Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Share

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Viktor on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:06 pm

    victor7 wrote: Syria has S300 and Iran only a domestic version of HQ-9.

    Syria does NOT have S-300 and god know what has Iran but I doubt is HQ-9.

    It may be some PR info war.

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:11 pm

    Syria announced an intention to buy the S-300P in 1991 and now seems to possess the system. During the Syrian revolution, Russia supplied the Syrian military with an array of S-300 missiles and sent Russian technical advisors with the missiles to provide the technical support for Syrian military to operate the missiles


    The above is from Wikipedia.

    Why would a country buy S-300 system and not order say a dozen Mig-31s. Syria also orderd 8 Foxhounds but delivery got stopped either by pressure from Israel or Syrian lack of funds.

    Israel threatened Russia that it will 'neutralize' S-300 if these were delivered to Iran. It seems Russia bucked and stopped the S-300 sales to Tehran. Do not know the real reason. Also, Russia has stopped the production of S-300 since few months ago. All focus is on S-400 and S-500 down the road.

    Mindstorm
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 737
    Points : 920
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Mindstorm on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:15 pm

    Syria has S300 but range is only 150-200 kms.

    Victor please , try to participate in a serious way : Syria has NOT any S-300 of any type ,the latest SAM it will receive is BUK-M2E ,in observance to has signed a contract still not implemented (at now only some evaluations units of this system are present in Syria ).

    Notio
    Private
    Private

    Posts : 17
    Points : 17
    Join date : 2012-02-22

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Notio on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:42 pm

    victor7 wrote: Syria announced an intention to buy the S-300P in 1991 and now seems to possess the system. During the Syrian revolution, Russia supplied the Syrian military with an array of S-300 missiles and sent Russian technical advisors with the missiles to provide the technical support for Syrian military to operate the missiles


    The above is from Wikipedia.


    There is a lot of good information in Wikipedia, but also a serious amount of inaccuracies and outright lies/false information. There are no reliable sources confirming S-300 in Syria claims, if such a deal was to be made you should expect a lot of noice and protesting from Israel as happened with the S-300 deal to Iran and Yahkont sales to Syria.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  GarryB on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:46 pm

    In the case of Syria (for example), would these foxhounds if available be vulnerable to F22s and F35s.

    First of all lets eliminate the F-35 it is simply not ready for service yet.

    With the F-22 a foreign deployment of F-22s would not go unnoticed and whereever they are based becomes a target for Syrian Scuds and Scud modifications.

    Basing F-22s would be considered an act of war by Syria as soon as the first explosions occur, so any tankers belonging to NATO would be on the hit list along with any airborne early warning aircraft.

    Ground based radar would be used, and I think probably a press release stating that any attack on Syria would lead to a direct attack on Israel and western assets in the region (ie oil assets and US bases) would be targeted if Syria was attacked by an outside threat would be sufficient to prevent the US risking an attack.

    If they do attack then launching Scuds at nuclear facilities in Israel and US oil interests in Jordan and Iraq would be priority one.

    The Israeli airforce would kill the Syrian Air Force, though with Mig-31s they would certainly have plenty of losses themselves.

    The biggest problem with the Arabs vs the west and the Arabs vs Israel is their division...

    The point is that the USAF will not deploy the F-22s anywhere.

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:47 pm

    Mindstorm wrote:
    Syria has S300 but range is only 150-200 kms.

    Victor please , try to participate in a serious way : Syria has NOT any S-300 of any type ,the latest SAM it will receive is BUK-M2E ,in observance to has signed a contract still not implemented (at now only some evaluations units of this system are present in Syria ).

    Syria has S300 or not does not matter, the question is how to defend a territory using a combination of S300 and Foxhounds. The attackers being F22s and F35s using stealth cruise missiles.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  GarryB on Sun Mar 04, 2012 9:55 pm

    The whole concept of stealth aircraft was intended to defeat the combination of S-300 and Foxhound... both of which are late 1970s designs originally.

    It is like saying "How do you use an M47 US tank to defeat a T-90AM"

    In a conventional air attack both the Foxhound and S-300 can engage conventional enemy aircraft at extended ranges and cruise missiles at medium ranges.

    Make them stealthy and the effective ranges shrink dramatically to the point where they are not much use.

