Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Su-25SM numbers

    franco
    franco

    Posts : 3181
    Points : 3213
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  franco on Wed Oct 31, 2018 10:01 pm

    3 more Su-25SM3 arrived in the Krasnodar.

    https://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/113595/
    d_taddei2
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 1531
    Points : 1711
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  d_taddei2 on Tue Jan 01, 2019 7:42 pm

    Off topic slightly. but what's people's view on disadvantages and advantages between su-25 and A-10.

    Also can anyone confirm ceiling height for su-25 keep getting various figures from various sources some seem very low to the point that means su-25 unable to stay out of manpad range. I know that this type of aircraft normally flies low in its role but I'd still expect it to be able to stay out of manpad range in certain missions. 

    Also I read that it's target tracking radar range for ground targets was only 8km range this true? I would of thought it to have been further 

    and correct me if I am wrong su-25 are no longer produced as the factory in Georgia was destroyed in the short war with Russia or has sukhoi got a factory in Russia producing aircraft
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 3269
    Points : 3267
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  Isos on Tue Jan 01, 2019 8:09 pm

    Su25 doesn't have radar. They fly at max 7-8km altitude while manpad are limited to 2 or 3 km.

    Su-25T is better. It has more weapons.

    The T variant is as good as a-10 in destroying tanks. Advantage to the su-25 for SEAD mission with much bigger and supersonic missiles.

    Normal su-25 is outdated and pretty bad.

    No more production. Only upgrades.
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 20657
    Points : 21211
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jan 02, 2019 3:59 am

    Off topic slightly. but what's people's view on disadvantages and advantages between su-25 and A-10.

    In practical terms the A-10 was a hunter that would operate over the front line or behind enemy lines looking for convoys of vehicles of any type to shoot up with cannon or guided anti armour missile in the form of the Maverick.

    It was sort of a mix of CAS and short range strike, so it needed range and lots of guided missiles, and a gun with a large amount of ammo... which is basically what it was.

    The Su-25 was more of a ground support aircraft like a stuka, but instead of dive bombing it would generally use conventional bombs from very low level and direct fire unguided rockets and cannon.

    It could carry guided weapons but not very often and normally it was something like an AS-10 laser homing missile for use against point enemy positions like bunkers or buildings...

    The Su-25 didn't need long range or incredibly heavy payload, but was small and fast and with direct delivery of weapons accurate enough.

    Various upgrades that didn't really catch on included the Su-25T and later Su-25TM, which added the SHKVAL EO system similar to the one carried by the Ka-50 Hokum, which allowed it to also carry and use the Vikhr ATGM, which was actually rather impressive for its time in terms of detecting and auto tracking targets.

    It had no thermal capability and was purely optical so it wasn't all weather capable.

    The T and TM upgrades were rejected for being too complicated and expensive... a bit like the rejection of the SMT upgrades for the MiG-29... it made the aircraft rather more capable, but without the high tech precision weapons in mass production they were just more complicated to service... Vikhr was ordered a few years ago but in the 90s and early 2000s they didn't have it in stocks...

    A new low drag pylon holding 4-8 Ataka missiles could have been rather useful for the Frogfoot...

    The Su-25SM3 has a lot of basic improvements including DIRCMS and the built in EO system looks rather good too, but the focus is still flying near friendly troops on the front line dropping dumb bombs and firing unguided rockets at enemy positions rather than standoff attack with guided missiles.

    The original factory was in Georgia, but there is a factory in Russia that produced the two seat version... the Su-25T and TM were based on the two seat model so more avionics could be added...

    Have read about a few western pilots who were given a chance to fly some Soviet types and they all wanted to fly the MiG-29 or Su-27, but some flew the Su-25 and were surprised at how much they liked it... It seems to be a good little aircraft with few vices and easy to fly, with good manouver performance.
    medo
    medo

    Posts : 3507
    Points : 3591
    Join date : 2010-10-24
    Location : Slovenia

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  medo on Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:24 am

    For Su-25SM3 we could say that its improvements were done exactly for stand off precision operations. It got new MAWS sensors, not DIRCM and new ECM pods for self defense. New Pastel RWR was tested with Su-25SM3 to use Kh-58 anti-radar missiles. New EO sight SOLT-25 include thermovision camera for night operations and it got new data link communication. New navigation complex with GLONASS satnav give high precision bombings capabilities with unguided bombs from higher safe altitudes. Su-25SM3 also got new armament, like TV guided bombs and missiles and satellite guided bombs like new satellite guided gliding cluster bomb PBK-500U Drel with 30 km range. Bazalt also plan to equip this bomb with pulsejet engine to increse range to at least 80 km.
    higurashihougi
    higurashihougi

    Posts : 2243
    Points : 2336
    Join date : 2014-08-13
    Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  higurashihougi on Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:31 am

    d_taddei2 wrote:Off topic slightly. but what's people's view on disadvantages and advantages between su-25 and A-10.

