No it is bull$hit. Wikipedia and BBC of all places are the last places one would go if you want to seriously study something.
Wikipedia source has 27 references , there is athird source i put, these sources are convincing for me and you are free to believe it or not.
Regarding Akbar, He did some good things, no doubt especially mend the differences with Indian people. But why did he needed to do that, meaning things were not right in the first place. What are your thoughts on this particular sentence in bold letters? As He/his legacy was dead and gone, Mughals were back to what they were good at.
Akbar was one of Mughal emperors ,
every new king like presidents today , try to rule better than the last one ,not anew thing, not every muslim is atrue one, you can find amuslim who don't apply islam right, so if he did something wrong, don't say islam is wrong ,say this guy is wrong ,
If we see who came after Akbar , we find Muhammad Jahangir "Nooruddin" and from Wiki he didn't force anyone to convert to islam and he didn'timpose the jizya ! "
While Sunni Islam was the state religion, there was not widespread pressure to convert; indeed, Jahangir specifically warned his nobles that they "should not force Islam on anyone
.” In the first century of Islamic expansion this attitude was taken partially because of concerns that an absence of non-Muslims would deprive the state of a valuable source of revenue. However, as the jizya was not imposed by Jahangir, there might have been more behind this policy of toleration than mere economic reasoning. Jahangir was certainly willing to engage with other religions, and Edward Terry, an English chaplain in India at the time, saw a ruler under which "all Religions are tolerated and their Priests [held] in good esteem ""
Jahangir was a naturalist as well; he was not only a known birdwatcher or ornithologist but a keen observer of plants and animals as well. Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri (Memoirs of Jahangir) has his recorded observations. Even until the mid-nineteenth century zoologists were unaware of the gestation period of elephants but Jahangir on the other hand had accurately estimated the gestation period of elephants to be 18 to 19 months in the early-seventeenth century itself. He gave the details of the pairing of sarus cranes and detailed descriptions of many Indian birds such as the hawk-cuckoo and animals such as the polecat. Once he was presented with a Dodo which was then depicted in a painting by his court painter. Also he used to record solar and lunar eclipses and the length of a comet's tail. He was also responsible for the cultivation of high-altitude trees on the plains. Once he conducted an experiment to show that the soil in Mahmudabad was healthier than in Ahmedabad (both in Gujarat). It was due to the efforts of Dr. Salim Ali that these contributions of Jahangir were rediscovered.""""
No they brought hell right here on the Indians.
This is your point of view , i understand you consider them a conquest, but that hate shouldn't make you to say somethings that didn't happen,
Gandhi was assissinated by Nathuram Godse,who was a Hindu nationalist who felt Gandhi was sympathetic to Muslims, so i think he is aterrorist but he isn't muslim , wow am shocked
No I didnt forget it, since I am from this region and have visited the place many times. But it is nothing compared to pyramids of human skulls if you know what that means. Not saying British were any good.
Pyramids of what ?!! lol ,i don't know what you mean ,
Read this excerpt from Will Durant's book.
""A troop of English soldiers had reached the spot, and without warning, began firing into a crowd that had women and children. Some people got as many as twenty-one bullet wounds in their bodies.
A young Sikh boy stood in front of a soldier and asked him to fire at him, which the soldier unhesitatingly did.
Similarly, an old woman came forward, was shot, and fell down wounded. The police snatch off the men's garments, twist and squeeze the testicles, and even batter them until the victims foam at the mouth and become unconscious."
Madeline Slade, an eyewitness, says: "And so we went on from this house to another.
Lathi blows on head chest, stomach and joints, thrusts with lathis in private parts, tearing off loin cloths and thrusting of sticks into anus, dragging of wounded by legs and arms, beating them, throwing of wounded men into thorn hedges or salt water, thrusting of pins and thorns into men's bodies..."
This was done by the British "using your own Hindus" ,but you see them not terrorists because they are not muslims , great !
The point is that there was no History of Ancient India properly recorded. The British wrote the History of India, exploiting it to create the divide, which was the policy of Divide and Rule, on which they pitted one against the other, in order to keep control.
