonic speed on the final segment of the trajectory of 2100-2600 m / s

    https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/09/19/russian-iskander-m-missile-system-credible-deterrent.html


    Rubezh+Avangard was foreseen as one system. And Rubezh was tested with 2000km for sure.



    R wrote: (1) what percentage of cruise missiles that Russia has (or even US has) are actually supersonic? Speed itself is not enough. (2) Notice that there are no takers for Brahmos despite the fact that it is a supersonic missile.

    (1) supersonic doesn't make sense for terrain flowing stealth missile (Kh-50, Kh-101/102) its RCS and low trajectory does the trick. But this is buy no means anti ABM weapons . War might be over before they reach destination.

    (2) better question with Brahmos is did India export any weapons ever?





    miketheterrible
    miketheterrible

    Posts : 3896
    Points : 3876
    Join date : 2016-11-06

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  miketheterrible on Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:50 pm

    Add Kalibr to that list too.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4913
    Points : 4943
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Age : 77
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Wed Mar 27, 2019 1:22 am

    miketheterrible wrote:Add Kalibr to that list too.

    hmm although Kalibr is a great CM I dont think is stealth optimized



    Kh-101
    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 X_101





    Kh-50
    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Kh59MK2_02
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5283
    Points : 5436
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:12 am

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    miketheterrible wrote:Add Kalibr to that list too.

    hmm although Kalibr is a great CM I dont think is stealth optimized

    Yes, not stealth optimized but there are ways around it. I remember when the first Kalibrs were fired from Buyan-M's into Syria from the Caspian Sea. Presumably the ECM assets in Syria were actually masking the presence of their flight. The Pentagon spokesman admitted they couldn't effectively track them. There's a saying in the English language "There's more than one way to skin a cat", RAM coating and stealth shaping are one way (only effective against X-band), the other ways include using electromagnetic spectrum opaque aerosol made up aluminum-silicate particulate which is effective in every wavelength, the other way was already mentioned is to use ECM to mask the presence of an object.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4913
    Points : 4943
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Age : 77
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:25 am

    magnumcromagnon wrote:Yes, not stealth optimized but there are ways around it. I remember when the first Kalibrs were fired from Buyan-M's into Syria from the Caspian Sea. Presumably the ECM assets in Syria were actually masking the presence of their flight. The Pentagon spokesman admitted they couldn't effectively track them. There's a saying in the English language "There's more than one way to skin a cat", RAM coating and stealth shaping are one way (only effective against X-band), the other ways include using electromagnetic spectrum opaque aerosol made up aluminum-silicate particulate which is effective in every wavelength, the other way was already mentioned is to use ECM to mask the presence of an object.

    There's no question about what you've said nonetheless Russian CMs' shape evolution shows this also has importance.
    In every case couple of hours waiting for CM application result is in war were Avangard go to antipodes in 30minutes a bit long for ABM attacking. For conventional war or retaliation of course this another story.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5283
    Points : 5436
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:34 am

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    magnumcromagnon wrote:Yes, not stealth optimized but there are ways around it. I remember when the first Kalibrs were fired from Buyan-M's into Syria from the Caspian Sea. Presumably the ECM assets in Syria were actually masking the presence of their flight. The Pentagon spokesman admitted they couldn't effectively track them. There's a saying in the English language "There's more than one way to skin a cat", RAM coating and stealth shaping are one way (only effective against X-band), the other ways include using electromagnetic spectrum opaque aerosol made up aluminum-silicate particulate which is effective in every wavelength, the other way was already mentioned is to use ECM to mask the presence of an object.

    There's no question about what you've said  nonetheless Russian  CMs' shape evolution shows this also has importance.
    In every case couple of hours waiting for CM application result is in war were Avangard go to antipodes in 30minutes a bit long for ABM attacking. For conventional war or retaliation of course this another story.

