Military Forum for Russian and Global Defence Issues


    Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Share
    avatar
    Morpheus Eberhardt

    Posts : 1942
    Points : 2059
    Join date : 2013-05-20

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt on Sat Dec 05, 2015 3:19 am

    George1 wrote:Russia successfully tests new cruise missile launch system for strategic bombers

    YEKATERINBURG, December 4. /TASS/. Russia has successfully tested a system to launch long-range cruise missiles directly from strategic aircraft's weapons bays, the defense contractor Start, part of state hi-tech corporation Rostec, told TASS on Friday.  "The [b]9A-829K3 multi-position launcher[/b] is designed for suspending, transporting and launching long-range cruise missiles directly from a plane’s weapons bays," the defense contractor said. wrote:

    So with this system, they can probably carry 9 missiles of the Kh-101/Kh-102 category in each weapons bay instead of 6.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16541
    Points : 17149
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GarryB on Sat Dec 05, 2015 3:56 am

    program host is actually stating that up to now Tu160 could use bombs and missiles and new one (i.e. M) will use only missiles 7:75

    Then I think the host was confused or the translation was wrong.

    The Tu-160 could use unguided bombs and guided missiles in the form of land attack cruise missiles and self defence anti radiation/air defence penetration missiles (ie Kh-55, Kh-555, and Kh-15).

    The upgrade adds other guided missiles and also guided bombs.

    I suspect what he meant to say was that the old plane carried guided and unguided weapons but the new plane will only likely carry guided weapons... I can't think of any other Russian type that could carry the FOAB for example.

    Also the new weapon rack might enable the Blackjack to carry larger weapons like the FAB-3000, FAB-5000 and FAB-9000 as well as FOAB and as Morpheus mentions smaller weapons in larger numbers.

    I remember when they mentioned the Tu-160M upgrade they mentioned increasing payload from 40 tons to 45 tons...


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    Berkut

    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Berkut on Sat Dec 05, 2015 4:17 am

    Nonsense. The upgraded frames will not be able to use bombs at all, neither the host or translation is wrong. They even *removed* that capability, just look on the underside pics of some freshy modernized frames.

    What Tu-160M2 will be able to do is open to question.
    avatar
    Militarov

    Posts : 5538
    Points : 5579
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Militarov on Sat Dec 05, 2015 4:21 am

    Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:
    George1 wrote:Russia successfully tests new cruise missile launch system for strategic bombers

    YEKATERINBURG, December 4. /TASS/. Russia has successfully tested a system to launch long-range cruise missiles directly from strategic aircraft's weapons bays, the defense contractor Start, part of state hi-tech corporation Rostec, told TASS on Friday.  "The [b]9A-829K3 multi-position launcher[/b] is designed for suspending, transporting and launching long-range cruise missiles directly from a plane’s weapons bays," the defense contractor said. wrote:

    So with this system, they can probably carry 9 missiles of the Kh-101/Kh-102 category in each weapons bay instead of 6.

    "Tekhnodinamika has modified the rotator of the 9A-829K3 multiple weapons rack in 2015, which has raised its reliability through an increase in the rigidity of the rotator’s load-bearing parts. The performance of the 9A-829K3 remained unchanged. A multiple rotary launcher equipped with the advanced rotator had undergone standard tests with Start and the Makeyev State Rocket Center for a month and a half. Its rotator’s durability and its vibration resistance and vibration survival had been tested. The trials proved the viability of the design modifications to the 9A-829K3 rotary launcher," the press office said."
    avatar
    Morpheus Eberhardt

    Posts : 1942
    Points : 2059
    Join date : 2013-05-20

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Morpheus Eberhardt on Sat Dec 05, 2015 5:48 am

    Militarov wrote:
    Morpheus Eberhardt wrote:
    George1 wrote:Russia successfully tests new cruise missile launch system for strategic bombers

    YEKATERINBURG, December 4. /TASS/. Russia has successfully tested a system to launch long-range cruise missiles directly from strategic aircraft's weapons bays, the defense contractor Start, part of state hi-tech corporation Rostec, told TASS on Friday.  "The [b]9A-829K3 multi-position launcher[/b] is designed for suspending, transporting and launching long-range cruise missiles directly from a plane’s weapons bays," the defense contractor said. wrote:

    So with this system, they can probably carry 9 missiles of the Kh-101/Kh-102 category in each weapons bay instead of 6.