    But then you could say the value of having such systems drives up the cost of the attack.

    The 120 cruise missiles used in Libya were not stealthy uber cruise missiles, and the aircraft used in the attack would all have been vulnerable to S-300s and Foxhounds.

    The solution to evade S-300 most of the time is to fly very low... where MANPADS become a threat.

    The point is that the cost of a regime change has skyrocketed when the opposition starts using air defence systems developed in the 1970s and 1980s by the Soviets.

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:10 pm

    Make them stealthy and the effective ranges shrink dramatically to the point where they are not much use.

    This means Russia is vulnerable to salvos of stealthy cruise missile attacks in combination with F22s acting as some sort of jammer initially. May be IR type missiles might be able to locate these stealth cruisers and real late stage CIWS should fire like mad once JASSMs are optically visible.

    Btw, does US have the capability to monitor a area say 10km x 10km in the real time via satellite. I know they can do that via spec ops planted in the area. But purely satellite ability is the question. Because that would further erode the advantages of mobile SAMs.

    Mindstorm
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 737
    Points : 920
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Mindstorm on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:05 am


    the question is how to defend a territory using a combination of S300 and Foxhounds.The attackers being F22s and F35s using stealth cruise missiles.


    Question Question

    Victor i truly don't understand what is your fixation with F-22 and F-35 m which are obviously among the less worrying menaces for Russia in an eventual conflict against USA .

    1) F-22 and F-35 DON'T carry in theirs internal weapon bay any type of long range (stealthy or not) cruise missiles , therefore if you want at any cost to employ those two aircraft (...i don't know why, but those seem to me the typical symptomes of the infamous F-16 . net disease) at least try to maintain integer their distinctive CONOPS and capabilities.
    If instead you want to talk of a BY FAR much efficient and truly dangerous massive stand-off cruise missile attack ,obviously those two aircraft have literally zero strategic value and what become critically important is the efficiency of the opposing IAD's layers capable to credibly deal with that menace

    2) The corollary to what up said is that the employment of stand-off cruise missiles and ballistic missiles attacks can render any critical not hardened asset, such as C4, radar stations and ....airfields of an enemy devoid of a very extensive ,dense and multilayered IAD ,COMPLETELY WORTHLESS and incapable even only to come into play in the conflict's operations (from that derive the very strong emphasis putted by Russians in the anti-ballistic and anti-cruise missile performances of almost any of its domestic SAM systems).
    Destroy Elmendorf Air Base with almost any assets and aircraft here present (only to respond to your question on F-22s) become a truly trivial task employing real strategically useful capabilities between military great power .such as stand-off cruise missile attacks and even more ballistic missiles attacks.
    Several groups of mobile Klub missile launchers form well within Russian Federation territory under the protection several layers and several hundreds of Kilometers of national IAD and Aior Forces, exit for a pair of minutes from : multi-exit redeploying tunnels , abandoned hangars, old trains stock, a group of inflatable launchers etc..etc...shoot theirs missiles and quickly disperse or return to the tunnels for reload and prepare to attack another target . From this instant the only element capable to save thiosd assets from complete annihilation is the quality and extension of the multilayered IAD at its defense ...if present.

    URSS/Russia invest in this type of multilayered Strategic IAD since '50 years ; the results are : Mig-31 the aircraft at world by far more optimized for the task, various type of mobile ground based long range EW assets like SPN-2/4 ,SPN-30/40, 1L245 series and various type of GPS jammers (any of which ,like you well know, with a level of jamming power radiated 6-7 times greater than the greater airborne one !!), Long range SAM ,such as S-300 family, with 360 degree engagement capabilities and impressive anti-low-altitude cruise missiles and anti-ballistic missile capabilities, Medium range SAMs such as BUK-M1/2 with very good cruise missile interception features, and point defense systems , such as Tunguska-M1, Tor-M1/2, Pantsyr-s1 and Igla/Igla-s MANPADS all with impressive anti missile/PGM capabilities .
    Now i am curious to know what is the "made-in-USA" corresponding of a Tor-M1 or a SPN-40 or a Tunhuska-M1 or Pantsyrs-S1 and the extension and density of the IAD ..if the employment of a similar word wouldn't appear ironic in this instance...at defense of its widely spread and insulated airbases and command centers , capable to save all those assets from similar decapitating attacks conducted safely from thousands of kilometers of distance under full protection of the enemy entire Air Force and National IAD Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:28 am

    JASSM with range of 370Kms can be launched by F35.
    JASSM-ER/XR can be launched from 500 to 900 to 1600 from the target even by a legacy bird.

