Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Russian population

    Share

    NickM
    Sergeant
    Sergeant

    Posts : 184
    Points : 131
    Join date : 2012-11-09
    Location : NYC,USA / Essex,UK

    Re: Russian population

    Post  NickM on Sun May 26, 2013 9:36 am

    TR1 wrote:That's not racist at all.

    At last ..... the Prodigal son returns .

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Sun May 26, 2013 9:45 am

    TR1 wrote:That's not racist at all.


    I thought it was appropriate and insightful, especially in response to somebody who suggests Russia send Muslim men to their death so that Russian men can then mate with the Muslim women, and that American send Mestizo men to their deaths so that White American men can then mate with Mestiza women.



    Is it racist to point out that some races have tens of thousands of inventions and other races never even built the wheel let alone developed geometry, algebra, calculus, and techniques of engineering.


    Romans under Caesar were bridging the Rhine [which Caesar's legions did in seven DAYS] while Africans in the Congo were eating each other.


    History, if there are people to record it and people to care, will regard egalitarianism, along with multi-racialism and multi-culturalism as the height of folly. It will be seen as the most shocking example of a failed social experiment, even surpassing communism; the idea that Africans, who never invented anything, never built anything, never contributed anything to the progress of human civilization or technological advancement, could be transplanted into Western nations, given passports, declared citizens, and that somehow they would morph into productive citizens and blaze trials that Volta, Tesla, Edison, Colt, Goethe, Kirchhoff, Plato, Aristotle, could only dream of.


    Our race has traveled into space, our race has walked on the moon, their race never even invented the wheel, never even built a bridge across a creek or a stream, let alone built a ship to sail the oceans.

    If the entire planet were of the black race, there wouldn't be a single electric light anywhere and the only structures would be single story mud huts or grass huts. There wouldn't be a single meter of paved road anywhere in the world, the entire world would resemble sub-saharan Africa prior to its discovery by Europeans.

    It is hard to comprehend that such an inferior creation could actually exist. I can hardly fathom how spectacularly inferior a people must be that they can spend centuries gazing upon the waves and never dare to dream about what is beyond the horizon, to never have a spark ignite deep within them that compels them to design a ship and venture out to explore the unknown.


    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15465
    Points : 16172
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian population

    Post  GarryB on Sun May 26, 2013 11:12 am

    Ohhh come on... science is not like art... if the Mona Lisa had not been painted then it never would have been painted, but the reality is that most inventions are there just waiting to be discovered... the fact that white men have made a few discoveries recently completely ignores the discoveries made long ago that made the current age possible.

    Without the printed word... invented by non whites BTW, the church would hold control of knowledge and history and we would all be fucked, because they would hold all the power and they certainly wouldn't share it with anyone.

    The Christian church fought democracy tooth and nail and would hold on to literacy as best it could because that gave it a lot of control and power.

    How many white people would be making their discoveries if they couldn't read or write? How would we know they made those discoveries.

    Ancient batteries found in ruins show that ancient cultures made discoveries all on their own... they just didn't have the Discovery channel to tell everyone. Things like powered flight and radar were actually discovered in a lot of different places all at once... independently.

    If someone waved a magic wand and everyones skin turned black the main difference is that some people will have a hard time working out why they hate other groups of people because they can't use skin colour any more... I am sure they will find a way though... worked great for Hitler... all your problems are black or jewish... it is not your fault... and look what monsters that created...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5840
    Points : 5892
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: Russian population

    Post  TR1 on Sun May 26, 2013 11:55 am

    You can keep talking about our vs their race all you want, but at the end of the day, racial inferiority if a pseudoscience. Period.


    Firebird
    Lieutenant Colonel
    Lieutenant Colonel

    Posts : 909
    Points : 941
    Join date : 2011-10-14

    Re: Russian population

    Post  Firebird on Sun May 26, 2013 12:09 pm

    [quote="Regular"][quote="Firebird"]
    Regular wrote:
    Well once again you are talking nonsense.
    I presume You know better deal about things than me ?

