Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Share

    milky_candy_sugar
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 404
    Points : 529
    Join date : 2009-10-30
    Age : 22
    Location : Switzerland

    Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  milky_candy_sugar on Fri Jul 23, 2010 6:06 pm

    Leading Russian spacecraft producer Energia has presented a concept of a universal military satellite with offensive capabilities.
    The 20-ton orbiter with a life expectancy of 10 to 15 years would be powered by a 150 to 500 kilowatt nuclear reactor and will be able to “monitor territories and airspace, provide informational superiority – including in armed conflicts – and perform target designation and traffic control. It will also be offensive-capable,” said Energia head Vitaly Lopota, as cited by ITAR-TASS news agency.

    He did not specify what offensive capabilities the satellite would have; whether it will be able to target other spacecraft, ground targets, or both.

    The concept goes against Russia’s voiced intention to keep space an arms-free zone. However, with several nations believed to be actively pursuing space-based or anti-satellite weapons, Energia’s design may find support among the country’s leadership.


    _________________

    NationalRus
    Senior Lieutenant
    Senior Lieutenant

    Posts : 637
    Points : 650
    Join date : 2010-04-11

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  NationalRus on Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:26 pm

    hmmm..... we need a nuclear weapons offensive military satellite... but its dangerous, the last thing that we ... the WORLD needs is a nuclear weapons race in the fucking space.... but we need some, im sure usa and even china have such programms... we need to build some and lunch them in secret under cover as a "normal" satellite... that would be my opinion

    Russian Patriot
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1168
    Points : 2062
    Join date : 2009-07-21
    Age : 25
    Location : USA- although I am Russian

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Russian Patriot on Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:33 am

    NationalRus wrote:hmmm..... we need a nuclear weapons offensive military satellite... but its dangerous, the last thing that we ... the WORLD needs is a nuclear weapons race in the fucking space.... but we need some, im sure usa and even china have such programms... we need to build some and lunch them in secret under cover as a "normal" satellite... that would be my opinion


    USA: Starwars Program!

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:56 am

    If the US wont commit to a treaty banning weapons in space then Russia simply has no choice.
    The irony is that the US is the most reliant country in the world on their extensive satellite network so they actually have the most to lose in the weaponisation of space.
    Just put some satellites in orbits that largely match the satellites the US is using to manage the war invading your country and then as they get close in their orbits flick a switch on the ground and boom both satellites disappear along with many of the other satellites around them.

    Stealthflanker
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 808
    Points : 894
    Join date : 2009-08-04
    Age : 28
    Location : Indonesia

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Stealthflanker on Sat Jul 24, 2010 4:15 pm

    Will this "Offensive Sat" will be another form of Skif/Polyus Very Happy ?

    I think if development of that "offensive Satellite" begin.. the Skif will be a good starting point


    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:28 am

    Not only was Polyus an interesting system, it was clear proof of the superior design of the Buran space shuttle system.
    Because the "main tank" and two "side mounted thrusters" are actually one rocket system that lifts the Buran into space (ie conceptually a rocket with a glider on its back, as opposed to the US space shuttle design that was like a plane with an enormous fuel tank underneath that needed two large solid rocket boosters to get it airborne) it means that the 100 tons of Buran can be left on Earth and a large satellite system up to 100 tons in weight can be lifted into earth orbit in one piece.

    Vladimir79
    Grand Marshal
    Grand Marshal

    Posts : 2193
    Points : 3099
    Join date : 2009-07-10

    Russia loses military satellite

    Post  Vladimir79 on Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:14 am

    Russia loses military satellite: reports

    AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE
    Published: 1 Feb 2011 15:51

    MOSCOW - Russia's top military and space official launched a search Tuesday for a missing military satellite that apparently was put into the wrong orbit shortly after its launch.

    The Russian defense ministry confirmed that it had lost sight of the craft - a dual-use vessel that can draw a three-dimensional map of the Earth and locate the precise positions of various targets.

    The incident came just a month after President Dmitry Medvedev sacked two top space officials for a similar setback and delivered another humiliating blow to Russia's much-maligned space industry.

    The seriousness of the situation was underscored late Tuesday by reports that the defense ministry had set up an urgent joint task force with the Russia's space agency to look for the missing craft.

    The Geo-IK-2 satellite was created in Russia to help the military survey land and create a detailed three-dimensional map of the Earth. It was designed to spin in a circular orbit 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) above ground.

    But news reports said that the satellite had been put in an elliptical orbit whose lowest point brought it to within 330 kilometers of Earth.

    "We have still not been able to establish contact with the craft, and it looks like most likely, it will be declared lost," a Russian space source told the Interfax-AVN news service.

    "The spacecraft will not be able to perform its intended functions at these orbit characteristics," another space official told the news agency.

    Reports pointed the initial blame for the failure on the satellite's Briz-KM upper stage rocket.

    The satellite's launch had already been delayed from December because of technical malfunctions that were detected at its northern Russian launch site in Plesetsk.