    So what do you think about the development of Kalibr-M? They'll be a range upgrade, but not a ram/shaping upgrade, which would otherwise be a naval Kh-101. It was speculated that Kh-101 would find it's way in to UKSK/M, but it seems like that's not the case. For that matter the USN has never attempted to make Tomahawks stealthy, and their obsession with stealth is myopic/tunnel-vision derangement level.
    GunshipDemocracy
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 4913
    Points : 4943
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Age : 77
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Wed Mar 27, 2019 12:03 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:So what do you think about the development of Kalibr-M? They'll be a range upgrade, but not a ram/shaping upgrade, which would otherwise be a naval Kh-101. It was speculated that Kh-101 would find it's way in to UKSK/M, but it seems like that's not the case. For that matter the USN has never attempted to make Tomahawks stealthy, and their obsession with stealth is myopic/tunnel-vision derangement level.


    same question I might ask why Kh-50 is stealthy and Kh-101 external look changed as well... Tomahawks? build form 83? c'mon   nobody is gonna to redesign them  touching them. LRASM - is new and stealthy
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5283
    Points : 5436
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Thu Jun 27, 2019 10:19 pm

    Guys, do you want a good a laugh? You want to see the prima faci definition of Orwellian double-think? I can't wait to hear from GarryB or kvs on this:

    The Pentagon began developing missiles in case of the collapse of the INF.

    The United States has announced the development of new non-nuclear missiles. According to the statement of the new executive head of the Pentagon, research is being conducted in case the DISMD is terminated.

    The Treaty on Medium and Short Range Missiles (DDRM), which is under threat of termination due to the policy of Donald Trump, may cause a new arms race. As stated by the. The head of the US military department, Mark Esper, in case of the termination of the agreement, Washington began the development of promising non-nuclear missiles.

    According to Esper, the United States complies with the provisions of the INF. However, "in order to cope with potential threats," America began developing new non-nuclear missiles. According to the head of the Pentagon, both research and development work in this direction is already underway.

    Esper: NATO should develop a missile defense system

    Mark Esper also noted that the United States and the North Atlantic Alliance should strengthen the missile defense system in order to defend themselves against any type of Russian cruise missile.

    "At the moment, European countries are under threat from cruise missiles with nuclear warheads from Russia."

    We do not want a new arms race.

    - declared Esper.

    History of SMDR

    The United States and the Soviet Union signed the Treaty on Medium and Short Range Missiles on December 8, 1987. On June 1, 1988, it entered into force. Thanks to this document, it was possible to overcome the crisis, which threatened to lead to an even greater arms race and significantly increased the risks of a nuclear war.

    The de jure treaty eliminated a whole class of missiles: the ban included the production, testing and deployment of medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles (medium range from 1,000 to 5,500 km) and a shorter range (from 500 to 1,000 km). In addition, launchers for these types of missiles fell under the same prohibitions.

    Some time ago, the United States accused the Russian Federation of violating the terms of the treaty, after which, on October 20 last year, United States President Donald Trump threatened to suspend its validity. After Trump's statements, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo presented Russia with an ultimatum, according to which Moscow had to destroy or modify the 9M729 missile: Russia refused to do so.

    At the beginning of February, Washington suspended its participation in DPDMD 2, after which Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that Moscow’s response would be a mirror one. It is assumed that the United States will withdraw from the treaty in early July.


    https://topwar.ru/159510-pentagon-nachal-razrabotku-raket-na-sluchaj-kraha-drsmd.html

    Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy! You develop INF violating missiles in case the INF treaty failed, only for the development cause the failure....and to openly admit it!!! How brazen!
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 4869
    Points : 4992
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  kvs on Thu Jun 27, 2019 10:33 pm

    I think even Eric Blair would cringe at the "logic" being spewed at Russia by NATO today.

    In the last few days NATO has given Russia an ultimatum to return to the INF even though the US has officially killed it.    Of course
    they do not expect Russia to comply.   But they do expect their lemming mass media consumers to swallow such shit up and sing
    praise be to NATO.    The ultimatum-based termination of the INF is argued to be a precursor to killing off New START by Russian
    pundits and I agree.  