    And why is that? Because Lithuanian emigrants like you, along with Indians and Fillipinos have benefited quite nicely from the bizarre brand of globalism.
    Cry me a river. At least I'm working and not claiming asylum money. UK is eager to dish money left and right and people feel no shame taking them. My input generates income for British company. Money I've spend cycles through UK market. No, I don't buy milk from China or toilet paper from Pakistan. I use local services and I prefer local products as British market probably has best quality food products I've ever seen. Even if Mark & Spencer is poor's man luxury retailer, standards are way above where I am from and with a fraction of price. UK didn't have to provide me with education or skills, I came here with all knowledge I need and good working ethics and that I can offer and that is it. As far as I am concerned, Britain is lucky to have me and especially my wife as she is big spender. My country is paying it for not being able to create us same conditions and loosing good share of money.

    And finally, its nothing to do with "sorting lives out first".

    Strange thing that is very popular excuse for married people who still don't go for baby. Academic people for example.
    Having kids can be less than a year out for mothers, and no time whatsoever for fathers.
    You must be kidding, right? It's not only about popping baby on dirty concrete floor somewhere in Ukraine's hospital. It takes a bit longer to RAISE a child. Leaving all responsibilities to child's mother is not really smart idea too. Very eastern European way to be honest :/

    The fact is, they see that the sums dont add up for having families. Do some research.Unemployed/struggling 1st world males arent gonna choose to have kids in large numbers. Suggesting otherwise is ridiculous. Do some research.
    Are you really Brit cause you speak utterly rubbish. HERE IT'S MORE PROFITABLE TO BREED LIKE RABBIT. Should I give You links to gov sites? Council house, tax returns, income support, housing benefits, allowances.. Not to mention how much you get if You are single parent.. Half of the guys in my gym are on benefits, have children and still sit around in gym all day not looking for work or education
    And no-one has kids while at college, so your other claim is also irrelevant.. and wrong.
    Not sure if You are serious, college time means loads of action in Dorms. Even our geeks in IT groups got burned. Same here, Liverpool turns into big whorehouse, no need to go for Thailand.
    Finally there's an essential requirement for reproduction. Otherwise u get a greying population and no workers to keep the country afloat. But hey.. dont let facts get in the way of your sales pitch...
    Greying population could be doing all FINE in some countries. It depends if their economy relies on big labour force. Breeding like Chinese probably wouldn't best thing in Russia, cause typical Chinese peasant has no better life conditions than homeless alcoholic bomzh in Rubliovka.
    Situation in Russia is still far way from being bad like in Norway. Russia imports low skilled, low paid, lazy-ass gastarbaiters just because they are cheaper than tools they wield. They are usually backwards people without no education and there are no respect towards them, I think they are called churki, ruberoidi and etc. I'm not racist but I got that general feeling while staying in Pushchino from academic people!

    Much utter nonsense again, no surprise. As I've said in various threads. Your smears and lies against 1st world people are pathetic. You fail to argue any form of case for the parasitic version of globalism that you benefitted from. Enjoy it while you can. The tide is turning in Britain and in Russia and America. Soon you'll be back in Lithuania. A nasty bigoted and jealous territory. Jealous of Britain, Russia and any country that has talents. You always pretend to know better than others. And then we see what a mess your own place is. Because jealously is exactly whats fuelling the drivel that you write.

    Regular
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1955
    Points : 1962
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Western Hemisphere.. mostly

    Re: Russian population

    Post  Regular on Sun May 26, 2013 3:36 pm

    Keep ad hominem to Yourself.
    What did I lie? Why should I be jealous??? You sound similar to typical supremacist from the west. Open your eyes. There is no such thing as 1 world people. Get off your fake superiority horse.
    What the hell are you talking about my country, it's doing fine and it doesn't become political correct, tolerant, spineless parking lot as Your country is. Gays get their face smashed in, obese people don't get social support just for being fat, teachers in school can still hit children if they misbehave, men are men and women are women, no feminism. You can clearly see how delusional and your society of today is by watching X factor and your 'talents'. Or your music on bbc one. What does typical Brit has better than Eastern Europeam doesn't? Your know nothing of hardship, your new generation is soft, your men are weak not only by mind but by bodies too and being obese is considered to be norm. There is no competition thats why You loose in job market to foreigner work force. Ask anyone who lived in Uk what they think about You people.
    I'm not jealous just got enough of chauvinism from people that think they are beacon of culture and democracy. Europe is loosing it's values and You are already lost

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Sun May 26, 2013 7:53 pm

    GarryB wrote:

    Without the printed word... invented by non whites BTW, the church would hold control of knowledge and history and we would all be fucked, because they would hold all the power and they certainly wouldn't share it with anyone.