    The challenge for Russian AD and RuAF is the

    "ability to detect, track and kill stealth aircrafts and missiles at longer ranges than 60km by S400 and that too in a hostile full power jamming assault on own assets."

    F22 is a game changer and only lion in the jungle until Pakfa comes out in 2015.

    Btw, thanks for the informative reply. So you think that Russian Federation will be able to "hold off" and "repel" a full scale USAF assault......successfully.

    If someone asks me, I would say ICBMs are currently the main and probably the ONLY source of threat that Russia can pose to US/NATO and that is why Medvedev came on tv to warn about ABM plans in Poland and Czech. Once ABM is in full swing, then Russia's ability to counter strike will diminish by alot and that is why Russian high command is really worried. Strategic Rocket Forces (i.e. missiles research) has been probably the only area in Russian Defense that was not brutally neglected in the 1990s and hence Russian lead in air to air missiles, Topols etc.






    Last edited by victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:34 am; edited 1 time in total

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  GarryB on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:29 am

    This means Russia is vulnerable

    THAT IS THE KEY.

    Russia is vulnerable.

    There is not sense in trying to be invulnerable because such a state does not exist.

    Russia is vulnerable to stealth cruise missiles.

    NATO and the US is vulnerable to stealth cruise missiles.

    Russia is vulnerable to submarine launched ballistic missiles.

    The US is vulnerable to submarine launched ballistic missiles.

    It is the same with ICBMs.

    It is the same with suicide bombers.

    This means Russia is vulnerable to salvos of stealthy cruise missile attacks in combination with F22s acting as some sort of jammer initially.

    If an F-22 wan'ts to give away its position by being a jammer then that is their mistake.

    Btw, does US have the capability to monitor a area say 10km x 10km in the real time via satellite. I know they can do that via spec ops planted in the area. But purely satellite ability is the question. Because that would further erode the advantages of mobile SAMs.

    The US has shown zero capability to hit scud launcher vehicles before they launch, their performance against mobile SAMs is worse.

    Russia is too far north.

    Satellites can't hover like you see in the movies, unless it is in a geostationary orbit very high up and near the equator, a satellite comes over every 90 minutes or so and can see one spot on the ground for between 2 and 6 minutes depending on its flight path in relation to the spot on the ground.

    Most Russian SAMs are mobile to some degree, and some, like Pantsir-S1 can fire while moving... the thing is that the Russians would never just sit and take a US or NATO attack... odds are they would strike back... and NATO and the US's ability to stop a stealth cruise missile attack is worse than Russias.

    The advantage of mobile SAMs over static SAMs is proven in Libya and any conflict before it.

    MANPADS are effective because they are mobile and concealable.

    They force the enemy to fly higher... that is their goal and a sign of their success.

    It is normally the cost of the rest of the required system that prevents most non colonial/non imperialist countries from defending themselves against Team America World Lynch mob.

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:40 am

    They force the enemy to fly higher... that is their goal and a sign of their success.

    Just read that JDAMs and JSOWs can be launched by planes flying at 33-40,000 feet. I think that's what was happening in Libya and more so because both J's have gps/intertial/laser based targeting support and these can be updated while in flightalso.


    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  GarryB on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:50 am

    Btw, thanks for the informative reply. So you think that Russian Federation will be able to "hold off" and "repel" a full scale USAF assault......successfully.

    There wouldn't be an attack in the first place.

    Very simply the F-22 is not for Russia, it is to pinch oil from Libya when Libya starts buying S-300s and Flankers.

    If the F-22 ever crossed the Russian border in anger the result will very quickly become nuclear.

    Putin himself has already said that current conventional military options are accurate enough to be comparable to nuclear attack in terms of decapitation, so any conventional attack by NATO on Russia would be considered a nuclear attack and be replied in kind.

    Very simply the goal of any attack would be assumed to be aimed at taking out Russias nuclear deterrent capability before they could use it. The obvious response is to use it before you lose it.