    "Tekhnodinamika has modified the rotator of the 9A-829K3 multiple weapons rack in 2015, which has raised its reliability through an increase in the rigidity of the rotator’s load-bearing parts. The performance of the 9A-829K3 remained unchanged. A multiple rotary launcher equipped with the advanced rotator had undergone standard tests with Start and the Makeyev State Rocket Center for a month and a half. Its rotator’s durability and its vibration resistance and vibration survival had been tested. The trials proved the viability of the design modifications to the 9A-829K3 rotary launcher," the press office said."

    Interesting. The original TASS report seemed to suggest that the rotary launcher was gone. That's why I assumed that if, in place of the rotary launcher, a successful method for suspending a 3X3 matrix of missiles can be implemented (similar to what they do for the bombs) then the load out for each weapons bay would reach 9.

    I am sure you are correct, as a 9A-829K3 designation probably just implies another mod of the 9A-829K series.


    Last edited by Morpheus Eberhardt on Sat Dec 05, 2015 6:19 am; edited 2 times in total
    avatar
    x_54_u43

    Posts : 190
    Points : 210
    Join date : 2015-09-19

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  x_54_u43 on Sat Dec 05, 2015 5:53 am

    Berkut wrote:Nonsense. The upgraded frames will not be able to use bombs at all, neither the host or translation is wrong. They even *removed* that capability, just look on the underside pics of some freshy modernized frames.

    What Tu-160M2 will be able to do is open to question.

    Sorry if I am incorrect, did they remove the optical systems? I am not able to search for the recently modernized Tu-160s at the moment.

    I wonder if we will see an expansion of the Tu-160's guided arsenal, I would love to see them stuff racks of Kh-59MK2s on there, after all, they are not exactly using the Kh-101 ranges to full extent.
    avatar
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 1570
    Points : 1608
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Sat Dec 05, 2015 10:12 am

    GarryB wrote:
    program host is actually stating that up to now Tu160 could use bombs and missiles and new one (i.e. M) will use only missiles 7:75

    Then I think the host was confused or the translation was wrong.

    The Tu-160 could use unguided bombs and guided missiles in the form of land attack cruise missiles and self defence anti radiation/air defence penetration missiles (ie  Kh-55, Kh-555, and Kh-15).

    The upgrade adds other guided missiles and also guided bombs.
    []
    I remember when they mentioned the Tu-160M upgrade they mentioned increasing payload from 40 tons to 45 tons...

    As you can see from previous conversation opinions are divided on this topic. I just wonder if Tu-160M is going to carry only missiles then what is to be carrier of FOAB toys? Tu-22? Tu-95?

    Well 45tons of hypersonic/cruise missiles is helluva ordnance to keep NATO from next aggression :
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16541
    Points : 17149
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GarryB on Sun Dec 06, 2015 1:51 am

    Well the description above of the upgrade talks about modifying the rotary launcher to make it stronger and more stable and reliable... that would be rather more important for accurate precise bomb release and totally meaningless for cruise missile launch.

    a 0.5 second delay in releasing a 5,000km range Kh-101 wont affect its accuracy or performance in any way.

    A 0.5 second delay would have an enormous effect on the accuracy of a dumb bomb dropped using the Gefest& T computerised bomb aiming system.

    The old rotary launcher could carry bombs... what changes have been made to prevent the new rotary launcher from doing the same?

    I appreciate that ideally the Tu-160 should not have to overfly its targets as that makes it safer against capable enemies, but against ISIS or the Muj in Afghanistan a bomb is a much cheaper way to deliver HE to precise points on a map. Guided bombs even more so as one bomb per target is more efficient.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    Berkut

    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Berkut on Sun Dec 06, 2015 2:53 pm

    x_54_u43 wrote:
    Berkut wrote:Nonsense. The upgraded frames will not be able to use bombs at all, neither the host or translation is wrong. They even *removed* that capability, just look on the underside pics of some freshy modernized frames.