    I don't know who you're referring to. The Assyrians and Egyptians were White, as were the original Aryans of the Indus River civilization.



    Also, I don't blame Jews and blacks. I place most of the blame at the feet of White sociopaths who sold out for money, power, and influence, with a large share going to the Jews for being evil. Blaming a black for being violent would be the equivalent of blaming a coyote for snapping at you, a coyote is just a coyote, it does what it does, but you don't dress it up and bring it into the house and give it all the rights afforded to a member of the family.

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Sun May 26, 2013 8:04 pm

    TR1 wrote:You can keep talking about our vs their race all you want, but at the end of the day, racial inferiority if a pseudoscience. Period.




    Saying something is pseudoscience isn't sufficient.

    If I were to write an essay and declare, "this is the best essay ever and it deserves an A, period" and turn it in, it would be total garbage.


    Many times we see articles that use such phrases as, "experts agree," "studies show," "scientists have long agreed," and other such appeals to authorities or supposely authoritative studies, but the experts are never named, the studies are never cited, instead only vague references to experts that might not even exist and studies that might never have been done [to say nothing about studies with improper methodology].

    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5840
    Points : 5892
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: Russian population

    Post  TR1 on Sun May 26, 2013 10:50 pm

    So, according to you, there is a majority of accredited authors and scientists who support racial theories of intellectual superiority?

    Nonsense.

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Sun May 26, 2013 11:29 pm

    TR1 wrote:So, according to you, there is a majority of accredited authors and scientists who support racial theories of intellectual superiority?

    Nonsense.


    The stance of academia on race/social science after the 1940s-1950s is of little interest to me.

    It is all heavily politicized and all of their studies are based on premises and assumptions from the Frankfurt School and the cultural marxists.


    They rule academia with an iron fist and won't tolerate any dissent from the "out of Africa we're all the same" theory. The evolutonists even viciously attack those who suggest that the major races all developed separately in distinct regions, the mainstream "scientists" must adhere to the accepted orthodoxy of "out of Africa we're all the same" or their articles will be refused by major journals, their projects will not receive funding, and they will not receive tenure at any university.



    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5840
    Points : 5892
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: Russian population

    Post  TR1 on Sun May 26, 2013 11:31 pm

    Lol, so let's ignore modern academia, and instead go for outdated racial theory.

    Why don't we go back to social darwinism while we are at it?

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Mon May 27, 2013 12:58 am

    TR1 wrote:Lol, so let's ignore modern academia, and instead go for outdated racial theory.

    Why don't we go back to social darwinism while we are at it?



    I have about two dozen books on social darwinism and racial theory, original first edition books that were not modified in later re-prints. These books are from the 1910s up to the 1960s.


    Even in the 1960s some very reputable scientists [who were evolutionists by the way] were able to advance the idea of separate development/evolution.



    Social darwinism actually makes a great deal of sense. Those who cannot survive on their own merits cannot expect to have their existence maintained by others. Furthermore, they certainly have no right to demand that society subsidize their breeding.


    If your neighbor just lost his job because the steel mill closed and you happen to have an opening at your small business you would do well to at least give him an interview and see if he is right for the position. If you're a dentist and your neighbor cannot afford to take his kids to the dentist for a teeth cleaning, you might cut him a deal and help him out.


    But if a third generation welfare queen believes she has the right to have 11 children and that society should foot the bill to feed, house, clothe, and maintain them, there is nothing wrong with declaring "you will either work for your daily bread or you and your brood are welcome to starve."



    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Mon May 27, 2013 1:01 am

    TR1 wrote:Lol, so let's ignore modern academia, and instead go for outdated racial theory.

    Why don't we go back to social darwinism while we are at it?


    Modern academia has also declared that homosexuality is not a mental disorder as it was commonly understood to be in the 1950s and 1960s. Also, alcoholism is no longer a character flaw or a personal weakness, it is a disease [and people cannot be blamed for having a disease, can they? no individual responsibility]. Modern academia also teaches that gender/sex are social constructs and now they are even pushing the idea that pedophilia is not a mental disorder nor a perversion but just an "alternative sexual orientation."