    Tuesday's malfunction came less than five weeks after Medvedev fired two top space officials and reprimanded the space agency chief for a launch failure caused Russia to delay the deployment of its own navigation system.

    Russia's Proton-M rocket had on that occasion proven too heavy to reach its initial orbit and had been forced to dump its three high-tech Glonass-M satellites near the Hawaii Islands.

    Investigators said that accident was caused by a basic fuel miscalculation that made the craft too heavy to reach its required height.

    The three Glonass satellites would have completed a system whose research had been started by the Soviet Union in 1976.

    http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=5593198&c=EUR&s=TOP

    Pervius
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 259
    Points : 287
    Join date : 2011-03-08

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Pervius on Tue Mar 08, 2011 10:12 am

    Problem now launching satellites for everyone....

    Everyone knows how to alter atmosphere from afar to put more drag on your missile/satellite to increase drag....not reach orbit.

    Those Russian missile tests with the big swirly's look like someone has a hand over the missile keeping it from climbing.

    New Radio Tower arrays being used to alter atmosphere far away?

    At what point will those radio tower arrays be attacked for messing with peoples stuff? Simple sensors could detect atmospheric changes showing atmosphere too dense where it's supposed to be thin...or non existent.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:43 am

    Everyone knows how to alter atmosphere from afar to put more drag on your missile/satellite to increase drag....not reach orbit.

    Gas escaping the earths atmosphere is normal... and we can't even predict the weather for next week with 100% accuracy... do you really think anyone can change the shape of the atmosphere?

    Those Russian missile tests with the big swirly's look like someone has a hand over the missile keeping it from climbing.

    It looked swirly because the rocket exhausts were oriented to make the missile spin. The best way to protect a missile from laser attack is to make it spin so that the laser can't concentrate on a single point like the rays from a magnifying glass on an ant.

    Most radio towers... are radio towers.

    And the best way to stop other people from using atmosphere weapons on you is to build your own and threaten them back.

    nightcrawler
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 559
    Points : 687
    Join date : 2010-08-20
    Age : 27
    Location : Pakistan

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  nightcrawler on Wed Mar 09, 2011 9:34 am

    Actually what it comes down to is a multitude of factors, namely the thickness of the missiles body, ablative shielding if present, the energy output of the laser, and duration of laser on the target. Depending on the laser duration on target a missile could theoretically spin fast enough to throw off a lasers damage. Mind you this is assuming something like 10 kilojoule laser roughly dumping its energy every second (effectively 10 kilojoules per second) on a target X size. The key to killing missiles and even planes (potentially even tanks in the future) is dumping the energy VERY VERY fast in pulses. Do it fast enough and not even mirrored surfaces help. Dump your same 10 kilojoules of energy on a target over .05 microseconds and you got yourself an equivalent roughly to a 20 gigawatt laser shining on said surface for 1 second

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:24 pm

    At a target sitting in a lab is one thing... over thousands of kms through space junk is another.

    Remember also that space based assets are subject to direct targeting themselves.

    Also the new Russian rockets have new boosters with shorter burn times to reduce the boost phase and when the payload reaches space there is no bus so you will have decoys deployed and individual missile warheads to deal with... that don't have enormous IR plumes at their bases to make them stand out.

    nightcrawler
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 559
    Points : 687
    Join date : 2010-08-20
    Age : 27
    Location : Pakistan

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  nightcrawler on Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:19 am

    that don't have enormous IR plumes at their bases to make them stand out.

    They will have a marginal IR signature against the cold Space though

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:51 am

    They will emit some IR energy because they will be hotter than 0 degrees Kelvin, but the difference would be enormous... spotting a rocket plume would be easy. Spotting a warhead bus from thousands of kms would be practically impossible so you would have to use radar to try to narrow the search.

    And as we know Buses are being replaced in Russian missiles by MARV warheads... so the trillions of dollars it would cost to get an effective laser constellation has been wasted...

    nightcrawler
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 559
    Points : 687
    Join date : 2010-08-20
    Age : 27
    Location : Pakistan

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  nightcrawler on Fri Mar 11, 2011 3:21 pm

    ^^
    Even if plumes be detected can you tell me if we can get precise coordinates & trajectories of warheads or just OTH radars will tell there is something out there but not have enough data to intercept them

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:42 am

    If you are firing lasers then you don't need a precise range because the speed of light is so fast that an approximate range will do... just aim a low power beam and adjust it forward till it strikes the darker part in front of the IR plume and then crank the beam up to full power.
    During the boost phase there is no manoeuvring and a simple ballistic path that is very predictable.
    Extreme manoeuvres at this stage would generate enormous g force on a very light structure designed primarily to hold a lot of fuel so even small trajectory changes need to be carefully made to prevent a collapse and destruction of the rocket.

    Pervius
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 259
    Points : 287
    Join date : 2011-03-08

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Pervius on Thu Mar 17, 2011 2:29 pm

    """... do you really think anyone can change the shape of the atmosphere?"""

    Yes. There are several countries playing with that technology.