    For some reason, the stellar intellect deciders in NATO have concluded that they need a nuclear arms race against Russia.
    I do not see what strategic advantage this gives them.   The only thing that I can think of is that these f*cktards are drinking
    their own urine koolaid that the USSR was bankrupted by the arms race.    As I have posted numerous times, missiles are the
    cheapest and highest bang for the buck weapons system period.    Russia is not going to waste money on building 60,000
    T-14 tanks.   It is not going to waste money build 50,000 Su-57s.   It is actually NATO that can go bankrupt since it has a
    totally corrupt MIC procurement process where the price reflects the desires of MIC corporations and not any sort of objective
    price.   If NATO does not build 60,000 Abrams, Leclercs and Leopards, then its MIC will turn missiles into price hogs like MBTs.  

    I expect a 2014 sanctions redux.   Obummer and the rest of NATO actually believed they would put Russia on its knees with
    the sanctions.   Instead, their sanctions were an epic fail and own goal.    This supports my contention that NATO deciders are
    drinking their own special koolaid.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22332
    Points : 22876
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GarryB on Fri Jun 28, 2019 8:00 am

    It is really an opportunity for Russia... what they can do is develop IRsBMs and IRCMs (intermediate range... semi ballistic and cruise missiles)... the semi ballistic missiles can be hypersonic manouvering missiles, and cruise missiles are relatively cheap that will rely on the fact that the faster semi ballistic missiles will have already nuked the airfields and SAM sites that would be a threat to cruise missiles.

    The more expensive semi ballistic missiles could be designed to be the air breathing last stage when fitted with an enormous solid rocket booster first stage to a space launch system for small satellites.

    It means Russia could build thousands of hypersonic missiles to shred EU and NATO and US defences, that could alternatively be used during peacetime to launch small short term satellites which would also be useful in times of war to replace damaged systems.

    Cruise missiles also mass produced are relatively cheap and with conventional alternative warheads can be used in conventional wars too so they are both fully dual purpose and not wasted money at all.

    Provide all with nuke warheads for when you really mean business... with the new breeder reactors that should be relatively quick and easy to achieve anyway.

    I say screw the INF treaty... the Soviets mostly went bankrupt developing a fully integrated air defence network and new layered modern SAMs and now they are being rewarded with the fruits of their labour... keeping the INF treaty means the EU can ignore the threat and not bother spending trillions of dollars not to mention the arguments between states on developing a complete EU wide air defence network that is not purely based on fighter aircraft and AWACS platforms.

    Let the west waste an enormous amount of money setting up their own air defences too...
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5283
    Points : 5436
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Sat Aug 03, 2019 12:43 pm

    Both sides are now 'officially' out of the treaty, and they've been recently pointing fingers at eachother. NATO moving it's goal posts East, and disguising it's launchers as SAMS (mk. 41 cells), the real question is how will the Federation respond? Personally I think the first response is that they develop cruise missile analog for their MLRS. Imagine if they made a family of cruise missiles for Tornado-G/Grad, Tornado-U/Uragan, Tornado-S/Smerch? I could definitely see a cruise missile for Tornado-S/Smerch having 1500-2500km range, maybe seeing the Tornado-U/Uragan cruise missiles have 1000-1500km range, and the Tornado-G/Grad equivalents that extend to 250-500km range.

    Of course they'll need to have smaller warheads to maximize the amount of fuel, which would be O.K. because they'll be carrying rather potent nuclear warheads. Another interesting option if they developed the cruise missiles for MLRS, but they made a system that allowed attack helicopters, fighter/strike bombers and other aerial vehicles that could use the newly developed MLRS cruise missiles. I could see Mi-24/28, Ka-52 using the aerial launched version of Tornado-G cruise missiles, while strike bombers like the Su-32/34 could launch the Tornado-U/S variants. The cruise missiles launched by the Su-34's would have significantly higher performance (range wise) the higher the altitude they're launched. It'll also be interesting what they could do with tactical and strategic airlift in regards to this. Could they multi-stack on the weapon pylons on the Il-476? Or maybe they could use the internal space for that capacity?
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 4869
    Points : 4992
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  kvs on Sat Aug 03, 2019 4:15 pm

    magnumcromagnon wrote:Both sides are now 'officially' out of the treaty, and they've been recently pointing fingers at eachother. NATO moving it's goal posts East, and disguising it's launchers as SAMS (mk. 41 cells), the real question is how will the Federation respond? Personally I think the first response is that they develop cruise missile analog for their MLRS. Imagine if they made a family of cruise missiles for Tornado-G/Grad, Tornado-U/Uragan, Tornado-S/Smerch? I could definitely see a cruise missile for Tornado-S/Smerch having 1500-2500km range, maybe seeing the Tornado-U/Uragan cruise missiles have 1000-1500km range, and the Tornado-G/Grad equivalents that extend to 250-500km range.