    Modern academia can go where it belongs, straight to hell.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15465
    Points : 16172
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian population

    Post  GarryB on Mon May 27, 2013 11:02 am

    I don't know who you're referring to. The Assyrians and Egyptians were White, as were the original Aryans of the Indus River civilization.

    The concept of the printing press was invented in China my friend.

    Blaming a black for being violent would be the equivalent of blaming a coyote for snapping at you, a coyote is just a coyote, it does what it does, but you don't dress it up and bring it into the house and give it all the rights afforded to a member of the family.

    Totally correct except a person with a non white skin colour is still a person... violence is a human trait.

    There is more difference... physically, between a new born white baby and a 90 year old white man, than there is between a 90 year old white man and a 90 year old black man.

    Thinking that somehow skin colour determines intelligence is stupid... do white people placed on tanning beds and made a darker skin colour get dumber? Do they become more athletic? Do the mens penises get bigger?

    If you are judging people by the colour of their skin then you are an idiot. Sounds harsh, but if I told you people with black hair are not as smart as people with white hair or red hair you'd think I was an idiot too... and rightly so.

    Many times we see articles that use such phrases as, "experts agree," "studies show," "scientists have long agreed," and other such appeals to authorities or supposely authoritative studies, but the experts are never named, the studies are never cited, instead only vague references to experts that might not even exist and studies that might never have been done [to say nothing about studies with improper methodology].

    But that is the key... ignore the conclusions of studies that do not list the studies they base their information on, ignore the studies that use comments from experts that are not named using quotes that are not credited to someone you can look up.

    The stance of academia on race/social science after the 1940s-1950s is of little interest to me.

    So you take nazi theory over modern theory?

    I did a few anthropology papers at university... over a decade ago now, but they pretty much sounded rather more open minded than you give them credit for.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    Regular
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1955
    Points : 1962
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Western Hemisphere.. mostly

    Re: Russian population

    Post  Regular on Mon May 27, 2013 7:37 pm

    Talking about modern academia..
    European Union wants to push incest as legal and normal thing. I barely agree with homosexuality as a norm, but this is outrageous. Norway is sick social experiment country that wants all Europe accept their ways. Soon we will see articles that invest is ok and acceptable.

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Mon May 27, 2013 7:39 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    I don't know who you're referring to. The Assyrians and Egyptians were White, as were the original Aryans of the Indus River civilization.

    The concept of the printing press was invented in China my friend.




    That is NOT what he said. He said the "written word" which means script, writing, letters that form words written down on some form of parchment or carved into stone tablets.


    I believe ancient Whites were the first to conceive of a system of writing.

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Mon May 27, 2013 7:42 pm

    GarryB wrote:

    If you are judging people by the colour of their skin then you are an idiot. Sounds harsh, but if I told you people with black hair are not as smart as people with white hair or red hair you'd think I was an idiot too... and rightly so.






    Read IQ and the Wealth of Nations.


    Also, blacks tend to do well in sprinting and short distance running but they fall apart in long distance running.

    Whites are less than 6% of the world population but they consistently win over 80% of gold medals at the Olypmics. So much for the "more athletic" theory.

    Professional sports in the USA are heavily caste based. Whites are not cultivated in high school or college and don't get "drafted" into the prime spots in professional teams, except for positions such as pitcher/catcher in baseball, quarter-back in football, etc, with some exceptions.


    Consider professional boxing, it was all the rage in the 1970s-1990s and even thugs with criminal records such as Mike Tyson were paraded around by the press for all the world to see. Now that the reigning heavy weight champions are Whites from Eastern Europe, who are clean cut and might be able to serve as decent role models, we hear virtually nothing about professional boxing these days.


    I would bet on a Spartan warrior over a Zulu any day.

    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Mon May 27, 2013 7:44 pm

    GarryB wrote:

    Totally correct except a person with a non white skin colour is still a person... violence is a human trait.



    Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Professor Rushton


    Different races have greater propensity for violence.