    F22 is a game changer and only lion in the jungle until Pakfa comes out in 2015.

    Not even slightly. It is a very expensive conventional weapon that can only have one purpose against Russia and therefore can't be used... just like a Minuteman III.

    Game changer is a stupid term, war is not a game. Most of the time it is murder for property or possessions. Recently it has been on moral grounds which is even worse.

    Even if you consider war a game, what is a game changer? Does it suddenly become Soccer?

    Will the F-22 suddenly allow the US to do what it wants? It does that anyway. Will it suddenly be able to invade countries and not lose all its fighters to enemy action? It is already doing that.

    Will it make North Korea and Iran so scared they will work even harder on nuclear weapons to try to defend themselves? Probably.

    Will it be invincible and make America never lose in combat ever again... I doubt it.

    Will it help in Afghanistan and Iraq? Nope.

    Will it cost the US taxpayers enormous amounts of money never go any where near Russia or China and currently be grounded because of problems with oxygen generation systems? Yup.

    Once ABM is in full swing, then Russia's ability to counter strike will diminish by alot and that is why Russian high command is really worried.

    The US ABM system is not really a threat as such, in its current form it is pathetic and can easily be fooled. The problem is that being sea based with potentially thousands of missiles, and being unregulated and unlimited that eventually it might evolve into something that the US might think is more effective than it is. This makes it dangerous because the US might get to the point where it thinks in combination of a first strike with stealth and SLBMs located close to Russia that much of Russias nuclear capability could be neutralised to the point where the ABM shield could stop the remainder.

    The problem is not that it will stop the Russian retaliation, but it will make the conflict more likely in the first place.

    And the new Russian ICBMs should have no trouble evading US ABM systems for several decades to come, though if plans for the US ABM systems around the world go forward I can see Russia withdrawing from the New Start and INF treaties and putting nukes into large scale production.

    Regarding the lack of Russias ability to invade the US... just shows what poppycock all that cold war crap about the threat of the Soviet Union was all about... nothing.

    Russia used to be an imperial power but since WWII the only imperial powers are the west.


    so because both J's have gps/intertial/laser based targeting support and these can be updated while in flightalso.

    To hit their targets they need to get lower though...

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:13 am

    Btw, recent studies and simulations by US have shown that nukes are not that big a danger as in few weeks the nation can be brought back to half the normalcy atleast. More damage was done by Katrina Storm than 1 megaton H-Bomb would do the same city.

    parowanprophet.com/Nuclear_War_Comes/May_25_83_Revelation.htm

    Upto 10-15 H-Bombs around US, say launched by China, they say "would be taken without as much as a minor flinch on the face". More damage would be in form of economic, social terms than infrastructure and industrial. That is why Obama is suggesting reduction of US nukes by 80% as they know more damage can be done by conventional means that they are developing.


    However, their new focus is on items like 'Rods from Gods', EMP bombs, Free Electron Lasers, Ground Penetrating Radars based on Quantum Entanglement Theories. Russia is not too far behind on these but for financing and also lots of financing eaten up by defense industry corruption. To the tune of 20% of the annual budget as acknowledged by Medvedev on tv.

    A truck size and weight projectile launched from space at hyper speed can devastate a big city more than Hiroshima nuke of 15kt or even H-Bomb of 5 Megaton. That is the concept of 'rods from gods'. This concept is more on upswing as it does not voilate the space treaty which disallows the nuclearization of space.


    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15470
    Points : 16177
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  GarryB on Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:08 am

    Btw, recent studies and simulations by US have shown that nukes are not that big a danger as in few weeks the nation can be brought back to half the normalcy atleast. More damage was done by Katrina Storm than 1 megaton H-Bomb would do the same city.

    And before Katrina I remember talking to Americans who said that the lawlessness that occured in places like Iraq and Afghanistan when the US removed law and order in each country would never happen in the US.

    Yet we have seen law and order break down over a black guy getting beaten up by police.

    The US went to pieces over a couple of planes hitting some buildings and killing less than 3,000 people... many of which weren't even Americans.

    Every major city in the US being hit by a nuclear weapon would reduce America to no longer being a world power.

    Upto 10-15 H-Bombs around US, say launched by China, they say "would be taken without as much as a minor flinch on the face".

    Based on what evidence/experience?