    Of course they'll need to have smaller warheads to maximize the amount of fuel, which would be O.K. because they'll be carrying rather potent nuclear warheads. Another interesting option if they developed the cruise missiles for MLRS, but they made a system that allowed attack helicopters, fighter/strike bombers and other aerial vehicles that could use the newly developed MLRS cruise missiles. I could see Mi-24/28, Ka-52 using the aerial launched version of Tornado-G cruise missiles, while strike bombers like the Su-32/34 could launch the Tornado-U/S variants. The cruise missiles launched by the Su-34's would have significantly higher performance (range wise) the higher the altitude they're launched. It'll also be interesting what they could do with tactical and strategic airlift in regards to this. Could they multi-stack on the weapon pylons on the Il-476? Or maybe they could use the internal space for that capacity?

    By opting out of the INF, the yanquis have snookered themselves. They could only cheat within a framework that limited Russia, i.e. the INF. Now
    that there are no constraints, Russia can target with any number of missiles of any type all their dual use "SAM" sites and anything else. In fact,
    Russia can target these yanqui assets with hypersonic missiles. That will take launch on warning to a whole new level. The NATO ubermenschen
    won't know what hit them.

    BTW, there must be a few brain cells in the NATO leadership. That is why they are saturating Russia's borders with military deployments. They
    want to preclude any near border positioning of Russia's counterstrike missiles. But I think they are going to fail in this task, no matter how
    many saboteurs they dispatch.

    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22332
    Points : 22876
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GarryB on Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:19 am

    This is a story of two opposed organisms... one... that used to include all of the soviet union and the warsaw pact, that was based in Moscow, and one that composed of old HATO and everyone thinks was based in brussels but is actually in fact based in Washington.

    During the cold war the quality of missiles was improving so rapidly a situation was created where HATO could base an IRBM in Turkey and within 5 minutes or so set off a nuke in Moscow effectively taking out one sides ability to launch a full retaliatory strike, so even though the Soviets had vastly more deployed IRBMs and a better air defence network it was really in their interests to eliminate this class of weapon... because otherwise they would have their nuclear response on a hair trigger because any decision to launch would have to be made within about 3 minutes of any warning... sounds like a lot of time... but 3am on new years day something has been detected coming from Turkey... it might be the first missile of an all out nuclear attack or it could be a software error or mistake... do you want to launch a full nuclear strike on the enemy knowing that even if this is not an attack that their response means it will end up being the end?

    I am not a great decision maker at 3am on anything let alone something that important.

    So an agreement was signed that pretty much stopped HATO from decapitating the Soviet response.

    Soviet IRBMs can't reach Washington so it is really not so important to them actually, and the flight time from Russian territory to Brussels or Paris or London or Berlin meant they would have had a bit more time anyway.

    Roll on 30 years and things have changed... HATO has massively expanded, but really US capacity to hit Moscow remains with new HATO members popping up all around Russian borders, so what they used to need a 1,500-2,000km range missile they could now do with a 500km range weapon... which further shortens the flight time, but their problem now is that shorter ranged missiles can be intercepted by S-300, and S-400 can actually intercept most IRBMs... and of course Pantsir and TOR systems can hit cruise missiles and other munitions... and the S-500 will be able to intercept most ICBMs and SLBMs... and of course two other factors... the ABM system around Moscow has been continually upgraded and improved with new sensors and missiles, and of course the Russians have systems in place where Putin can order a nuclear response no matter where he happens to be, and even if he can't dead hand means the missiles will be launched if needed even if no one is alive to order it...