    Regular
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1955
    Points : 1962
    Join date : 2013-03-10
    Location : Western Hemisphere.. mostly

    Re: Russian population

    Post  Regular on Mon May 27, 2013 8:26 pm



    Also, blacks tend to do well in sprinting and short distance running but they fall apart in long distance running.
    Do some research. Really. You know Kenya?

    Whites are less than 6% of the world population but they consistently win over 80% of gold medals at the Olypmics. So much for the "more athletic" theory.
    So there are only 6 percent whites in olympics? Cool. I guess even our swimmer Meilutyte is black.

    Consider professional boxing, it was all the rage in the 1970s-1990s and even thugs with criminal records such as Mike Tyson were paraded around by the press for all the world to see. Now that the reigning heavy weight champions are Whites from Eastern Europe, who are clean cut and might be able to serve as decent role models, we hear virtually nothing about professional boxing these days.
    Boxing clubs were owned by criminals in Eastern Europe in 90ies.
    You really don't know Klitcho story then! Vitalik was torpeda of for oligarch Igor Bakai and Vitaliy Ribalko "Ribka" for some time. Don't get me wrong, not trying to bad mouth him, just stating facts. I respect Klitcho family, and consider them like our own. We always cheer for them, by we I mean all country as like he would be our own. Their family was even living in Lithuania in Panevezys, Lithuanian boxing capital and they started boxing there. Julius Kibas was Vitaliks first couch and Klitcho now helps us to develop with our boxing tournaments, so no more mafia in this sport




    BTRfan
    Junior Lieutenant
    Junior Lieutenant

    Posts : 437
    Points : 477
    Join date : 2010-09-30
    Location : USA

    Re: Russian population

    Post  BTRfan on Tue May 28, 2013 7:42 am

    GarryB wrote:
    I don't know who you're referring to. The Assyrians and Egyptians were White, as were the original Aryans of the Indus River civilization.

    The concept of the printing press was invented in China my friend.

    Blaming a black for being violent would be the equivalent of blaming a coyote for snapping at you, a coyote is just a coyote, it does what it does, but you don't dress it up and bring it into the house and give it all the rights afforded to a member of the family.

    Totally correct except a person with a non white skin colour is still a person... violence is a human trait.

    There is more difference... physically, between a new born white baby and a 90 year old white man, than there is between a 90 year old white man and a 90 year old black man.

    Thinking that somehow skin colour determines intelligence is stupid... do white people placed on tanning beds and made a darker skin colour get dumber? Do they become more athletic? Do the mens penises get bigger?

    If you are judging people by the colour of their skin then you are an idiot. Sounds harsh, but if I told you people with black hair are not as smart as people with white hair or red hair you'd think I was an idiot too... and rightly so.

    Many times we see articles that use such phrases as, "experts agree," "studies show," "scientists have long agreed," and other such appeals to authorities or supposely authoritative studies, but the experts are never named, the studies are never cited, instead only vague references to experts that might not even exist and studies that might never have been done [to say nothing about studies with improper methodology].

    But that is the key... ignore the conclusions of studies that do not list the studies they base their information on, ignore the studies that use comments from experts that are not named using quotes that are not credited to someone you can look up.

    The stance of academia on race/social science after the 1940s-1950s is of little interest to me.

    So you take nazi theory over modern theory?

    I did a few anthropology papers at university... over a decade ago now, but they pretty much sounded rather more open minded than you give them credit for.



    Let's please try to discuss/debate [and even disagree] without resorting to absurd remarks about genitals/penis size and making jabs such as "idiot" and "stupid."


    We're both reasonably intelligent adults and since we're both men we should be able to have a debate without the eruption of a bitch fit.

    TR1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 5840
    Points : 5892
    Join date : 2011-12-06

    Re: Russian population

    Post  TR1 on Tue May 28, 2013 8:04 am

    Pseudoscience that reeks of Social Darwinism isn't intelligent debate though.

    It's lunacy, and has VERY offensive implications.

    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 15465
    Points : 16172
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Russian population

    Post  GarryB on Tue May 28, 2013 8:29 am

    That is NOT what he said. He said the "written word" which means script, writing, letters that form words written down on some form of parchment or carved into stone tablets.

    Who is he?