    1997 US Secretary of Defense Cohen: """Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. """

    www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674

    You should read the Patents for HAARP that are publicly available as well as the scientific papers written by very credible scientists.

    There are people playing GOD with that technology today on Earth. These new weapons are much more powerful than nuclear bombs. Somebody could effect the atmosphere and make Russia's cotton crop fail for example. Well then they'd have to buy US cotton. See how ideal such a weapon would be? Deny space access, destroy a countries crops....don't even have to fire bullets anymore.

    God doesn't run Earth anymore.

    Russians know this:
    www.rferl.org/content/Russian_Scholar_Warns_Of_Secret_US_Climate_Change_Weapon/2114381.html
    http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6550323-russian-scientist-blames-moscow-heat-wave-on-us-climate-weapon

    nightcrawler
    Lieutenant
    Lieutenant

    Posts : 559
    Points : 687
    Join date : 2010-08-20
    Age : 27
    Location : Pakistan

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  nightcrawler on Fri Mar 18, 2011 11:46 am

    ^^
    I don't believe it study

    Cyberspec
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1946
    Points : 2117
    Join date : 2011-08-08
    Location : Terra Australis

    Russian Military Satellite Development & Launches:

    Post  Cyberspec on Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:03 pm

    Russia resumes launch of Proton-M carrier rocket
    http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/sci/2011-09/21/c_131152145.htm


    Said to be a new type of data relay satellite - "Garpun"


    Garpun (Russian: Гарпун, meaning Harpoon), GRAU index 14F136, is a new Russian Military communications satellite for operative relaying of large volumes of digital information between optical and radio survelliance satellites moving in low orbits and a ground receiving stations in real time. Garpun will replace older Potok (Geyzer) satellites which were a part of the Global Space Command and Relay System.

    More info, including video of preparation and launch:  Arrow http://orbiter-forum.com/showthread.php?t=24475

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:15 pm

    Nice.

    This will is basically the equivelant of ripping out the old network cables and putting in fibre optics.

    It will be the backbone of the C4IR system they are working on.

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5671
    Points : 6077
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Age : 40
    Location : India

    Russian military satellites

    Post  Austin on Thu Feb 23, 2012 5:46 pm

    Popovkin: new satellites will detect launches of cruise missiles

    "First of all, 100 new units, which must be received in the armed forces - is, first of all, a new quality of information. New quality of intelligence information over a broadband noise immunity and stable relationship. This detection system not only launches of ballistic missiles and cruise , operational and tactical missiles. This mapping system is to bind high-precision weapons, "- said Popovkin.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Fri Feb 24, 2012 7:49 am

    These satellites will be part of a new network of sensors that combine ground based, air based, and space based sensors including radar and EO sensors monitoring the air and space above Russia and also likely reaching over neighbouring countries and territory too.

    The advantage of space based systems is that they share the ability to look down at low flying threats, yet they are less vulnerable to air defences than aircraft.

    Aircraft are obviously cheaper, but because of the height the satellites operate at they offer broader coverage.

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5671
    Points : 6077
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Age : 40
    Location : India

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Austin on Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:37 pm

    Russia to Launch 100 Military Satellites in Next Decade

    Russia is planning to launch at least 100 military satellites in the next 10 years to boost its reconnaissance and missile detection capabilities, head of Russian Space Agency Roscosmos Vladimir Popovkin said on Wednesday.

    “The new 100 satellites will provide us with better quality intelligence, faster and more reliable communications,” Popovkin said in an interview with Vesti 24 television.


    “This will also enable us to detect the launches and track not only ballistic, but also cruise missiles, theater and tactical missiles,” Popovkin said.


    The expansion of the military satellite cluster will also boost global positioning and mapping capabilities of the Russian military, which is necessary to guide advanced high-precision weapons being developed in Russia.

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5671
    Points : 6077
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Age : 40
    Location : India

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Austin on Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:39 pm

    The ability to track cruise missile and TBM at theatre level is very interesting.

    Hopefully it also has ability to provide Fire Control data to ABM system as American future Satellite will be getting.

    100 is a big number , considering currently they have 60 odd satellites which are military and dual purpose.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15468
    Points : 16175
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  GarryB on Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:24 am

    Communication satellites will make efforts to improve C4IR much easier and extend the reach of UAVs/UCAVs.

    Many satellites will simply be part of the GLONASS constellation, and of course their new satellites to perform the mission of Legenda will add numbers too.

    They will want coverage of Europe and the US and China with IR sensor equipped satellites to detect BM launches too.

    Austin
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5671
    Points : 6077
    Join date : 2010-05-08
    Age : 40
    Location : India

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Austin on Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:55 pm

    GLONASS will take 28 odd satellites in orbit , the rest 70 satellites will be communication and reconnance (C4ISR ) , Early Warning , EO/SAR satellites and special one like Naval ELINT/Submarine Detection etc

    I hope they realise that protection against anti-satellite system , robotic sats , laser that US will deploy early on during conflict are taken care off

    Sponsored content

    Re: Russian Military Satellites: News & Development

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 1:05 pm


      Current date/time is Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:05 pm