Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Share
    avatar
    Vladimir79
    Grand Marshal
    Grand Marshal

    Posts : 2167
    Points : 3059
    Join date : 2009-07-10

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  Vladimir79 on Mon Jul 01, 2013 11:27 pm

    TR1 wrote:Currently French pilots are getting tops around 150 hours per year....and with current cuts, only 40 of those will be on fast jets!

    Russian units that fly new birds will be flying at least that (Kursk pilots already flew 150 hours pr year in 2012) and AFAIK that is all in fast jets.

    Over the last year hours were cut to 150, but that isn't permanent.  The proposed plan is for second tier fighter pilots to cut to 40hrs on their aircraft and 140 in advanced trainers.  The first tier would retain 180hrs on their aircraft.  This is something we already do but even our instructors don't exceed 150.  The difference is our junior pilots are lucky to fly 50hrs and our simulators in service do not compare to that of the French.  New ones are only just arriving and not enough by far.  We should observe how France implements our tiered model and take notes, i am sure it will end up being superior to our corrupt training system. The way we treat our pilots disgusts me.


    _________________
    The true value of life knows only the paratrooper. For he is more likely to look death in the eye.  -- Vasily Margelov
    avatar
    nemrod
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 812
    Points : 1311
    Join date : 2012-09-11

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  nemrod on Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:39 pm

    SU-35's most dangerous adversary -with Rafale-. I wish to understand what the russian specialist say, but unfortunetly, there is no english translation. If someone among you could translate or to say us what it was said in this video.



    The EAF Typhoon is very dangerous because this fighter is very manoeuvrable, I know that Mig-35, and SU-35 too.
    avatar
    magnumcromagnon
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 4496
    Points : 4675
    Join date : 2013-12-05
    Location : Pindos ave., Pindosville, Pindosylvania, Pindostan

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  magnumcromagnon on Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:11 am

    nemrod wrote:SU-35's most dangerous adversary -with Rafale-. I wish to understand what the russian specialist say, but unfortunetly, there is no english translation. If someone among you could translate or to say us what it was said in this video.



    The EAF Typhoon is very dangerous because this fighter is very manoeuvrable, I know that Mig-35, and SU-35 too.

    1.) Step one: click on the 'Youtube' icon on the bottom right corner of the video to get to the main youtube website.

    2.) Step two: click on the 'CC' caption icon on the dark blackish-grey bar at the bottom of the youtube video. It should automatically have Russian captions setting on.

    3.) Step three: click on the 'gear-cog' emblem to the right of the 'CC' captions icon to bring up video options. A transparent grey box should show up with some options, within that a dark grey box their is a white bar that has a 'Subtitles/CC' title to the left of it. Click on the black 'down arrow' and a white box should pop with caption/subtitle options, and click on the very bottom option with a grey divider line above...it should say 'Translate Captions'. It should bring up a dark grey box with a title 'Translate...', with a white bar with the name of languages. Click on the language bar, then scroll down till you find 'English'. Click on that, then click 'OK'.

    ...After you complete those steps you should get rough translations, however keep in mind it's far from perfect...it has a hard time translating fast speech, slurred words, some trouble with accents and slang...but with that being said you should get a good enough rough translation that you can get a basic understanding on what they're talking about.
    avatar
    Cyberspec
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 1931
    Points : 2096
    Join date : 2011-08-08
    Location : Terra Australis

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  Cyberspec on Sun Jun 14, 2015 8:54 am

    The problem is the Youtube translator is terrible!

    In short, he says the Su-35 is better as multirole aircraft while the Eurofighter is more optimised for A-A and the Su-35 will be able to detect and lock onto the EF much earlier thanks to it's powerful radar
    avatar
    OminousSpudd
    Major
    Major

    Posts : 871
    Points : 888
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 21
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  OminousSpudd on Sun Jun 14, 2015 9:53 am

    Going from Cyberspec's summary of the video... (You'll be lucky if Google translate on Youtube videos is even close to on topic, definitely WIP)