    That is why Obama is suggesting reduction of US nukes by 80% as they know more damage can be done by conventional means that they are developing.

    Obama is happy to give up some nukes because it has NATO and a fully functioning conventional military.

    NOTICE HOWEVER OBAMA STILL WANTS PARITY. The US isn't going to give up nukes for nothing. They wont say... well you have 1,500 nukes but we only need 500 so we are going to give up more than you will...

    The warheads they are giving up are not even being destroyed, they are storing them. The Russia nukes on the other hand are being sold to American companies to be processed to use in nuclear power stations.

    A truck size and weight projectile launched from space at hyper speed can devastate a big city more than Hiroshima nuke of 15kt or even H-Bomb of 5 Megaton. That is the concept of 'rods from gods'. This concept is more on upswing as it does not voilate the space treaty which disallows the nuclearization of space.

    Not sure where you heard that, but that is rubbish. When accuracy is high but you don't want a lot of damage often a HE payload might be replaced with something inert like concrete... especially for practise weapons.

    The so called rods from god (which I think is boll0cks BTW... right up there with game changer, and mother of all bombs) is mainly about hitting very small precise targets, like the room in a building or a particular car.

    The projectile might have the energy of a truck, but will not be anywhere near that size because if it was it would rapidly slow down and burn up during reentry and only hit the target supersonically.

    I think you might be confusing rods of god with rocks from space... which are travelling 5 or more times faster at 20-30km/s.

    Rods of god as the name suggests will likely be rods of very dense material designed to be very low drag.

    The obvious problem is that they are basically launched by ICBM and one ICBM launch looks like any other ICBM launch and if the Russians or the Chinese believe they are directed at them then it is likely they will retaliate with real ICBMs.

    So called rods of god missiles would be indistinguishable from real ICBMs and will therefore count as real ICBMs.

    At the end of the day if the US wants to give up real nukes for high speed penetrators that might kill a few people at a time then that is their choice, but I doubt they'd get it through congress.

    BTW a 5 megaton bomb would have a fireball 10km across inside which everything would be incinerated... a rod of god would punch a very deep hole in the ground about 30cm across... not even nearly comparable... whoever told you that is on drugs.

    Mindstorm
    Captain
    Captain

    Posts : 737
    Points : 920
    Join date : 2011-07-20

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Mindstorm on Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:25 am

    JASSM with range of 370Kms can be launched by F35.

    JASSM-ER/XR can be launched from 500 to 900 to 1600 from the target even by a legacy bird.



    The challenge for Russian AD and RuAF is the

    "ability to detect, track and kill stealth aircrafts and missiles at longer ranges than 60km by S400 and that too in a hostile full power jamming assault on own assets."

    F22 is a game changer and only lion in the jungle until Pakfa comes out in 2015.


    Victor7 please , please , do you realise that not reading what other people write (or ,for better say ,i hope for you that you don't read...because if you read the problem would be a much more serios problem of comprehension) damage ,not reinforce your line of reasoning ?

    That is NOT F16 . net, here repeating 100 or 1000 times ridiculous,low level mantras devoid of any empirical grounding and founded on the basis of odd ideas and comical misunderstanding conceived by confused or fanatical amateurs will only render your position less and less credible.


    JASSM with range of 370Kms can be launched by F35.


    JASSM CANNOT be carried in the internal weapon bay of F-35 (and even less a F-22)
    Only to be more clear, a supersonic B1B with a much greater range is ,for this specific role (practically the only with some weight in a conlict between world level powers) ,immensely more efficient than F-35.

    Like you can see any line of argument , at the end of the day, return on the unique element having some weight in a conflict between advanced opponents : stand off cruise missile attacks.

    In this optic ,Victor7, you can easily realise that the problem exist obviously NOT for the side owning a monstrous extensive and lutilayered IAD, which, to the contrary ,create billions of immense problems and strategic bonds for the enemy, but on the side lacking a similar IAD , because the same assets necessary for carry out attacks against the enemy would be easily and very quickly destroyed by the enemy employing the same stamd-off offensive means in a progressively faster demotion's chained process of its offensive military capabilities ,clear ?




    ability to detect, track and kill stealth aircrafts and missiles at longer ranges than 60km by S400

    I have understood perfectly ....and unfortunately Rolling Eyes Rolling Eyes .... from what come from this odd figure of 60 km for S-400 and F-22 Laughing Laughing , you have two possibilities at this point:

    1) Elaborate your model of representation of the tracking sequence, avoiding to fall in the traps of involved parametrical figures.....completely out of line Smile Smile
    2) Read what other ,nore informed people have written and ,hopefully, realize the laughable misunderstandings that had originated those odd numberes.