    What Tu-160M2 will be able to do is open to question.

    Sorry if I am incorrect, did they remove the optical systems? I am not able to search for the recently modernized Tu-160s at the moment.

    I wonder if we will see an expansion of the Tu-160's guided arsenal, I would love to see them stuff racks of Kh-59MK2s on there, after all, they are not exactly using the Kh-101 ranges to full extent.

    Yes. The window on the underside is filled in (forget its name, Kaira?, Su-24M has same system). Here is for example one of the newest examples that went through the refurbishment;



    GunshipDemocracy wrote:As you can see from previous conversation opinions are divided on this topic. I just wonder if Tu-160M is going to carry only missiles then what is to be carrier of FOAB toys? Tu-22? Tu-95?

    Well 45tons of hypersonic/cruise missiles is helluva ordnance to keep NATO from next aggression :

    Tu-95MS is just like Tu-160; they are not bombers but missile platforms. Tu-95MS isnt able to carry bombs either. Tu-22M3 and Su-34 will be the bomb trucks.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16541
    Points : 17149
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GarryB on Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:50 am

    Are you sure it has been removed and is not just using a more retractable system?

    With the number of new glide bombs and the potential to carry sat guided bombs rather cheaply I wonder why they would take away the ability to carry bombs...

    What platform will carry the FOABs and other very heavy bombs like the FAB-9000 and FAB-5000 and FAB-3000?

    Seems to me to be a little short sighted.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 1570
    Points : 1608
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Mon Dec 07, 2015 10:58 am

    GarryB wrote:Are you sure it has been removed and is not just using a more retractable system?

    With the number of new glide bombs and the potential to carry sat guided bombs rather cheaply I wonder why they would take away the ability to carry bombs...

    What platform will carry the FOABs and other very heavy bombs like the FAB-9000 and FAB-5000 and FAB-3000?

    Seems to me to be a little short sighted.

    Rather question of priorities. Strategic deterrence of western aggressors apparently has higher priority then precision bombing on this platform.

    Besides about 40 operational Tu-22s is in RuAF.   Wiki is maybe not the best source of info but up to 30 Tu-22M3M to be ready till 2020. For bombing  Turkish gay wolves  and FSA/IGIL Tu-22M3M can do the job.
    avatar
    Militarov

    Posts : 5538
    Points : 5579
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Militarov on Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:32 pm

    GarryB wrote:Are you sure it has been removed and is not just using a more retractable system?

    With the number of new glide bombs and the potential to carry sat guided bombs rather cheaply I wonder why they would take away the ability to carry bombs...

    What platform will carry the FOABs and other very heavy bombs like the FAB-9000 and FAB-5000 and FAB-3000?

    Seems to me to be a little short sighted.

    PAK DA? Maybe they look to the future, you never know. None the less i doubt they would completely remove bomb carrying capability it would be out of any logic.
    avatar
    Berkut

    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Berkut on Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:59 pm

    GarryB wrote:Are you sure it has been removed and is not just using a more retractable system?

    With the number of new glide bombs and the potential to carry sat guided bombs rather cheaply I wonder why they would take away the ability to carry bombs...

    What platform will carry the FOABs and other very heavy bombs like the FAB-9000 and FAB-5000 and FAB-3000?

    Seems to me to be a little short sighted.

    We will see what they will do with Tu-160M2 but for the current modernized ones they are limited to Kh-55/555 and Kh-101. Which frankly is exactly as it always was.

    The way i see it, PAK-DA is dead.
    avatar
    sepheronx

    Posts : 7252
    Points : 7546
    Join date : 2009-08-06
    Age : 28
    Location : Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  sepheronx on Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:05 pm

    People didnt believe in pak fa either. And here we are.