    Implying that the Eurofighter would be an issue to the Su-35S is kind of funny. For a start the EF is hardly fielded in adequate numbers (essentially a European F-22/F-35) and really isn't a threat in A2A due to it's manoeuvrability, pretty sure the Flanker-E has a far better performance at both spectrums of AoA (high and low speed limits), and it's thrust-to-weight (empty) ratio is 1.3 approx as opposed to the EF's 1.25 approx. As for BVR combat we know the Su-35 dominates all legacy platforms here.


    avatar
    medo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3143
    Points : 3233
    Join date : 2010-10-24
    Location : Slovenia

    EF Typhhon vs Su-35S

    Post  medo on Sun Jun 14, 2015 10:33 am

    Eurofighter is a multirole fighter and both Eurofighter and Rafale have good maneuverability. But in my opinion, both Su-30SM and Su-35 are better air dominance fighters with more powerful radars and IRST sensors, with equal ESM equipment and more powerful jammers, not to say, they have better agility with TVC engines, which Eurofighter and Rafale don't have.
    avatar
    George1
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 10045
    Points : 10533
    Join date : 2011-12-22
    Location : Greece

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  George1 on Thu Dec 31, 2015 5:26 am

    Here are some comparisons of Su-35 from a relative site

    Rafale vs Su-35

    Facts – Dassault Rafale vs Sukhoi SU-35

    Sukhoi SU-35 is cheaper.
    Dassault Rafale is more economical.
    Sukhoi SU-35 is faster.
    Sukhoi SU-35 is better armed.
    Dassault Rafale is better dogfighter.
    Dassault Rafale is smaller than Sukhoi SU-35.


    Eurofighter vs SU-35


    Facts – Eurofighter Typhoon versus Sukhoi SU-35
    Sukhoi SU-35 is cheaper.
    Eurofighter Typhoon is more economical.
    Eurofighter Typhoon is faster.
    Sukhoi SU-35 is better armed.
    Eurofighter Typhoon is better dogfighter.
    Eurofighter Typhoon is smaller than Sukhoi SU-35.

    Of course anyone can question the conclusions above


    _________________
    "There's no smoke without fire.", Georgy Zhukov

    avatar
    higurashihougi
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 2153
    Points : 2258
    Join date : 2014-08-13
    Location : A small and cutie S-shaped land.

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  higurashihougi on Thu Dec 31, 2015 5:53 am

    Sukhoi SU-35 is cheaper.
    Dassault Rafale is more economical.
    Sukhoi SU-35 is cheaper.
    Eurofighter Typhoon is more economical.

    What the heck is going on ? Why EU carnards are more economical ?

    Dassault Rafale is better dogfighter.
    Eurofighter Typhoon is better dogfighter.

    What the f*** is this shit ?

    EU carnard is better dogfighter ?

    Can EU carnard do Corba or can they achieve high AoA like Sukhoi and MiG ?

    At high AoA, the vertical stabilizer of EU carnard is completely blocked by the hull and wings, and therefore lost its function. EU carnard cannot achieve high AoA like MiG-25/31, MiG-29/35, Su-27...37, and F-15.

    High AoA is vital in maneuverability and dogfight. And that means, EU carnard's dogfighting is pathetic.
    avatar
    GarryB
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 16038
    Points : 16669
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  GarryB on Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:59 am

    I call BS on the dogfighter crap...

    With any aircraft that does not have thrust vectoring engines you can only turn so far before the air separates from your conventional control surfaces and instead of generating a turning force your control surfaces start generating drag.

    With thrust vectoring there is no such thing as a stall... point your nose at the target and launch a missile.... the end.

    BTW don't underestimate the cost factor... costing five times less means you can have five times more...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    medo
    Colonel
    Colonel

    Posts : 3143
    Points : 3233
    Join date : 2010-10-24
    Location : Slovenia

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  medo on Thu Dec 31, 2015 8:36 pm

    Dassault Rafale is better dogfighter.

    Eurofighter Typhoon is better dogfighter.

    I don't think so. For now Indian Su-30MKI in air exercises show, that it is equal in dogfight with them and Su-35 is lighter and with lower drag than Su-30MKI and have more powerful engines with 3D TVC.

    Sponsored content

    Re: EF Typhoon/Rafale vs Su-35S

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:35 pm