    You can see from future air defense plans that Russia ,after introduction of the latest OLS , EW assets and above all the latest generation SAM systems is so sure to having fully responded,from its root, to actual menaces ,don't even consider LO/VLO aerodynamics targets still as a threat element against which shape the requirements of its future air defense systems ,and instead work intensively and has redirected all it s R&D work ,already since several years, toward the neutralization of future offensive means ,such as low orbit hypersonic weapons and space based tracking, offensive and defensive means.


    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 1:59 pm

    cracked.com/article_16477_5-famous-sci-fi-weapons-that-theyre-actually-building.html

    Future hi tech weapons that they are actually building. Link from 2008 so must have added some more.

    medo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3051
    Points : 3149
    Join date : 2010-10-24
    Location : Slovenia

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  medo on Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:01 pm

    Syria has S300 and Iran only a domestic version of HQ-9.

    Syria and Iran have S-200 (SAM-5) not S-300. I know Iran produce Chinese HQ-2 (SAM-2) and domestic improved HAWK as well as Crotale and Rapier.


    The challenge for Russian AD and RuAF is the

    "ability to detect, track and kill stealth aircrafts and missiles at longer ranges than 60km by S400 and that too in a hostile full power jamming assault on own assets."

    F22 is a game changer and only lion in the jungle until Pakfa comes out in 2015.
    [quote]

    In 1999 war in FRY, Serbs have no problem to see stealth B-2 and F-117 with their old metric wave radars and Russia have a lot of new metric wave radars as Nebo-U, Nebo-SV, Nebo-SVU and Nebo-M as well as a lot of other passive detecting systems, so Russian air force and air defense will not have such problem to see F-22 and F-35 on long distances. When they are spotted, they could send Su-35 fighters, which will intercept them using IRST and L-band wing radar. Su-35 and F-22 will end fighting in dogfights, where Su-35 is no worse than F-22, because Su-35 could easily detect and overcome AMRAAMs launched from F-22 or F-35.

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:24 pm

    In 1999 war in FRY, Serbs have no problem to see stealth B-2 and F-117 with their old metric wave radars

    Shot down 1 F-117 by flight path information and then flooding the area matrix with missiles............and that proved the ability to see stealth for the end of time.
    This impracticality scares me and hope RuAF does not think like that. Best counter point is 'if so, the why did not FRY shoot down more Stealths' and why did not they develop technologies to export to others who are on the list of 'bad guys' for the US.

    This brings me to another crucial point. Not only Russia has to develop ways to see, track and kill stealth at longer distances, it also has to develop more robust defenses for the next layers of the IAD. End of it, the most vulnerable items like Tanks, BMDs, Troop trucks, Artillery, mobile AAA, Mobile C2s etc. need to be protected in order to do their jobs well. With laser/INS/GPS guided bombing taking place from 40K feet, there is a limit to how much Tor/Buks can do to protect columns on the move. Pantsirs seem nice but they are expensive. If MANPADS can't kill 40K birds then there has to be tech to kill off the JDAM/JSOW/SMACM and other launched. I am talking about end stage CIWS and cheap and small enough to be installed on each tank, BMD and offer protection of 1 km radius. At what speed do JDAMs fall? I bet several Machs, so there has to be a way to kill or deflect them before they hit the intended target. Be it Laser/Small Missile/CIWS or whatever. With this in place the overwhelming advantage of USAF to 'bomb at will' will be mostly gone. F22s can take out S-200/300/400 SAMs and then Tor/Buk and even Pantsirs. But ability to deny their weapons reaching moving troops and machines will force their hands out of the game. However, in next 5 years, US will be fielding robotic warriors good enough to put a dogged fight and meeting full or partial ground objectives.

    Developing the end stage defenses will be a boost for the Russian defense industries. Nations will have to put $100M to buy a couple of Su-35s but for the same amount they can have enough goodies to protect a small coloum of thousand troops and dozen tanks moving into a area and getting the job done.