    So for Russia the reasons for having the INF treaty have disappeared, and to be honest having a large force of IRBMs with nuclear payloads would be a very good way of dealing with a hostile EU that outnumbers them substantially, while at the same time making it clear it is about destroying a threat and not invading and occupying neighbours.

    The new weapons they develop will be very useful on their naval vessels too... long range guided hypersonic missiles... devastating.
    JohninMK
    JohninMK

    Posts : 6656
    Points : 6723
    Join date : 2015-06-16
    Location : England

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  JohninMK on Sun Aug 04, 2019 4:46 pm

    Interesting analysis

    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/08/the-end-of-the-inf-treaty-will-not-create-a-new-arms-race.html
    kvs
    kvs

    Posts : 4869
    Points : 4992
    Join date : 2014-09-11
    Location : Canuckistan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  kvs on Sun Aug 04, 2019 5:29 pm

    JohninMK wrote:Interesting analysis

    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/08/the-end-of-the-inf-treaty-will-not-create-a-new-arms-race.html

    Conclusions discussed on this site several times before.

    1) The author does not really understand, like the vast majority, what involves a "first strike".   There is no
    first strike since early warning and launch on warning has been built into MAD since the earliest stage.   So
    a first strike triggers an instantaneous counter-strike before any warheads hit their targets.   The idea
    of a decapitating first strike is retarded unless the "enemy" command and control is already decapitated.

    So a rain of nuclear warheads will fall on the USA when it decides to launch its first strike.   Its drooling idiot,
    sexual deviant leaders think that some ABM system will intercept every warhead that Russia launches.   That
    is not going to happen and 100% interception is physically impossible.   That is why I am a proponent of
    massive 1980s type launcher and warhead deployment.   Even 10% penetration (I know that it will be more
    like 90% penetration) will glass the evil yanqui empire.  

    2) The belief that the USSR imploded under the weight of an arms race is full bore ignorance and wishful thinking.
    Consider all instances of discussion of this theory.   They are full of references to budgets and costs.   Utter,
    mindnumbing ignorance.   The USSR command economy did not operate on FIAT and budgets.  It operated
    on directive.   There is no isomorphism between a capitalist economy and a command economy in key aspects
    even if there is a lot of similarity.   There is no debt and bankruptcy in a command economy.   The only issue
    is running out of energy, resources and human labour and skills.   During the 1980s Soviet workers were not
    allocated to work building nuclear missiles at the expense of growing and processing food and providing goods
    and services.  

    The shortages in the shops were due to a systemic crisis which involved outright sabotage of food transport
    to stores on a massive scale.   The Soviet elites became primitively corrupt in the capitalist fashion and concluded
    that the only way their greed could be satisfied was to get rid of the system that was preventing them from
    building mansions, hiring service staff and owning massive yachts.   What is worse, the Soviet system prevented
    them from ever becoming billionaires since they could not own corporations and vast swaths of the economy.
    So the Soviet elite started the rot from the fish head.   This pattern has been seen throughout human history.
    Read "I, Claudius" for an example.  

    Even the US itself adopted command economic measures during WWII.   To the USSR, building 50,000 tanks
    and 10,000 nuclear missiles was nothing.   Only physical constraints mattered, which means availability of
    skilled workers and resources.   The USSR had enough of these to churn out military production on a massive
    scale.   There was no budget constraint.   Something that the morons who push the "arms race bankrupted the
    USSR" theory clearly do not grasp or deliberately ignore.
    avatar
    Arrow

    Posts : 443
    Points : 443
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  Arrow on Mon Aug 05, 2019 7:52 am

    The new weapons they develop will be very useful on their naval vessels too... long range guided hypersonic missiles... devastating. wrote:

    So hypersonic weapon changes the balance of forces at sea. It causes a significant increase in the capabilities of the Russian fleet. Even a small ship with a displacement of> 1000 tons will carry Cirkons, which can pose a huge threat to the aircraft carrier and destroyers.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 22332
    Points : 22876
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  GarryB on Mon Aug 05, 2019 8:17 am

    Talk about a self-fulfilling prophecy! You develop INF violating missiles in case the INF treaty failed, only for the development cause the failure....and to openly admit it!!! How brazen!