    I said:

    Without the printed word... invented by non whites BTW, the church would hold control of knowledge and history and we would all be fucked, because they would hold all the power and they certainly wouldn't share it with anyone.

    And I stand by it. The skills of writing were largely cornered by the various churches and governments which had the money to pay for such things as parchment and skilled writers who could actually read and write... unlike 90% of the population.

    It was the invention of the printed word by the Chinese that allowed the mass production of books as opposed to expensive hand made ones. Without the invention of the printing press only a select few would hold the knowledge and the power.

    I believe ancient Whites were the first to conceive of a system of writing.

    Of course you do... it fits the western white oriented Whites = smart, civilised, non whites = dumb, natives, mentality. It made it much easier to plunder the worlds resources by pretending the non-whites were lessor people.

    The problem for such thinking is that globalisation and the internet... and most importantly a depolarisation of the powers of the world from east and west, to lots of countries investing money and energy and technology into poorer countries... well lets just say if you take a baby from a village in Paupa New Guinea that has practises that would be familiar to most hunter gatherer tribes and put them in an apartment in New York, by the time that child grows up in the western society it wont be a hunter gatherer, it will essentially be a 21st C westerner. Skin colour will have nothing to do with it. The people still in that tribal village might be considered savages by the people of western society but there is nothing physiologically that prevents them from being as western as any native white child.

    In Australia they already went through the BS regarding the concept that blacks are a lessor species of human and many Aboriginal children were taken from their natural parents in the hope that growing up with a white family might make them "better" people. A total catastrophe... but just another case of white westerners thinking they are superior and have the right to impose their culture upon others at will because they were more "civilised".

    I can tell you it was BS.

    Also, blacks tend to do well in sprinting and short distance running but they fall apart in long distance running.

    So why are all the long distance runners at olympic games that win black too? It is the area lots of African nations win most of their medals.... imagine how well they would do if they had the sort of drugs the western competitors use and the chemicals they use to hide their cheating?

    Whites are less than 6% of the world population but they consistently win over 80% of gold medals at the Olypmics. So much for the "more athletic" theory.

    Professional sports in the USA are heavily caste based. Whites are not cultivated in high school or college and don't get "drafted" into the prime spots in professional teams, except for positions such as pitcher/catcher in baseball, quarter-back in football, etc, with some exceptions.

    So whites win all the medals but only get picked for certain roles in US sports... isn't that a contradiction?

    Different races have greater propensity for violence.

    Such statistics are generalisations and never much use in specific cases. Or are you suggesting that Ghandi is a thug and Chuck Norris would rather talk about it than hit someone?

    Let's please try to discuss/debate [and even disagree] without resorting to absurd remarks about genitals/penis size and making jabs such as "idiot" and "stupid."

    If we are to discuss this then I think all stereotypes should be included, and the stereotype that blacks have larger penis sizes, with whites next and asians having the smallest penis sizes is a fairly well known stereotype... it is also a case of statistics being misused as physical size is unlikely to have been taken into account. I have seen very large men with small Mr Winkies, and very small men with average sized ones that look big on them. The next person you meet such statistics are meaningless... if they are black and you are white can you assume their penis is large? We are talking about statistics that work with averages so there are always deviations so as a rule of thumb it is totally useless.

    Equally IQ tests often include "general knowledge" questions. It can often come down to luck whether an individual knows the correct answer to many of the questions, which makes IQ a poor test of general intelligence and brain power.

    We're both reasonably intelligent adults and since we're both men we should be able to have a debate without the eruption of a bitch fit.

    Totally agree, but I have many non white friends and family and to be honest find your position mildly offensive.

    You have every right to believe what you believe and I am not going to try to change your opinion, but would suggest you look at the small global sample here... can you list the members here based on skin colour purely based on the intelligence of their posts?

    More importantly, do you actually pick your friends based on whether they are intelligent or not?

    I have some mentally disabled people I call friends and they are not sharp, but they also have never tried to stab me in the back or steal my girlfriend, or take money from me.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

    NickM
    Sergeant
    Sergeant

    Posts : 184
    Points : 131
    Join date : 2012-11-09
    Location : NYC,USA / Essex,UK

    Re: Russian population

    Post  NickM on Tue May 28, 2013 12:11 pm

    GarryB wrote:
    Of course you do... it fits the western white oriented Whites = smart, civilised, non whites = dumb, natives, mentality. It made it much easier to plunder the worlds resources by pretending the non-whites were lessor people.