    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 4:42 pm

    When they are spotted, they could send Su-35 fighters, which will intercept them using IRST and L-band wing radar. Su-35 and F-22 will end fighting in dogfights, where Su-35 is no worse than F-22, because Su-35 could easily detect and overcome AMRAAMs launched from F-22 or F-35.


    In 1995, Pavel Grachev the Russian Defense Minister confidently quipped regarding attack on Grozny "Oh, it will take only two small brigades of VDV troops to finish off the rebels in 3 days at most". What actually happened is known to everyone and how much did it cost Russian in 2 Chechen wars? I can say easily $10B and probably much more in direct military costs. Do not mention the troops and civilians killed, there is no dearth of troops and civilians in Russia to be used as cannon fodder. Also, how many towns and villages blown into rubbles.

    The above comment quoted is very much on those lines as made by the corrupt former defense minister. So for now, a squadron of F22s can eat up, digest and spit the bones out of............any legacy air force and that includes airforces with Su-35s fielding 60 Km IRST capability. There is a rumor that Russian and Chinese pilots carry some gadgets with them to see and track stealth. But that is only a rumor, not a fact and can't count on rumors to save the country from aggressors.

    Firebird
    Lieutenant Colonel
    Lieutenant Colonel

    Posts : 909
    Points : 941
    Join date : 2011-10-14

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Firebird on Mon Mar 05, 2012 6:46 pm

    One approach would be "curtains" of radar balloons around Russia's borders.
    ( I suspect some so called UFOs are actually variations on this technology)
    Another approach is to build more secret bases.

    But if certain powers can invade Russian airspace, what else can Russia do in return?
    Can Russia send Pak-Fas into US airspace? This is obviously v tricky due to distances - unless Cuba or somewhere is used as a base.

    Clearly tho' stealth and counter stealth are becoming more and more important.
    Who knows how important when laser and railgun techology etc is in full force..

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:04 pm

    NEW TECH TO LOCATE MOBILE SAMs LIKE S300s.

    ausairpower.net/sargmti-intro.html

    The most revolutionary change which the wide deployment of SAR/GMTI capable radars will bring is the contraction of the targeting cycle. Targets can be detected, located, identified, engaged and damage assessed in a matter of minutes. The targeting cycle is then contracted down to a look-shoot-kill-look cycle, all under arbitrary weather conditions and at standoff ranges, if suitable munitions are used.

    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Viktor on Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:14 pm

    victor7 wrote:In 1999 war in FRY, Serbs have no problem to see stealth B-2 and F-117 with their old metric wave radars
    Shot down 1 F-117 by flight path information and then flooding the area matrix with missiles............and that proved the ability to see stealth for the end of time.
    This impracticality scares me and hope RuAF does not think like that. Best counter point is 'if so, the why did not FRY shoot down more Stealths' and why did not they develop technologies to export to others who are on the list of 'bad guys' for the US.


    Serbs needed to see, track and guide old S-75 at F-117 to shoot it down.

    They where not shooting missiles blinded. They see F-117 coming, they could track it and they could shoot it. End of story.

    victor7 wrote:F22s can take out S-200/300/400 SAMs and then Tor/Buk and even Pantsirs. But ability to deny their weapons reaching moving troops and machines will force their hands out of the game. However, in next 5 years, US will be fielding robotic warriors good enough to put a dogged fight and meeting full or partial ground objectives.

    F-22 has rather small combat radius. From what bases would US launched F-22/35 on attack missions to Russia. Georgia/Litva/Latvia/Finland??? LOL
    Do you thing its employment would go unnoticed or its airstrips go unharmed?

    You talk about F-22/35 like stealth is an ultimate weapon that can not be detected or seen by any means until its too late and swarms of missiles are flying left and right and there is nothing you could do but surrender keys of the Kremlin. LOL

    You are using digits about its stealth like its a word of God when saying 0.000001 etc. In reality we can never be sure until some war erupts where those weapons will be used. Same has being said in the past about F-117 until Serbs took it down with 30 year old technology. So what now. Now is F-22 that has undetectable stealth. LOL Well if it not for Serbs, US would still spam about undetectable F-117.