    Pak Da will end up replacing Tu-22M as that plane is also getting old and will need replacement eventually.
    avatar
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 1570
    Points : 1608
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Mon Dec 07, 2015 6:24 pm

    sepheronx wrote:People didnt believe in pak fa either. And here we are.

    Pak Da will end up replacing Tu-22M as that plane is also getting old and will need replacement eventually.

    40 Tu-22 and 60 Tu-95 need to be replaced by something new so PAK DA is surely needed.
    avatar
    Militarov

    Posts : 5538
    Points : 5579
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Militarov on Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:07 pm

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    sepheronx wrote:People didnt believe in pak fa either. And here we are.

    Pak Da will end up replacing Tu-22M as that plane is also getting old and will need replacement eventually.

    40 Tu-22 and 60 Tu-95 need to be replaced by something new so PAK DA is surely needed.

    I thought there is more Tu22Ms in service than 40, Flightglobal says 70 in their "Special report - world airfroces" for 2015.

    Tu95s can be replaced with that still unconfirmed production of Tu160M2 since they have same role, Tu22Ms however would require new platform for direct replacement. They tho might end up being indirectly replaced by two platfroms of different class Su34s and Tu160M/M2s might end up being only bombers in RuAF if PAK DA does not happen.
    avatar
    PapaDragon

    Posts : 5432
    Points : 5536
    Join date : 2015-04-26
    Location : Fort Evil, Serbia

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  PapaDragon on Mon Dec 07, 2015 7:58 pm

    Berkut wrote:
    GarryB wrote:Are you sure it has been removed and is not just using a more retractable system?

    With the number of new glide bombs and the potential to carry sat guided bombs rather cheaply I wonder why they would take away the ability to carry bombs...

    What platform will carry the FOABs and other very heavy bombs like the FAB-9000 and FAB-5000 and FAB-3000?

    Seems to me to be a little short sighted.

    We will see what they will do with Tu-160M2 but for the current modernized ones they are limited to Kh-55/555 and Kh-101. Which frankly is exactly as it always was.

    The way i see it, PAK-DA is dead.

    Angara, T-50, Gorshkov frigate, Lada Vesta, Vostochni Spaceport etc, etc, etc..... all dead... Rolling Eyes
    avatar
    Berkut

    Posts : 190
    Points : 215
    Join date : 2015-05-05

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Berkut on Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:36 pm

    Re-write your message just a tad more dramatic and twist my words some more.

    Considering they want 50+ of Tu-160M2's and each are rumored to cost 400+ million USD and PAK-DA is delayed "post 2023" instead of being operational by then (thanks to Tu-160M2) i don't see how it will survive.
    avatar
    GarryB

    Posts : 16541
    Points : 17149
    Join date : 2010-03-30
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GarryB on Tue Dec 08, 2015 11:25 am

    We will see what they will do with Tu-160M2 but for the current modernized ones they are limited to Kh-55/555 and Kh-101. Which frankly is exactly as it always was.

    The way i see it, PAK-DA is dead.

    Well if what you say is correct (an no bomb capability for Tu-160M or Tu-106M2) then that logically means the Su-34 and Tu-22M3M will be the bomb trucks, which means you are likely wrong and that the PAK DA becomes critical to replace the Backfire in the theatre bombing role.

    I suspect the PAK DA will actually be designed to carry large payloads internally including the FOAB as well as a large internal load of guided bombs... in addition to cruise missiles.

    I suspect the Blackjack will remain the cruise missile carrier and the Bear and Backfire will be replaced by the bomb carrying PAK DA.

    What is the point of stealth if you are carrying 5,000km range cruise missiles?

    Considering they want 50+ of Tu-160M2's and each are rumored to cost 400+ million USD and PAK-DA is delayed "post 2023" instead of being operational by then (thanks to Tu-160M2) i don't see how it will survive.

    It will survive by offering a capability they are clearly removing from the Tu-160.

    If the Tu-160 kept its bomb carrying capacity then there would be little reason to make the PAK DA.