    Su-25 is designed for dive bombing surgical strike, therefore people demand high maneuverability, and they concentrate all the weights into the center of gravity.

    Which means all important parts are put in more or less a single chamber and therefore save material and increase armor thickness.

    Meanwhile A-10 is optimized for gun firing and it emphasize stability, therefore everything is spreaded out.
    d_taddei2
    d_taddei2

    Posts : 1531
    Points : 1711
    Join date : 2013-05-11
    Location : Scotland UK

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  d_taddei2 on Wed Jan 02, 2019 12:16 pm

    Hi all thanks for the info and info on loaded ceiling height? manpads have upto 5km range does the su-25 operate above this? Or will it relay on the defensive systems only. many sources seem to indicate very low ceiling height. I did always see A-10 as similar but not the same in roles. I remember reading a report on it saying that it's engines were very robust and sand gravel etc didn't seem to bother the aircraft. 

    I wonder if the su-25sm3 will be the last cas aircraft in Russian service will drones be the future ?
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 20657
    Points : 21211
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  GarryB on Wed Jan 02, 2019 11:30 pm

    They continue investing in attack helos so I suspect they want aircraft to operate at low altitudes on the battlefield...

    There has been talk of a PAK Sh or something intended to replace the Frogfoot, but I really don't see the point in making it stealthy... radar is hardly a common threat for CAS aircraft... that is why they fly so low.
    Isos
    Isos

    Posts : 3269
    Points : 3267
    Join date : 2015-11-06

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  Isos on Thu Jan 03, 2019 8:38 am

    GarryB wrote:They continue investing in attack helos so I suspect they want aircraft to operate at low altitudes on the battlefield...

    There has been talk of a PAK Sh or something intended to replace the Frogfoot, but I really don't see the point in making it stealthy... radar is hardly a common threat for CAS aircraft... that is why they fly so low.

    CAS jets are full of weapons that you can't store in weapon bays unless you carry few of them specially rockets and atgm. So can't be stealthy anyway.

    Su-25 is very good only need better avionics, radar and a targeting pod.
    LMFS
    LMFS

    Posts : 1398
    Points : 1392
    Join date : 2018-03-03

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  LMFS on Thu Mar 28, 2019 7:55 pm

    The defense Ministry will repair and modernizes su-25 to su-25СМ3 for 2.8 billion rubles

    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/6271174
    dino00
    dino00

    Posts : 845
    Points : 886
    Join date : 2012-10-12
    Age : 31
    Location : portugal

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  dino00 on Wed May 08, 2019 10:26 am

    Russian upgraded Su-25 attack aircraft to get sighting system with artificial intelligence

    More:
    http://tass.com/defense/1057440
    GarryB
    GarryB

    Posts : 20657
    Points : 21211
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  GarryB on Wed May 08, 2019 11:42 am

    It includes being able to receive target data from other platforms including the IC4R system included with Ratnik 2..., and the Havoc will get the same capability to receive target data directly from other platforms on the battlefield...
    franco
    franco

    Posts : 3181
    Points : 3213
    Join date : 2010-08-18

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  franco on Wed May 08, 2019 11:23 pm

    According to the head of the press service of the Southern Military District, Vadim Astafyev, on the eve of the Aviation of the 4th Army of the Air Force and Air Defense, having covered 800 kilometers, three advanced Su-25SM3 attack aircraft arrived. Given the previously delivered aircraft of this modification, the second assault squadron was fully formed. Earlier it was reported on receipt in the same part of four Su-25SM3. Thus, 2 squadrons of modernized attack aircraft have already been formed as part of the 4th Army.

    The delivered vehicles were accepted by the engineering and technical services of the aviation unit and allowed to perform combat missions.
    Su-25SM3 is a further modification of the Su-25SM attack aircraft. On the upgraded machines installed a digital display, which displays the ground and air situation, installed a new fire control system and satellite navigation GLONASS. The aircraft is capable of hitting ground targets from a considerable distance, without entering into visual contact with a target, but only by coordinates. The aircraft is designed to destroy small-sized mobile and stationary ground objects, as well as low-speed air targets.

    Earlier it was reported that up to the level of the Su-25SM3 it is planned to upgrade the entire existing fleet of Su-25 attack aircraft, including the Su-25SM.

    Sponsored content

    Su-25SM numbers - Page 14 Empty Re: Su-25SM numbers

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Sun May 26, 2019 4:36 pm