    In reality stealth has its advantages. For certain frequency reduces detection/tracking range. For others it does NOT. Thats why Russia uses all sorts of different methods to deal with the threat.

    But you have some way of thinking that I do not understand. Russian equivalent of you could say. What the idea of the "west" with all those ships when Russia has build antiship missiles that fly several times faster than the speed of sound, communicate to each other, have artificial intelligence, can manoeuvre when incoming have largest warheads of all, can be fired from ships, subs, planes and in conjunction with EW from space, land, sea and air see all whats going on everywhere ... and press on with the story.

    We did not know how invisible F-117 was until it got shot down. US than realized it can be seen and shoot down and pull it to the graveyard of history only to pop up with the next undetectable undestroyable ... LOL

    btw JDAM does not go anywhere near speed of the sound not to mention few of them. Its speed is about 100m/s witch is sitting duck for systems like Tor-M1 witch was designed from the first place to be able to knock down MACH 2+ type missile and guess why that. Look at HARMs speed.



    Viktor
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5629
    Points : 6282
    Join date : 2009-08-25
    Age : 36
    Location : Croatia

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Viktor on Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:26 pm

    victor7 wrote:NEW TECH TO LOCATE MOBILE SAMs LIKE S300s.

    ausairpower.net/sargmti-intro.html

    The most revolutionary change which the wide deployment of SAR/GMTI capable radars will bring is the contraction of the targeting cycle. Targets can be detected, located, identified, engaged and damage assessed in a matter of minutes. The targeting cycle is then contracted down to a look-shoot-kill-look cycle, all under arbitrary weather conditions and at standoff ranges, if suitable munitions are used.

    LOL. And Russia has satellites that can see everything and pick up radar signals and triangular its position right after ballistic missile comes in.

    It would be very dangerous to fly JSTARS near Russian borders. This type of assets is very useful once you have air supremacy to locate and find and bomb ground targets. You do not wan to have this type of equipment flying in the same area with S-300/MIG-31/Su-35BM/PAK-FA

    victor7
    Senior Sergeant
    Senior Sergeant

    Posts : 216
    Points : 229
    Join date : 2012-02-27

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  victor7 on Mon Mar 05, 2012 8:41 pm

    Do not even want to discuss "1 Glory" kill of F-117 which was a result of a shot gotten more lucky than the megamillion lottery ticket.

    You talk about F-22/35 like stealth is an ultimate weapon that can not be detected or seen by any means until its too late and swarms of missiles are flying left and right and there is nothing you could do but surrender keys of the Kremlin. LOL

    First find me a way to detect, track and kill F22s from 200km or better 400km, then come and talk about how big chunk of USAF it can gobble up within half an hour. That S400 can track subsonic stealth cruise missile at 60kms is somewhat of a relief. It can always find a way to kill it or go silent and scooter away a couple of miles to safety.



    What the idea of the "west" with all those ships when Russia has build antiship missiles that fly several times faster than the speed of sound, communicate to each other, have artificial intelligence, can manoeuvre when incoming have largest warheads of all, can be fired from ships, subs, planes and in conjunction with EW from space, land, sea and air see all whats going on everywhere ... and press on with the story.

    UK is soon launching Sea Ceptor missile by 2015 that would be an answer to Moskits and Yakhonts. Also, Type 45 destroyer has L-Band SMART-L radar and others which can require a salvo of 8-12 ASMs before the boat is hit. The problem with Russian mindset is they develop something and then sit and enjoy it over several days of vodka and go to sleep for a whole week. The west builds something and after a very short break, goes onto further improving and devicing mode.

    btw JDAM does not go anywhere near speed of the sound not to mention few of them. Its speed is about 100m/s witch is sitting duck for systems like Tor-M1 witch was designed from the first place to be able to knock down MACH 2+ type missile and guess why that. Look at HARMs speed.

    thanks for the info on terminal velocity of JDAMs. This means even a small CIWS type gun can kill these at a distance that exploding bomb does no harm.

    Look at the article above from ausairpower. Killing off the weapons launched from birds at 40K feet is becoming real real requirement. Otherwise, in half an hour a whole moving coloum of 500 soldiers and two dozen tanks will be reduced to rubble.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Is Russia safe from F-22 and Β-2?

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 4:19 pm


      Current date/time is Wed Dec 07, 2016 4:19 pm