    Despite its stealth design I suspect the PAK DA will be the cheap subsonic bomber... a bit like the Tu-95 is now but with bombs and cruise missiles rather than just cruise missiles, and with the bombs the ability to perform theatre missions as well as strategic missions.


    _________________
    “The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion […] but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.”

    ― Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order
    avatar
    OminousSpudd

    Posts : 892
    Points : 909
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 22
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  OminousSpudd on Tue Dec 08, 2015 11:59 am

    But Shoigu said test flights by 2019. How does a project get delayed past 2023 if it was supposed to be in pre-production phase by 2019.
    avatar
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 1570
    Points : 1608
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:19 pm

    OminousSpudd wrote:But Shoigu said test flights by 2019. How does a project get delayed past 2023 if it was supposed to be in pre-production phase by 2019.


    new technologies to be yet developed? requirements updated? or maybe Tu-160M2 can be a testbed for new avionics/coatings/engines?

    Not to mention about carrying missions where endurance and stealthiness not speed is important factor?
    avatar
    Project Canada

    Posts : 622
    Points : 627
    Join date : 2015-07-20
    Age : 29
    Location : Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Project Canada on Thu Dec 10, 2015 12:36 am

    according to TV Zvezda Tu-160s used kh-101 cruise missiles against ISIS targets in Syria

    http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201512091632-75ll.htm
    avatar
    OminousSpudd

    Posts : 892
    Points : 909
    Join date : 2015-01-03
    Age : 22
    Location : New Zealand

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  OminousSpudd on Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:04 am

    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:But Shoigu said test flights by 2019. How does a project get delayed past 2023 if it was supposed to be in pre-production phase by 2019.


    new technologies to be yet developed? requirements updated? or maybe Tu-160M2 can be a testbed for new avionics/coatings/engines?

    Not to mention about carrying missions where endurance and stealthiness not speed is important factor?

    I guess it would have to specifically come down to the Tu-160M2s. If the PAK DA's pre-production prototypes were extended past 2023 due to a change in its mission statement, you'd be talking a pretty radical change.
    avatar
    Militarov

    Posts : 5538
    Points : 5579
    Join date : 2015-09-02
    Location : Serbia

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Militarov on Thu Dec 10, 2015 1:10 am

    OminousSpudd wrote:
    GunshipDemocracy wrote:
    OminousSpudd wrote:But Shoigu said test flights by 2019. How does a project get delayed past 2023 if it was supposed to be in pre-production phase by 2019.


    new technologies to be yet developed? requirements updated? or maybe Tu-160M2 can be a testbed for new avionics/coatings/engines?

    Not to mention about carrying missions where endurance and stealthiness not speed is important factor?

    I guess it would have to specifically come down to the Tu-160M2s. If the PAK DA's pre-production prototypes were extended past 2023 due to a change in its mission statement, you'd be talking a pretty radical change.  

    Even if PAK DA dies now, it will eventually come around as future unmanned strategic bomber at least some ideas from it.
    avatar
    GunshipDemocracy

    Posts : 1570
    Points : 1608
    Join date : 2015-05-17
    Location : fishin on Stalin´s Strait between Mexico and Canada

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  GunshipDemocracy on Thu Dec 10, 2015 3:39 am

    OminousSpudd wrote: guess it would have to specifically come down to the Tu-160M2s. If the PAK DA's pre-production prototypes were extended past 2023 due to a change in its mission statement, you'd be talking a pretty radical change.

    That´s one of probable explantions - say PAK "Armata" , a quantum leap in bomber technology. the other explanation is much simpler: so many new technologies must be developed and "mature" an with constrains of limited means that time must be extended. Then deterrence priorities are now put on Tu-160M2. For other tasks than strategic deterrence Tu-95&Tu-22 life will be extended.


    Militarov wrote: Even if PAK DA dies now, it will eventually come around as future unmanned strategic bomber at least some ideas from it.

    I guess "pilotless" option can be included in PAK DA for dangerous/one way missions.

    Sponsored content

    Re: Tu-160 and Tu-95MS ( Blackjack and Bears )

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:12 pm