    Well it is like all these Russian troll farms and hackers that keep hacking and interfering with US elections... then we find out that government funded organisations have been set up throughout europe that attack any pro Russian public figure and ruin their political career, or the ones in the US led by the owner of Linkdn who "tested" some techniques to effect elections there to see if the Russians could do it... their own attempts to counter the alleged actions of the Kremlin mimicked the crimes they claim the Kremlin was committing... so again they created the situation they said they were trying to prevent...

    So hypersonic weapon changes the balance of forces at sea. It causes a significant increase in the capabilities of the Russian fleet. Even a small ship with a displacement of> 1000 tons will carry Cirkons, which can pose a huge threat to the aircraft carrier and destroyers.

    Yes, although in a sense similar weapons have been available... most major long range naval SAMs are well hypersonic, but are not designed to manouver hard in the anti surface role, they perform fairly simple manouvers to intercept a target and largely rely on enormous speed and a relatively large warhead, but that probably wont be hugely effective in the anti surface role... AFAIK it has never actually been done in a combat situation.

    But relatively compact manouvering long range hypersonic missiles are going to raise the bar for air defence meaning AWACS and fighters become even more critical as layers of a defence to stop such weapons.
    avatar
    Arrow

    Posts : 443
    Points : 443
    Join date : 2012-02-12

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  Arrow on Mon Aug 05, 2019 8:56 am

    No SM-2 and SM-6 isn"t hypersonic. The maximum speed SM-6 is only 1200m/s. Missile from S-300/400 are hypersonic.
    avatar
    Mindstorm

    Posts : 868
    Points : 1035
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  Mindstorm on Tue Aug 20, 2019 12:28 am

    US has tested a ground launched cruise missile with range capability outside of the limits imposed by INF Treaty until 2 of this same month.

    https://dod.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/Videos/?videoid=703577


    Obviously nothing already attentively projected and planned since a long time....... Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes


    All of that while getting the face to accuse the Federation of theirs sins..........simply disgusting.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 4016
    Points : 4006
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  Isos on Tue Aug 20, 2019 12:47 am

    Mindstorm wrote:US has tested a ground launched cruise missile with range capability outside of the limits imposed by INF Treaty until 2 of this same month.

    https://dod.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/Videos/?videoid=703577


    Obviously nothing already attentively projected and planned since a long time....... Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes


    All of that while getting the face to accuse the Federation of theirs sins..........simply disgusting.

    More precisly a tomahawk missile from the same VLS launcher that is used in Poland and for which Russiia complained that it could be used with nuk armed tomahawks. The today test proves that US had the capacity to do so since very long time as the treaty's end was not far long ago and such conversion would take some months so they were working on it at least since last year and in my opinion they never destroy land based tomahawks.

    If it was up to me I would destroy them very quickly. And if I was European leader I would let Russians destroy them. It can only make another nuclear crisis and risk a nuclear war in a time where stupid decision makers are informed by twitter and facebook's fake news rather than by their intel. We saw that in Syria. Same missile will be used but with nuks inside.

    US are a cancer.
    magnumcromagnon
    magnumcromagnon

    Posts : 5283
    Points : 5436
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Tue Aug 20, 2019 9:13 am

    Mindstorm wrote:US has tested a ground launched cruise missile with range capability outside of the limits imposed by INF Treaty until 2 of this same month.

    https://dod.defense.gov/News/Special-Reports/Videos/?videoid=703577


    Obviously nothing already attentively projected and planned since a long time....... Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes  Rolling Eyes


    All of that while getting the face to accuse the Federation of theirs sins..........simply disgusting.

    Absolutely disgusting, this proves without a shadow of a doubt the Mk. 41 cells of Aegis Ashore were designated INF Treaty violators.

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 1566256180_jaja

    Sponsored content

    INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life   - Page 29 Empty Re: INF Treaty - coming to the end of its life

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Nov 15, 2019 7:08 am