George1 wrote:Source: Russian Navy intends to 2020 to buy the planes on the basis of the Be-200
Great news....maybe there's still a chance to revamp the A-40 Albatross project
George1 wrote:Source: Russian Navy intends to 2020 to buy the planes on the basis of the Be-200
GunshipDemocracy wrote:I hope this would not be the case - Tu-214 is ready to be produced and no teething problems. No imported parts... and you keep production lines letting Yak capitalize on export potential..
well there was project a-40 modification , a-42pe , using 2 turboprop engines from AN-70.artjomh wrote:GunshipDemocracy wrote:I hope this would not be the case - Tu-214 is ready to be produced and no teething problems. No imported parts... and you keep production lines letting Yak capitalize on export potential..
No, screw turbofans on Maritime Patrol Aircraft. We've been through this already, it's not a good solution.
Russia needs a new mid-sized turboprop engine to replace the Motor Sich Ivchenko one sometime in late 2020, and an airfraft to go with it. Until then, you don't need a new model MPA. Get the engine done, then then worry about new aircraft.
Sea Dragon upgrade is a decent stopgap until then.
artjomh wrote:
No, screw turbofans on Maritime Patrol Aircraft. We've been through this already, it's not a good solution.
PapaDragon wrote:
''Russia Develops New 'Sub-Killer' Version of Be-200 Amphibious Aircraft''
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150719/1024805011.html
flamming_python wrote:PapaDragon wrote:
''Russia Develops New 'Sub-Killer' Version of Be-200 Amphibious Aircraft''
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150719/1024805011.html
Is this the A-40 or something different?
Wish they went with the A-42; those turboprops look efficient.
flamming_python wrote:PapaDragon wrote:
''Russia Develops New 'Sub-Killer' Version of Be-200 Amphibious Aircraft''
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150719/1024805011.html
Is this the A-40 or something different?
Wish they went with the A-42; those turboprops look efficient.
Austin wrote:artjomh wrote:
No, screw turbofans on Maritime Patrol Aircraft. We've been through this already, it's not a good solution.
Why so this is what P-8A is all about and even India bought 8 P-8I and ordered 4 more few days back
George1 wrote:flamming_python wrote:PapaDragon wrote:
''Russia Develops New 'Sub-Killer' Version of Be-200 Amphibious Aircraft''
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150719/1024805011.html
Is this the A-40 or something different?
Wish they went with the A-42; those turboprops look efficient.
No Beriev A-40 is different and bigger aircraft than Be-200
flamming_python wrote:But what's the point of developing an anti-sub version of the Be-200 when the A-40 is already pretty much an anti-sub version of the Be-200? (in addition to other functions)
If it's true that this is a seperate aircraft, then the article suggests that this project and the A-40 will be developed/ordered together - which makes even less sense.
flamming_python wrote:
But what's the point of developing an anti-sub version of the Be-200 when the A-40 is already pretty much an anti-sub version of the Be-200? (in addition to other functions)
If it's true that this is a seperate aircraft, then the article suggests that this project and the A-40 will be developed/ordered together - which makes even less sense.
Perhaps only if this is a turboprop version; like a slightly smaller A-42; designed to replace the Be-12s mainly; while the A-40 functions as the larger, longer-range version for patrol and so on; ultimately replacing the Il-38s and Il-20s.
Rmf wrote:well there was project a-40 modification , a-42pe , using 2 turboprop engines from AN-70.
flamming_python wrote:But what's the point of developing an anti-sub version of the Be-200 when the A-40 is already pretty much an anti-sub version of the Be-200? (in addition to other functions)
If it's true that this is a seperate aircraft, then the article suggests that this project and the A-40 will be developed/ordered together - which makes even less sense.
Perhaps only if this is a turboprop version; like a slightly smaller A-42; designed to replace the Be-12s mainly; while the A-40 functions as the larger, longer-range version for patrol and so on; ultimately replacing the Il-38s and Il-20s.
well there was project a-40 modification , a-42pe , using 2 turboprop engines from AN-70.
But what's the point of developing an anti-sub version of the Be-200 when the A-40 is already pretty much an anti-sub version of the Be-200? (in addition to other functions)
Austin wrote:Russian Navy Eyes Il-114 as Future MPA
George1 wrote:flamming_python wrote:PapaDragon wrote:
''Russia Develops New 'Sub-Killer' Version of Be-200 Amphibious Aircraft''
Is this the A-40 or something different?
Wish they went with the A-42; those turboprops look efficient.
No Beriev A-40 is different and bigger aircraft than Be-200
But what's the point of developing an anti-sub version of the Be-200 when the A-40 is already pretty much an anti-sub version of the Be-200? (in addition to other functions)
If it's true that this is a seperate aircraft, then the article suggests that this project and the A-40 will be developed/ordered together - which makes even less sense.
Perhaps only if this is a turboprop version; like a slightly smaller A-42; designed to replace the Be-12s mainly; while the A-40 functions as the larger, longer-range version for patrol and so on; ultimately replacing the Il-38s and Il-20s.
JohninMK wrote:Slightly OT but whilst discussing Russian amphibious aircraft this interesting article has appeared on similar function Japanese aircraft and their long history.
|
|