I have read the entire History of India by Indians and none talks about millions of Hindus being killed by Muslims ,
Talking about 80 million Hindus being slaughtered is laughable. It is like saying, "Move over, Jews! Here we Hindus come with a bigger hoax!"
The population of India was 239 million in 1901, 1095 million in 2001 and you can see that the breeding was the fastest in the last 100 years.
In the 10th-12th Century period, the population was about 35 million against the world population of 170 million.
The claim that Muslims killed 80 million shows that the Hindus had no balls at all. If it were true, all the renowned Historians would have said the same.
Kush means range. Koh-e-Hindu-Kush means Hindu mountain ranges. If the Muslims could have killed 80 million Hindus, they did not need to take the slaves to go through the silly tough route. They could have shipped them on dhows plying between Gujrat, Muscat and Bahrain
And nobody has found any Hindu skull hills or even a single Hindu skull on the mountain ranges. This is just like the idiotic claim of Christians that the Romans had crucified thousands at Golgotha in Jerusalem and so far archaeologists have found only one heel bone!
The only reason I am not interested is because you will run on a tangent to what I am saying that Islam did spread by sword in the Indian sub-continent and caused some of the biggest genocide in history here in the past and maybe will cause a nuclear war one day. Ever heard of term Gazwa-E-Hind? Explain that?
If islam spreads by force here and there in indonisya ,malisya ,middle east ,south africa etc ,, you will be interested to write this as aprove on your allegations
and don't try to predict future , every reliogion has it's secnario to the end of the world , Gazwa-E-Hind is aweak hadeeth , and if it's right, did it mention anuclear war ?!! the last war on the earth will happen using old equipments
only two nuclear explotions happened and it wasn't religious war , even muslims were not apart on this war
Sorry, no idea what you meant here.
I mean when i came you and enforce you to convert to another reliogion , if you refused i think i'll use force and you might be dead , muslims ruled india for 1000 years , if they use force to make people convert to islam , i think indians now would be non existed or we should find adesert or ajungle full of skulls !!
What history, one one was taught to you in your school in 6th standard. I am telling you again if you are genuinely interested move up from Wikipedia and other propaganda channels. I think you are smart enough to understand what i meant here. There are often communal riots in India and those feelings didnt just originate from thin air.
I didn't study indian history , i'm just a web reader
Don't compare apples with oranges and past with present. I don't see any Sikh converting to Islam, if you know what I mean. The people who have history with you muslims.
this link would be good,just asample
Exactly what i said typical middle East thinking of converting others or asking them to convert. Where is the self respect? If somebody comes to me and tells me follow this book because this is the word of God, I for some reason find it offensive.
If the idea about Missionary , christians has the largest number of Missionary movements around world, but christians numbers decreased , most of christians now in europe are not christians, they are Seculars not christians
Did you think muslims go through europe streets and start to convince people to convert to islam ?!!
your country contains 200 million muslim , did anyone came to your home to argue with you to make you convert ?
i'm amuslim , did you ever imagine i could try to convince anyone in this forum to make him convert ?
this is silly , most of cases that convert in europe were a self search and read books to understand islam well, then they converted ,
, who the hill has time and mind to convince those to convert to islam 20000 Americans Convert To ISLAM Each Year
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rfx4glTU5JQThousands of Danish Converts to Islam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kru6XQ8CT48&feature=relatedUk London,Young People Converts to Islam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bVV5m--CdM&feature=relatedThousands of European Youths Embraced Islam in Holland Holland TV
Hamza young american convert to islam crying when performing hajj
I can't count all videos
Well guess what, quality matters over quantity (Not intended as offensive). The day the ruling elite(what ever that means, but you will get the point) of those countries call themselves Muslims and start doing Haj to Mecca, until then your statement is invalid.
Muslims in europe already doing Haj to Mecca,
I don't care if muslims rule europe or not, what i do care with is that people convert to islam with no swords as some people say , what i do care with is giving muslims there rights in europe just as christians take their right in M.E .