    Accept it , reject it . It is clearly mentioned in the HOLY BIBLE that Blacks , Asians are an inferior breed . They are inferior in God's eyes . Not only the slavery of blacks/asians was in fulfillment of the Biblical curse, but their dark skin color is too. Now before you jump to the conclusion that I am a racist , read what the BIBLE has to say .

    “Cursed be Canaan [Genesis 9:25]—this doom has been fulfilled in. . . the slavery of the Africans, the descendants of Ham.”

    GarryB wrote:... can you list the members here based on skin colour purely based on the intelligence of their posts?

    Yes . You may not accept it but the forum members from countries like India and other such 3rd world nations that I have come across in this forum are the least intelligent as is evident from the poor quality of their posts . I can name them as well , but what's the use , they realize as much .

    Again, it is a matter of race . Whites will never make such stupid comments . Why is it that all the developed nations in the world are White nations and all the 3rd world nations populated by blacks/asians .

    In Russia too these dark skinned immigrants from Central Asia are the biggest criminals and are dislike by all the locals .

    I have given you enough evidence for today .

    KomissarBojanchev
    Lieutenant Colonel
    Lieutenant Colonel

    Posts : 988
    Points : 1141
    Join date : 2012-08-05
    Age : 19
    Location : Varna, Bulgaria

    Re: Russian population

    Post  KomissarBojanchev on Tue May 28, 2013 2:22 pm

    NickM wrote:Accept it , reject it . It is clearly mentioned in the HOLY BIBLE that Blacks , Asians are an inferior breed . They are inferior in God's eyes . Not only the slavery of blacks/asians was in fulfillment of the Biblical curse, but their dark skin color is too. Now before you jump to the conclusion that I am a racist , read what the BIBLE has to say .

    “Cursed be Canaan [Genesis 9]—this doom has been fulfilled in. . . the slavery of the Africans, the descendants of Ham.”
    Laughing Laughing Laughing Since when did the bible become a legitimate source on anthropology?


    Yes . You may not accept it but the forum members from countries like India and other such 3rd world nations that I have come across in this forum are the least intelligent as is evident from the poor quality of their posts . I can name them as well , but what's the use , they realize as much .
    Explain me in detail how posts from Sujoy or Austin for example are "less intelligent" than comments from a white person for example yourself?

    Again, it is a matter of race . Whites will never make such stupid comments .


    Of course they can. Your comments are an excellent example.

    Why is it that all the developed nations in the world are White nations and all the 3rd world nations populated by blacks/asians .


    And I assume you haven't heard of the first world nations of Brazil, South Africa, ROK, Japan, PRC, Singapore, etc.

    gaurav
    Master Sergeant
    Master Sergeant

    Posts : 309
    Points : 309
    Join date : 2013-02-19
    Age : 36
    Location : Blr

    Re: Russian population

    Post  gaurav on Tue May 28, 2013 4:19 pm

    Oh man.. Where has all this discussion gone.. oh man.. oh man..
    In this days of U.S recession you all have so much time..
    But not all things are worthless.. Cool
    For i.e this


    along with Indians and Fillipinos have benefited quite nicely from the bizarre brand of globalism.

    And finally, its nothing to do with "sorting lives out first". Having kids can be less than a year out for mothers, and no time whatsoever for fathers. The fact is, they see that the sums dont add up for having families. Do some research.Unemployed/struggling 1st world males arent gonna choose to have kids in large numbers. Suggesting otherwise is ridiculous. Do some research. And no-one has kids while at college, so your other claim is also irrelevant.. and wrong.
    Yes Indians and filipinos have .. benefited most from bizarre globalism.. absolutely correct..

    YEs ,, sorting out lives, I mean what is this .. this is typical western analysis ..
    of some struggling countries... I criticize it downright..
    Firebird ..Firebird .. why are you so always..
    bang on target.. Smile

    Sponsored content

    Re: Russian population

    Post  Sponsored content Today at 9:41 pm


      Current date/time is Mon Dec 05, 2016 9:41 pm